Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2025, Vol. 49 Issue (4): 846-854    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2025.0040
  方法研究信息处理仪器研制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
地震波形指示反演方法在叠置薄砂岩预测中的应用——以松辽盆地南部乾安油田高台子油层为例
杨光1(), 王立贤1, 胡佳1, 刘智军1, 张红杰1, 王云鹤1, 孙龙1, 张旭升2, 陈彦虎2()
1.中国石油吉林油田分公司 地球物理勘探研究院, 吉林 松原 138000
2.北京中恒利华石油技术研究所, 北京 100101
Application of the seismic meme inversion method in predicting superimposed thin sandstones: A case study of the Gaotaizi oil layer in the Qian'an oilfield,southern Songliao Basin
YANG Guang1(), WANG Li-Xian1, HU Jia1, LIU Zhi-Jun1, ZHANG Hong-Jie1, WANG Yun-He1, SUN Long1, ZHANG Xu-Sheng2, CHEN Yan-Hu2()
1. Research Institute of Geophysical Exploration, Jilin Oilfield Company,PetroChina, Songyuan 138000, China
2. Beijing Zhongheng Lihua Petroleum Technology Research Institute, Beijing 100101, China
全文: PDF(5023 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

针对陆相盆地叠置薄砂岩预测的难点,本文提出了利用地震波形指示反演方法开展叠置薄砂岩的技术流程。首先,基于波形相似性原则优选的样本井测井曲线构建反演初始模型;然后,在贝叶斯框架下对初始模型进行迭代优化,得到高分辨率的波形指示反演结果;最后,地震波形指示方法与低频反演结果融合,不仅能够提供纵向上的高分辨率,还能够有效地描绘砂岩的横向叠置特征与砂岩横向边界。研究实例表明,地震波形指示反演在叠置薄砂岩预测中精度达到了2~3 m,参与井和验证井的符合率分别达到91.5%和85.2%,证明了该方法的合理性和反演结果的高精度,为陆相盆地薄层叠置砂岩预测提供了有效的技术手段。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨光
王立贤
胡佳
刘智军
张红杰
王云鹤
孙龙
张旭升
陈彦虎
关键词 地震波形指示反演叠置薄砂岩储层预测乾安地区青山口组    
Abstract

To address the challenges in predicting superimposed thin sandstones in lacustrine basins,this study proposed a technical workflow for their prediction using the seismic meme inversion(SMI) method.First,an initial inversion model was constructed using log curves from sample wells selected based on seismic waveform similarity.Second,the initial inversion model was iteratively optimized in a Bayesian framework to yield high-resolution SMI results.Third,the SMI results were integrated with low-frequency inversion results to yield high vertical resolution while effectively characterizing the lateral superimposed patterns and boundaries of sand bodies.Case studies demonstrate that the SMI method achieved a prediction accuracy of 2 m to 3 m for superimposed thin sandstones.The coincidence rates for calibration and validation wells reached 91.5 % and 85.2 %,respectively,confirming the effectiveness of the SMI method and the high precision of the inversion results.Overall,this study provides an effective technical approach to predicting superimposed thin sandstones in lacustrine basins.

Key wordsseismic meme inversion    superimposed thin sandstone    reservoir prediction    Qian'an area    Qingshankou Formation
收稿日期: 2025-02-24      修回日期: 2025-06-10      出版日期: 2025-08-20
ZTFLH:  P631.4  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(41972139);国家自然科学基金项目(41922015)
通讯作者: 陈彦虎(1982-),男,博士,教授级高级工程师,主要从事地震储层预测方法研究工作。Email:32568750@qq.com
作者简介: 杨光(1976-),男,硕士,高级工程师,主要从事石油地质综合研究及勘探部署工作。Email:yangguang@pertrochina.com
引用本文:   
杨光, 王立贤, 胡佳, 刘智军, 张红杰, 王云鹤, 孙龙, 张旭升, 陈彦虎. 地震波形指示反演方法在叠置薄砂岩预测中的应用——以松辽盆地南部乾安油田高台子油层为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2025, 49(4): 846-854.
YANG Guang, WANG Li-Xian, HU Jia, LIU Zhi-Jun, ZHANG Hong-Jie, WANG Yun-He, SUN Long, ZHANG Xu-Sheng, CHEN Yan-Hu. Application of the seismic meme inversion method in predicting superimposed thin sandstones: A case study of the Gaotaizi oil layer in the Qian'an oilfield,southern Songliao Basin. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2025, 49(4): 846-854.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2025.0040      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2025/V49/I4/846
  地震波形指示反演技术流程
Fig.2  叠置薄砂岩地质模型、正演地震道与不同方法反演结果对比
a—叠置薄砂岩地质模型;b—阻抗模型叠合地震波形;c—稀疏脉冲反演结果叠合地震波形;d—波形指示反演结果叠合地震波形
Fig.3  过Q163—Q163-3—Q165—Q199连井砂岩对比剖面
Fig.4  岩性识别直方图
Fig.5  最高截止频率分析折线
Fig.6  过Q163—Q163-3—Q165—Q199连井的地震与反演剖面
a—地震剖面;b—稀疏脉冲反演纵波阻抗剖面;c—波形指示反演GR剖面
Fig.7  反演预测砂岩厚度与井点砂岩厚度交会
井类型 井名 井点砂岩
厚度/m
预测砂岩
厚度/m
绝对误差
/m
相对误差
绝对值/%
参与井 Q118 2.0 1.8 0.2 10.0
Q118-2 6.9 7.5 -0.6 8.7
Q119 6.0 5.5 0.5 8.3
Q126 9.6 10.2 -0.6 6.3
Q162 11.4 10.5 0.9 7.9
Q162-1 11.8 11.1 0.7 5.9
Q162-2 9.0 8.4 0.6 6.7
Q162-3 8.5 8.3 0.2 2.4
Q163 8.5 9.0 -0.5 5.9
Q163-1 3.0 3.5 -0.5 16.7
Q163-2 6.9 7.5 -0.6 8.7
Q163-3 8.2 8.6 -0.4 4.9
Q163-4 4.0 4.5 -0.5 12.5
Q163-5 2.6 2.2 0.4 15.4
Q164 10.7 10.1 0.6 5.6
Q164-1 8.0 8.5 -0.5 6.3
Q164-2 8.8 8.2 0.6 6.8
Q164-3 3.6 3.1 0.5 13.9
Q164-4 12.1 13.1 -1.0 8.3
验证井 Q2-3 4.8 5.5 -0.7 14.6
Q2-5 9.6 8.6 1.0 10.4
Q2-9 17.4 15.8 1.6 9.2
Q2-11 6.6 7.5 -0.9 13.6
Q2-13 8.2 7.1 1.1 13.4
Q3-1 4.0 4.6 -0.6 15.0
Q3-2 3.4 2.4 1.0 29.4
Q3-3 5.6 6.3 -0.7 12.5
Table 1  地震波形指示反演砂岩厚度符合率统计
[1] 杨华童, 林小兵, 张萱, 等. 塔里木盆地牙哈地区巴什基奇克组水下分流河道迁移叠置演化规律及地质意义[J]. 特种油气藏, 2024, 31(2):93-102.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2024.02.011
[1] Yang H T, Lin X B, Zhang X, et al. Evolution of migration and superposition of underwater distributary channel of Bashi Kichik Formation in Yaha area of Tarim Basin and its geological significance[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2024, 31(2):93-102.
[2] 雷涛, 莫松宇, 李晓慧, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地大牛地气田二叠系山西组砂体叠置模式及油气开发意义[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2024, 36(2):147-159.
doi: 10.12108/yxyqc.20240214
[2] Lei T, Mo S Y, Li X H, et al. Sand body superposition model of Permian Shanxi formation in Daniudi gas field of Ordos basin and its significance for oil and gas development[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2024, 36(2):147-159.
[3] 张雨欣, 李长洪, 沈文洁, 等. 长庆油田上古生界河流相砂岩叠置模式研究及其在提高水平井储层钻遇率中的应用[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2):129-138.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.02.021
[3] Zhang Y X, Li C H, Shen W J, et al. Study on superimposed patterns of upper Paleozoic fluvial sand bodies and its application in improving reservoir drilling rate of horizontal wells in Changqing Oilfield[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2023, 34(2):129-138.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.02.021
[4] 邓守伟, 范晶, 王颖. 松辽盆地南部中浅层石油地质条件、资源潜力及勘探方向[J]. 海相油气地质, 2019, 24(2):33-42.
[4] Deng S W, Fan J, Wang Y. The geological conditions,resource potential,and exploration direction of oil of middle-shallow layers in the southern Songliao Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2019, 24(2):33-42.
[5] Mallat S, Zhang Z. Adaptive time-frequency transform[C]// IEEE International Conference on Acoustics,Speech,and Signal Processing,1993.
[6] Pinnegar C R, Mansinha L. The S-transform with windows of arbitrary and varying shape[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(1):381-385.
[7] Puryear C I, Castagna J P. Layer-thickness determination and stratigraphic interpretation using spectral inversion:Theory and application[J]. Geophysics, 2008, 73(2):R37-R48.
[8] Donoho D L. Compressed sensing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2006, 52(4):1289-1306.
[9] 张珩, 王建立, 李文滨, 等. 基于压缩感知和反演理论的储层预测研究[J]. 石油物探, 2022, 61(6):1028-1034.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2022.06.008
[9] Zhang H, Wang J L, Li W B, et al. Reservoir prediction based on compressed sensing and inversion theory[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2022, 61(6):1028-1034.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2022.06.008
[10] 袁萌, 蒲勇, 缪志伟, 等. 涪陵地区凉高山组多期叠置河道砂岩叠前高精度识别及预测[C]// 中国石油学会天然气专业委员会,第33届全国天然气学术年会论文集(01地质勘探),2023.
[10] Yuan M, Pu Y, Miao Z W, et al. Pre-stack high-precision identification and prediction of multi-period superimposed river sandstone in the Lianggao Mountain group in Fuling region[C]// Proceedings of the 33rd National Natural Gas Academic Annual Conference of China Petroleum Society (01 Geological Exploration),2023.
[11] 袁川洲, 尹成, 王午琪, 等. 基于改进的积分展开相位谱识别砂岩叠置区[C]// 中国地球物理学会油气地球物理专业委员会,第五届油气地球物理学术年会论文集, 2023.
[11] Yuan C Z, Yin C, Wang W Q, et al. Sandstone superposition identification based on improved integral phase spectrum[C]// Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of Petroleum and Gas Geophysics of China Geological Society of Exploration, 2023.
[12] 赵百强, 尹成, 王午琪, 等. 调谐厚度下薄互层叠置砂岩的响应特征与敏感属性分析[C]// 中国地球物理学会油气地球物理专业委员会,第五届油气地球物理学术年会论文集, 2023.
[12] Zhao B Q, Yin C, Wang W Q, et al. Response characteristics and sensitive attribute analysis of thin interbedded sandstone in superposition zone under tuning thickness[C]// Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference of Petroleum and Gas Geophysics of the Geophysical Society of China, 2023.
[13] 石岩, 李国良, 李玉英, 等. 层状分频构形反演技术的研究与应用——以苏76区块为例[J]. 录井工程, 2023, 34(2):123-128.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9803.2023.02.020
[13] Shi Y, Li G L, Li Y Y, et al. Research and application of layered frequency-division configuration inversion technology:A case study of Su 76 block[J]. Mud Logging Engineering, 2023, 34(2):123-128.
[14] 程雯泽, 尹成, 袁川洲, 等. 典型河流相叠置砂岩构型的地震相位特征分析[J]. 石油物探, 2023, 62(6):1115-1125.
doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2023.62.06.011
[14] Cheng W Z, Yin C, Yuan C Z, et al. Seismic phases of typical superimposed fluvial sandstone architectures[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2023, 62(6):1115-1125.
doi: 10.12431/issn.1000-1441.2023.62.06.011
[15] 陈彦虎. 地震波形指示反演方法、原理及其应用[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学(北京), 2020.
[15] Chen Y H. Method, principle and application of seismic waveform indication inversion[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2020.
[16] 陈彦虎, 陈佳. 波形指示反演在煤层屏蔽薄砂岩分布预测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(6):1254-1261.
[16] Chen Y H, Chen J. The application of seismic meme inversion to thin sand distribution prediction under coal shield[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 43(6):1254-1261.
[17] 顾雯, 章雄, 徐敏, 等. 强屏蔽下薄储层高精度预测研究——以松辽盆地三肇凹陷为例[J]. 石油物探, 2017, 56(3):439-448.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2017.03.014
[17] Gu W, Zhang X, Xu M, et al. High precision prediction of thin reservoir under strong shielding effect and its application:A case study from Sanzhao Depression,Songliao Basin[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2017, 56(3):439-448.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2017.03.014
[18] 陈彦虎, 毕建军, 邱小斌, 等. 地震波形指示反演方法及其应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(6):1149-1158.
doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.06.08
[18] Chen Y H, Bi J J, Qiu X B, et al. A method of seismic meme inversion and its application[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(6):1149-1158.
[19] 卢宝坤, 史謌. 测井资料与地震属性关系研究综述[J]. 北京大学学报:自然科学版, 2005, 41(1):154-160.
[19] Lu B K, Shi G. A review of study on relation between well logging data and seismic attributes[J]. Acta Scicentiarum Naturalum Universitis Pekinesis, 2005, 41(1):154-160.
[20] 王俊, 鲍志东, 王云龙, 等. 松辽盆地南部乾安地区上白垩统青三段高分辨率层序地层及沉积特征[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(2):327-340.
doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2017.02.025
[20] Wang J, Bao Z D, Wang Y L, et al. High-resolution sequence stratigraphy and sedimentary characteristics of the Member 3 of Qingshankou Formation of Upper Cretaceous in Qian'an area,south Songliao Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography:Chinese Edition, 2017, 19(2):327-340.
[21] 王俊, 赵家宏, 腾军, 等. 浅水三角洲前缘砂岩地震沉积学研究——以松南乾安地区上白垩统青三段为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2018, 36(3):570-583.
[21] Wang J, Zhao J H, Teng J, et al. Seismic sedimentology research on shallow water Delta Front Sandbodies:A case study on Member 3 of upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation in Qian'an area,south Songliao Basin,NE China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2018, 36(3):570-583.
[1] 高君, 徐睿, 黄家宸, 苑书金. 水道浊积体特征识别模式及其储层地震预测——以西非下刚果盆地MC块为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2025, 49(4): 919-924.
[2] 汪舒, 王锐, 杨家义, 赵卫升, 廖建. 基于非平稳褶积模型的泊松阻抗及裂缝参数叠前地震各向异性高分辨率直接反演方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2025, 49(3): 642-652.
[3] 张振波, 刘灵, 刘道理, 杨登锋. 番禺4洼古近系储层叠前反演预测技术研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2025, 49(2): 312-320.
[4] 米信武, 周成刚, 田军, 韩耀祖, 李亚楠, 肖冰清. 塔里木盆地轮南地区三叠系非均质薄砂岩储层预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2025, 49(2): 321-329.
[5] 张永升, 张荣, 樊易, 张安家, 李英才. 基于稀疏约束频率域抛物线Radon变换的波场分解[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(6): 1653-1663.
[6] 曹绍贺, 任凤茹, 王霄霄. 东胜气田致密砂岩储层甜点预测关键技术与应用效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(4): 954-961.
[7] 何希鹏, 刘明, 薛野, 李彦婧, 何贵松, 孟庆利, 张勇, 刘昊娟, 蓝加达, 杨帆. 渝东南复杂构造区常压页岩气地球物理勘探实践及攻关方向[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(2): 314-326.
[8] 李路路, 姜国宇, 刘涛, 何岩, 张永波. 准噶尔盆地石南地区白垩系储层地球物理方法识别[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(2): 334-341.
[9] 史全党, 孔令业, 吴超, 丁艳雪, 刘泽民, 于雪, 王江. 基于小波边缘分析与井—震联合建模的波阻抗反演技术在陆梁隆起带储层预测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(6): 1425-1432.
[10] 陈人杰, 徐乐意, 刘灵, 朱焕, 易浩, 姜曼. 基于协克里金技术的陆相地层反演低频模型构建方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(6): 1595-1601.
[11] 宋晨, 金吉能, 潘仁芳, 朱博远, 喻志骅, 唐小玲. 分频AVO技术在安岳气田须二段储层含气性分析中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(3): 681-689.
[12] 冯鑫. 平点技术在西非深水碎屑岩储层烃检中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(2): 433-443.
[13] 王成泉, 王孟华, 周佳宜, 王盛亮, 杨洲鹏, 刘慧, 张红文. 多属性融合定量储层预测方法研究与应用——以廊固凹陷杨税务潜山为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 87-95.
[14] 刘鸿洲, 王孟华, 张浩, 彭玲丽, 李雯, 张杰, 赵智鹏, 伍泽荆. 基于分频构形反演方法的河道砂精准预测——以华北冀中探区赵皇庄地区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1311-1319.
[15] 刘家材, 张冲, 韩绪军. 哈萨克斯坦B油田M02段综合地震储层预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(2): 379-386.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com , whtbjb@163.com