Due to factors such as environment,the signals received by ground-penetrating radar (GPR) contain various clutter interference,posing high challenges in subsurface anomaly interpretation and late-stage imaging.Clutter,primarily including noise,antenna-coupled waves,and surface direct waves,cannot be eliminated effectively using single data processing methods.Hence,this study proposed a spatiotemporal combined clutter suppression method. In the temporal dimension,threshold processing based on empirical mode decomposition(EMD) was applied to the data of all survey points in the echo profile,achieving effective noise removal.In the spatial dimension,the Karhunen-Loeve(KL) transform was employed to remove residual interference in the entire radar echo profile by utilizing the correlation of target echoes and the randomness of clutter at all survey points.Both theoretical simulation and measured data processing verify that the method proposed in this study is effective in eliminating clutter and highlighting weak signals.
Shen J Q, Yan H Z, Hu C Z. Evaluation method based on image entropy for clutter suppression effect of ground-penetrating radar[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2011, 26(2):267-271,413.
Shi X X, Yang Q F, Hou Y W. Eliminating random noise interference of ground penetrating radar signal by resorting to 2-D physical wavelet fame[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2012, 27(6):1186-1192,1268.
Wu B J, Yang H, Zhang W G. S transform time-frequency analysis of GPR data[J]. Shanghai Geology, 2008, 107(3):13-15,19.
[4]
Huang N E, Wu M L C, Long S R, et al. A confidence limit for the empirical mode decomposition and Hilbert spectral analysis[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A:Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences,2003, 459(2037):2317-2345.
[5]
Flandrin P, Rilling G, Goncalves P. Empirical mode decomposition as a filter bank[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 2004, 11(2):112-114.
doi: 10.1109/LSP.2003.821662
Yi H C, Liu S C, He K S, et al. Data denoising based on EMD and its ap-plication to geological exploration[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Explora-tion, 2013, 37(3):533-537.
Feng D S, Dai Q W, Yu K. GPR signal processing under low SNR based on empirical mode decomposition[J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2012, 43(2):596-604.
[8]
Tesfamariam, Gebremichael T, Mali D, et al. Clutter reduction techniques for GPR based buried landmine detection[C]// Thuckalay:2011 International Conference on Signal Processing,Communication,Computing and Networking Technologies.IEEE, 2011:182-186.
[9]
Khan U S, Al-Nuaimy W. Background removal from GPR data using Eigenvalues[C]// Lecce: Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.IEEE, 2010:1-5.
Shen J Q, Yan H Z, Hu C Z. Auto-selected rule on principal component analysis in ground penetrating radar signal denoising[J]. Chinese Journal of Radio Science, 2010, 25(1):83-87.
[11]
Solimene R, Cuccaro A, Dell’Aversano A, et al. Ground clutter removal in GPR surveys[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2014, 7(3):792-798.
doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.4609443
[12]
Wu Z H, Huang N E. A study of the characteristics of white noise using the empirical mode decomposition method[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A:Mathematical,Physical and Engineering Sciences,2004, 460(2046):1597-1611.
[13]
Donoho D L. De-noising by soft-thresholding[J]. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 1995, 41(3):613-627.
doi: 10.1109/18.382009
Yang T C, Zhang H, Li H. Signal processing of ground penetrating radar by KL transform[J]. Journal of Hunan University of Science & Technology:Natural Science Edition, 2013, 28(2):66-69.
