Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  1984, Vol. 8 Issue (5): 284-296    
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
内蒙干旱荒漠区域化探工作方法初步研究
任天祥, 赵云, 张华, 杨少平
地质矿产部物化探研究所
A PRELIMIARY STUDY ON THE UTILIZATION OFREGIONAL GEOCHEMICAL PROSPECTING METHOD INTHE ARID AND DESERT AREA OF INNER MONGOLIA
Ren Tianxiang, Zhao Yun, Zhang Hua, Yang Shaoping
Institute of Exploration Geophysics and Geochemistry
全文: PDF(948 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

内蒙和我国其它干旱荒漠区一样,由于:(1)风成沙干扰,使通常所选用的采样介质(土壤、水系沉积物)元素含量遭到稀释、歪曲,乃至样品间几乎没有差异;(2)缺乏一套针对干旱环境特点和该区地貌组合的特殊工作方法,致使区域性化探工作长期处于不利局面。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 赣南地区茶叶成土母岩土壤地球化学特征营养评价    
Abstract

This paper presents some valuable results obtained in experimental geoc-bemical exploration work in tbe arid area of Inner Mongolia. Surface soil and drainage sediments in tbe arid area of Inner Mongolia and western Gansu are commonly mixed with aeolian (wind-borne) sand, whose interference reduces element contents of geocbemical samples nearly to background values. Aimed at eliminating the effect of this aeolian sand, we have graded the geochemical samples according to grain size, calculated tbe proportion possessed by eachsize fraction, made microscopic identification for genesis and determined contents of various elements. The resulting data suggest that aeolian sand is predominantly of -0.9-+0.2 mm in size and the optimum sampling size seems to be -5-+2 mm-samples in this size range show high anomalous values with small variation coeJficients and fine recurrence. Investigation has also been made on such problems as optimum sampling site, sampling horizon and sampling density, combined with a comparison of effectiveness between soil survey, rock survey, hydrochemical survey and some other geochemical methods. Ail this has led to the conclusion that, in arid and desert areas, the most economical and efficient regional geochemical prospecting methods are drainage sediment survey of coarse-sized fraction and underground hydroche mical survey, whereas in peneplane or denuded gobi areas the optimum sampling media are rocks and underground water, with soil being secondary in importance.

Key wordssouthern Jiangxi    tea leaves    rock, soil    geochemical characteristics    nutrition assessment
     出版日期: 1984-10-24
引用本文:   
任天祥, 赵云, 张华, 杨少平. 内蒙干旱荒漠区域化探工作方法初步研究[J]. 物探与化探, 1984, 8(5): 284-296.
Ren Tianxiang, Zhao Yun, Zhang Hua, Yang Shaoping. A PRELIMIARY STUDY ON THE UTILIZATION OFREGIONAL GEOCHEMICAL PROSPECTING METHOD INTHE ARID AND DESERT AREA OF INNER MONGOLIA. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1984, 8(5): 284-296.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y1984/V8/I5/284

[1] 国家地图编纂委员会,1965,中华人民共和国自然地图集。
[2] 朱震达等,1980,中国沙漠概论。科学出版社。
[3] A. A. Levinson, 1980, Introduction to exployation geoche mistry (Second edition),672-681.
[4] E. M. Shazly, et al, 1977, Geochemical exploration under extremely arid conditions, Jour Geoch E(1977),305-323.
[5] M. M. Hassaan et al, 1978, Geochemical Orientation Survey for manganese deposits in arid Conditions, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Tth Int. Geoch Expl. Sym, 93-101.
[6] E. Cameron et al, 1980, Yeelirrie calcvete uranium deposit, Murchison Region, W. A. Jour Geoch Ezplo 1980, Vol 12 Not-3 350-353.
[7] W. C. Overstreet of al, 1981, Some concepts and Fechniquea in Geochemical exploration. Economic Geology 75-th Anmiversary Volume.

[1] 王志强, 杨建锋, 魏丽馨, 石天池, 曹园园. 石嘴山地区碱性土壤硒地球化学特征及生物有效性[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 229-237.
[2] 赵筱媛, 杨忠芳, 程惠怡, 马旭东, 王珏, 李志坤, 王琛, 李明辉, 雷风华. 四川邻水县华蓥山—西槽土壤Cu地球化学特征与生态健康[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 238-249.
[3] 孟伟, 莫春虎, 刘应忠. 黔西北地区土壤重金属地球化学背景及管理目标值[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 250-257.
[4] 李建亭, 刘雪敏, 王学求, 韩志轩, 江瑶. 地表土壤微细粒测量中微量元素和同位素对福建罗卜岭隐伏铜钼矿床的示踪与判别[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 32-45.
[5] 张春来, 杨慧, 黄芬, 曹建华. 广西马山县岩溶区土壤硒含量分布及影响因素研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1497-1503.
[6] 奚小环, 侯青叶, 杨忠芳, 叶家瑜, 余涛, 夏学齐, 成杭新, 周国华, 姚岚. 基于大数据的中国土壤背景值与基准值及其变化特征研究——写在《中国土壤地球化学参数》出版之际[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1095-1108.
[7] 刘国栋, 李禄军, 戴慧敏, 许江, 刘凯, 张一鶴, 杨泽. 松辽平原土壤碳库变化及其原因分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1109-1120.
[8] 侯佳渝, 杨耀栋, 程绪江. 天津市城区不同功能区绿地土壤重金属分布特征及来源研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1130-1134.
[9] 肖高强, 向龙洲, 代达龙, 高晓红, 宗庆霞. 花岗质岩浆岩土壤重金属地球化学特征及生态风险评价——以云南盈江旧城—姐冒地区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1135-1146.
[10] 刘道荣, 焦森. 天然富硒土壤成因分类研究及开发适宜性评价[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1157-1163.
[11] 解庆锋, 周小果, 王振峰, 马振波, 李胜昌, 张得恩, 司法祯. 河南省土壤环境监测背景点位布设参考区域划分研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1164-1170.
[12] 雷波, 兰明, 贺锋, 鲁宝龙, 罗才武. 基于熵—中位数子区滤波提取土壤氡气浓度异常——以甘肃省花海盆地为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 1064-1070.
[13] 刘伟, 黄韬, 王庭勇, 刘怡, 张继, 刘文涛, 张琦斌, 李强. 综合物探方法在城市隐伏断裂探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 1077-1087.
[14] 史琪, 赵延朋, 迟占东, 葛华, 康铁锁, 李发兴, 魏翔宇, 卢见昆, 杨人毅. 老挝川圹省约俄锡多金属矿区沟系土壤地球化学特征及成矿预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 824-834.
[15] 窦备, 张必敏, 叶荣, 迟清华. 黄土覆盖区隐伏矿地球化学勘查技术试验研究——以河南中河堤银铅锌多金属矿为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 933-941.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com