地表土壤微细粒测量中微量元素和同位素对福建罗卜岭隐伏铜钼矿床的示踪与判别

doi:10.11720/wtyht.2022.2585

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF(4571 KB) HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

在已知隐伏矿——罗卜岭斑岩型铜钼矿床上方采集了表层土壤以及典型钻孔中的矿石和围岩样品,分析了6个微量元素(Cu、Mo、Ba、Pb、Zn、V)的含量变化以及硫、铅同位素的组成特征,来验证土壤金属活动态测量技术、微细粒级土壤全量测量技术在隐伏矿区的找矿效果,并根据铅、硫同位素的组成特征来识别地表地球化学异常的来源。研究表明:微细粒级土壤全量测量技术对该矿区深部矿体的指示效果最好,其中Cu、Ba、Mo的含量高值区与深部隐伏矿体的展布相关性较强。土壤金属活动态、微细粒级土壤全量均显示出14、15号采样点下方极有可能存在着隐伏矿体,同时两种测量方法均可以根据V、Pb、Zn的含量变化较为准确地圈定出接近地表矿化岩体的范围。由于异常区土壤全量的硫同位素组成大多数信息继承自非赋矿围岩,掩盖了来自深部矿体的贡献,故在本矿区用硫同位素指示地表土壤中的异常来源效果较差,建议测量土壤金属活动态中的硫同位素组成应更为合理。异常区土壤全量的铅同位素继承了来自深部矿体铅同位素的特征,直接为微细粒级土壤全量测量技术在覆盖区的矿产勘查提供了证据,同时²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb在地表微细粒级土壤全量中的变化与下伏隐伏矿体的展布相关性较强,可以有效指示深部隐伏矿体。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李建亭
	刘雪敏
	王学求
	韩志轩
	江瑶

关键词 ：罗卜岭铜钼矿床, 铅、硫同位素, 微量元素, 土壤微细粒测量, 覆盖区找矿

Abstract：

This paper collected surface soil above the known concealed deposit the Luoboling porphyry-type copper-molybdenum deposit and acquired samples of ore and surrounding rocks from typical boreholes of the deposit. Then, it analyzed the changes in the contents of six trace elements (Cu, Mo, Ba, Pb, Zn, and V) and the isotopic composition of S and Pb, aiming to verify the ore prospecting effects of the measurement technology of mobile forms of metals in soil and full analysis of fine-grained soil in concealed deposits and to identify the sources of surface geochemical anomalies according to the isotopic composition of Pb and S. The study results are as follows. The total analysis of fine-grained soil showed the best effects in indicating deep ore bodies in the Luoboling deposit, and the areas with high contents of Cu, Ba, and Mo correlated strongly with the distribution of deeply concealed ore bodies. Both the mobile forms of metals in the soil and the total analysis of fine-grained soil showed that it is quite possible that concealed ore bodies occur below sampling points No.14 and 15. Meanwhile, the changes in the contents of V, Pb, and Zn obtained using both methods can accurately delineate the scopes of mineralized rock masses close to the ground surface. However, most of the total sulfur isotopic composition in the soil of anomaly zones inherits from the non-ore-hosting surrounding rocks and masked the contribution from the deep ore bodies. Consequently, sulfur isotopes showed poor effects in indicating the sources of anomalies in the surface soil in the Luoboling deposit. Therefore, it is more reasonable to measure the sulfur isotopic composition according to the mobile forms of metals in the soil. In contrast, the total Pb isotopes in the soil of the anomaly zones inherit the characteristics of the Pb isotopes of deep ore bodies. This serves as direct evidence of full analysis of fine-grained soil in the mineral exploration of coverage areas.Moreover, the changes in the ²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb ratio in the full analysis of surface fine-grained soil correlated strongly with the distribution of underlying concealed ore bodies and thereby can effectively indicate the deep concealed ore bodies.

Key words： Luoboling copper-molybdenum deposit lead and sulfur isotopes trace elements fine particle soil survey ore prospecting of coverage areas

收稿日期: 2020-12-25 修回日期: 2021-09-13 出版日期: 2022-02-20

ZTFLH:

P632

基金资助:国家重点研发计划项目“覆盖区地球化学异常源示踪与判别”(2016YFC0600604)

通讯作者: 刘雪敏

作者简介: 李建亭(1994-),男,硕士,主要从事穿透性地球化学勘查技术学习与研究工作。Email: 448287250@qq.com

引用本文:

李建亭, 刘雪敏, 王学求, 韩志轩, 江瑶. 地表土壤微细粒测量中微量元素和同位素对福建罗卜岭隐伏铜钼矿床的示踪与判别[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 32-45.
LI Jian-Ting, LIU Xue-Min, WANG Xue-Qiu, HAN Zhi-Xuan, JANG Yao. Tracing and identification of concealed Luoboling copper-molybdenum deposit in Fujian Province using trace elements and isotopes in fine-grained surface soils. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 32-45.

链接本文:

https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2022.2585 或 https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2022/V46/I1/32

Fig.1 福建紫金山矿田地质简图(a)及罗卜岭矿区地质简图(b)(修改自Zhong J等^[22])
1—早白垩世罗卜岭花岗闪长斑岩;2—早白垩世四坊花岗闪长岩; 3—早白垩世火山石帽山岩体;4—第四系冲积沉积物;5—晚侏罗世才溪岩体;6—中侏罗世紫金山复式岩体;7—白垩纪英安玢岩;8—白垩纪隐爆角砾岩;9—早石炭世岩体(林地组);10—晚泥盆世碎屑沉积岩体(天瓦岽组、桃子坑组);11—下震旦统楼子坝群;12—断层;13—264号测线; 14—经典矿床;15—矿化蚀变带(K-Phl:弱钾化-绢英岩化蚀变带,Chl-Phl:弱绿石化-绢英岩化蚀变带,Kl-Phy:高岭石化-黄铁绢英岩化,Ms-Di-Alu:白云岩化-地开石化-明矾石化);16—研究区;17—土壤采样点位;18-钻孔

Table 1 各介质的分析方法

Table 2 罗卜岭铜钼矿区264号测线微细粒级土壤6个微量元素全量统计参数(n=15)

Fig.2 福建罗卜岭铜钼矿区264号勘探线微细粒级土壤6个微量元素的全量折线图(修改自赵辰等^[34])

Table 3 罗卜岭铜钼矿区264号测线微细粒级土壤金属活动态含量统计参数(n=15)

Fig.3 罗卜岭铜钼矿区264号勘探线微细粒级土壤6个微量元素的金属活动态折线图

Table 4 罗卜岭铜钼矿区细粒级土壤、矿石、围岩样品的硫同位素数据(n=39)

Fig.4 罗卜岭铜钼矿区矿石、围岩、土壤背景和土壤异常的硫同位素组成

Table 5 罗卜岭矿区不同介质硫同位素数据单因素方差分析P值

Fig.5 罗卜岭矿区264号勘探线土壤微细粒级全量中硫同位素组成分布

	样品编号	点性	²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	误差	²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	误差	²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb	误差
	264-1	背景	38.799	0.006	15.655	0.002	18.555	0.003
	264-2	背景	38.787	0.003	15.64	0.001	18.578	0.001
	264-3	背景	38.805	0.003	15.639	0.001	18.582	0.002
	264-4	背景	38.815	0.004	15.649	0.002	18.611	0.002
	264-5	背景	38.846	0.003	15.661	0.001	18.645	0.001
	264-6	异常	38.804	0.003	15.651	0.001	18.607	0.001
	264-7	异常	38.694	0.003	15.626	0.001	18.481	0.001
土壤	264-8	异常	38.788	0.003	15.655	0.001	18.529	0.002
	264-9	异常	38.751	0.003	15.646	0.001	18.521	0.001
	264-10	异常	38.773	0.005	15.651	0.002	18.492	0.002
	264-11	异常	38.694	0.004	15.627	0.002	18.493	0.002
	264-12	异常	38.754	0.003	15.637	0.001	18.508	0.001
	264-13	异常	38.728	0.004	15.635	0.001	18.48	0.001
	264-14	异常	38.774	0.005	15.636	0.002	18.495	0.002
	264-15	异常	38.773	0.003	15.642	0.001	18.54	0.002
	IX04-7	黄铁矿	38.767	0.007	15.634	0.008	18.509	0.008
	IX04-8	黄铁矿	38.951	0.007	15.595	0.003	18.537	0.003
	IX04-10	黄铁矿	38.899	0.004	15.629	0.001	18.491	0.002
	VI03-10	黄铁矿	39.067	0.007	15.643	0.003	18.764	0.003
	VII03-7	黄铁矿	39.215	0.009	15.618	0.003	18.617	0.004
	VII03-8	黄铁矿	38.864	0.008	15.622	0.003	18.634	0.004
	M1^#	辉钼矿	38.741	0.001	15.655	0.001	18.479	0.001
	M4^#	辉钼矿	38.732	0.011	15.666	0.004	18.48	0.005
	M5^#	辉钼矿	38.751	0.001	15.667	0.001	18.455	0.002
	Py5^#	黄铁矿	38.67	0.013	15.666	0.005	18.493	0.006
	Py8^#	黄铁矿	38.749	0.007	15.667	0.003	18.417	0.004
	Py9^#	黄铁矿	38.752	0.003	15.661	0.001	18.486	0.002
矿石	Py10^#	黄铁矿	38.788	0.003	15.668	0.001	18.476	0.002
	Py11^#	黄铁矿	38.799	0.001	15.67	0.001	18.491	0.001
	Py18^#	黄铁矿	38.773	0.004	15.668	0.002	18.453	0.002
	Py20^#	黄铁矿	38.736	0.001	15.655	0.001	18.473	0.001
	Py23^#	黄铁矿	38.775	0.003	15.658	0.002	18.469	0.002
	Py32^#	黄铁矿	38.743	0.001	15.654	0.001	18.482	0.001
	Py33^#	黄铁矿	38.812	0.007	15.663	0.003	18.502	0.004
	Py34^#	黄铁矿	38.838	0.007	15.674	0.003	18.503	0.004
	Py35^#	黄铁矿	38.674	0.002	15.644	0.001	18.426	0.001
	Py36^#	黄铁矿	38.772	0.002	15.66	0.001	18.503	0.001
	Py37^#	黄铁矿	38.815	0.005	15.66	0.002	18.505	0.002
	Py39^#	黄铁矿	38.811	0.008	15.67	0.003	18.498	0.004
	Py40^#	黄铁矿	38.719	0.002	15.65	0.001	18.456	0.001
	IX04-20	非赋矿岩体	39.358	0.004	15.659	0.001	19.243	0.002
	VI03-4	非赋矿岩体	39.854	0.004	15.709	0.002	19.86	0.002
	VI03-20	非赋矿岩体	39.463	0.006	15.668	0.002	19.349	0.003
	VII03-15	非赋矿岩体	39.025	0.003	15.647	0.001	18.936	0.001
	VII03-17	非赋矿岩体	39.352	0.004	15.695	0.001	19.253	0.002
围岩	ZK4012-1^#	非赋矿岩体	38.721	0.001	15.647	0.001	18.575	0.001
	16-308^#	非赋矿岩体	38.823	0.001	15.665	0.001	18.525	0.001
	ZL-1-4^#	非赋矿岩体	38.777	0.003	15.654	0.001	18.538	0.001
	IX-01-3^#	非赋矿岩体	38.864	0.002	15.648	0.001	18.634	0.001
	IX01-4^#	非赋矿岩体	38.826	0.001	15.654	0.001	18.589	0.001
	IX01-7^#	非赋矿岩体	38.785	0.001	15.643	0.001	18.565	0.001
	IX01-10^#	非赋矿岩体	38.803	0.002	15.652	0.001	18.627	0.001

Table 6 罗卜岭铜钼矿区细粒级土壤、矿石、围岩样品的铅同位素数据(n=52)

Fig.6 罗卜岭铜钼矿区矿石、围岩、土壤背景和土壤异常²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁴Pb-²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb(a)、²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb-²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb(b)图解

Table 7 罗卜岭矿区不同介质铅同位素数据单因素方差分析P值

Fig.7 罗卜岭矿区不同介质²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb-²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb图解

Fig.8 罗卜岭矿区264勘探线微细粒级土壤全量中铅同位素组成分布

[1]	Ryss Y S, Goldber G I S. The partial extraction of metals (CHIM) method in mineral exploration[J]. Method and Technique, 1973,84:5-19.
[2]	Kristiansson K, Malmqvist L. Evidence for nondiffusive transport of ⁸⁶Rn in the ground and a new physical model for the transport[J]. Geophysics, 1982,47(10):1444-1452. doi: 10.1190/1.1441293
[3]	Clark J R. Enzyme-induced leaching of B-horizon soils for mineral exploration in areas of glacial overburden[J]. Transactions of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy Section B-Applied Earth Science, 1993,102:B19-B29.
[4]	Mann A W, Birrell R D, Mann A T, et al. Application of the mobile metal ion technique to routine geochemical exploration[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1988,61:87-102. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6742(97)00037-X
[5]	Wang X Q, Cheng Z Z, Lu Y X, et al. Nanoscale metals in earthgas and mobile forms of metals in overburden in wide-spaced regional exploration for giant deposits in overburden terrains[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1997,58:63-72. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6742(96)00052-0
[6]	Wang X Q. Leaching of mobile forms of metals in overburden: development and application[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 1998,61:39-55. doi: 10.1016/S0375-6742(97)00039-3
[7]	王学求. 寻找和识别隐伏大型特大型矿床的勘查地球化学理论方法与应用[J]. 物探与化探, 1998,22(2):81-108.
[7]	Wang X Q. Geochmical methods and application for glant ore deposits in concealed terrains[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1998,22(2):81-108.
[8]	汪明启, 高玉岩. 利用铅同位素研究金属矿床地气物质来源:甘肃蛟龙掌铅锌矿床研究实例[J]. 地球化学, 2007,36(4):391-399.
[8]	Wang M Q, Gao Y Y. Tracing source of geogas with lead isotopes: A case study in Jiaolongzhang Pb-Zn deposit, Gansu Province[J]. Geochimica, 2007,36(4):391-399.
[9]	徐洋, 汪明启, 高玉岩, 等. 利用铅同位素研究山东邹平王家庄铜矿地气物质来源[J]. 物探与化探, 2014,38(1):23-27.
[9]	Xu Y, Wang M Q, Gao Y Y, et al. Tracing the source of geogas mathrials with the leaad isotope method in the Wangjiazhuang copper ore deposite of Zouping, Shandong Province[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014,38(1):23-27.
[10]	刘雪敏, 陈岳龙, 王学求. 深穿透地球化学异常源同位素识别研究:以新疆金窝子金矿床、内蒙古拜仁达坝—维拉斯托多金属矿床为例[J]. 现代地质, 2012,26(5):1104-1116.
[10]	Liu X M, Chen Y L, Wang X Q. Research on isotope identification for anomalous sources of deeppenetration geochemistry: two cases of Jinwozi Au deposit, Xinjiang and Bairendaba-weilasituo polymetallic deposit, Inner Mongolia[J]. Modern Geology, 2012,26(5):1104-1116.
[11]	Saunders J A, Mathur R, Kamenov G D, et al. New isotopic evidence bearing on bonanza (Au-Ag) epithermal ore-forming proceses[J]. Mineralium Deposita, 2015,51(1):1-11. doi: 10.1007/s00126-015-0623-y
[12]	Matthew I L, Brian L C, Wayne D G. Lead isotopes in ground and surface waters: fingerprinting heavy metal sources in mineral exploration[J]. Geochemistry: Exploration, Environment, Analysis, 2009,9:115-123. doi: 10.1144/1467-7873/09-195
[13]	Caritat P D, Kirste D, Carr D, et al. Groundwater in the broken hillregion, Australia: Recognising interaction with bedrock and mineralisation using S and Pb isotopes[J]. Applied Geochemistry, 2005,20(4):767-787. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2004.11.003
[14]	于波, 裴荣富, 邱小平, 等. 福建紫金山矿田中生代岩浆岩演化序列研究[J]. 地球学报, 2013,34(4):437-446.
[14]	Yu B, Pei R F, Qiu X P, et al. The evolution series of mesozoic magmatic rocks in the Zijinshan orefield, Fujian province[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2013,34(4):437-446.
[15]	林东燕, 陈郑辉. 福建上杭拉分盆地与紫金山铜金矿床成矿关系[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2011,31(4):438-442.
[15]	Lin D Y, Cheng Z H. Relationship between Shanghang pull-apart basin in Fujian and Zijinshan copper-gold deposit mineralization[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2011,31(4):438-442.
[16]	王少怀, 裴荣富, 曾宪辉, 等. 再论紫金山矿田成矿系列与成矿模式[J]. 地质学报, 2009,83(2):145-157.
[16]	Wang S H, Pei R F, Zeng X H, et al. Metallogenic series and model of the Zijinshan mining field[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2009,83(2):145-157.
[17]	张德全, 佘宏全, 阎升好, 等. 福建紫金山地区中生代构造环境转换的岩浆岩地球化学证据[J]. 地质论评, 2001,3(6):608-616.
[17]	Zhang D Q, Sheng H Q, Yan S H, et al. Geochemistry of mesozoic magmatites in the Zijinshan regine and implication on regional tectonal inversion[J]. Geological Review, 2001,23(6):608-616.
[18]	黄仁生. 福建省紫金山铜金矿床成矿物理化学条件的研究[J]. 福建地质, 1994,26(3):159-173.
[18]	Huang R S. On the metallogenic physicochemical conditions of the Zijinshan copper-gold deposit in Fujian Province[J]. Geology of Fujian, 1994,26(3):159-173.
[19]	陶建华, 许春林. 福建上杭紫金山铜金矿床控岩控矿构造分析[J]. 福建地质, 1992,26(3):186-203.
[19]	Tao J H, Xu C L. Discussion on the rock and ore-controlling structures of the Zijinshan Copper-gold deposit in Shanghang country, Fujian Province[J]. Geology of Fujian, 1992,26(3):186-203.
[20]	潘天望, 袁远, 吕勇, 等. 福建紫金山矿田早白垩世以来构造演化和成岩成矿时空格架[J]. 地质力学学报, 2019,25(1):61-76.
[20]	Pan T W, Yuan Y, Lyu Y, et al. The early-cretaceous tectonic evolution and the spatial-temporal framework of magmatismmine ralization in Zijinshan ore-field,Fujian province[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2019,25(1):61-76.
[21]	陈素余, 王少怀, 黄宏祥. 紫金山深部铜矿物特征研究[J]. 矿床地质, 2014,33(S1):667-668.
[21]	Chen S Y, Wang S H, Huang H X. Study on the characteristics of deep copper deposits in Zijinshan[J]. Mineral Deposite, 2014,33(S1):667-668.
[22]	Zhong J, Chen Y J, Pirajno J, et al. Geology geochronology,fluid inclusion and H-O isotope geochemistry of the Luoboling porphyry Cu-Mo deposit, Zijinshan orefield, Fujian Province, China[J]. Ore Geology Reviews, 2014,57:61-77. doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.09.004
[23]	赖晓丹, 祁进平, 邱小平, 等. 福建省上杭县罗卜岭斑岩型铜钼矿床含矿裂隙研究[J]. 矿床地质, 2012,31(S1):853-854.
[23]	Lai X D, Qi J P, Qiu X P, et al. Study on ore-bearing fractures of Luobaling porphyry copper-molybdenum deposit in Shanghang County, Fujian Province[J]. Mineral Deposite, 2012,31(S1):853-854.
[24]	郭祥清. 福建上杭县罗卜岭斑岩型铜矿蚀变、矿化分带及找矿标志[J]. 世界有色金属, 2020,11(8):58-61.
[24]	Guo X Q. The characteristics of alteration and mineralization zone and the prospecting indicator in the Luoboling porphyry Cu-Mo deposit, Shanghang, Fujian[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2020,11(8):58-61.
[25]	王进燚, 祁进平, 李晶, 等. 罗卜岭斑岩铜(钼)矿床围岩蚀变及矿化特征探讨[J]. 矿物学报, 2013,33(S2):833-834.
[25]	Wang J Y, Qi J P, Li J, et al. Study on alteration and mineralization of surrounding rock of Luobling porphyry copper (molybdenum) deposit[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2013,33(S2):833-834.
[26]	郭祥清, 祁进平. 福建上杭罗卜岭铜(钼)矿床地质特征及找矿标志[J]. 矿物学报, 2013,33(S2):903-904.
[26]	Guo X Q, Qi J P. Geological characteristics and prospecting criteria of Luobuling copper (molybdenum) deposit in Shanghang, Fujian[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2013,33(S2):903-904.
[27]	王学求, 刘占元, 叶荣, 等. 新疆金窝子矿区深穿透地球化学对比研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2003,27(4):247-254.
[27]	Wang X Q, Liu Z Y, Ye R, et al. Deep-penetrating geochemistry: a comparative study in the Jinwozi gold ore district, Xinjiang[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2003,27(4):247-254.
[28]	刘汉粮, 王学求, 张必敏, 等. 沙泉子隐伏铜镍矿地球化学勘查方法试验[J]. 物探与化探计算技术, 2014,36(6):200-206.
[28]	Liu H L, Wang X Q, Zhang B M, et al. Geochemical exploration for concealed Cu-Ni deposit, Shaquanzi, Xinjiang[J]. Computational Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014,36(6):200-206.
[29]	唐金荣, 吴传璧, 施俊法. 深穿透地球化学迁移机理与方法技术研究新进展[J]. 地质通报, 2007,12(12):1579-1590.
[29]	Tang J R, Wu C B, Shi J F. Rrecent progress in the study of the deep-penetrating geochemical migration mechanisms and methods[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2007,12(12):1579-1590.
[30]	刘汉粮, 张必敏, 刘东盛, 等. 土壤微细粒全量测量在甘肃花牛山矿区的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016,40(1):33-39.
[30]	Liu H L, Zhang B M, Liu D S, et al. The application of soil geochemical measurement method to the Huaniushan Pb-Zn deposit, Gansu Province[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2016,40(1):33-39.
[31]	韩志轩, 张必敏, 乔宇, 等. 隐伏铜矿区土壤微细粒测量有效性实验——以江西通江岭铜矿为例[J]. 地球学报, 2020,41(6):977-986.
[31]	Han Z X, Zhang B M, Qiao Y, et al. Validity experiments of fine-grained soil geochemical survey for exploring concealed copper deposits: A case study in the Tongjiangling copper deposit, Jiangxi province[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2020,41(6):977-986.
[32]	陈振金, 陈春秀, 刘用清, 等. 福建省土壤元素背景值及其特征[J]. 中国环境监测, 1992,12(3):107-110.
[32]	Chen Z J, Chen C X, Liu Y Q, et al. Background values and characteristics of soil elements in Fujian province[J]. Environmental Monitoring in China, 1992,12(3):107-110.
[33]	Zhang B M, Wang X Q, Ye R, et al. Geochemical exploration for concealed depositesat the periphery of the Zijinshan copper-gold mine, south-estern China[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2015,157:184-193. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2015.06.015
[34]	赵辰, 文美兰, 吴彦彬, 等. 碳硫分析在不同地球化学覆盖区的找矿应用研究[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2021,4(1):42-46.
[34]	Zhao C, Wen M L, Wu Y B, et al. Prospecting application of carbon-sulfur analysis in different geochemical cover areas[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2021,4(1):42-46.
[35]	宓奎峰, 柳振江, 李春风, 等. 内蒙古乌努格吐山大型铜钼矿床元素迁移及成矿过程探讨[J]. 中国地质, 2014,41(4):1270-1287.
[35]	Mi K F, Liu Z J, Li C F, et al. Metallogenic processes and migration of ore-forming elements in the Wunugetushan porphyry Cu-Mo deposit, Inner Mongolia[J]. Geological in China, 2014,41(4):1270-1287.
[36]	宋雷鹰. 内蒙古哈如勒敖包矿区金属活动态测量的试验效果[J]. 科技情报开发与经济, 2010,20(7):174-176.
[36]	Song L Y. Analysis on the test results of MOMEO of Haruleaobao mining area, Xinbaerhu right banner, Inner Mongolia[J]. Sci-Tech Information Development & Economy, 2010,20(7):174-176.
[37]	杨刚刚, 李方林, 张雄华. 金属活动态测量在东戈壁钼矿找矿效果研究[J]. 新疆地质, 2018,36(2):182-188.
[37]	Yang G G, Li F L, Zhang X H. The prospecting effect research of East gobi molybdenum ore using MOMEO[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2018,36(2):182-188.
[38]	常华进, 储雪蕾, 黄晶, 等. 沉积环境细菌作用下的硫同位素分馏[J]. 地质评论, 2007,53(6):807-813.
[38]	Chang H J, Chu X L, Huang J, et al. Sulfur isotope fractionation accompanying bacterial action under sedimentary condition[J]. Geological Review, 2007,53(6):807-813.
[39]	Habick K, Canfield D E, Rathemeier J. Sulfur isotope fractionation during bacterial reduction and disproportionation of thiosulfate and sulfite[J]. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 1998,62(15):2585-2595. doi: 10.1016/S0016-7037(98)00167-7
[40]	李斌. 福建紫金山矿田中生代岩浆演化与铜金钼成矿作用地球化学研究[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2015.
[40]	Li B. Geochemistry of mesozoic magmatic rocks and related Cu-Au-Mo minerralizations in the Zijinshan ore field of Fujian Province[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University, 2015.
[41]	杜思敏. 硫同位素在示踪金属矿床成矿物质来源中的应用[J]. 化工矿产地质, 2019,41(3):296-310.
[41]	Du S M. Application of sulphur isotope in tracing ore-forming material sources of metal deposites[J]. Geology of Chemical Minerals, 2019,41(3):296-310.

[1]	张哲寰, 戴慧敏, 宋运红, 杨佳佳. 黑龙江省乌裕尔河流域土壤中某些微量元素地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(5): 1097-1104.
[2]	李秋燕, 张一鹤, 魏明辉, 贺鹏飞. 海伦市土壤主要微量元素空间分布特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(5): 1114-1120.
[3]	赵敏, 盛勇, 戚良刚. 高精度重磁测量在覆盖区找矿中的应用——以无为县蔚山铁铜矿预查为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(6): 1211-1216.
[4]	严明书, 吴春梅, 蒙丽, 丁相伦, 董攀, 邓海, 雷家立, 龚媛媛, 鲍丽然. 重庆市黔江猕猴桃果园土壤养分状况分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(5): 1123-1130.
[5]	杨庆坤, 张小亮, 华琛, 于玉帅, 周万蓬. 赣中大王山石英脉型钨钼多金属矿床成岩成矿年代学及其地质意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(3): 558-567.
[6]	刘汉粮, 张必敏, 王学求, 张振海, 刘东盛. 土壤微细粒测量地球化学模式的再现性与可对比性[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(3): 506-512.
[7]	严明书, 黄剑, 何忠庠, 鲍丽然, 罗宇洁. 地质背景对土壤微量元素的影响——以渝北地区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(1): 199-205.
[8]	郝立波, 田密, 赵新运, 赵昕, 张瑞森, 谷雪. 基于实码加速遗传算法的投影寻踪模型在圈定水系沉积物地球化学异常中的应用——以湖南某铅锌矿床为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(6): 1151-1156.
[9]	刘银飞, 孙彬彬, 贺灵, 曾道明, 刘占元, 周国华. 福建龙海土壤垂向剖面元素分布特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(4): 713-721.
[10]	谢小占. 广东怀集高凤矿区地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(2): 303-309.
[11]	杨超. 陕西双王金矿地球化学特征及其成因分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(2): 296-302.
[12]	刘汉粮, 张必敏, 刘东盛, 王学求, 张振海, 韩志轩. 土壤微细粒全量测量在甘肃花牛山矿区的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(1): 33-39.
[13]	孙彬彬, 张学君, 刘占元, 周国华, 张必敏, 陈亚东. 地电化学异常形成机理初探[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(6): 1183-1187.
[14]	周亚龙, 孙忠军, 杨志斌, 张富贵, 张舜尧. 多目标化探数据与油气藏指标特征的相关性研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(3): 466-472.
[15]	张元培, 黄春娟, 孙卫国, 骆必继. 秭归地区闪长岩岩体风化壳微量元素地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(5): 755-759.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed