Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2023, Vol. 47 Issue (2): 279-289    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2023.1144
  地质调查·资源勘查 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
山东省临沂凸起东北缘重力场特征及大地构造单元边界讨论
王润生1,2(), 武斌3, 张海瑞3, 于嘉宾1,2(), 董彦龙4,5, 郭国强1,2, 康一鸣1,2
1.山东省物化探勘查院,山东 济南 250013
2.山东省地质勘查工程技术研究中心,山东 济南 250013
3.山东省第四地质矿产勘查院,山东 潍坊 261021
4.中国地质大学(武汉) 地球科学学院,湖北 武汉 430074
5.中国地质大学(武汉) 地质过程与矿产资源国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430074
Gravity field characteristics and boundaries of geotectonic units on the northeastern margin of the Linyi uplift, Shandong Province
WANG Run-Sheng1,2(), WU Bin3, ZHANG Hai-Rui3, YU Jia-Bin1,2(), DONG Yan-Long4,5, GUO Guo-Qiang1,2, KANG Yi-Ming1,2
1. Shandong Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration Institute, Jinan 250013, China
2. Shandong Geological Exploration Engineering Technology Research Center, Jinan 250013,China
3. No. 4 Exploration Institute of Geology and Mineral Resources of Shandong Province, Weifang 261021,China
4. School of Earth Sciences, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan),Wuhan 430074, China
5. State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China Univesity of Geosciences(Wuhan),Wuhan 430074, China
全文: PDF(9602 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

临沂凸起东北缘位于鲁西地块东端,东侧紧邻沂沭大断裂,NE向鄌郚—葛沟断裂与NW向蒙山断裂控制了研究区内主要构造格架。受新生界覆盖影响,区内主要构造单元边界几乎处于隐伏状态,蒙山断裂东端走向变化及临沂凸起北界角度不整合界线的展布均有待深入研究。本文利用最新1:5万高精度重力资料,基于重力场定性分析及多元化重力位场转换解释,同时结合山东省大地构造单元划分方案,对区内构造单元边界位置及其交切关系进行了重点研究和讨论。分析认为:蒙山凸起、平邑凹陷交界的蒙山断裂在半程镇以东由NW走向转为近EW走向,并明显切割NE向鄌郚—葛沟断裂,且向东再次呈现NW向转折趋势;临沂凸起、平邑凹陷交界的角度不整合界线既非向北终止于蒙山断裂,也非向南转折,而是向东延伸至鄌郚—葛沟断裂,该不整合界线也控制了平邑凹陷南界,使其NW向条带状重力异常向东转折,在区内呈现出“靴形”重力低值异常特征。本研究基于高精度重力边界识别,精细厘定了临沂凸起东北缘地段的断裂体系及构造区划,为该区基础地质研究工作提供了高精度重力数据支撑,同时为下步矿产地质调查工作奠定了良好的基础。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
王润生
武斌
张海瑞
于嘉宾
董彦龙
郭国强
康一鸣
关键词 临沂凸起重力异常位场转换大地构造单元边界识别    
Abstract

The northeastern margin of the Linyi uplift is located at the eastern end of the Luxi Block and immediately adjacent to the Yishu fault in the east. The main structural framework of the study area is controlled by the NE-trending Tangwu-Gegou fault and the NW-trending Mengshan fault. Covered by the Cenozoic sediments, the boundaries of main tectonic units in the study area are almost all concealed, and it is necessary to further investigate the change in the strike of the eastern end of the Mengshan fault as well as the distribution of the angular unconformity along the northern boundary of the Linyi uplift. Using the latest 1:50,000 high-precision gravity data, this study mainly investigated the positions and intersection relationships of the boundaries of tectonic units based on the qualitative analysis of gravity field, the interpretation of multiple gravity potential field conversion, and the division scheme of geotectonic units in Shandong Province. The analysis results are as follows. The Mengshan fault at the junction of the Mengshan uplift and the Pingyi sag transitions from the NW trending to nearly-EW trending in the east of Bancheng Town, significantly cuts the NE-trending Tangwu-Gegou fault, and shows a NW-trending turn to the east again. The angular unconformity at the junction of the Linyi uplift and the Pingyi sag neither ends in the Mengshan fault in the north nor turns southward but extends to the Tangwu-Gegou fault in the east. This unconformity also controls the southern boundary of the Pingyi sag, making the NW-trending banded gravity anomalies of the sag turn eastward. Consequently, the boot-shaped low-value gravity anomalies were formed in the study area. Based on the high-precision gravity boundary identification, this study determined the fault system and tectonic division of the northeastern margin of the Linyi uplift, providing high-precision gravity data for the basic geological study in the study area and laying a good foundation for further mineral geological survey.

Key wordsLinyi uplift    gravity anomaly    potential field conversion    geotectonic unit    boundary identification
收稿日期: 2022-03-29      修回日期: 2022-09-17      出版日期: 2023-04-20
ZTFLH:  P631  
基金资助:山东省级地质勘查项目(鲁勘字(2018)36号);山东省重大科技创新工程项目(2018CXGC1601);山东省地矿局科技攻关项目(KY202226)
通讯作者: 于嘉宾(1992-),女,2014年毕业于成都理工大学,主要从事地质矿产及地球物理勘查工作。Email:461960777@qq.com
引用本文:   
王润生, 武斌, 张海瑞, 于嘉宾, 董彦龙, 郭国强, 康一鸣. 山东省临沂凸起东北缘重力场特征及大地构造单元边界讨论[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(2): 279-289.
WANG Run-Sheng, WU Bin, ZHANG Hai-Rui, YU Jia-Bin, DONG Yan-Long, GUO Guo-Qiang, KANG Yi-Ming. Gravity field characteristics and boundaries of geotectonic units on the northeastern margin of the Linyi uplift, Shandong Province. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(2): 279-289.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2023.1144      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2023/V47/I2/279
Fig.1  区域地质构造简图
地质年代 地层或序列 群或单元 岩石名称 密度σ/(103kg·m-3) 密度特征
平均值 变化范围
新生代 第四系 沙土、黏土 1.71 1.69~1.78 低密度
古近系 官庄群 泥岩、砾岩 2.38 2.23~2.43
中生代 白垩系 青山群 潜粗面岩 2.51 2.40~2.55 低密度
莱阳群 凝灰岩 2.52 2.36~2.59
古生代 奥陶系 马家沟群 白云质灰岩 2.73 2.67~2.82 高密度
寒武系 九龙群 灰岩 2.74 2.71~2.80
长清群 砂岩 2.64 2.59~2.68 中低密度
新元古代 南华系 土门群 砂岩 2.68 2.63~2.71 中等密度
新太古代 傲徕山 蒋峪单元 二长花岗岩 2.61 2.57~2.65 中低密度
Table 1  研究区密度特征
Fig.2  区域布格重力异常
Fig.3  研究区布格重力异常
Fig.4  研究区剩余重力异常
Fig.5  研究区断裂体系划分重力剖析
a—剩余重力异常;b—布格重力异常水平梯度模;c—布格重力异常垂向一阶导数
Fig.6  研究区大地构造背景
华北板块 鲁西隆起区 鲁中隆起 蒙山—蒙阴断隆 蒙山凸起
尼山—平邑断隆 临沂凸起、
平邑凹陷
沂沭断裂带 马站—苏村断陷 苏村凹陷
Table 2  研究区大地构造单元划分
Fig.7  重力推断构造单元划分综合示意
a—布格重力异常;b—剩余重力异常;c—推断构造单元划分
Fig.8  重力推断前新近纪基岩地质
[1] 黄太岭, 高建国. 山东省区域地球物理场[J]. 山东地质, 2002, 18(3/4):88-94.
[1] Huang T L, Gao J G. Regional geophysical field in Shandong Province[J]. Geology of Shandong, 2002, 18(3/4):88-94.
[2] 杜晓娟, 孟令顺, 张凤旭, 等. 利用重磁场研究郯庐断裂及周边构造[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2005, 35(S1):51-56.
[2] Du X J, Meng L S, Zhang F X, et al. Study on Tanlu Fault Zone and adjacent area by gravity and magnetic field[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2005, 35(S1):51-56.
[3] 唐新功, 陈永顺, 唐哲. 应用布格重力异常研究郯庐断裂构造[J]. 地震学报, 2006, 28(6):603-610.
[3] Tang X G, Chen Y S, Tang Z. Bouguer gravity study of middle section of Tanlu Fault[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2006, 28(6):603-610.
[4] 王鑫, 张景发, 付萍杰, 等. 沂沭断裂带重力场及地壳结构特征[J]. 地震地质, 2015, 37(3):731-747.
[4] Wang X, Zhang J F, Fu P J, et al. Deep structures of Yishu Fault Zone derived from gravity data[J]. Seismology and Geology, 2015, 37(3):731-747.
[5] 于磊, 张健, 高玲举, 等. 鲁西隆起重磁异常特征及其构造活动性分析[J]. 地震学报, 2017, 39(5):694-707.
[5] Yu L, Zhang J, Gao L J, et al. Gravity magnetic anomalies and tectonic activities in Luxi uplift[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2017, 39(5):694-707.
[6] 晁洪太, 崔昭文, 李家灵. 鲁中地区北西向断裂及其第四纪晚期的活动特征[J]. 地震学刊, 1992(2):1-10.
[6] Chao H T, Cui Z W, Li J L. The N-W trending faults in middle part of Shandong Province and their activities in the late Quaternary[J]. Journal of Seismology, 1992(2):1-10.
[7] 王志才, 石荣会, 晁洪太, 等. 鲁中南隆起区第四纪晚期断裂活动特征[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2001, 21(4):95-102.
[7] Wang Z C, Shi R H, Chao H T, et al. Characteristics of the Quaternary fault activities in the middle and south region of Shandong Province[J]. Marine Geology & Quaternary Geology, 2001, 21(4):95-102.
[8] 王先美, 钟大赉, 王毅. 鲁西北西向断裂系晚中生代活动的几何学、运动学及年代学研究[J]. 地质学报, 2008, 82(9):1258-1273.
[8] Wang X M, Zhong D L, Wang Y. Geometry,kinematics and thermochronology study of the late Mesozoic movement of NW-trending faults,Western Shandong[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2008, 82(9):1258-1273.
[9] 王先美, 钟大赉, 李理, 等. 鲁西北西向断裂系与沂沭断裂带晚中生代演化关系及其动力学背景探讨[J]. 地学前缘, 2010, 17(3):166-190.
[9] Wang X M, Zhong D L, Li L, et al. Relationship between NW faults of West Shandong and Yishu fault zone in late Mesozoic and their geotectonic setting operations[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2010, 17(3):166-190.
[10] 张鹏, 王良书, 石火生, 等. 郯庐断裂带山东段的中新生代构造演化特征[J]. 地质学报, 2010, 84(9):1316-1323.
[10] Zhang P, Wang L S, Shi H S, et al. The Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic evolution of the Shandong segment of the Tanlu Fault Zone[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2010, 84(9):1316-1323.
[11] 谢庆宾, 管守锐, 李熙哲. 山东平邑盆地官中段沉积环境和层序地层特征[J]. 沉积学报, 1999, 17(1):71-77.
[11] Xie Q B, Guan S R, Li X Z. Depositional environment and sequence stratigraphy characteristics of middle member of the Guanzhong Formation in the Pingyi Basin,Shandong[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1999, 17(1):71-77.
[12] 宋奠南. 山东中新生代盆地基本特征及演化过程[J]. 山东地质, 2001, 17(5):5-10.
[12] Song D N. Basic characteristics and evolution history of Meso-Cenozoic Basins in Shandong Province[J]. Geology of Shandong, 2001, 17(5):5-10.
[13] 陈华国, 赵艳杰, 甘延景, 等. 平邑盆地古近纪官庄群沉积建造与膏岩富集规律[J]. 山东国土资源, 2008, 24(5):30-32,36.
[13] Chen H G, Zhao Y J, Gan Y J, et al. Sedimentary foundation and plaster rock concentration rules of Paleogene Guanzhuang Group in Pingyi Basin[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2008, 24(5):30-32,36.
[14] 张增奇, 刘书才, 杜圣贤, 等. 山东省地层划分对比厘定意见[J]. 山东国土资源, 2011, 27(9):1-9.
[14] Zhang Z Q, Liu S C, Du S X, et al. Determination opinions on stratigraphic division and correlation in Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2011, 27(9):1-9.
[15] 孙天柱, 武斌. 临沂方城盆地中生代青山群火山岩地球化学特征及地质意义[J]. 山东国土资源, 2020, 36(6):14-22.
[15] Sun T Z, Wu B. Geochemical characteristics and geological significance of volcanic rocks in Mesozoic Qingshan Group in Fangcheng Basin of Linyi City[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2020, 36(6):14-22.
[16] 晁洪太, 李家灵, 崔昭文, 等. 山东中部一条明显的北西向中强地震带[J]. 华北地震科学, 1998, 16(2):23-29.
[16] Chao H T, Li J L, Cui Z W, et al. An evident NW-trending seismic zone of medium-strong earthquake in central Shandong Province[J]. North China Earthquake Sciences, 1998, 16(2):23-29.
[17] 牛树银, 胡华斌, 毛景文, 等. 鲁西地区地质构造特征及其形成机制[J]. 中国地质, 2004, 31(1):34-39.
[17] Niu S Y, Hu H B, Mao J W, et al. Structure in Western Shandong and its genetic mechanism[J]. Geology in China, 2004, 31(1):34-39.
[18] 王万银, 张瑾爱, 刘莹, 等. 利用重磁资料研究莺—琼盆地构造分界及其两侧断裂特征[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2013, 28(3):1575-1583.
[18] Wang W Y, Zhang J A, Liu Y, et al. Research on the tectonic boundary of Yingqiong Basin and adjacent faults' features based on gravity and magnetic data[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2013, 28(3):1575-1583.
[19] 曾琴琴, 王永华, 李富, 等. 重力异常垂向二阶导数在攀西裂谷特征分析中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(1):29-33.
[19] Zeng Q Q, Wang Y H, Li F, et al. Application of the vertical second derivative of gravity anomaly for characteristics analysis of Panxi Rift[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(1):29-33.
[20] 马涛, 朱莹洁, 杨永, 等. 基于重磁异常的嘉偕平顶山群构造区划特征研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(4):938-948.
[20] Ma T, Zhu Y J, Yang Y, et al. Research on tectonic division in Jiaxie guyots based on gravity and magnetic anomalies[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(4):938-948.
[21] 许文强, 袁炳强, 刘必良, 等. 多种重磁位场边缘识别方法及在南黄海北部断裂构造识别中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(4):962-974.
[21] Xu W Q, Yuan B Q, Liu B L, et al. Multiple gravity and magnetic potential field edge detection methods and their application to the boundary of fault structures in northern South Yellow Sea[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(4):962-974.
[22] 张磊, 王万银, 赵修军, 等. 基于重磁场特征的新蔡铁矿区构造单元分布特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(4):975-984.
[22] Zhang L, Wang W Y, Zhao X J, et al. Distribution characteristics of structural units in the Xincai iron ore district based on gravity and magnetic field characteristics[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(4):975-984.
[23] 王润生, 郝兴中, 陈大磊, 等. 山东齐河—禹城地区矽卡岩型铁矿成矿地质体边界讨论及深部特征研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37(1):59-68.
[23] Wang R S, Hao X Z, Chen D L, et al. Discussion on the boundary of metallogenic geological body of skarn type iron deposits and study on its deep characteristics in Qihe-Yucheng area,Shandong Province[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2022, 37 (1):59-68.
[24] 王润生, 郝兴中, 刘洪波, 等. 鲁西齐河地区矽卡岩型铁矿重磁方法找矿规律研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37(2):664-677.
[24] Wang R S, Hao X Z, Liu H B, et al. Study on prospecting law of skarn type iron deposit by gravity and magnetic method in Qihe area of western Shandong[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2022, 37(2):664-677.
[25] 李三忠, 王金铎, 刘建忠, 等. 鲁西地块中生代构造格局及其形成背景[J]. 地质学报, 2005, 79(4):487-497.
[25] Li S Z, Wang J D, Liu J Z, et al. Mesozoic structure and its tectonic setting in the Western Shandong Block[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2005, 79(4):487-497.
[26] 宋明春. 山东省大地构造单元组成、背景和演化[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2008, 31(3):165-175.
[26] Song M C. The composing,setting and evolution of tectonic units in Shandong Province[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2008, 31(3):165-175.
[27] 李洪奎, 杨永波, 耿科, 等. 山东重大基础地质问题研究进展[J]. 岩石学报, 2013, 29(2):594-606.
[27] Li H K, Yang Y B, Geng K, et al. Research progress on major basic geological problems in Shandong Province[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013, 29(2):594-606.
[28] 张增奇, 张成基, 王世进, 等. 山东省地层侵入岩构造单元划分对比意见[J]. 山东国土资源, 2014, 30(3):1-23.
[28] Zhang Z Q, Zhang C J, Wang S J, et al. Views on classification and contrast of tectonic units in strata in Shandong Province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2014, 30(3):1-23.
[1] 杨荣祥, 王万银, 蔡梦轲, 王丁丁, 罗新刚. 基于卫星重力异常的渤海盆地秦南凹陷及邻区构造格局研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(3): 584-596.
[2] 孙争, 王俊, 丁鹏, 谭鑫. 一种重力异常向上延拓高度最优化确定方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(1): 162-170.
[3] 孙伯轩, 侯振隆, 周文月, 巩恩普, 郑玉君, 程浩. 多分量重力梯度数据联合欧拉反褶积与软件系统设计[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(5): 1241-1250.
[4] 石泽玉, 张志厚, 刘鹏飞, 范祥泰. 重力及其梯度异常正演的Moving-footprint大尺度模型分解方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(3): 576-584.
[5] 王蓉, 熊杰, 刘倩, 薛瑞洁. 基于深度神经网络的重力异常反演[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(2): 451-458.
[6] 杨婧, 郭良辉. 重力异常曲化平的改进插值—迭代法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 123-129.
[7] 冯旭亮, 魏泽坤. 基于界面反演增强的位场边缘识别方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 130-140.
[8] 邢锦程, 袁炳强, 张春灌, 冯旭亮, 段瑞锋, 薛健, 贾洪杨, 李想. 特立尼达盆地重力场特征及油气远景[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1606-1616.
[9] 高维强, 史朝洋, 张利明, 冯旭亮. 山区地形改正密度逐次回归选取方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1530-1538.
[10] 王正科, 卢琳, 刘花婷. 一种实测重力异常区域场的消除方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1569-1577.
[11] 陈青, 孙帅, 丁成艺, 黄小宇, 陈浩, 申鹏, 罗港, 魏耀聪. iTilt-Euler法在重力数据处理及断裂解释中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1578-1587.
[12] 王冠鑫, 罗锋, 周锡华, 闫方. 航空重力弱信号提取的卡尔曼滤波方法研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(1): 76-83.
[13] 王学发, 王万银, 马杰, 杨敏, 梁建设, 邱春光, 王丁丁, 纪晓琳, 刘金兰. 基于重力资料的马达加斯加岛及邻区盆地构造单元分布特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(4): 928-937.
[14] 许文强, 袁炳强, 刘必良, 姚长利. 多种重磁位场边缘识别方法及在南黄海北部断裂构造识别中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(4): 962-974.
[15] 陈挺, 严迪, 杨剑, 廖国忠, 武斌, 冉中禹. 基于重力值标准差研究长宁6.0级地震活动性[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(3): 480-488.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com