Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2020, Vol. 44 Issue (1): 81-87    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2020.1199
     地质调查·资源勘查 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
珠江口盆地惠州凹陷储层测井产能分级与识别方法
冯进1, 赵冰2, 张占松2(), 张超谟2
1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司 深圳分公司,广东 深圳 518054
2. 长江大学 油气资源与勘探技术教育部重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430100
Classification and identification method of reservoir logging capacity in Huizhou depression of Pearl River mouth basin
Jin FENG1, Bing ZHAO2, Zhan-Song ZHANG2(), Chao-Mo ZHANG2
1. Shenzhen Branch of CNOOC(China) Co.,Ltd.,Shenzhen 518054,China
2. Key Laboratory of Exploration Technologies for Oil and Gas Resources,Ministry of Education,Yangtze University,Wuhan 430100,China
全文: PDF(4594 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

产能预测是油田生产中的关键一步,而定量预测储层产能存在难度。因此通常先对产能级别进行划分,为储层产能定量预测提供基础。通过分析珠江口盆地惠州凹陷储层产能影响因素,利用能够反映储层岩石物理特征的191块岩心毛管压力曲线形态将储层类别划分为3类,然后将储层分类和产能分级相结合,将储层米采油指数的分级界限确定为12和2 m 3/(d·MPa·m),提出储层宏观与微观物性参数结合的综合评价指数Z来划分储层产能,最终利用储层品质因子RQI来识别全井段储层产能级别。利用该产能分级与识别方法对研究区所有测试层产能级别进行划分,准确率达到了90%以上。该方法应用效果较好,可尝试推广使用。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
冯进
赵冰
张占松
张超谟
关键词 惠州凹陷产能影响因素毛管压力曲线储层分类产能分级与识别    
Abstract

Capacity prediction is a key step in oilfield production.It is difficult to predict reservoir capacity quantitatively.Therefore,the classification of reservoir capacity is usually carried out first to provide a basis for quantitative prediction of reservoir capacity.By analyzing the factors affecting the reservoir capacity in the Huizhou depression of Pearl River mouth basin,191 core capillary pressure curves which can reflect the petrophysical characteristics of reservoirs were used to classify reservoirs into three categories.Then,through combining reservoir classification with capacity classification,the classification limits of reservoir oil production index per meter were determined as 12 and 2 m 3/(d·MPa·m).The comprehensive evaluation index Z,which combines the macroscopic and microscopic physical parameters of the reservoir,was used to divide the reservoir capacity,and finally the reservoir quality index was used to identify the reservoir capacity category of the whole well.Using the capacity classification and identification method,the authors divided the capacity categories of all test sites in the study area,with the accuracy rate over 90%.The method has a good application effect and deserves promotion.

Key wordsHuizhou depressin    factors affecting the capacity    capillary pressure curve    reservoir classification    capacity classification and identification
收稿日期: 2019-04-09      出版日期: 2020-03-03
:  P631.4  
基金资助:国家科技重大专项“南海东部海域勘探新领域及关键技术”(2016ZX05024-004);国家科技重大专项“复杂碳酸盐岩储层测井评价关键技术研究与应用”(2017ZX05032-003-005)
通讯作者: 张占松
作者简介: 冯进(1972-), 高级工程师, 硕士, 现主要从事地球物理测井相关工作。 Email: fengjin@cnooc.com.cn
引用本文:   
冯进, 赵冰, 张占松, 张超谟. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷储层测井产能分级与识别方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(1): 81-87.
Jin FENG, Bing ZHAO, Zhan-Song ZHANG, Chao-Mo ZHANG. Classification and identification method of reservoir logging capacity in Huizhou depression of Pearl River mouth basin. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(1): 81-87.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2020.1199      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2020/V44/I1/81
Fig.1  惠州凹陷珠海组岩心扫描电镜照片
Fig.2  岩心毛管压力曲线形态分类
Fig.3  测试层对应的毛管压力曲线
Fig.4  米采油指数与物性参数交会
Fig.5  米采油指数与综合评价指数交会
Fig.6  综合评价指数Z与储层品质因子RQI交会
Fig.7  H井产能测井分级评价
[1] 沈旭友, 牛广侠, 窦凤华 . 龙西地区扶余油层致密砂岩储层分类与产能预测[J]. 国外测井技术, 2018,39(3):12-17.
[1] Shen X Y, Niu G X, Dou F H . Dense sandstone reservoir classification and productivity prediction of Fuyu oil layer in Longxi area[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2018,39(3):12-17.
[2] 张占松, 张超谟, 郭海敏 . 基于储层分类的低孔隙度低渗透率储层产能预测方法研究[J]. 测井技术, 2011,35(5):482-486.
[2] Zhang Z S, Zhang C M, Guo H M . On productivity prediction of low porosity and permeability reservoirs based on reservoirs classification[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2011,35(5):482-486.
[3] 王智, 许江文, 谷斌 . 基于测井资料的低孔低渗储层产能预测研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2009,31(6):51-55.
[3] Wang Z, Xu J W, Gu B . Low porosity and low permeability reservoir deliverability based on well logging data[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University:Science & Technology Edition, 2009,31(6):51-55.
[4] 李玮 . HB油田碎屑岩储层测井产能预测方法研究与应用[D]. 武汉:长江大学, 2014.
[4] Li W . The logging study and application of production in the clastic formations of HB oil field[D]. Wuhan:Yangtze University, 2014.
[5] 田敏, 董春梅, 林承焰 , 等. 柴达木盆地涩北二号生物气田砂体产能分类评价[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2017,47(4):1060-1069.
[5] Tian M, Dong C M, Lin C Y , et al. Productivity evaluation method of single sand body gas reservoir in Sebei-2 biogenic gas field,Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2017,47(4):1060-1069.
[6] 吴永平, 昌伦杰, 郑广全 , 等. 低渗裂缝性气藏产能分类方法[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013,24(6):1220-1225.
[6] Wu Y P, Chang L J, Zheng G Q , et al. Research on productivity classification method of low permeability fractured gas field[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013,24(6):1220-1225.
[7] 何羽飞, 万金彬, 王长江 , 等. 基于测井资料的特低渗储层产能预测分类研究[J]. 国外测井技术, 2014(2):25-28.
[7] He Y F, Wan J B, Wang C J , et al. Research on classification and prediction of extra low permeability reservoir capacity based on well logging data[J]. World Well Logging Technology, 2014(2):25-28.
[8] 马宁, 侯读杰, 施和生 , 等. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷烃源岩发育的主控因素分析[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2012,36(3):19-24.
[8] Ma N, Hou D J, Shi H H , et al. Analysis of the main controlling factors of source rocks of Huizhou sag in the Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2012,36(3):19-24.
[9] 葛百成, 文政, 郑建东 . 利用测井资料预测油层自然产能的评价方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2003,22(1):54-56.
[9] Ge B C, Wen Z, Zheng J D . Evaluating and predicting method of oil layer's natural production using well logging data[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2003,22(1):54-56.
[10] 康永尚, 郇国庆, 宋健兴 . 试油层自然产能预测方法及其在塔里木盆地的应用[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2006,27(6):751-753.
[10] Kang Y S, Huan G Q, Song J X . Method for natural productivity prediction in production testing interval and its application to Tarim Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2006,27(6):751-753.
[11] 黄雨阳 . 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷纯油藏产能影响因素分析[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2018,15(6):720-725.
[11] Huang Y Y . Analysis of factors affecting pure reservoir capacity in Huizhou depressin of Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2018,15(6):720-725.
[12] 龙更生, 施和生, 郑荣才 , 等. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷深部古近系储层特征及发育控制因素[J]. 海相油气地质, 2011,16(3):71-78.
[12] Long G S, Shi H S, Zheng R C , et al. Characteristics and development controlling factors of Paleogene deep reservoirs in Huizhou depression,Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Marine Origin Petroleum Geology, 2011,16(3):71-78.
[13] 马宁, 侯读杰, 施和生 , 等. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷烃源岩发育的主控因素分析[J]. 大庆石油学院学报, 2012,36(3):19-24.
[13] Ma N, Hou D J, Shi H S , et al. Analysis of main controlling factors of source rocks of Huizhou sag in the Pearl River Mouth Basin[J]. Journal of Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2012,36(3):19-24.
[14] 刘义坤, 王永平, 唐慧敏 , 等. 毛管压力曲线和分形理论在储层分类中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2014,26(3):89-92.
[14] Liu Y K, Wang Y P, Tang H M , et al. Application of capillary pressure curves and fractal theory to reservoir classification[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2014,26(3):89-92.
[15] 窦文超, 刘洛夫, 吴康军 , 等. 基于压汞实验研究低渗储层孔隙结构及其对渗透率的影响——以鄂尔多斯盆地西南部三叠系延长组长7储层为例[J]. 地质论评, 2016,62(2):502-512.
[15] Dou W C, Liu L F, Wu K J , et al. Pore structure characteristics and its effect on permeability by mercury injection measurement:An example from Triassic Chang-7 reservoir,southwest Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Review, 2016,62(2):502-512.
[1] 陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 柴慧强, 王勇. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 22-31.
[2] 石磊, 管耀, 冯进, 高慧, 邱欣卫, 阙晓铭. 基于多级次流动单元的砂砾岩储层分类渗透率评价方法——以陆丰油田古近系文昌组W53油藏为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 78-86.
[3] 张建智, 胡富杭, 刘海啸, 邢国章. 煤矿老窑采空区地—井TEM响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 191-197.
[4] 刘仕友, 张明林, 宋维琪. 基于曲波稀疏变换的拉伸校正方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 114-122.
[5] 王迪, 张益明, 牛聪, 黄饶, 韩利. 压制孔隙影响的流体敏感因子优选及其在烃类检测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1402-1408.
[6] 芮拥军, 尚新民. 胜利油田非一致性时移地震关键技术探索与实践[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1439-1447.
[7] 王飞, 孙亚杰, 裴金梅, 宋建国, 李文建. 高密度单点接收地震采集数据的处理方法讨论[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1469-1474.
[8] 刘兰锋, 尹龙, 黄捍东, 周振亚, 董金超. 一种基于岩石物理建模的横波预测方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1482-1487.
[9] 徐浩, 吴小平, 盛勇, 廖圣柱, 贾慧涛, 徐子桥. 微动勘探技术在城市地面沉降检测中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1512-1519.
[10] 张豪, 辛勇光, 田瀚. 基于双相介质理论预测川西北地区雷口坡组储层含气性[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1386-1393.
[11] 韦红, 白清云, 张鹏志, 甄宗玉. 基于反褶积广义S变换的双相介质理论油水识别法在渤海S油田馆陶组的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1394-1401.
[12] 魏岩岩, 吴磊, 周道卿, 肖安成, 黄凯. 柴达木盆地西部阿拉尔断裂新生代构造变形特征及意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1171-1178.
[13] 张振宇, 袁桂琴, 孙跃, 王之峰. 地质调查地球物理技术标准现状与发展趋势[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1226-1230.
[14] 朱颜, 韩向义, 岳欣欣, 杨春峰, 常文鑫, 邢丽娟, 廖晶. 致密砂岩储层脆性测井评价方法研究及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地渭北油田为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1239-1247.
[15] 雍凡, 刘子龙, 蒋正中, 罗水余, 刘建生. 城市三维地震资料处理浅层成像关键技术[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1266-1274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com