Seismic data processing reveals that internal multiples exhibit highly complex formation mechanisms,making their accurate identification and effective suppression a persistent challenge in geophysical exploration.Traditional methods for internal multiple suppression frequently require manual identification of subsurface reflection interfaces,making them difficult to apply to complex underground medium structures.Moreover,these methods are not only computationally cumbersome but also typically ensure only temporal and positional consistency when predicting internal multiples.The amplitude often deviates from observed values,requiring adaptive matching subtraction algorithms for effective suppression.This study developed an internal multiple suppression method based on Marchenko theory.Specifically,the wavefield relationships between the focusing function and Green’s function were constructed using the convolution and correlation reciprocity theorem of the Green’s function during data processing.The Green’s function was then solved using the focusing function,yielding either multiples or primaries constructed from the Green’s function.This method requires only the background velocity or the original data as operators during the iterative multidimensional correlation and convolution process,rendering it simple and computationally efficient. This study constructed an expression for the primary wave field using the Green’s function and the Marchenko equation.The tests using the SMAART model and actual data from the Gulf of Mexico demonstrate that the Marchenko method can effectively suppress internal multiples under the conditions of complex subsurface media.The iterative process requires no velocity information,providing significant advantages over conventional methods and great potential for application in complex underground environments where layers are difficult to distinguish.
Zhang Y W, Yan J Y, Liu Z D, et al. Multiples attenuation approach by F-K and radon transform[J]. Geological Survey of China, 2015, 2(3):22-27.
[4]
White R E. A multichannel method of multiple attenuation based on hyperbolic moveout curves[C]// 50th EAEG meeting,Extended Abstracts,1988:1-22.
[5]
胡天跃, 王润秋, White R E. 地震资料处理中的聚束滤波方法[J]. 地球物理学报, 2000, 43(1):105-115.
[5]
Hu T Y, Wang R Q, White R E. Beamforming in seismic data processing[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2000, 43(1):105-115.
[6]
Berkhout A J. Pushing the limits of seismic imaging,Part I:Prestack migration in terms of double dynamic focusing[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(3):937.
[7]
Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J, Romijn R. Reconstruction of seismic data using the focal transformation[C]// SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2004,Society of Exploration Geophysicists,2004.
[8]
Hadidi M T, Verschuur D J. Removal of internal multiples-field data examples[C]//Geneva:59th EAGE Conference & Exhibition. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers,1997.
[9]
Kelamis P G, Erickson K E, Verschuur D J, et al. Velocity-independent redatuming:A new approach to the near-surface problem in land seismic data processing[J]. The Leading Edge, 2002, 21(8):730-735.
Xin K F, Wang H Z, Ma Z T, et al. Tomographic velocity modeling based on CFP technology[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2005, 44(4):329-333,15-16.
Bao P N, Wang X, Xie J F, et al. Internal multiple suppression method based on iterative inversion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2021, 64(6):2061-2072.
[16]
Jakubowicz H. Wave equation prediction and removal of interbed multiples[C]// SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1998.Society of Exploration Geophysicists,1998.
[17]
Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J. Removal of internal multiples with the common-focus-point (CFP) approach:Part 1—Explanation of the theory[J]. Geophysics, 2005, 70(3):V45-V60.
[18]
Ikelle L T. A construct of internal multiples from surface data only:The concept of virtual seismic events[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2006, 164(2):383-393.
Wu J, Wu Z Q, Hu T Y, et al. Seismic internal multiple attenuation based on constructing virtual events[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013, 56(3):985-994.
[20]
Araújo F V, Weglein A B, Carvalho P M, et al. Inverse scattering series for multiple attenuation:An example with surface and internal multiples[C]// SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1994.Society of Exploration Geophysicists,1994.
[21]
Weglein A B, Gasparotto F A, Carvalho P M, et al. An inverse-scattering series method for attenuating multiples in seismic reflection data[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(6):1975-1989.
[22]
Malcolm A E, de Hoop M V. A method for inverse scattering based on the generalized Bremmer coupling series[J]. Inverse Problems, 2005, 21(3):1137-1167.
[23]
Löer K, Curtis A, Angelo Meles G.Relating source-receiver interferometry to an inverse-scattering series to derive a new method to estimate internal multiples[J]. Geophysics, 2016, 81(3):Q27-Q40.
Jin D G, Chang X, Liu Y K. Algorithm improvement and strategy of internal multiples prediction based on inverse scattering series method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2008, 51(4):1209-1217.
Chen X H, Li H F. Comparison between inverse scattering series method and SRME method in free surface related multiple prediction[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012, 27(3):1040-1050.
Ye Y M, Yao G S, Zhao C L, et al. Sea bottom peg-leg multiple suppression based on seismic interferometry[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(2):225-231.
Yang J L, Zhu L H. Inverse scattering series internal multiple attenuation method and its application[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2018, 57(6):853-861.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2018.06.007
Bi L F, Qing N, Li Z X, et al. Wavefield prediction with inverse scattering series and 2D blind separation of convolved mixtures for suppressing internal multiples[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(3):521-529.
[30]
Rose J H. Single-sided autofocusing of sound in layered materials[J]. Inverse Problems, 2002, 18(6):1923-1934.
[31]
Broggini F, Snieder R. Connection of scattering principles:A visual and mathematical tour[J]. European Journal of Physics, 2012, 33(3):593-613.
[32]
Broggini F, Snieder R, Wapenaar K. Focusing the wavefield inside an unknown 1D medium:Beyond seismic interferometry[J]. Geophysics, 2012, 77(5):A25-A28.
[33]
Wapenaar K, Broggini F, Slob E, et al. Three-dimensional single-sided Marchenko inverse scattering,data-driven focusing,Green's function retrieval,and their mutual relations[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2013, 110(8):084301.
[34]
Wapenaar K, Thorbecke J, van der Neut J, et al. Marchenko imaging[J]. Geophysics, 2014, 79(3):WA39-WA57.
[35]
Slob E, Wapenaar K, Broggini F, et al. Seismic reflector imaging using internal multiples with Marchenko-type equations[J]. Geophysics, 2014, 79(2):S63-S76.
[36]
Meles G A, Löer K, Ravasi M, et al. Internal multiple prediction and removal using Marchenko autofocusing and seismic interferometry[J]. Geophysics, 2015, 80(1):A7-A11.
[37]
van der Neut J, Wapenaar K. Adaptive overburden elimination with the multidimensional Marchenko equation[J]. Geophysics, 2016, 81(5):T265-T284.
[38]
Zhang L L, Staring M. Marchenko scheme based internal multiple reflection elimination in acoustic wavefield[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2018,159:429-433.