Current field distribution characteristics and detection influencing factors of the focusing DC IP method for tunnels
ZHAO Jun1(), MENG Xin-Jia2, LI Bing2, LIU Zhi-Min2
1. Shanxi Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Changzhi 046011, China 2. College of Mechanical and Equipment Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China
This study aims to explore the current field distribution characteristics and detection influencing factors of the focusing DC induced polarization (IP) method for tunnels. The study processes are as follows: the normal and anomalous potentials of the spatial electric field were calculated using the finite element method; a homogeneous 3D geoelectric detection model was constructed using the Comsol software, the model was divided into grid cells using the adaptive algorithm for tetrahedral mesh generation, and the numerical calculation precision was compared and analyzed; the distribution and change patterns of the focusing current field were investigated, and the range of the current ratio of the focusing effect was determined, and a 3D geoelectric model was constructed for anomalous geological structures in front of the tunneling section, and the influences of factors such as the area of the tunneling section, interference bodies, and current ratio coefficient of focusing effect on the IP effect parameters were simulated through the forward modeling using the equivalent resistivity method. The results are as follows: the focusing DC IP method was highly sensitive to the detection of the unfavorable geological bodies in front of the tunneling section; the impact of the interference bodies in the tunnel cavity on the detection of the anomalous target bodies can be ignored; the farther the lateral anomalous interference bodies from the tunnel floor, the less the impact on the detection of the anomalous target bodies, and the exploration distance can be effectively increased by increasing the area of the tunneling section and the current ratio coefficient of the focusing effect. This study can be utilized as a basis and reference for the inversion using the focusing DC IP method and is greatly significant for promoting the development of the focusing electrical exploration theory.
赵军, 孟欣佳, 李冰, 刘志民. 坑道聚焦直流激电法电流场分布特性及探测影响因素分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(1): 120-128.
ZHAO Jun, MENG Xin-Jia, LI Bing, LIU Zhi-Min. Current field distribution characteristics and detection influencing factors of the focusing DC IP method for tunnels. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(1): 120-128.
Keller G V. An improved electrode system for use in electric logging[J]. Producers Monthly, 1949, 13(10):12-15.
[2]
Doll H G. The laterolog:A new resistivity logging method with electrodes using an automatic focusing system[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1951, 3(11):305-316.
doi: 10.2118/951305-G
[3]
Moran J H, Chemali R E. More on the laterolog device[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1979, 27(4):902-930.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb01006.x
[4]
Roy A, Apparao A. Depth of investigation in direct current methods[J]. Geophysics, 1971, 36(5):943-959.
doi: 10.1190/1.1440226
[5]
Dey A, Meyer W H, Morrison H F et al. Electric field response of two-dimensional inhomogeneities to unipolar and bipolar electrode configurations[J]. Geophysics, 1975, 40(4):630-640.
doi: 10.1190/1.1440554
[6]
Panissod C, Lajarthe M, Tabbagh A. Potential focusing:A new multi-electrode array concept,simulation study and field tests in archaeological prospecting[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 1997, 38(1):1-23.
doi: 10.1016/S0926-9851(97)00011-6
[7]
黄启声. 垂向屏障等位电测法[J]. 物探与化探, 1981, 5(3):164-171.
[7]
Huang Q S. Vertical barrier equipotential electrical measurement[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1981, 5(3):164-171.
[8]
费锡铨. 聚焦垂直极化法[J]. 地质与勘探, 1983, 10:46-50.
[8]
Fei X Q. Focusing vertical IP method[J]. Geology and Exploration, 1983, 10:46-50.
[9]
Geophydraulik Data. Beam presentation[Z/OL]. Kirchvers:Geohydraulik data corp., 2004. http://www.geoexploration technologies.de/.
[10]
Zhang G, Lyu Q T, Lin P R, et al. Electrode array and data density effects in 3D induced polarization tomography and applications for mineral exploration[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2019, 12(6):1-17.
doi: 10.1007/s12517-018-4128-8
Ruan B Y, Deng X K, Liu H F, et a1. Research on a new method of advanced focus detection with DC resistivity in tunnel[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009, 52(1):289-296.
Zhang L, Ruan B Y, Lyu Y Z, et al. Study of full-space numerica1 modeling of advanced exploration in tunnel with DC Focus resistivity method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2011, 54(4):1130-1139.
[13]
Deng X K, Liu J X, Liu H F, et al. 3D finite element numerical simulation of advanced detection in roadway for DC focus method[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2013, 23(7):2187-2193.
doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(13)62716-8
Liu H F, Liu J X, Ma C Y. Development and application of inversion interpretation system with direct current IP data[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2014, 11(3):376-382.
[15]
徐世浙. 地球物理中的有限单元法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社,1994.
[15]
Xu S Z. FEM in geophysics[M]. BeiJing: Science Press,1994.
[16]
Ángel R R, David P, Carlos T V. Fast 2.5D finite element simulations of borehole resistivity measurements[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2018, 22(5):1271-1281.
doi: 10.1007/s10596-018-9751-7
[17]
Ren Z, Tang J. 3D direct current resistivity modeling with unstructured mesh by adaptive finite-element method[J]. Geophysics, 2010, 75(1):H7-H17.
doi: 10.1190/1.3298690
[18]
Shahbazian A, Salem M K, Ghoranneviss M. Simulation by COMSOL of effects of probe on inductively coupled Argon Plasma[J]. Brazilian Journal of Physics, 2021, 51(3):351-360.
doi: 10.1007/s13538-020-00821-3
