Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2015, Vol. 39 Issue (6): 1223-1232    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2015.6.21
  计算技术与信息处理 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于Poynting矢量的逆时偏移去噪
李沁慈1,2, 刘国峰1,2, 孟小红1,2, 任丽1,2
1. 中国地质大学(北京)地下信息探测技术与仪器教育部重点实验室, 北京 100083;
2. 中国地质大学(北京)地球物理与信息技术学院, 北京 100083
The denoising of reverse time migration based on the Poynting vector
LI Qin-Ci1,2, LIU Guo-Feng1,2, MENG Xiao-Hong1,2, REN Li1,2
1. Key Laboratory of Geo-detection, Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China;
2. School of Geosciences and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
全文: PDF(2640 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

因为逆时偏移采用双程波动方程的缘故,加之利用零延迟互相关成像条件,由此带来了不可避免的低频成像噪声。基于Poynting矢量进行去噪的方法可以有效地去除这类低频噪声,该方法利用正常反射成像点与异常成像点处的炮检波场传播方向间夹角的不同来达到去噪目的。对于波场传播方向间的夹角,利用波场的Poynting矢量方向与传播方向一致这一特点来进行求取,而在求取Poynting矢量的过程中,针对无法利用原有公式求取Poynting矢量的部分,采用平滑处理的方式;对于额外增加计算量这一缺陷,使用了CPU/GPU异构并行计算。利用上述方法,对双层速度模型及Marmousi速度模型进行了去噪测试,模型试算结果显示:文中所采用的平滑方法可有效提高Poynting矢量求取的稳定性,引入CPU/GPU并行计算可大幅提高计算速度;双层速度模型在最大去噪角度为70°时去噪效果较好,Marmousi速度模型在最大去噪角度为100°时去噪效果较好。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

Because of using the two-way wave equation and zero-lag cross correlation imaging condition,RTM causes unwanted artifacts.In this paper,the authors introduced a denoising method using the Poynting vector,which is one of the methods denoising the artifacts of reverse time migration.This method utilizes the difference between normal and abnormal imaging points in angles between the source and the received wave propagation direction, which is based on the uniformity between the direction of wave propagation and its Poynting vector.As for calculating the Poynting vector,the authors smoothed the Poynting vector for those unable to use the formula and employed CPU/GPU heterogeneous parallel computation for intensive computation cost.Through the two-layer velocity model and Marmousi velocity model denoising image with different denoising angle ranges,the authors have reached the conclusion that the smoothing method used in this paper can improve the stability of Poynting vector calculation,that the application of CPU/GPU heterogeneous parallel computation can reduce the time of calculation,that the two-layer velocity model with the 70° max denoising angle is better,and that Marmousi with the 100° max denoising angle is better.

收稿日期: 2015-01-27      出版日期: 2015-12-10
:  P631.4  
基金资助:

国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)(2013AA063905);北京市青年英才计划

作者简介: 李沁慈(1992-),女,硕士,中国地质大学(北京),主要从事逆时偏移去噪方面的研究。E-mail:liqinci0818@126.com
引用本文:   
李沁慈, 刘国峰, 孟小红, 任丽. 基于Poynting矢量的逆时偏移去噪[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(6): 1223-1232.
LI Qin-Ci, LIU Guo-Feng, MENG Xiao-Hong, REN Li. The denoising of reverse time migration based on the Poynting vector. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 39(6): 1223-1232.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2015.6.21      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2015/V39/I6/1223

[1] 王保利.逆时偏移与全波形反演方法及GPU超算技术研究[D].西安:西安交通大学,2012.

[2] 许璐,孟小红,刘国峰.逆时偏移去噪方法研究进展[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(4):1548-1556.

[3] 刘红伟,刘洪,邹振,等.地震叠前逆时偏移中的去噪与存储[J].地球物理学进展,2010,53(9):2171-2180.

[4] Baysal E,Kosloff D D,Sherwood J W C.A two-way nonreflecting wave equation[J].Geophysics,1984,49(2):132-141.

[5] Loewenthal D,Stoffa P L,Faria E L.Suppressing the unwanted reflections of the full waveequation[J].Geophysics,1987,52(7):1007-1012.

[6] Fletcher R F,Fowler P,Kitchenside P,et al.Suppressing artifacts in prestack reverse time migration[J].SEG,75th Annual International Meeting,2005,24(1):2049-2051.

[7] Yoon K,Marfurt K J.Reverse-time migration using the Poynting vector[J].Exploration Geophysics,2006,37(1):102-106.

[8] Kaelin B,Gutton A.Imaging condition for reverse time migration[C]//Expanded Abstracts of 76th SEG Annual Internet Meeting,2006,25(1):2594-2598.

[9] Liu F Q,Zhang G Q,Morton S A,et al.An antidispersion wave equation for modeling and reverse-time migration[C]//Expanded Abstracts of 78th SEG Annual Internet Meeting,2008,27(1):2277-2281.

[10] Bulcao A,Filho D M S,Mansur W J.Improved quality of depth images using reverse time migration[C]//Expanded Abstracts of 77th SEG Annual Internet Meeting,2007,26(1):2407-2411.

[11] Mulder W A,Plessix R E.A comparison between one-way and two-way wave-equation migration[J].Geophysics,2004,69(6):1491-1504.

[12] Guitton A,Kaelin B,Biondi B.Least-square attenuation of reverse time migration artifacts[C]//Expanded Abstracts of 76th SEG Annual Internet Meeting,2006,25(1):2348-2352.

[13] Suh S Y.Reverse time migration by fan filtering plus wavefield decomposition[C]//Expanded Abstracts of 79th SEG Annual Internet Meeting,2009,28(1):2804-2807.

[14] Zhang Y,James S.Practical issues in reverse time migration:true amplitude gathers,noise removal and harmonic-source encoding[J].First Break,2009,27(1):53-59.

[15] Costa J C,Silva Neto F A,Alcantara M R M,et al.Obliquity-correction imaging condition for reverse time migration[J].Geophysics,2009,74(3):57-66.

[16] Dickens T A,Winbow G A.RTM angle gathers using Poynting vectors[C]//Expanded Abstracts of 81st SEG Annual Internet Meeting,2011,29(1):3109-3113.

[17] Yoon K,Guo M H,Cai J,et al.3D RTM angle gathers using wave propagation direction and dip[C]//Expanded Abstracts of 81st SEG Annual Internet Meeting,2011,29(1):3136-3140.

[18] 王保利,高静怀,陈文超,等.逆时偏移中用Poynting矢量高效地提取角道集[J].地球物理学报,2013,56(1):262-268.

[1] 陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 柴慧强, 王勇. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 22-31.
[2] 石磊, 管耀, 冯进, 高慧, 邱欣卫, 阙晓铭. 基于多级次流动单元的砂砾岩储层分类渗透率评价方法——以陆丰油田古近系文昌组W53油藏为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 78-86.
[3] 张建智, 胡富杭, 刘海啸, 邢国章. 煤矿老窑采空区地—井TEM响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 191-197.
[4] 刘仕友, 张明林, 宋维琪. 基于曲波稀疏变换的拉伸校正方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 114-122.
[5] 王迪, 张益明, 牛聪, 黄饶, 韩利. 压制孔隙影响的流体敏感因子优选及其在烃类检测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1402-1408.
[6] 芮拥军, 尚新民. 胜利油田非一致性时移地震关键技术探索与实践[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1439-1447.
[7] 王飞, 孙亚杰, 裴金梅, 宋建国, 李文建. 高密度单点接收地震采集数据的处理方法讨论[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1469-1474.
[8] 刘兰锋, 尹龙, 黄捍东, 周振亚, 董金超. 一种基于岩石物理建模的横波预测方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1482-1487.
[9] 徐浩, 吴小平, 盛勇, 廖圣柱, 贾慧涛, 徐子桥. 微动勘探技术在城市地面沉降检测中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1512-1519.
[10] 张豪, 辛勇光, 田瀚. 基于双相介质理论预测川西北地区雷口坡组储层含气性[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1386-1393.
[11] 韦红, 白清云, 张鹏志, 甄宗玉. 基于反褶积广义S变换的双相介质理论油水识别法在渤海S油田馆陶组的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1394-1401.
[12] 魏岩岩, 吴磊, 周道卿, 肖安成, 黄凯. 柴达木盆地西部阿拉尔断裂新生代构造变形特征及意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1171-1178.
[13] 张振宇, 袁桂琴, 孙跃, 王之峰. 地质调查地球物理技术标准现状与发展趋势[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1226-1230.
[14] 朱颜, 韩向义, 岳欣欣, 杨春峰, 常文鑫, 邢丽娟, 廖晶. 致密砂岩储层脆性测井评价方法研究及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地渭北油田为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1239-1247.
[15] 雍凡, 刘子龙, 蒋正中, 罗水余, 刘建生. 城市三维地震资料处理浅层成像关键技术[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1266-1274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com