|
|
The application of phase scanning method to determining the polarity of seismic profile |
Pei HE, Qing-Cai ZENG, Jia-Qiang HUANG, Ren JIANG, Sheng CHEN, Xiao-Long GUO, Xiu-Jiao WANG, Ya-Di YANG |
PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development,Langfang 065007,China |
|
|
Abstract Synthetic seismic record calibration is the basis of structural interpretation and reservoir prediction.The accuracy of synthetic seismic record calibration directly determines the accuracy of subsequent structural interpretation and reservoir prediction,and only when the polarity of the corresponding seismic section is accurately determined,the calibration can be accurate.Therefore,determining the polarity of seismic data is the most basic work.In practical production applications,the conventional method which uses the positive and negative polar waves to produce the synthetic seismic records and then compare the correspondence between the two and the seismic trace often fails to determine the polarity of the seismic profile.In this paper,the polarity determination of the Sulige gas field was taken as an example and,according to the principle of phase scanning,the forward modeling and formula derivation were conducted.The results show that the phase of the seismic profile and phase correction quantities are opposite.In the actual data analysis,the phase correction can be obtained by using the phase scanning to compare the well impedance and the relative impedance of the seismic traces nearby the borehole,and then the phase of the actual seismic profile can be obtained to determine the polarity of the seismic profile.The method is intuitive and has good operation and popularization in practical application.
|
Received: 21 December 2017
Published: 03 August 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
刘传奇, 明君, 马奎前 , 等. 地震资料极性判别与道积分技术在渤中M油田的应用[J]. 石油物探, 2013,52(3):329-334.
|
[2] |
卢圣详 . 地震资料解释之前的准备工作[J].江汉石油科技, 2009(4):22-27.
|
[3] |
孙振涛 . 高精度合成地震记录制作技术研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2002,37(6):640-643.
|
[4] |
谭明友, 刘福贵, 王立春 . 埕岛地区速度与剖面极性的研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 1994,29(s1):129-133.
|
[5] |
靳玲, 苏桂芝, 刘桂兰 , 等. 合成地震记录制作的影响因素及对策[J]. 石油物探, 2004,43(3):267-271.
|
[6] |
陈广军, 张善文 . 对地震资料应用中几个常见问题的思考[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2001,36(1):115-121.
|
[7] |
吴俊刚, 吴奎, 孙书滨 , 等. 地震资料极性判别技术在储层预测中的应用[J]. 海洋石油, 2011,31(4):15-19.
|
[8] |
王金铎, 路慎强, 于建国 , 等. 地震资料解释中的极性判别技术[J]. 石油物探, 2001,40(2):77-83.
|
[9] |
王克宁 . 地震记录极性和层位标定研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 1992,27(1):130-139.
|
[10] |
Dalby A E, Landrum R . Speeial report of the Subeommittee on polarity standards[J]. Geophysics, 1975,4(40).
|
[11] |
韩文功 . 地震剖面的极性问题[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 1994,29(6):769-772.
|
[12] |
陈俊, 程金星 . 苏北盆地地震剖面极性判别方法[J]. 复杂油气藏, 2012,5(3):32-35.
|
[13] |
李庆忠 . 走向精确勘探的道路[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1993.
|
[14] |
赖仲康 . 如何判别地震资料极性做好井约束反演[J]. 新疆石油地质, 1999,20(4):302-306.
|
[15] |
杨海长, 周玉 . 合成记录在层位标定应用中的几个关键问题[J]. 西南石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2009,31(4):52-57.
|
[16] |
周兴元 . 常相位校正[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 1989,24(2):119-129.
|
[17] |
姚逢昌 . 振幅谱补偿和相位校正[J]. 石油物探, 1990,29(3):46-59.
|
[18] |
刘金俊, 王修田, 刘怀山 . 子波零相位化、反褶积与地震记录分辨率的关系[J]. 海洋地质动态, 2000,16(4):5-8.
|
[19] |
吕景英, 蒋进勇 . 地震子波零相位化改造的应用[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2003,26(2):121-123.
|
[20] |
刘雯林 . 油气田开发地震技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1996.
|
[1] |
CHEN Xiu-Juan, LIU Zhi-Di, LIU Yu-Xi, CHAI Hui-Qiang, WANG Yong. Research into the pore structure of tight reservoirs:A review[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 22-31. |
[2] |
SHI Lei, GUAN Yao, FENG Jin, GAO Hui, QIU Xin-Wei, QUE Xiao-Ming. Multi-level division method of flow units for accurate permeability assessment of glutenite reservoirs:A case study of reservoir W53 of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Lufeng oilfield[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 78-86. |
|
|
|
|