Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2017, Vol. 41 Issue (5): 872-880    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2017.5.13
  方法研究·信息处理·仪器研制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于角度域共成像点道集的微分相似优化法偏移速度分析
任芳, 李振春, 张敏, 杨国权, 陈飞旭
中国石油大学(华东) 地球科学与技术学院,山东 青岛 266580
Differential semblance optimization migration velocity analysis based on angle domain CIGs
REN Fang, LI Zhen-Chun, ZHANG Min, YANG Guo-Quan, CHEN Fei-Xu
School of Geoscience and Technology,China University of Petroleum (East China),Qingdao 266580,China
全文: PDF(713 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 微分相似优化(Differential Semblance Optimization,DSO)法是一种可以有效避免非线性最小二乘反演过程中不聚焦问题的速度反演方法。基于DSO原理的波动方程偏移速度分析将成像道集的聚焦或者拉平程度作为速度判定的准则,其目标泛函具有良好的凸性,可以有效避免局部极值问题,目标泛函的梯度较为光滑,并且对地震数据中低频成分的要求较低,对速度模型中背景速度的估计较为准确。一般情况下,DSO方法利用偏移距域共成像点道集建立目标泛函,文中利用角度域共成像点道集建立目标泛函对速度的准确性进行判定。模型试算结果表明,通过角道集可以更加直观地对速度的准确性进行判定,并且准确反映速度与深度的对应关系。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract:Differential semblance optimization (DSO) is an approach to the inversion of the velocity which avoids the severe convergence associated with nonlinear least-squares inversion.DSO method-based wave-equation migration velocity analysis measures the focusing or flatness of image gathers and uses the deviation as the criterion to update the velocity.The DSO objective function has a decent global convexity property,therefore it can avoid the local minima problem,the gradient of objective function is smooth,it can inverse the background velocity accurately when there lacks low frequency data.Generally,ODCIGs is used to construct the objective function.In this paper,the authors use ADCIGs to construct the objective function,and the result of the test shows that DSO method with ADCIGs can estimate the correctness of velocity model directly and reflect the coupling relation between velocity and depth accurately.
收稿日期: 2016-08-01      出版日期: 2017-10-20
:  P631.4  
基金资助:山东省自然科学基金(ZR2013DL012); 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(20120133120012); 国家自然科学基金(41504100)
作者简介: 任芳(1990-),女,在读硕士研究生,主要从事地震波偏移成像以及速度分析方面的研究工作。
引用本文:   
任芳, 李振春, 张敏, 杨国权, 陈飞旭. 基于角度域共成像点道集的微分相似优化法偏移速度分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(5): 872-880.
REN Fang, LI Zhen-Chun, ZHANG Min, YANG Guo-Quan, CHEN Fei-Xu. Differential semblance optimization migration velocity analysis based on angle domain CIGs. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2017, 41(5): 872-880.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2017.5.13      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2017/V41/I5/872
[1] Sava P,Biondi B.Wave-equation migration velocity analysis . I. Theory [J].Geophysical Prospecting,2004,52(6):593-606.
[2] Shen P,Symes W W.Automatic velocity analysis via shot profile migration [J].Geophysics,2008,73(5):VE49-VE59.
[3] Albertin U,Etgen J,Maharramov M,et al.Adjoint wave-equation velocity analysis [C]//New Orleans:Expanded Abstracts of 76 th SEG Meeting,2006:3009-3013.
[4] Toldi J L.Velocity analysis without picking [J].Geophysics,1989,54(2):191-199.
[5] Chavent G,Jacewitz C A.Determination of background velocities by multiple migration fitting [J].Geophysics,1995,60(2):476-490.
[6] Soubaras R,Gratacos B.Velocity model building by semblance maximization of modulated-shot gathers[J].Geophysics,2007,72(5):U67 U73.
[7] Symes W W,Carazzone J J.Velocity inversion by differential semblance optimization [J].Geophysics,1991,56(5):654-663.
[8] Symes W,Versteeg R.Velocity model determination using differential semblance optimization[C]//Washington:Expanded Abstracts of 63 rd SEG Meeting,1993:696-699.
[9] Symes W W,Kern M.Inversion of reflection seismograms by differential semblance analysis:algorithm structure and synthetic examples1[J].Geophysical Prospecting,1994,42(6):565 614.
[10] Mulder W A,Ten Kroode A P E.Automatic velocity analysis by differential semblance optimization [J].Geophysics,2002,67(4):1184-1191.
[11] Symes W W.Migration velocity analysis and waveform inversion [J].Geophysical prospecting,2008,56(6):765-790.
[12] Shen P,Symes W W,Stolk C C.Differential semblance velocity analysis by wave-equation migration[C]//Dallas:Expanded Abstracts of 73 rd SEG Meeting,2003:2132-2135.
[13] Shen P,Symes W W,Morton S,et al.Differential semblance velocity analysis via shot profile migration [C]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,SEG,2005:2249-2252.
[14] Shen P.An RTM based automatic migration velocity analysis in image domain [C]//Las Vegas:Expanded Abstracts of 82 nd SEG Meeting,2012:1-5.
[15] Fei W H,Williamson P.On the gradient artifacts in migration velocity analysis based on differential semblance optimization [C]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,SEG,2010:4071-4076.
[16] Yang T N,Sava P.Wave-equation migration velocity analysis using extended images [C]//Houston:SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,SEG,2009:3715 3719.
[17] Yang T N.Wavefield tomography using extended images[D].Colorado:Colorado School of Mines,2013.
[18] Tang Y X,Biondi B.Target-oriented wavefield tomography using synthesized Born data [J].Geophysics,2011,76(5):WB191-WB207.
[19] Shan G J,Wang Y.RTM based wave equation migration velocity analysis [C]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts,2013:4726-4731.
[20] Shen P,Symes W W.Subsurface domain image warping by horizontal contraction and its application to wave-equation migration velocity analysis [C]//Houston:2013 SEG Annual Meeting,SEG,2013:4715-4719.
[1] 陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 柴慧强, 王勇. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 22-31.
[2] 石磊, 管耀, 冯进, 高慧, 邱欣卫, 阙晓铭. 基于多级次流动单元的砂砾岩储层分类渗透率评价方法——以陆丰油田古近系文昌组W53油藏为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 78-86.
[3] 张建智, 胡富杭, 刘海啸, 邢国章. 煤矿老窑采空区地—井TEM响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 191-197.
[4] 刘仕友, 张明林, 宋维琪. 基于曲波稀疏变换的拉伸校正方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 114-122.
[5] 王迪, 张益明, 牛聪, 黄饶, 韩利. 压制孔隙影响的流体敏感因子优选及其在烃类检测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1402-1408.
[6] 芮拥军, 尚新民. 胜利油田非一致性时移地震关键技术探索与实践[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1439-1447.
[7] 王飞, 孙亚杰, 裴金梅, 宋建国, 李文建. 高密度单点接收地震采集数据的处理方法讨论[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1469-1474.
[8] 刘兰锋, 尹龙, 黄捍东, 周振亚, 董金超. 一种基于岩石物理建模的横波预测方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1482-1487.
[9] 徐浩, 吴小平, 盛勇, 廖圣柱, 贾慧涛, 徐子桥. 微动勘探技术在城市地面沉降检测中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1512-1519.
[10] 张豪, 辛勇光, 田瀚. 基于双相介质理论预测川西北地区雷口坡组储层含气性[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1386-1393.
[11] 韦红, 白清云, 张鹏志, 甄宗玉. 基于反褶积广义S变换的双相介质理论油水识别法在渤海S油田馆陶组的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1394-1401.
[12] 魏岩岩, 吴磊, 周道卿, 肖安成, 黄凯. 柴达木盆地西部阿拉尔断裂新生代构造变形特征及意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1171-1178.
[13] 张振宇, 袁桂琴, 孙跃, 王之峰. 地质调查地球物理技术标准现状与发展趋势[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1226-1230.
[14] 朱颜, 韩向义, 岳欣欣, 杨春峰, 常文鑫, 邢丽娟, 廖晶. 致密砂岩储层脆性测井评价方法研究及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地渭北油田为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1239-1247.
[15] 雍凡, 刘子龙, 蒋正中, 罗水余, 刘建生. 城市三维地震资料处理浅层成像关键技术[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1266-1274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com