Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2013, Vol. 37 Issue (6): 1071-1079    DOI: 10.11720/j.issn.1000-8918.2013.6.22
  方法技术研究 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
火成岩速度反演及三维速度场建立的关键技术及效果分析
谢会文1, 许永忠2,3, 郑多明1, 王兴军1, 苗青1, 徐亚3, 汤浩哲2
1. 中国石油塔里木油田公司研究院, 新疆 库尔勒 841000;
2. 中国矿业大学 资源与地球科学学院, 江苏 徐州 221116;
3. 中科院地质与地球物理研究所 油气资源研究重点实验室, 北京 100029
AN ANALYSIS OF THE KEY TECHNIQUES AND EFFECTS OF THE IGNEOUS ROCK VELOCITY INVERSION AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF 3D VELOCITY FIELD
XIE Hui-wen1, XU Yong-zhong2,3, ZHENG Duo-ming1, WANG Xing-jun1, MIAO Qing1, XU Ya3, TANG Hao-zhe2
1. Institute of China Petroleum Tarim Oilfield Company, Korla 841000, China;
2. School of Resource and Geosciences, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Petroleum Resources Research, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
全文: PDF(3293 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

以地震反演为主,结合测井、岩石物理、地震相和正演模拟等技术综合研究火成岩的速度场特征。岩石物理实验是研究火成岩物性参数有效的工具,实验数据的分析能帮助预测火成岩岩性和速度信息,为反演等工作利用地震资料描述火成岩提供依据。原始测井曲线的环境校正和标准化处理是高品质合成记录和反演效果的前提条件。稀疏脉冲反演、基于模型的反演和神经网络反演这三种方法结果的分辨率较原始地震数据有了很大提高,从中可识别出火成岩的空间展布,但基于模型的反演分辨率相对较高。伽马属性反演的分辨率在识别火成岩方面比上述三种方法要高得多,但是单一的属性又很难满足火成岩特征描述的要求,因此多参数融合是一种行之有效的方法。结合地震相的应用,最终得到符合地质特征的火成岩三维速度场,并通过误差分析和正演模拟验证了速度场精度,为变速度成图和低幅构造勘探提供了科学的依据。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

In this paper,the seismic inversion combined with the well logging,rock physics,seismic facies and the forward modeling was used to comprehensively study the characteristics of the igneous rocks.The rock physics experiment is a useful tool to study the physical property parameters of the igneous rocks.The analysis of the experimental data is helpful to predicting the igneous lithology and velocity. On such a basis,the seismic inversion is used to describe the igneous rocks by the seismic data.The environmental correction and standardization of the original logging curves is the prerequisite for high quality synthetic seismogram and inversion.The constrained sparse spike inversion,the model based inversion and the neural network inversion have higher resolution than the original seismic data.The spatial distribution of igneous rocks can be identified by them,with the model based inversion having the highest resolution.The GR characteristic inversion has higher resolution than the above-mentioned three methods.However,as a single characteristic can hardly be used to describe the characteristics of igneous rocks,the multi-parameter seismic inversion is an efficient way.The seismic facies is also used to obtain the igneous 3D velocity field.The precision of the velocity field is verified by the error analysis and forward modeling.

收稿日期: 2012-10-12      出版日期: 2013-12-10
:  P631.4  
基金资助:

国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)(2009CB219603)和国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05001-002-003、2011ZX05008-006)以及江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)联合资助。

通讯作者: 许永忠(1969-),男,褔建省莆田市人,博士,从事地球物理勘探及地震资料反演处理方面的研究。
作者简介: 谢会文(1967-),男,重庆万州人,高级工程师,矿产普查与勘探专业,现从事油气勘探方面的研究工作。
引用本文:   
谢会文, 许永忠, 郑多明, 王兴军, 苗青, 徐亚, 汤浩哲. 火成岩速度反演及三维速度场建立的关键技术及效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2013, 37(6): 1071-1079.
XIE Hui-wen, XU Yong-zhong, ZHENG Duo-ming, WANG Xing-jun, MIAO Qing, XU Ya, TANG Hao-zhe. AN ANALYSIS OF THE KEY TECHNIQUES AND EFFECTS OF THE IGNEOUS ROCK VELOCITY INVERSION AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF 3D VELOCITY FIELD. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2013, 37(6): 1071-1079.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/j.issn.1000-8918.2013.6.22      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2013/V37/I6/1071

[1] 刘小平, 杨晓兰, 曾忠玉, 等.多参数联合反演在火成岩储集体预测中的应用[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2007, 42 (1) :44-49.

[2] 王元君, 王贵重, 王建忠, 等.地震属性在英买力地区火成岩描述中的应用[J].石油物探, 2007, 46 (1) :48-52.

[3] 范洪军, 徐春雨, 王云雷.歧口凹陷北部火成岩地震预测方法研究[J].内蒙古石油化工, 2008, (5) :124-126.

[4] 韩小俊, 韩波.塔里木盆地库车坳陷中部地震速度场的建立方法[J].天然气工业, 2009, 29 (12) :23-25.

[5] 包洪刚, 孙思宇.高邮凹陷速度场特征研究[J].石油天然气学报, 2010, 32 (2) :69-72.

[6] Ja'fari A, Kadkhodaie-llkhchi A, Sharghi Y, et al.Fracture density estimation from petrophysical log data using the adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system[J].Journal of geophysics and engineering, 2012, 9 (1) :105-114.

[7] Duchesne M J, Gaillot P.Did you smooth your well logs the right way for seismic interpretation?[J].Journal of geophysics and engineering, 2011, 8 (4) :514-523.

[8] Tao Y, Sen M K.Shallow splay fault properties of the nankai trough accretionary wedge inferred from seismic inversion[J].Journal of geophysics and engineering, 2012, 9 (1) :1-11.

[9] Xu Y Z, Cui R F, Pan D M, et al.Application of seismic inversion based on model for igneous distribution in coalfield[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2006, 35 (2) :265-267.

[10] Xu Y Z, Huang W C, Chen T J, et al.Evaluation of deep thin coal seams and water-bearing/resisting layers in the quaternary system using seismic inversion[J].Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2009, 19 (2) :161-165.

[11] Xu Y Z, Chen T J, Chen S Z, et al.Comparison between several seismic inversion methods and their application in mountainous coal fields of western China[J].Mining Science and Technology, 2010, 20 (4) :585-590.

[12] Yang H J, Xu Y Z, Huang Z B, et al.Comparison between several multi-parameter seismic inversion methods in identifying plutonic igneous rocks[J].Mining Science and Technology, 2011, 21 (3) :325-331.

[13] Gislain B, Madiba G A, McMechan.Seismic impedance inversion and interpretation of a gas carbonate reservoir in the Alberta Foothills, western Canada[J].Geophysics, 2003, 68 (5) :1460-1469.

[14] Xu Y Z, Cui R F, Huang W C, et al.Reflectivity forward modeling and a CSSI method seismic inversion study of igneous intrusive area, coked area, and gas-enriched area located within a coal seam[J].Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2009, 19 (4) :457-462.

[1] 陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 柴慧强, 王勇. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 22-31.
[2] 石磊, 管耀, 冯进, 高慧, 邱欣卫, 阙晓铭. 基于多级次流动单元的砂砾岩储层分类渗透率评价方法——以陆丰油田古近系文昌组W53油藏为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 78-86.
[3] 张建智, 胡富杭, 刘海啸, 邢国章. 煤矿老窑采空区地—井TEM响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 191-197.
[4] 刘仕友, 张明林, 宋维琪. 基于曲波稀疏变换的拉伸校正方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 114-122.
[5] 王迪, 张益明, 牛聪, 黄饶, 韩利. 压制孔隙影响的流体敏感因子优选及其在烃类检测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1402-1408.
[6] 芮拥军, 尚新民. 胜利油田非一致性时移地震关键技术探索与实践[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1439-1447.
[7] 王飞, 孙亚杰, 裴金梅, 宋建国, 李文建. 高密度单点接收地震采集数据的处理方法讨论[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1469-1474.
[8] 刘兰锋, 尹龙, 黄捍东, 周振亚, 董金超. 一种基于岩石物理建模的横波预测方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1482-1487.
[9] 徐浩, 吴小平, 盛勇, 廖圣柱, 贾慧涛, 徐子桥. 微动勘探技术在城市地面沉降检测中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1512-1519.
[10] 张豪, 辛勇光, 田瀚. 基于双相介质理论预测川西北地区雷口坡组储层含气性[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1386-1393.
[11] 韦红, 白清云, 张鹏志, 甄宗玉. 基于反褶积广义S变换的双相介质理论油水识别法在渤海S油田馆陶组的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(6): 1394-1401.
[12] 魏岩岩, 吴磊, 周道卿, 肖安成, 黄凯. 柴达木盆地西部阿拉尔断裂新生代构造变形特征及意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1171-1178.
[13] 张振宇, 袁桂琴, 孙跃, 王之峰. 地质调查地球物理技术标准现状与发展趋势[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1226-1230.
[14] 朱颜, 韩向义, 岳欣欣, 杨春峰, 常文鑫, 邢丽娟, 廖晶. 致密砂岩储层脆性测井评价方法研究及应用——以鄂尔多斯盆地渭北油田为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1239-1247.
[15] 雍凡, 刘子龙, 蒋正中, 罗水余, 刘建生. 城市三维地震资料处理浅层成像关键技术[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1266-1274.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com