|
|
A new time-varying gain limits inverse Q filtering with the continuous compensation function |
DENG Ru-Bing( ), YAN Jian-Guo, CHEN Qi, SONG Xin-Lei |
College of Geophysics,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China |
|
|
Abstract Inverse Q filtering is one of the practical methods for improving the resolution and preserving the amplitude of seismic data,and hence it has important practical value in seismic reservoir prediction.Researchers have been studying the function of amplitude for a long time,and have found that the inverse Q filtering method using time-varying amplitude compensation function is one of the current research and improvement directions.In this paper,by studying several commonly used and effective inverse Q filtering methods,a time-varying gain limit inverse Q filtering method based on the Teager-Kaiser energy principle to obtain the gain limit of the amplitude compensation function is proposed,which improves the traditional inverse Q filter.The new method calculates the time-varying gain limit of the compensation function based on a smooth continuous function instead of the piecewise function or cut-off frequency used in traditional inverse Q filtering.Therefore,the new method has the advantage of stably adjusting the time-varying gain limit,so it can increase the accuracy of the inverse Q filter,especially for the amplitude preservation and resolution improvement of deep media.The effectiveness and practicability of the proposed method were proved with theoretical models and practical data.
|
Received: 09 April 2020
Published: 27 July 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trend of conventional inverse Q filtering amplitude compensation function
|
|
Trend of cutoff frequency method inverse Q filtering amplitude compensation function
|
|
Trend of amplitude compensation function of inverse Q filtering by stabilization factor method
|
|
Trend of adaptive gain limiting inverse Q filtering amplitude compensation function
|
|
Trend graph of time-varying gainlimit inverse Q filtering amplitude compensation function
|
|
Compensation results of different inverse Q filtering methods for the single-channel model a—post attenuation records;b—compensation records by conventional inverse Q filting;c—compensation records by inverse Q filting with cutoff frequency method;d—compensation records by inverse Q filting with stability factor method;e—compensation records by inverse Q filting with adaptive gain limit;f—compensation records by inverse Q filting with time varying gain limited stability factor method
|
|
Compensation results of different inverse Q filtering methods a—original records;b—compensation records by conventional inverse Q filting;c—compensation records by inverse Q filting with cutoff frequency method;d—compensation records by inverse Q filting with stability factor method;e—compensation records by inverse Q filting with adaptive gain limit;f—compensation records by inverse Q filting with time varying gain limited stability factor method
|
|
Compensation results of time-varying gain limit inverse Q filter for prestack CMP forward gather a—forward channel set model with original CMP;b—compensation results by stability factor method;c—compensation records by inverse Q filting with time varying gain limited stability factor method
|
|
Pre-stack CRP gathers before(a) and after(b) time-varying gain-limit inverse Q filter compensation
|
|
Time-varying gain limit inverse Q filtering results of poststack seismic data a—original seismic profile of T8 target strata;b—seismic profile of T8 target strata after inverse Q filtering with time varying gain limit;c—RMS horizontal section of original T8 target layer;d—RMS horizontal section of T8 target strata after inverse Q filtering with time varying gain limit
|
|
Comparative spectrum analysis after time-varying gain limited inverse Q filter of post-stack seismic data a—spectrum analysis of original seismic data;b—spectrum analysis after inverse Q filtering with time varying gain limit
|
|
Inversion results of the upper layer of the T8 target layer before (a) and after (b) time-varying gain limited inverse Q filtering
|
[1] |
Hale D Q. Adaptive prediction error filters[J]. Stanford Exploration Project Report, 1981, 28:209-231.
|
[2] |
Wang Y. A stable and efficient approach of inverse Q filtering[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(2):657-663.
|
[3] |
Wang Y. Quantifying the effectiveness of stabilized inverse Q filtering[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(1):337-345.
|
[4] |
Wang Y. Inverse Q-filter for seismic resolution enhancement[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(3):V51-V60.
|
[5] |
Wang Y H, Guo J. Seismic migration with inverse Q filtering[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2004, 31(21):1-4.
|
[6] |
Zhang H, Cao C, Dan Z, et al. Improving pre-stack seismic data resolution based on inverse Q filter[J]. Applied Mechanics & Materials, 2013, 331:617-621.
|
[7] |
Kaiser J F. On a simple algorithm to calculate the energy of a signal[J]. Proceedings of the IEEE ICASSP, 1990:381-384.
|
[8] |
Zhang G L, Wang X M, He Z H, et al. The study of inverse Q-filter for seismic resolution enhancement[C]// Eage Workshop on Borehole Geophysics, 2015.
|
[9] |
Tim S, Elena K, Sarah S. Amplitude friendly inverse Q filtering [C]// 89th Annual International Meeting,SEG , 2019.
|
[10] |
Futterman W I. Dispersive body waves[J]. Geophysics, 1962, 69(13):5279-5291.
|
[11] |
张瑾. 地震波能量补偿反Q滤波方法研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2013.
|
[11] |
Zhang J. Study on the inverse Q filtering method for seismic wave energy[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2013.
|
[12] |
余振, 王彦春, 何静, 等. 反Q滤波方法研究综述[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2009, 32(5):309-314.
|
[12] |
Yu Z, Wang Y C, He J, et al. Summary of research on inverse Q filtering method[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2009, 32(5):309-314.
|
[13] |
裴江云, 何樵登. 基于Kjartansson模型的反Q滤波[J]. 地球物理学进展, 1994, 9(1):90-99.
|
[13] |
Pei J Y, He Q D. Inverse Q filtering based on Kjartansson model[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 1994, 9(1):90-99.
|
[14] |
张固澜, 林进, 王熙明, 等. 一种自适应增益限的反Q滤波[J]. 地球物理学报, 2015, 58(7):2525-2535.
|
[14] |
Zhang G L, Lin J, Wang X M, et al. An adaptive gain limit inverse Q filter[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2015, 58(7):2525-2535.
|
[15] |
曹思远, 袁殿. 高分辨率地震资料处理技术综述[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2016, 37(1):112-119.
|
[15] |
Cao S Y, Yuan D. Overview of high-resolution seismic data processing technology[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2016, 37(1):112-119.
|
[16] |
陈爱飞. 基于改进广义S变换的地震波Q值提取及反Q滤波研究[D]. 南昌:东华理工大学, 2017.
|
[16] |
Chen A F. The study on Q value extraction and inverse Q filtering of seismic wave based on improved generalized S transform[D]. Nanchang:East China University of Technology, 2017.
|
[17] |
黄飞. 稳定高效的Q值提取与反Q滤波方法研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2012.
|
[17] |
Huang F. Study on stable and efficient Q extraction and inverse Q filtering[D]. Changchun:Jilin University, 2012.
|
[18] |
李君君, 王志章, 张枝焕, 等. 质心频率线性拟合法估算品质因子Q[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(2):254-259.
|
[18] |
Li J J, Wang Z Z, Zhang Z H, et al. Quality factor Q estimated by linear fitting of centroid frequency[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(2):254-259.
|
[19] |
王东鹤, 陈祖斌, 刘昕, 等. 地震波射线追踪方法研究综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2016, 31(1):344-353.
|
[19] |
Wang D H, Chen Z B, Liu X, et al. Review of research on seismic wave ray tracing methods[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2016, 31(1):344-353.
|
[20] |
严红勇, 刘洋. 地震资料Q值估算与反Q滤波研究综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2011, 26(2):606-615.
|
[20] |
Yan H Y, Liu Y. A review of research on seismic data Q value estimation and inverse Q filtering[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2011, 26(2):606-615.
|
[1] |
YU Dai, HE Zhi-Jun, SUN Yuan, WANG Ying. A comparison of the inverse Q filtering methods based on wavefield continuation[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 42(2): 331-338. |
[2] |
WANG Shan, YU Cheng-Ye, WANG Yun-Zhuan, LIU Ying-Chao. RESEARCHES ON STABILIZED AND EFFECTIVE INVERSE Q FILTERING[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2009, 33(6): 696-699. |
|
|
|
|