|
|
Geochemical characteristics and prospecting potential of Jianchi Town, Shaanxi Province, China based on 1∶25,000 stream sediment survey |
ZHANG Jia-Sheng( ), ZHOU Wei, LI Wei-Liang, QI Xiao-Peng, YANG Jie, WANG Lu |
Sino Shaanxi Nuclear Industry Group Geological Survey Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710100, China |
|
|
Abstract Jianchi Town of Shaanxi Province is located in the Nanjiang foreland-superimposed basin on the northern margin of the Yangtze Plate. To determine the prospecting potential, this study conducted a 1∶25,000 stream sediment survey in the study area. Based on the testing results of 12 elements and compounds closely related to mineralization, namely K2O, Na2O, CaO, MgO, Cl, S, B, Rb, Cs, Li, Br, and I, this study analyzed the geochemical characteristics of these elements and compounds and determined that Li is the major metallogenic element, Li-B-Rb-Cs-K2O is the indicator element association for the prospecting of lithium deposits, and the spatial morphology of Li agrees with that of various geological bodies. By combining the metallogenic geological setting, this study delineated 18 integrated anomalies. Through the follow-up examination of the anomalies, multiple lithium ore bodies (mineralized points) were discovered, indicating that the study area has favorable metallogenic geological and geochemical conditions and great prospecting potential.
|
Received: 16 March 2022
Published: 05 July 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional geological structure map
|
元素 | 测试方法 | 方法检出限 | 行标检出 限要求 | 报出率/% | 精密度 S≤±0.2 | 准确度 ΔlgC≤±0.17 | 内检合 格率/% | 异常检查 合格率/% | K2O | X荧光光谱法 | 0.042 | 0.05 | 98.6 | 0.02~0.05 | 0.01~0.07 | 100 | 96.7 | Na2O | X荧光光谱法 | 0.037 | 0.05 | 100 | 0.01~0.04 | -0.03~0 | 100 | 100 | CaO | X荧光光谱法 | 0.064 | 0.05 | 100 | 0.01~0.02 | -0.01~0 | 100 | 100 | MgO | X荧光光谱法 | 0.030 | 0.05 | 100 | 0.01~0.05 | -0.02~0.02 | 100 | 93.3 | Br | X荧光光谱法 | 0.010 | 1 | 100 | 0.01~0.11 | -0.07~0.05 | 100 | 93.3 | S | X荧光光谱法 | 30 | 50 | 100 | 0.02~0.05 | -0.04~-0.01 | 100 | 100 | Cl | X荧光光谱法 | 20 | 20 | 86.4 | 0.01~0.06 | -0.05~0.02 | 100 | 100 | B | 发射光谱法 | 1 | 5 | 97.9 | 0.01~0.05 | -0.02~0.03 | 100 | 90.0 | Li | 等离子体质谱法 | 1 | 5 | 100 | 0.01~0.06 | -0.02~0.05 | 100 | 100 | Rb | 等离子体质谱法 | 1 | 10 | 100 | 0.01~0.06 | -0.01~0.05 | 100 | 100 | Cs | 等离子体质谱法 | 0.02 | 0.2 | 100 | 0.01~0.06 | 0.01~0.07 | 100 | 96.7 | I | 等离子体质谱法 | 0.010 | 0.5 | 100 | 0.01~0.09 | -0.06~0.04 | 100 | 96.7 |
|
Analytical method and qualityindex
|
元素 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 最小值 | 方差 | 背景值 | 富集系数 | 变异系数 | S | 7253.63 | 415.58 | 34.22 | 385.91 | 400.00 | 1.04 | 0.93 | Cl | 790.58 | 132.61 | 19.99 | 117.24 | 280.00 | 0.47 | 0.88 | K2O | 5.83 | 1.94 | 0.05 | 1.02 | 1.70 | 1.14 | 0.53 | CaO | 56.08 | 27.66 | 1.03 | 17.90 | 3.29 | 8.41 | 0.65 | Na2O | 3.40 | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 2.30 | 0.10 | 1.23 | MgO | 14.46 | 3.72 | 0.16 | 3.57 | 2.80 | 1.33 | 0.96 | Li | 961.67 | 56.04 | 0.80 | 66.14 | 21.00 | 2.67 | 1.18 | Rb | 216.78 | 55.15 | 0.73 | 44.88 | 78.00 | 0.71 | 0.81 | Cs | 29.59 | 3.54 | 0.03 | 3.61 | 1.40 | 2.53 | 1.02 | B | 375.72 | 48.86 | 1.00 | 44.62 | 7.60 | 6.43 | 0.91 | Br | 14.66 | 1.54 | 0.01 | 1.40 | 4.40 | 0.35 | 0.91 | I | 6.90 | 0.37 | 0.01 | 0.55 | 0.60 | 0.62 | 1.48 |
|
Geochemical characteristic values of elements
|
|
R-type cluster analysis pedigree of stream sediments elements
|
|
Distribution map of Li geochemical high background in the study area
|
元素 | 背景值 | 标准差 | 异常下限 | 单元素异常数 | 异常总面积/km2 | 异常总规模 | 浓度分带 | S | 373.50 | 239.86 | 750.00 | 41 | 4.28 | 7.02 | 三级 | Cl | 120.64 | 96.54 | 280.00 | 38 | 6.51 | 9.20 | 二级 | K2O | 1.92 | 0.99 | 3.00 | 55 | 6.29 | 7.65 | 一级 | CaO | 27.66 | 17.90 | 45.00 | 41 | 7.47 | 8.17 | 一级 | Na2O | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.30 | 17 | 9.77 | 23.34 | 三级 | MgO | 3.71 | 3.56 | 8.00 | 44 | 6.47 | 9.14 | 一级 | Li2O | 80.09 | 51.56 | 200.00 | 43 | 6.93 | 13.71 | 三级 | Rb | 54.68 | 44.16 | 120.00 | 32 | 5.80 | 6.95 | 一级 | Cs | 3.29 | 3.10 | 8.00 | 28 | 7.27 | 9.96 | 二级 | B | 41.86 | 31.89 | 95.00 | 47 | 5.79 | 9.20 | 二级 | Br | 1.26 | 0.78 | 2.90 | 36 | 6.66 | 10.85 | 三级 | I | 0.21 | 0.10 | 0.90 | 30 | 4.10 | 9.94 | 三级 |
|
Single-element anomaly lower limit and anomaly characteristic parameters
|
异常编号 | 主成矿元素 浓度分带 | 主成矿元素 变异系数 | 异常规模 | 异常元素 组合特征 | 异常套 合程度 | 异常区地 质背景 | 矿化程度 | 总分 | 评序 | HS09 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 1 | HS12 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 2 | HS13 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 3 | HS06 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 4 | HS14 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 4 | HS03 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 6 | HS01 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 7 | HS08 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 7 | HS10 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 15 | 7 | HS15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 7 | HS18 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 14 | 11 | HS11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 12 | HS05 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 13 | HS16 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 14 | HS07 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 14 | HS04 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 14 | HS17 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 14 | HS02 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 18 |
|
Integrated anomalies rating list
|
|
HS09 integrated anomaly anatomy diagram
|
异常编号 | 异常点数 | 面积/km2 | 异常形态 | 异常走向 | 平均值 | 极大值 | 标准离差 | 衬度 | 变异系数 | 规模 | 浓度分带 | Li17 | 23 | 0.48 | 条带状 | NE | 409.51 | 1368.09 | 265.88 | 2.05 | 0.65 | 0.975 | 三级 | Cl22 | 6 | 0.23 | 不规则 | 近EW | 550.24 | 726.70 | 136.87 | 1.97 | 0.25 | 0.455 | 二级 | Cl25 | 4 | 0.03 | 条带状 | NW | 327.57 | 358.91 | 25.70 | 1.17 | 0.08 | 0.032 | 一级 | S27 | 4 | 0.13 | 条带状 | NW | 1272.26 | 2265.39 | 582.68 | 1.70 | 0.46 | 0.223 | 二级 | S28 | 13 | 0.14 | 不规则 | NE | 1098.14 | 1725.67 | 259.95 | 1.46 | 0.24 | 0.205 | 二级 | B15 | 11 | 0.26 | 不规则 | NE | 163.40 | 291.21 | 54.10 | 0.86 | 0.33 | 0.219 | 一级 | Mg25 | 5 | 0.12 | 条带状 | 近EW | 12.10 | 13.90 | 1.94 | 1.51 | 0.16 | 0.186 | 一级 | Mg30 | 6 | 0.08 | 不规则 | NW | 10.49 | 12.40 | 1.34 | 1.31 | 0.13 | 0.100 | 一级 | K24 | 3 | 0.06 | 不规则 | NE | 3.44 | 3.62 | 0.13 | 1.15 | 0.04 | 0.070 | 一级 | Ca33 | 10 | 0.15 | 不规则 | 近EW | 49.91 | 55.39 | 3.01 | 1.11 | 0.06 | 0.164 | 一级 | I13 | 3 | 0.07 | 不规则 | 近EW | 1.65 | 2.69 | 0.75 | 1.83 | 0.45 | 0.133 | 二级 | Cs4 | 2 | 0.04 | 条带状 | 近EW | 10.24 | 10.26 | 0.02 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.056 | 一级 | Na3 | 1 | 0.02 | 近椭圆 | NW | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0 | 1.57 | 0.00 | 0.026 | 一级 | Rb3 | 3 | 0.02 | 不规则 | NE | 125.68 | 127.88 | 2.87 | 1.05 | 0.02 | 0.020 | 一级 |
|
Comprehensive abnormal eigenvalue statistics of HS09
|
|
DH27 rock geochemical profile
|
|
HS12 integrated anomaly anatomy diagram
|
异常编号 | 异常点数 | 面积/ km2 | 异常形态 | 异常走向 | 平均值 | 极大值 | 标准离差 | 衬度 | 变异系数 | 规模 | 浓度分带 | Li26 | 11 | 0.56 | 不规则 | NE | 609.58 | 1210.62 | 319.37 | 3.05 | 0.52 | 1.715 | 三级 | Cs7 | 9 | 0.43 | 不规则 | NE | 17.45 | 24.22 | 5.32 | 2.18 | 0.30 | 0.942 | 二级 | B19 | 8 | 0.44 | 不规则 | NE | 202.57 | 375.72 | 72.93 | 1.07 | 0.36 | 0.469 | 一级 | Rb5 | 7 | 0.28 | 不规则 | NE | 166.66 | 199.58 | 36.69 | 1.39 | 0.22 | 0.395 | 一级 | I16 | 3 | 0.19 | 不规则 | NW | 1.45 | 1.61 | 0.15 | 1.61 | 0.10 | 0.298 | 一级 | K31 | 6 | 0.18 | 不规则 | NE | 3.81 | 4.39 | 0.36 | 1.27 | 0.09 | 0.233 | 一级 | Na4 | 6 | 0.19 | 不规则 | 近SN | 0.35 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 1.17 | 0.11 | 0.218 | 一级 | Mg33 | 3 | 0.07 | 不规则 | NW | 10.43 | 11.52 | 1.50 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.086 | 一级 |
|
Comprehensive anomaly eigenvalue statistics of HS12
|
|
DH02 rock geochemical profile
|
[1] |
杨卉芃, 柳林, 丁国峰. 全球锂矿资源现状及发展趋势[J]. 矿产保护与利用, 2019, 39(5):26-40.
|
[1] |
Yang H P, Liu L, Ding G F. Present situation and development[J]. Conservation and Utilization of Mineral Resources, 2019, 39(5):26-40.
|
[2] |
屈金芝, 张艳松, 张艳. 新形势下中国锂矿资源供应安全评价[J]. 中国矿业, 2021, 30(12):1-7.
|
[2] |
Qu J Z, Zhang Y S, Zhang Y. Safety evaluation of lithium resources supply in China under the new situation[J]. China Mining Magazine, 2021, 30(12):1-7.
|
[3] |
王学求, 刘汉粮, 王玮, 等. 中国锂矿地球化学背景与空间分布:远景区预测[J]. 地球学报, 2020, 41(6):798-806.
|
[3] |
Wang X Q, Liu H L, Wang W, et al. Geochemical abundance and spatial distribution of lithium in China:Implications for potential prospects[J]. Acta Geoscientica Sinica, 2020, 41(6):798-806.
|
[4] |
刘丽君, 王登红, 刘喜方, 等. 国内外锂矿主要类型、分布特点及勘查开发现状[J]. 中国地质, 2017, 44(2):263-278.
|
[4] |
Liu L J, Wang D H, Liu X F, et al. The main types,distribution features and present situation of exploration and development for domestic and foreign lithium mine[J]. Geology in China, 44(2): 263-278.
|
[5] |
于沨, 王登红, 于扬, 等. 国内外主要沉积型锂矿分布及勘查开发现状[J]. 岩矿测试, 2019, 38(3):354-364.
|
[5] |
Yu F, Wang D H, Yu Y, et al. The distribution and exploration status of domestic and foreign sedimentary-type lithium deposits[J]. Rock and Mineral Analysis, 2019, 38(3):354-364.
|
[6] |
朱丽, 顾汉念, 杨永琼, 等. 黏土型锂矿资源提锂工艺研究进展[J]. 轻金属, 2020, 12:8-13.
|
[6] |
Zhu L, Gu H N, Yang Y Q, et al. Research progress of lithium extraction from clay-type lithium ore resources[J]. Light Metals, 2020, 12:8-13.
|
[7] |
温汉捷, 罗重光, 杜胜江, 等. 碳酸盐黏土型锂资源的发现及意义[J]. 科学通报, 2020, 65:53-59.
|
[7] |
Wen H J, Luo C G, Du S J, et al. Carbonate-hosted clay-type lithium deposit and its prospecting significance[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2020, 65:53-59.
|
[8] |
姚双秋, 庞崇进, 温淑女, 等. 桂西上二叠统合山组富锂黏土岩的发现及意义[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2021, 45(5):951-962.
|
[8] |
Yao S Q, Pang C J, Wen S N, et al. Li-rich claystone in the upper permian heshan formationin western guangxi and its prospecting significance[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2021, 45(5):951-962.
|
[9] |
马圣钞, 王登红, 孙艳, 等. 我国西南部T1/T2粘土岩地质年代学、地球化学特征及其对粘土型锂矿的找矿意义[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(2):427-440.
|
[9] |
Ma S C, Wang D H, Sun Y, et al. Geochronology and geochemical characteristics of lower-middle Triassic clay rock and their significances for prospecting clay-type lithium deposit[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(2):427-440.
|
[10] |
叶小拼. 桂西沉积型锂矿资源潜力分析[J]. 地质与资源, 2020, 29(5):429-434.
|
[10] |
Ye X P. Resource potential analysis of sedimentary lithium deposits in west Guangxi region[J]. Geology and Resources, 2020, 29(5):429-434.
|
[11] |
韩芳林, 张栓厚, 王根宝, 等. 陕西省区域地质志[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2013.
|
[11] |
Han F L, Zhang S H, Wang G B, et al. Regional geology of Shaanxi Province[M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 2013.
|
[12] |
董云鹏, 查显峰, 付明庆, 等. 秦岭南缘大巴山褶皱—冲断推覆构造的特征[J]. 地质通报, 2008, 27(9):1493-1508.
|
[12] |
Dong Y P, Zha X F, Fu M Q, et al. Characteristics of the Dabashan fold-thrust nappe structure at the southern margin of the Qinling,China[J]. Geological Bulletion of China, 2008, 27(9):1493-1508.
|
[13] |
李岩峰, 曲国胜, 刘殊, 等. 米仓山、南大巴山前缘构造特征及其形成机制[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2008, 32(3):286-291.
|
[13] |
Li Y F, Qu G S, Liu S, et al. Structural characters and mechanism in the Micang shan and Southern Daba Shan mountains front[J]. Geotectonica et Metallogenia, 2008, 32(3):286-291.
|
[14] |
陈高潮, 张俊良, 王炬川, 等. 区域地质调查报告(南江市幅)[R]. 陕西省地质调查院, 2008.
|
[14] |
Chen G C, Zhang J L, Wang J C, et al. Regional geological survey report(Nanjiang City)[R]. Shaanxi Institute of Geological Survey, 2008.
|
[15] |
宋小文, 侯满堂, 陈如意. 陕西省成矿区(带)的划分[J]. 西北地质, 2004, 37(3):29-42.
|
[15] |
Song X W, Hou M T, Chen R Y. Division of Shaanxi matellogenic province(belt)[J]. Northwestern Geology, 2004, 37(3):29-42.
|
[16] |
王新宇, 李杰, 凌坤跃, 等. 广西土壤和水系沉积物锂元素时空分布及找矿预测[J]. 桂林理工大学学报, 2021, 41(1):27-33.
|
[16] |
Wang X Y, Li J, Ling K Y, et al. Temporal spatial distribution of lithium in soils and drainage sediments and ore-prospecting significance in Guangxi[J]. Journal of Guilin University of Technology, 2021, 41(1):27-33.
|
[17] |
肖瑞卿, 赵春, 付小方, 等. 四川甘孜甲基卡锂矿地质—地球化学特征和找矿标志[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(6):1156-1165.
|
[17] |
Xiao R Q, Zhao C, Fu X F, et al. A geological-geochemical prospecting model of the Jiajika lithium deposit int Ganzi,Sichuan[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 42(6):1156-1165.
|
[18] |
程涌, 蹇龙, 唐果, 等. 滇东会泽地区下寒武统筇竹寺组黑色岩系微量元素异常特征及成矿意义[J]. 有色金属工程, 2020, 10(12):90-98.
|
[18] |
Cheng Y, Tang L, Tang G, et al. Trace element anomaly characteristics and metallogenic significance of the lower cambrian Qiongzhusi formation from Huize area,eastern Yunnan Province[J]. Nonferrous Metals Engineering, 2020, 10(12):90-98.
|
[19] |
孙社良, 冯增会, 黄孝波, 等. 新疆汉水泉地区水系沉积物测量地球化学特征及找矿方向[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(6):1116-1124.
|
[19] |
Sun S L, Feng Z H, Huang X B, et al. Geochemical characteristics and ore-search prospects of Hanshuiquan area in Xinjiang based on stream sediment survey[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2018, 42(6): 1116-1124.
|
[20] |
陆伟彦, 杜明龙, 纪山青, 等. 河北省卢龙县亮甲峪测区地球化学异常及找矿意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(4):719-726.
|
[20] |
Lu W Y, Du M L, Ji S Q, et al. Geological anomaly characteristics of Liangjiayu area in Hebei Province and their prospecting significance[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(4): 719-726.
|
[21] |
向运川, 牟绪赞, 任天祥, 等. 全国矿产资源潜力评价化探资料应用研究[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2018.
|
[21] |
Xiang Y C, Mou X Z, Ren T X, et al. Application research of the national mineral resource potential evaluation geochemical exploration data[M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 2018.
|
[22] |
戴慧敏, 宫传东, 鲍庆中, 等. 区域化探数据处理中几种异常下限确定方法的对比——以内蒙古查巴奇地区水系沉积物为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(6):782-786.
|
[22] |
Dai H M, Gong C D, Bao Q Z, et al. A comparison of several threshold determination methods in geochemical data processing: A case study of stream sediments in Chabaqi area of Inner Mongolia[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2010, 34(6):782-786.
|
[23] |
陈健, 李正栋, 钟皓, 等. 多种地球化学异常下限确定方法的对比研究[J]. 地质调查与研究, 2014, 37(3):187-192.
|
[23] |
Chen J, Li Z D, Zhong H, et al. Comparison of multiple methods to determine the geochemical anomaly threshold[J]. Geological Survey and Research, 2014, 37(3):187-192.
|
[1] |
WAN Tai-Ping, ZHANG Li, LIU Han-Liang. Regional geochemical characteristics and metallogenic prospect area prediction of strategic mineral antimony in the Eerguna block, Heilongjiang Province, China[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(5): 1179-1188. |
[2] |
JIANG Bing, LIU Yang, WU Zhen, ZHANG De-Ming, SUN Zeng-Bing, MA Jian. Geochemical characteristics of fluorine in irrigation water and soils in the Gaomi area, Shandong Province, China[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(5): 1348-1353. |
|
|
|
|