|
|
The identification of gravity anomaly body based on the convolutional neural network |
Yi-Chen WANG1,2,3, Lin-Tao LIU1,2, Hou-Ze XU1,2 |
1. Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China 2. State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China 3. Collage of Earth and Planetary Sciences,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China |
|
|
Abstract This study combines the deep learning with the identification of gravity anomaly body. Based on the CNN (convolutional neural network) which has been gaining its use in the past several years in the field of image identification, the contour image of gravity signal is taken as the unidentified image, while the space parameters of the gravity anomaly body will be identified through CNN. In the training phase, a large number of the 3D anomaly bodies are generated with random variation of parameters, then the network is fed with parametric labels and the computed gravity contour images. The testing is performed with generated testing models to estimate the performance of the trained model. The trained CNN accuracy shows excellent accuracy in the identifications. Then the CNN model is tested with measured main gravity anomaly data of Kauring area in West Australia, and the identified parameters of the 3D anomaly body are compared with known results. It is shown that the generalization of CNN can handle identification of the measured gravity data.
|
Received: 28 October 2019
Published: 22 April 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
The structure of the CNN
|
|
The structure of CNN used to identify the gravity anomaly bodies
|
|
The loss of CNN during training a—for depth identification;b—for size identification
|
|
The gravity anomaly bodies used in CNN model
|
|
The gravity contour map of testing bodies a—body a;b—body b;c—body c;d—body d
|
模型编号 | 真实深度、线度/m | 识别深度、线度/m | a | 300.0, 200.0 | 307.7, 201.5 | b | 600.0, 200.0 | 621.6, 201.7 | c | 400.0, 252.0 | 398.0, 249.1 | d | 400.0, 252.0 | 392.7, 251.0 |
|
The identified parameters of testing bodies
|
|
The measured main gravity anomaly in Kauring testing ground
|
作者 | 方法类别 | 异常体深度、线度/m | Martinez et al(2012) | 等效源识别 | 250.0, 300.0 | Liu et al.(2015) | 密度反演 | 420.0, 120.0 | 田宇(2019) | 密度反演 | 400, 160 | 本文 | 深度学习识别 | 421.6, 148.8 |
|
Comparison with known results of main gravity anomaly bodies in Kauring
|
[1] |
Reading A M, Cracknell M J, Bombardieri D J , et al. Combining machine learning and geophysical inversion for applied geophysics[J]. ASEG Extended Abstracts, 2019,2015(1):1-5.
|
[2] |
Aster R C, Borchers B, Thurber C H . Parameter estimation and inverse problems[M]. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier, 2005.
|
[3] |
Spichak V, Popova I . Methodology of neural network inversion of geophysical data[J]. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 2005,41(3):241-254.
|
[4] |
Grauch V J S . Detection of cavities and tunnels from gravity data using a neural network[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2018,32(3-4):204-208.
|
[5] |
周洪祥 . 基于神经网络的重力异常反演[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2014.
|
[5] |
Zhou H X . Gravity anomaly inversion based on neural networks[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
|
[6] |
管志宁, 侯俊胜, 黄临平 , 等. 重磁异常反演的拟BP神经网络方法及其应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 1998,41(2):242-251.
|
[6] |
Guan Z N, Hou J S, Huang L P , et al. Inversion of gravity and magnetic anomalies using pseduo-bp neural network method and its application[J]. Journal of Geophysics, 1998,41(2):242-251.
|
[7] |
相鹏 . 基于拟径向基函数神经网络的重力反演方法[C]//2018年中国地球科学联合学术年会, 2018: 933-935.
|
[7] |
Xiang P . Gravity inversion method based on quasi radial basis function neural network[C]//2018 China Geoscience Union Annual Meeting, 2018: 933-935.
|
[8] |
耿美霞, 杨庆节 . 应用RBF神经网络反演二维重力密度分布[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2013,48(4):651-657.
|
[8] |
Geng M X, Yang Q J . 2-D density inversion with the RBF neural network method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting. 2013,48(4):651-657.
|
[9] |
Al-Garni M A . Inversion of residual gravity anomalies using neural network[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2013,6(5):1509-1516.
|
[10] |
Al-Garni M A . Interpretation of spontaneous potential anomalies from some simple geometrically shaped bodies using neural network inversion[J]. Acta Geophysica, 2010,58(1):143-162.
|
[11] |
El-Kaliouby H, Al-Garni M . Inversion of self-potential anomalies caused by 2D inclined sheets using neural networks[J]. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2009,6(1):29-34.
|
[12] |
Ucan O N, Osman O, Albora A M . A new approach for residual gravity anomaly profile interpretations: Forced Neural Network (FNN)[J]. Annals of Geophysics, 2006,49(6):1201-1208.
|
[13] |
任强强, 王跃钢, 腾红磊 , 等. 基于小波神经网络的盲区重力数据预测[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2016,36(4):359-363.
|
[13] |
Ren Q Q, Wang Y G, Teng H L , et al. The gravity data forecast of unmeasurable zone based on wavelet neural network[J]. Journal of Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2016,36(4):359-363.
|
[14] |
Bengio Y, Courville A, Vincent P . Representation learning: a review and new perspectives[D]. Montreal Canada: University of Montreal, 2012.
|
[15] |
周志华 . 机器学习[M]. 北京: 清华大学出版社, 2016.
|
[15] |
Zhou Z H. Machine learning[M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2016.
|
[16] |
Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A. Deep Learning[M]. Boston: MIT Press, 2016.
|
[17] |
Dan Cireş D, Meier U, Schmidhuber J. Multi-column deep neural networks for image classification [C]// Providence, USA: 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012: 3642-3649.
|
[18] |
Cun L, Boser Y, Denker B , et al. Back-propagation applied to Handwritten Zip-code recognition[J]. Neural Computation-NECO, 1992,1(4), 541-551.
|
[19] |
Fukushima K . Neocognitron[J]. Scholarpedia, 2007: 1(2):1717.
|
[20] |
Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton G. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks [C]// New York: ACM, 2012: 84-90.
|
[21] |
Szegedy C, Liu W, Jia Y, et al. Going deeper with convolutions [C]//Boston: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015: 1-9.
|
[22] |
Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H , et al. ImageNet large scale visual recognition challenge[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2014,115(3), 211-252.
|
[23] |
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition [C]//Boston: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016: 770-778.
|
[24] |
Ciresan D, Meier U, Masci J, et al. Flexible, high performance convolutional neural networks for image classification [C]// Barcelona: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2011: 1237-1242.
|
[25] |
Levi G, Hassnet T. Age and gender classification using convolutional neural networks [C]//Boston: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2015: 34-42.
|
[26] |
Laina I, Rupprecht C, Belagiannis V, et al. Deeper depth prediction with fully convolutional residual networks [C]//Boston: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016: 239-248.
|
[27] |
Martinez C, Li Y. Understanding gravity gradiometry processing and interpretation through the Kauring test site data [C]// Brisbane: 22nd International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, 2012: 26-29.
|
[28] |
Liu J Z, Liu L T, Liang X H , et al. 3D density inversion of gravity gradient data using the extrapolated Tikhonov regularization[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2015,12(2):137-146.
|
[29] |
田宇, 柯小平, 王勇 . 利用航空重力梯度反演Kauring试验场三维密度结构[J]. 武汉大学学报:信息科学版, 2019,44(4):501-509.
|
[29] |
Tian Y, Ke X P, Wang Y . Inversion of three-dimensional density structure using airborne gradiometry data in Kauring test site[J]. Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University, 2019,44(4):501-509.
|
[1] |
WU Guo-Pei, ZHANG Ying-Ying, ZHANG Bo-Wen, ZHAO Hua-Liang. The calculation of full-region apparent resistivity of central loop TEM based on deep learning[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(3): 750-757. |
[2] |
ZHANG Yong, MA Xiao-Dong, LI Yan-Jing, CAI Jing-Shun. The application of deep learning to the shale gas content prediction in Nanchuan(South Sichuan)[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(3): 569-575. |
|
|
|
|