|
|
Characteristics of sand body development of Lower Cretacteous Huachi-Huanhe Formation in Haoran Qaidam area on the northern and western margin of Ordos Basin |
Xu-Liang WU1,2( ), Yong-Qiang WU1,2, Mao LI1,2( ) |
1. Airborne Survey and Remote Sensing Center of Nuclear Industry,Shijiazhuang 050002,China 2. CNNC Key Laboratory for Geophysical Exploration Technology Center of Uranium Resource,Shijiazhuang 050002,China |
|
|
Abstract Haoran Qaidam region is located in the western part of Hanggin Banner. According to the analysis of previous work, there exists great potential for prospecting in the lower Cretacteous Huachihuanhe Formation. Based on CSAMT sounding data obtained along five lines in 2019 and combined with geological and drilling data, the authors analyzed the sand body development characteristics of Huachihuanhe Formation. The research results show that the sand bodies in this area are well developed and widely distributed, with a roof buried depth of about 200 m, a thickness of 400~700 m, a local thickness of 750 m, and a NW strike. The overall development and distribution characteristics are thin in the northeast and thick in the middle southwest. The result obtained by the authors provides deep geological information for the layout of drilling projects.
|
Received: 21 October 2019
Published: 28 August 2020
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Mao LI
E-mail: Xuliang16@126.com;lm703@126.com
|
|
|
|
|
Geological map and survey line arrangement diagram of study area
|
地层 | 岩性 | 样本数 | ρ/(Ω·m) | 第四系 | 冲洪积物、砂砾石、风积物 | 30 | 40.0 | 下白垩统 | 泥岩 | 72 | 14.0 | 中砂岩 | 72 | 21.0 | 粗砂岩 | 78 | 24.4 | 砾岩 | 69 | 40.4 | 延安组 | 泥岩、粉砂岩 | 62 | 10.4 | 砂岩 | 61 | 16.0 | 钙质砂岩 | 38 | 18.60 | 煤 | 45 | 117.0 |
|
Statistical table of different rocks of resistivity
|
钻孔 | 地层 | K1lh | K1hc+h | K1l | J2a | J2z | J2y | ZKW2019-1 | 37.64 | 51.20 | 29.26 | × | × | × | ZK5-1 | 33.28 | 45.48 | 38.26 | 14.24 | 17.77 | 29.11 | ZKY2017-2 | 24.97(未分组) | 缺失 | 7.66 | 25.52 | ZKY2017-3 | 25.59(未分组) | 缺失 | 9.39 | 22.84 |
|
Statistical table of different rocks of resistivity(Ω·m)
|
|
Comparison of different initial inversion tests for 13.0~18.0 km on Y19K05 line a—1-D modeling and 2-D moving average resistivity;b—2-D moving average resistivity model;c—uniform half-space resistivity model;1—Luohandong Group; 2—Huachi huanhe Group; 3—Luohe Group; 4—Anding Group; 5—Zhiluo Group; 6—Yanan Group; 7—stratigraphic boundary; 8—driling and numbering
|
|
Geological interence interpretation cross section of inverted resistivity with horizontal distance of 10.4~14.0 km on Y19K03 Line
|
|
Contour plan of sand body thickness of Lower Cretaceous Huachi-Huanhe Formation in the research area
|
[1] |
刘忠厚, 丁万烈. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部1∶50万砂岩型铀矿成矿地质条件研究及编图总结报告[R]. 核工业二〇八大队, 2002
|
[1] |
Liu H Z, Din W L. Study on metallogenic conditions of 1∶500 000 sandstone Uranium in Northerm ordos basin and Compilation report[R]. 208 Brigade of Nuclear Industry, 2002.
|
[2] |
李茂, 杜建农. CSAMT法在砂体探测中的应用初探[J]. 铀矿地质, 2008,33(4):302.
|
[2] |
Li M, Du J L. Application of CSAMT in sand body detection[J]. Uranium Geology, 2008,33(4):302.
|
[3] |
李茂, 杜建农, 余水泉. CSAMT法在松辽盆地四平地区铀矿勘查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2006,30(4):298-302.
|
[3] |
Li M, Du J L, Yu S Q. Application of CSAMT in uranium exploration in siping area of Songliao Basin[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exporation, 2006,30(4):298-302.
|
[4] |
吴柏林, 张婉莹, 宋子升, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部砂岩型铀矿物地球化学特征及成因意义[J]. 地质学报, 2016,90(12):3394-3395.
|
[4] |
Wu B L, Zhang W Y, Song Z S, et al. Geochemical characteristics and genetic significance of sandstone-type uranium deposits in northern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016,90(12):3394-3395.
|
[5] |
夏菲, 孟华, 聂逢军, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地纳岭沟铀矿床绿泥石特征及地质意义[J]. 地质学报, 2016,90(12):3473-3476.
|
[5] |
Xia F, Meng H, Nian F J, et al. Chlorite characteristics and geological significance of Nalinggou uranium deposit in Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016,90(12):3473-3476.
|
[6] |
张龙, 吴柏林, 刘池洋, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部砂岩型铀矿直罗组物源分析及其铀成矿意义[J]. 地质学报, 2016,90(12):3441-3443.
|
[6] |
Zhang L, Wu B L, Liu C Y, et al. Formation of sandstone-type uranium deposits in northern Ordos Basin and its uranium metallogenic significance[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016,90(12):3441-3443.
|
[7] |
陈超, 刘洪军, 侯慧群, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部直罗组黄铁矿与砂岩型铀矿化关系研究[J]. 地质学报, 2016,90(12):3375-3377.
|
[7] |
Cheng C, Liu H J, Hou H Q, et al. Uranium mineralization in Zhiluo Formation of sandstone-type uranium deposits in northern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2016,90(12):3375-3377.
|
[8] |
李怀渊, 伍显红. 鄂尔多斯盆地白土井地区音频大地电磁测量报告[R]. 核工业航测遥感中心, 2007.
|
[8] |
Li H Y, Wu X H. Audio magnetotelluric survey report in Baitu well area of Ordos Basin[R]. Nuclear Industry Aerial Survey Remote Sensing Center, 2007.
|
[9] |
李茂, 张俊伟, 伍显红, 等. SCS2D程序反演参数的应用效果分析[J]. 铀矿地质, 2010,26(5):382-384.
|
[9] |
Li M, Zhang J W, Wu X H, et al. Application effect analysis of inversion parameters of SCS2D program[J]. Uranium Geology, 2010,26(5):382-384.
|
[10] |
刘波, 吴旭亮, 李茂, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘巴音青格利地段盖层地电结构特征[J]. 矿产与地质, 2019,33(4):678-680.
|
[10] |
Liu B, Wu X L, Li M, et al. Geoelectric structure characteristics of cap rock in Bayin Qinggeli Section on Northern Margin of Odos Basin[J]. Minerals and Geology, 2019,33(4):678-680.
|
[11] |
苗爱生, 郭虎科. 内蒙古自治区杭锦旗大营矿区铀矿普查报告[R]. 核工业二〇八大队, 2013.
|
[11] |
Miao A S, Guo H K. Uranium mine survey report of Daying mining area in Hangjinqi,Inner Mongolia autonomous Region[R]. 208 Brigade of Nuclear Industry, 2013.
|
[12] |
李茂, 祁程. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘伊和乌素地区可控源音频大地电磁测量报告[R]. 核工业航测遥感中心, 2019.
|
[12] |
Li M, Qi C. Controlled source audio magnetotelluric survey report in Yihe Wusu area,Northern Margin of Ordos Basin[R]. Nuclear Industry Aerial Survey Remote Sensing Center, 2019.
|
[1] |
LI Di-Quan, XIAO Jiao-Yu, ZHANG Ji-Feng, HU Yan-Fang, LIU Zui-Liang, ZHANG Xin. Comparison of application effects of WFEM and CSAMT in water-rich area of Xinyuan Coal Mine[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(5): 1359-1366. |
[2] |
YU Yong-Peng, YAN Zhao-Tao, MAO Xing-Jun, YANG Yan-Cheng, MA Yong-Xiang, HUANG Peng-Cheng, LU Ai-Guo, ZHANG Guang-Bing. The application of the comprehensive electric and seismic method to coal exploration in the huge Cenozoic coverage area[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(5): 1231-1238. |
|
|
|
|