Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2019, Vol. 43 Issue (3): 618-625    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2019.1292
  方法研究·仪器研制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
地震波逆时偏移中两种成像条件应用效果对比
宋宗平1, 陈可洋2, 杨微3, 李来林2, 吴清岭2, 范兴才2
1. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探事业部,黑龙江 大庆 163453
2. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 勘探开发研究院,黑龙江 大庆 163712
3. 中国石油大庆油田有限责任公司 第六采油厂,黑龙江 大庆 163712
Comparison of the application effect of two imaging conditions in seismic wave reverse time migration
Zong-Ping SONG1, Ke-Yang CHEN2, Wei YANG3, Lai-Lin LI2, Qing-Ling WU2, Xing-Cai FAN2
1. PetroChina Exploration Business Department of Daqing Oilfield Co.,Ltd.,Daqing 163453,China
2. PetroChina Exploration and Development Research Institute of Daqing Oilfield Co.,Ltd.,Daqing 163712,China
3. No. 6 Oil Production Company of Daqing Oilfield Co.,Ltd.,Daqing 163712,China
全文: PDF(5099 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

成像条件是实现地震波场准确成像的关键环节,而优化逆时成像条件在改善逆时成像应用效果中的作用尤为明显。为此,从零井源距和非零井源距脉冲响应出发,系统对比了常规相关法逆时成像条件和基于行波分离法逆时成像条件的逆时偏移脉冲响应波场差异,分析了逆时偏移低波数噪声的成因机理及波场规律,同时以复杂断陷理论模型和SZ工区实际三维地震资料为例,系统对比了两种逆时成像条件的成像应用效果。研究结果表明,采用基于行波分离法逆时成像条件的成像结果能够有效衰减逆时偏移低波数背景噪声,恢复掩盖在这种背景噪声之下的有效地震成像信息,地层细节刻画更加清晰,这可为当前复杂波场和复杂构造高精度地震成像提供方法指导。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
宋宗平
陈可洋
杨微
李来林
吴清岭
范兴才
关键词 逆时偏移成像条件脉冲响应理论模型实际资料低波数噪声    
Abstract

Imaging condition is the key to realizing accurate imaging of seismic wave field,and optimizing reverse-time imaging condition is especially important in improving the application of reverse-time migration method.For this reason,based on the impulse response of zero offset and non-zero offset,this paper compares the reverse-time imaging condition based on one-way wave separation with conventional reverse-time imaging condition in detail.On the basis of the complex theory model and the real 3D seismic data of SZ working area,the imaging effects of two kinds of reverse-time imaging conditions are compared.The results show that the imaging results of the reverse-time imaging condition based on one-way wave separation can effectively attenuate the low wave number background noise,restore the effective seismic imaging information concealed under this background noise,and the stratigraphic details are characterized more clearly.These results can provide guidance for the high precision seismic imaging of complex wave fields and complex structures.

Key wordsreverse-time migration    imaging condition    impulse response    model study    seismic data    low wave number noise
收稿日期: 2018-07-27      出版日期: 2019-05-31
:  P631.4  
基金资助:中国石油天然气股份公司重大科技专项“大庆油田原油4000万吨持续稳产关键技术研究”(2011E-1203)
作者简介: 宋宗平(1963-),男,汉族,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地震勘探技术研究。Email: songzongping@petrochina.com.cn
引用本文:   
宋宗平, 陈可洋, 杨微, 李来林, 吴清岭, 范兴才. 地震波逆时偏移中两种成像条件应用效果对比[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(3): 618-625.
Zong-Ping SONG, Ke-Yang CHEN, Wei YANG, Lai-Lin LI, Qing-Ling WU, Xing-Cai FAN. Comparison of the application effect of two imaging conditions in seismic wave reverse time migration. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 43(3): 618-625.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2019.1292      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2019/V43/I3/618
Fig.1  2种逆时成像条件零偏移距脉冲响应对比
a—层状介质模型零偏移距观测系统;b—采用常规逆时成像条件对应的脉冲响应;c—采用基于行波分离法逆时成像条件对应的脉冲响应
Fig.2  2种逆时成像条件有偏移距逆时偏移脉冲响应对比
a—层状介质模型有偏移距观测系统;b—采用常规逆时成像条件对应的脉冲响应;c—采用基于行波分离法逆时成像条件对应的脉冲响应
Fig.3  不同逆时成像条件理论模型单炮逆时偏移结果
a—复杂构造速度模型;b—正演模拟单炮记录;c—常规逆时成像条件单炮偏移结果;d—基于行波分离法逆时成像条件单炮偏移结果
Fig.4  不同逆时成像条件理论模型逆时偏移叠加结果
a—常规逆时成像条件偏移叠加结果;b—基于行波分离法逆时成像条件偏移叠加结果
Fig.5  松辽盆地SZ工区不同逆时成像条件实际资料逆时偏移结果对比
a—常规逆时成像条件偏移叠加结果;b—基于行波分离法逆时成像条件偏移叠加结果
[1] 陈可洋 . 高阶弹性波波动方程正演模拟及逆时偏移成像研究[D]. 大庆:大庆石油学院, 2009.
[1] Chen K Y . High-order elastic wave equation forward modeling and reverse-time migration[D]. Daqing:Daqing Petroleum Institute, 2009.
[2] Claerbout J F . Imaging the Earth’s Interior[D].Palo Alto: Blackwell Scientific Publications Inc., 1985.
[3] Baysal E, Kosloff D D , Sherwood J W C.Reverse time migration[J]. Geophysics, 1983,48(11):1514-1524.
doi: 10.1190/1.1441434
[4] 陈可洋 . 基于高阶有限差分的波动方程叠前逆时偏移方法[J]. 石油物探, 2009,48(5):475-478.
[4] Chen K Y . Wave equation pre-stack reverse-time migration scheme based on high-order finite-difference[J]. Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum, 2009,48(5):475-478.
[5] Liu G, Liu Y, Li R , et al. 3D seismic reverse time migration on GPGPU[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2013a,59:17-23.
[6] 康玮, 程玖兵 . 叠前逆时偏移假象去除方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012,27(3):1163-1172.
doi: 10.6038/j.issn.1004-2903.2012.03.041
[6] Kang W, Cheng J B . Methods of suppressing artifacts in prestack reverse time migration[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012,27(3):1163-1172.
[7] Chen K . Anisotropic analysis of difference approximation in seismic wave numerical modeling[J]. Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum, 2010,49(1):19-22.
[8] 杨仁虎, 常旭, 刘伊克 . 叠前逆时偏移影响因素分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010,53(8):1902-1913.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5733.2010.08.016
[8] Yang R H, Chang X, Liu Y K . The influence factors analyses of imaging precision in pre-stack reverse time migration[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010,53(8):1902-1913.
[9] Chang W , McMechan G A.3D acoustic prestack reverse-time migration[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1990,38(7):737-756.
doi: 10.1111/gpr.1990.38.issue-7
[10] 陈可洋 . 逆时成像技术在大庆探区复杂构造成像中的应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2017,29(6):91-100.
[10] Chen K Y . Reverse-time migration technology for complex structure imaging of Daqing exploration area[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2017,29(6):91-100.
[11] Wang Y, Liang W, Nashed Z , et al. Seismic modeling by optimizing regularized staggered-grid finite-difference operators using a time-space-domain dispersion-relationship preserving method[J]. Geophysics, 2014,79:T277-T285.
doi: 10.1190/geo2014-0078.1
[12] Zhang H, Zhang Y. Reverse time migration in 3D heterogeneous TTI media [C]//SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2008: 2196-2200.
[13] Zhao Y, Liu Y, Ren Z . Visco acoustic prestack reverse time migration based on the optimal time-space domain high-order finite difference method[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2014,11(1):50-62.
doi: 10.1007/s11770-014-0414-8
[14] Xu S, Zhang Y, Tang B . 3D angle gathers from reverse time migration[J]. Geophysics, 2011,76(2):S77-S92.
doi: 10.1190/1.3536527
[15] 王保利, 高静怀, 陈文超 , 等. 逆时偏移中用Poynting矢量高效地提取角道集[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013,56(1):262-268.
doi: 10.6038/cjg20130127
[15] Wang B L, Gao J H, Chen W C , et al. Extracting efficiently angle gathers using Poynting vector during reverse time migration[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013,56(1):262-268.
[16] Zhang J, Yao Z . Optimized finite difference operator for broadband seismic wave modeling[J]. Geophysics, 2013,78:A13-A18.
doi: 10.1190/geo2012-0277.1
[17] 许璐, 孟小红, 刘国峰 . 逆时偏移去噪方法研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012,27(4):1548-1556.
[17] Xu L, Meng X H, Liu G F . Reverse time migration and removing artifacts[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012,27(4):1548-1556.
[18] 陈可洋 . 松辽盆地地震资料小面元叠前插值逆时偏移处理[J]. 油气藏评价与开发, 2015,5(4):12-16.
[18] Chen K Y . Seismic data small bin pre-stack reverse-time migration processing in Songliao Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2015,5(4):12-16.
[19] Chen K, Chen S, Li L , et al. Numerical experiments on the elastic wave united pre-stack reverse-time migration[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2014,53(1):8-16.
[20] Chen K . Study on perfectly matched layer absorbing boundary condition[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2010,49(5):472-477.
[21] Chen K . Evaluation on the bordering method of the absorbing boundary condition[J]. Journal of the Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2010,27(2):170-175.
[22] Wang B, Chen J, Chen W . Efficient boundary storage strategies for seismic reverse time migration[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012,55(7):2412-2421.
[23] Chen K, Fan X, Wu Q , et al. Improvement of reverse-time migration precision with seismic wave pre-stack interpolation processing and application[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2013,52(4):409-416.
[24] 王娟, 李振春, 陶丽 . 逆时偏移成像条件研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012,27(3):1173-1182.
doi: 10.6038/j.issn.1004-2903.2012.03.042
[24] Wang J, Li Z C, Tao L . The research on imaging condition of reverse time migration[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012,27(3):1173-1182.
[25] Chen K . Time-limited time-shift correlation pre-stack reverse-time image condition and its application[J]. Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum, 2010,50(1):22-26.
[26] 陈可洋 . 基于波场分离和角度域衰减的地震波叠前逆时成像条件[J]. 计算物理, 2016,33(2):205-211.
[26] Chen K Y . Seismic wave pre-stack reverse-time migration imaging condition based on one-way wave field separation and angle domain attenuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Computational Physics, 2016,33(2):205-211.
[27] 徐兴荣, 王西文, 王宇超 , 等. 基于波场分离理论的逆时偏移成像条件研究及应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2012,27(5):2084-2090.
[27] Xu X R, Wang X W, Wang Y C , et al. Study and application of imaging condition for reverse-time migration based on wave-fields separation[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2012,27(5):2084-2090.
[28] 陈康, 吴国忱 . 逆时偏移拉普拉斯算子滤波改进算法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2012,47(2):249-255.
doi:
[28] Chen K, Wu G C . An improved filter algorithm based on Laplace operator in reverse-time migration[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2012,47(2):249-255.
[29] 丁亮, 刘洋 . 逆时偏移成像技术研究进展[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2011,26(3):1085-1100.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2011.03.039
[29] Ding L, Liu Y . Progress in reverse time migration imaging[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2011,26(5):1085-1100.
[30] Di Bartolo L, Dors C, Mansur W J . A new family of finite-difference schemes to solve the heterogeneous acoustic wave equation[J]. Geophysics, 2012,77:T187-T199.
doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0345.1
[31] Liu S, Wang H, Chen S , et al. Implementation strategy of 3D reverse time migration on GPU/CPU clusters[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013b,56(10):3487-3496.
[32] Chen K, Wu Q, Fan X , et al. Study on seismic wave pre-stack reverse-time migration’s impulse response and its application[J]. Geophysical Prospecting For Petroleum, 2013,52(2):163-170.
[33] Symes W W. Reverse time migration with optimal check pointing[J].Geophysics, 2007, 72:SM213-SM221.
doi: 10.1190/1.2742686
[34] 陈可洋 . 地震波逆时偏移方法研究综述[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2010,33(3):153-159.
[34] Chen K Y . Reviews on seismic wave reverse-time migration methods[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2010,33(3):153-159.
[1] 段莹, 张高成, 谭雅丽. 泌阳凹陷高陡构造带地震成像[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 981-989.
[2] 刘炜, 王彦春, 毕臣臣, 徐仲博. 基于优化交错网格有限差分法的VSP逆时偏移[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(6): 1368-1380.
[3] 陈紫静, 陈清礼. 瞬变电磁的逆时偏移成像方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(6): 1415-1419.
[4] 张文伟, 底青云, 耿启立, 雷达, 王中兴, 缪佳佳. 基于数字递归陷波的多通道瞬变电磁法周期噪声去除研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(2): 278-289.
[5] 马振, 孙成禹, 彭鹏鹏, 姚振岸. 速度误差和地震噪声对最小二乘逆时偏移的影响分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(2): 329-338.
[6] 龚俊波, 王洪华, 王敏玲, 罗泽明. 逆时偏移在探地雷达数据处理中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(4): 835-842.
[7] 郭旭, 黄建平, 李振春, 黄金强, 朱峰. 基于行波分离的VTI介质逆时偏移[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(1): 100-109.
[8] 许璐. 地震数据炮域规则化方法研究及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(6): 1245-1252.
[9] 李金丽, 曲英铭, 刘建勋, 李振春, 王凯, 于博. 三维黏声最小二乘逆时偏移方法模型研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(5): 1013-1025.
[10] 彭鹏鹏, 孙成禹, 马振, 李文静. 近地表散射体波场特征分析及成像[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(5): 990-998.
[11] 李金丽, 曲英铭, 刘建勋, 岳航羽, 李培, 陈德元. 天然气水合物储层弹性波最小二乘逆时偏移研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(6): 1050-1059.
[12] 张丽美, 成谷. 参数组合优化的随机边界条件及其在地震RTM中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(5): 890-898.
[13] 杨国权, 李河昭, 徐文才, 王红振, 刘泽民. TI介质一种稳定的标量波方程及其逆时偏移[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(6): 1237-1243.
[14] 王连坤, 方伍宝, 段心标, 胡光辉, 李振春, 万弘. 基于互相关误差泛函的最小二乘逆时偏移方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(5): 980-985.
[15] 刘建辉, 夏同星, 郭军, 周学锋. 浅层气对下伏地层深度预测影响定量研究及在渤海B油田中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(4): 763-770.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com