Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2024, Vol. 48 Issue (2): 443-450    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2024.1251
  方法研究·信息处理·仪器研制 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
不同方位各向异性反演技术对比和总结
梁志强(), 李弘
中石化石油物探技术研究院有限公司,江苏 南京 211103
Comparison and summary of different azimuthal anisotropy-based inversion techniques
LIANG Zhi-Qiang(), LI Hong
Geophysical Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,SINOPEC,Nanjing 211103,China
全文: PDF(3440 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

随着“两宽一高”地震采集技术的发展,基于方位各向异性理论的叠前P波裂缝反演技术的应用也越来越多。方位各向异性反演可以得到裂缝方位和裂缝强度,但是不同的反演技术得到的表征裂缝强度的参数各不相同,反演结果也常常有所差异,因此就造成了裂缝各向异性反演结果的不唯一性,进而造成谁才是“正确的”这种困惑和疑问。本文从Thomsen各向异性理论出发,通过裂缝模型(Hudson薄币模型、Schoenberg线性滑动模型)之间的相互关系,在不同的裂缝反演技术(VVAZ、Ruger近似和傅立叶级数)中建立各向异性的参数联系,给出了不同方位各向异性裂缝反演结果的真实含义和数学表达,并对不同反演技术与裂缝模型参数之间的联系进行了总结,进一步深化了方位各向异性裂缝反演的研究,为基于“两宽一高”数据开展大规模的裂缝检测奠定坚实的理论和技术基础。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
梁志强
李弘
关键词 方位各向异性裂缝反演VVAZRuger近似傅立叶级数    
Abstract

The progress in seismic acquisition techniques characterized by wide azimuths,wide frequency bands,and high densities has greatly promoted the application of the prestack P-wave fracture inversion technique based on the azimuthal anisotropy theory.Azimuthal anisotropy-based inversion can yield the azimuths and intensities of fractures.However,different inversion techniques yield different parameters for fracture intensity characterization,resulting in inconsistent inversion results.Consequently,the azimuthal anisotropy-based inversion results of fractures are non-unique,leading to confusion about accurate results.Based on the Thomsen anisotropy theory,as well as the interrelationships between fracture models(the Hudson coin model and the Schoenberg linear sliding model),this study established the connections of anisotropic parameters between different fracture inversion techniques(VVAZ,Ruger's approximation,and Fourier series),presenting the real meanings and mathematical expressions of results from different azimuthal anisotropy-based fracture inversion techniques.Additionally,this study summarized the relationships of parameters between different inversion techniques and fracture models,further deepening the research on azimuthal anisotropy-based fracture inversion.This study lays solid theoretical and technical foundations for large-scale fracture detection based on the seismic data obtained using the seismic acquisition techniques featuring wide azimuths,wide frequency bands, and high densities.

Key wordsazimuthal anisotropy    fracture inversion    VVAZ    Ruger's approximation    Fourier series
收稿日期: 2023-06-19      修回日期: 2024-01-15      出版日期: 2024-04-20
ZTFLH:  P631.4  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目“海相深层油气富集机理与关键工程技术基础研究”(U19B6003)
作者简介: 梁志强(1980-),男,硕士,高级工程师,现主要从事与复杂储层预测及油藏描述相关的研究工作。Email:liangzq.swty@sinopec.com
引用本文:   
梁志强, 李弘. 不同方位各向异性反演技术对比和总结[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(2): 443-450.
LIANG Zhi-Qiang, LI Hong. Comparison and summary of different azimuthal anisotropy-based inversion techniques. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2024, 48(2): 443-450.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2024.1251      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I2/443
Fig.1  HTI介质模型
Fig.2  Hudson薄硬币形状裂缝模型
Fig.3  线性滑动模型
Fig.4  VVAZ与AVAZ反演结果频率谱结果对比
Fig.5  利用AVAZ预测裂缝的技术流程
Fig.6  Ruger近似(a)与傅立叶系数算法(b)展开对比
Fig.7  Ruger近似与傅立叶系数页岩气应用对比(据Downton修编[12])
技术类型
属性参数
时差类 振幅类
VVAZ Ruger近似 傅立叶级数
数据 旅行时 振幅 振幅
属性类型 层间 界面 界面
各向异性方位
(裂缝方位)
明确的 90°误差 明确的
各向异性结果
(裂缝强度)
V p _ f a s t - V p _ s l o w V p _ f a s t Bani BaniΔTΔN
参数关系 Thomsen -δ ΔεΔTΔN ΔεΔTΔN
线性滑动
模型
ΔTΔN
的加权和
ΔTΔN
的加权差分
ΔTΔN
薄币模型 ε和Ω ΔεΔΩ ΔεΔΩ
分辨率 较低 较高
Table 1  方位各向异性裂缝反演技术对比汇总
[1] 曲寿利, 季玉新, 王鑫, 等. 全方位P波属性裂缝检测方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2001, 36(4):390-397.
[1] Qu S L, Ji Y X, Wang X, et al. Seismic method for using full-azimuth P wave attribution to detect fracture[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2001, 36(4):390-397.
[2] 梁志强. 面向AVAZ反演的解释性处理技术在裂缝预测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37(5):1977-1984.
[2] Liang Z Q. Application of interpretive processing techniques for AVAZ inversion in fracture prediction[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2022, 37(5):1977-1984.
[3] Bale R, Wright C. Compensation for shear-wave anisotropy effects above a heavy oil reservoir[C]// Calgary: 2009 CSPG CSEG CWLS GeoConvention,2009.
[4] Kendall R, Wikel K. Multicomponent time-lapse monitoring of bitumen recovery and geomechanical implications[C]//San Antonio:SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2011.
[5] 梁志强, 王世星, 郝奇. 基于TTI介质的P波剩余时差裂缝检测技术正演模拟研究[J]. 石油物探, 2013, 52(4):347-353.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2013.04.003
[5] Liang Z Q, Wang S X, Hao Q. Forward simulation of P-wave residual time difference crack detection technology based on TTI medium[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2013, 52(4):347-353.
[6] Davison C, Ratcliffe A, Grion S, et al. Azimuthal velocity uncertainty:Estimation and application[C]//San Antonio:SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2011.
[7] Tsvankin I. Reflection moveout and parameter estimation for horizontal transverse isotropy[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(2):614-629.
doi: 10.1190/1.1444170
[8] Pech A, Tsvankin I, Grechka V. Quartic moveout coefficient:3D description and application to tilted TI media[J]. Geophysics, 2003, 68(5):1600-1610.
doi: 10.1190/1.1620634
[9] Rüger A. Reflection coefficients and azimuthal AVO analysis in anisotropic media[D]. Center for Wave Phenomena,Colorado School of Mines,1996.
[10] Rüger A, Tsvankin I. Using AVO for fracture detection:Analytic basis and practical solutions[J]. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(10):1429-1434.
doi: 10.1190/1.1437466
[11] Rüger A. Reflection coefficients and azimuthal AVO analysis in anisotropic media[M].Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2002.
[12] Downton J, Russell H. Azimuthal Fourier coefficients:A simple method to estimate fracture parameters[C]//San Antonio:SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2011. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 2011.
[13] 陈怀震, 印兴耀, 张金强, 等. 基于方位各向异性弹性阻抗的裂缝岩石物理参数反演方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(10):3431-3441.
doi: 10.6038/cjg20141029
[13] Chen H Z, Yin X Y, Zhang J Q, et al. Seismic inversion for fracture rock physics parameters using azimuthally anisotropic elastic impedance[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014, 57(10):3431-3441.
[14] 陈怀震. 基于岩石物理的裂缝型储层叠前地震反演方法研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学, 2015.
[14] Chen H Z. Study on methodology of pre-stack seismic inversion for fractured reservoirs based on rock physics[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum(East China), 2015.
[15] Delbecq F, Downton J, LetiziaA M. A math-free look at azimuthal surface seismic techniques[J]. CSEG Recorder, 2013, 38(1):20-31.
[16] Thomsen L. Weak elastic anisotropy[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(10):1954-1966.
doi: 10.1190/1.1442051
[17] Hudson J A. Wave speeds and attenuation of elastic waves in material containing cracks[J]. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 1981, 64(1):133-150.
[18] Schoenberg M. Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces[J]. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1980, 68(5):1516-1521.
doi: 10.1121/1.385077
[19] Hsu C J, Schoenberg M. Elastic waves through a simulated fractured medium[J]. Geophysics, 1993, 58(7):964-977.
doi: 10.1190/1.1443487
[20] Schoenberg M, Douma J. Elastic wave propagation in media with parallel fractures and aligned cracks1[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1988, 36(6):571-590.
doi: 10.1111/gpr.1988.36.issue-6
[21] Teng L. Seismic and rock-physics characterization of fractured reservoirs[D]. USA: Stanford University,1998.
[22] Bakulin A, Grechka V, Tsvankin I. Estimation of fracture parameters from reflection seismic data—Part I:HTI model due to a single fracture set[J]. Geophysics, 2000, 65(6):1788-1802.
doi: 10.1190/1.1444863
[23] 梁志强. 面向AVAZ反演的解释性处理技术在裂缝预测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2022, 37(5):1977-1984.
[23] Liang Z Q. Application of interpretive processing techniques for AVAZ inversion in fracture prediction[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2022, 37(5):1977-1984.
[24] 舒梦珵. 改进的AVAZ方法在裂缝型储层预测中的应用研究[J]. CT 理论与应用研究, 2017, 26(1):45-52.
[24] Shu M C. The application of improved AVAZ method in predicting the fractured reservoir[J]. CT Theory and Applications, 2017, 26(1):45-52.
[25] Ikelle L T. 19 amplitude variations with azimuths(AVAZ) inversion based on linearized inversion of common azimuthal sections[M]//Seismic Anisotropy. Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 1996:601-644.
[26] Sayers C M, Dean S. Azimuth-dependent AVO in reservoirs containing non-orthogonal fracture sets[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2001, 49(1):100-106.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00236.x
[27] 肖鹏飞, 王世星, 曲寿利, 等. 倾角对裂缝密度反演的影响分析[J]. 石油物探, 2009, 48(6):544-551.
[27] Xiao P F, Wang S X, Qu S L, et al. Analysis on the impact of dip on fracture density inversion[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2009, 48(6):544-551.
[28] 张雪莹, 孙鹏远, 马学军, 等. 正交各向异性介质反射系数精确解[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2020, 55(5):1060-1072.
[28] Zhang X Y, Sun P Y, Ma X J, et al. Exact solution of reflection coefficient of orthotropic media[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2020, 55(5):1060-1072.
[1] 党青宁, 崔永福, 陈猛, 赵锐锐, 刘伟明, 李勇军. OVT域叠前裂缝预测技术——以塔里木盆地塔中ZG地区奥陶系碳酸盐岩为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(2): 398-404.
[2] 孙炜, 王彦春, 李梅, 杨锐, 郭海华, 李玉凤. 利用叠前地震数据预测火山岩储层裂缝[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(2): 229-232.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com