Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  1984, Vol. 8 Issue (5): 297-304    
  论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
中朝板块晚古生代的古地磁特征
林万智, 邵济安, 赵章元
北京大学地质学系
PALEOMAGNETIC FEATURES OFSINO-KOREA PLATE IN LATE PALEOZOIC ERA
Lin Wanzhi, Shao Jian, Zhao Zhangyuan
Department of Geology, Beijing University
全文: PDF(479 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

中朝板块及其北部的西伯利亚板块,是亚洲东部晚古生代的两大古板块。近年来的地质工作陆续发现,在中朝板块之北侧的索伦山—二连以东地区,存在着晚古生代的大洋壳残余。这表明,在晚古生代的一个时期中,中朝古板块和西伯利亚古板块之间曾一度被大洋所隔。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
关键词 藏东三江区域地球化学成矿带远景区    
Abstract

/With a view to further ascertaining tie relative position of the Sino-Korea Plate in late Paleozoic Era and investigating the migration of various plates in Asia, a total of 70 paleomagnetic hand specimens of Carboniferous and Permian sediments were collected along the Qiligou section and the West Valley (Due-rping) section at Xishan, Taiyuan on Shanxi anteclise which, lying in the middle of the North China Platform, were relatively stable during the late evolution stage of the platform. These hand specimens were cut into 140 samples which, after being subjected to heating demagnetization, were measured for remanent magnetization one by one. The average magnetization, paleolatitude and paleopole for every sampling site were thus obtained.The data acquired indicate the following facts. (1) Average paleolatitude of sampling sites during Permian was 24.9° and the difference in latitude between Sino-Korea Plate and Siberia Plate at that time was about 1200km larger than the present difference; paleolatitude in Carboniferous was averagely 16.2° and the difference in latitude between these two plates was some 2100km larger than the present difference. It is tentatively presumed that the Sino-Korea Plate must have lain within low-latitude area in late Paleozoic, in the process of migration from low latitude to high latitude. (2) The formerly-defined Permian strata are of negative polarity with the exception of the middle portion of Shiqianfeng Formation which possesses positive polarity. This formation, according to a comparison of documents available, is preliminarily assigned to Triassic.

Key words"Sanjiang area"    in eastern Tibet    regional geochemistry    metallogenic belt    prospect area.
     出版日期: 1984-10-24
引用本文:   
林万智, 邵济安, 赵章元. 中朝板块晚古生代的古地磁特征[J]. 物探与化探, 1984, 8(5): 297-304.
Lin Wanzhi, Shao Jian, Zhao Zhangyuan. PALEOMAGNETIC FEATURES OFSINO-KOREA PLATE IN LATE PALEOZOIC ERA. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1984, 8(5): 297-304.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y1984/V8/I5/297

[1] 黄汲清等,1981,中国大地构造及其演化,科学出版社,P.46.
[2] M .W. McElhinny(澳),1973, Palaeomagnetism and plate Tectornics,Cambridge University Press,London, P.252-270.
[3] 成都地质学院,1961,地质学,工业出版社。
[4] D.H.塔林(英),1978,古地磁学原理和应用,科学出版社。
[5] P. D. Stacey(澳)and S. K. Banerjee(美),1974,The Phqsical Principles of Rock Magnetism. Elsevict, Amsterdam, P66-95 121-127.
[6] 徐世浙,1982,古地磁学概论,地展出版社。
[7] 永田武(日),1953,岩石磁学。地质出版社,P.179-195.
[8] 张文治、李普,1980,中国蓟县展旦亚界的古地磁特征,中国地质科学院(天津地矿所分刊)第一卷第一期。
[9] M.杨诺夫斯基(苏),1978,地磁学,地质出版社,P.160-180.
[10] M. W. McElhinny,B. J.J.Embleton, X. H. Ma&z.k. zhang, Fragmentation of Asia in the Permian,from Natures Vot 293, 1981, P,212-216.
[11] A. H.赫拉莫夫等(苏),1961,古地磁的研究方法,科学出版社,1965.

[1] 奚小环, 侯青叶, 杨忠芳, 叶家瑜, 余涛, 夏学齐, 成杭新, 周国华, 姚岚. 基于大数据的中国土壤背景值与基准值及其变化特征研究——写在《中国土壤地球化学参数》出版之际[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1095-1108.
[2] 黄大正, 陈守余, 赵江南, 吴帅吉, 张毓策. 云南个旧老厂矿田东部大比例尺构造地球化学特征及找矿预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(6): 1261-1275.
[3] 陈挺, 严迪, 余舟, 瞿辰, 冉中禹, 邱隆君. 盐源盆地重力异常解释推断及成盐远景区预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1125-1134.
[4] 翁望飞, 王德恩, 王邦民, 丁勇, 王拥军. 安徽省祁门—黟县地区水系沉积物地球化学特征及找矿方向[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(1): 1-12.
[5] 王晓东, 李祥新, 宫进忠, 史玲玲. 京津冀基岩区地热资源远景的地球化学区划[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(6): 1246-1253.
[6] 王长城. 大地电磁测深法用于快速评价新生代盆地盐类矿床成矿远景区的初步试验[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(5): 997-1002.
[7] 张健, 余学中, 李逸川. 武当隆起西北缘淋滤型绿松石成矿远景区预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(2): 273-280.
[8] 孙社良, 冯增会, 黄孝波, 曾凡淼, 张献河, 牛建忠, 朱昌杰, 陈士海. 新疆汉水泉地区水系沉积物测量地球化学特征及找矿方向[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(6): 1116-1124.
[9] 张辉, 马庆, 宋贺民, 王占彬, 王兵, 牛学瑶. 地球化学定量预测法在区域矿产调查中的应用——以新疆比勒提地区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(5): 857-865.
[10] 王美丁, 马见青. 青海循化地区高精度磁异常特征及找矿预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(3): 491-498.
[11] 李伟, 刘翠辉, 贺根文, 温珍连, 陈琪. 壤中汞气测量在于都营脑隐伏矿产勘查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(5): 840-845.
[12] 郭友钊, 张振海, 张杰, 李磊. 北山成矿带黑山铜镍硫化物矿区物性特征及其找矿意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(4): 662-666.
[13] 胡树起, 贾玲珑, 刘国庆. 大兴安岭成矿带成矿远景地球化学调查评价之设想与建议[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(5): 843-852.
[14] 谢顺胜, 蔡水库, 舒晴, 张前, 朱耀河, 林清. 海南岛及周边海域1:10万航磁勘查成果[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(2): 225-234.
[15] 陈力子, 刘满年, 杨拴海, 杨高学, 魏立勇, 孙彪. 秦昆结合部塔秀—曲什安地区水系沉积物测量地球化学特征及找矿方向[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(5): 897-903.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com