牛东地区砂砾岩储层测井层内非均质性评价

doi:10.11720/wtyht.2024.1146

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF(8129 KB) HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

牛东地区砂砾岩储层具有低孔、低渗等特征,储层结构复杂,非均质性较强,常规测井对储层类型划分困难,影响了储层评价精度。岩心孔渗、薄片分析、X衍射等测试资料表明,牛东地区砂砾岩储层具有较强的非均质性,且根据毛管压力形态可将储层分为3个类别。本次研究利用电成像测井资料对储层层内非均质性进行评价:首先对电成像测井资料进行处理得到储层孔隙度谱,再对随深度变化的孔隙度谱进行研究,分别计算不同深度上孔隙度谱的均值、方差、洛伦兹系数和集中程度函数;根据综合概率模型,利用层次分析法确定评价指标的权重,得到储层非均质性综合指数,据此对储层进行划分,并建立储层非均质性的评价标准。应用该方法得到的研究结果与压汞实验结果一致,说明利用该方法能够有效地评价储层非均质性,可丰富现有的储层非均质性评价方法,为储层的精细评价提供一定的理论支撑。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	周军
	边会媛
	陈文安
	张迪
	刘国良
	王飞

关键词 ：电成像测井, 非均质性评价, 压汞曲线, 洛伦兹系数, 储层分类

Abstract：

Glutenite reservoirs in the Niudong area exhibit low porosity and permeability, intricate reservoir structures, and pronounced heterogeneity, making it difficult to classify the reservoirs using conventional logs and further impairing reservoir evaluation accuracy. As indicated by the data from core porosity and permeability tests, thin-section analysis, and X-ray diffraction tests, the glutenite reservoirs in the Niudong area feature high heterogeneity and can be classified into three types based on capillary pressure morphologies. This study evaluated the intralayer heterogeneity of the reservoirs using electrical imaging logs. First, reservoir porosity spectra were derived from the electrical imaging logs. Then, the averages, variances, Lorenz coefficients, and concentration functions of the porosity spectra of different depths were calculated by analyzing these depth-varying porosity spectra. Based on the integrated probability model, the weights of evaluation indices were determined through hierarchical analysis, obtaining the composite index of reservoir heterogeneity. Accordingly, the reservoirs were classified, and the evaluation criteria for reservoir heterogeneity were established. The results of this study were consistent with the results of mercury injection experiments. The method used in this study proves effective in reservoir heterogeneity evaluation, enriching current methods for reservoir heterogeneity evaluation and providing theoretical support for fine-scale reservoir evaluation.

Key words： electrical imaging log heterogeneity evaluation mercury injection curve Lorentz coefficient reservoir classification

收稿日期: 2023-04-10 修回日期: 2023-06-09 出版日期: 2024-02-20

ZTFLH:

P631.84

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(42304143);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划(2022JM-147)

通讯作者: 边会媛(1986-),女,副教授,主要从事复杂储层测井精细解释及岩石物理研究的教学与研究工作。Email:smilebianhuiyuan@126.com

作者简介: 周军(2000-),男,硕士研究生,研究方向:测井评价与岩石物理研究。Email:akzhoujun@126.com

引用本文:

周军, 边会媛, 陈文安, 张迪, 刘国良, 王飞. 牛东地区砂砾岩储层测井层内非均质性评价[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(1): 142-150.
ZHOU Jun, BIAN Hui-Yuan, CHEN Wen-An, ZHANG Di, LIU Guo-Liang, WANG Fei. Log-based evaluation of intralayer heterogeneity of glutenite reservoirs in the Niudong area. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2024, 48(1): 142-150.

链接本文:

https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2024.1146 或 https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I1/142

Fig.1 柴达木盆地牛东地区侏罗系构造位置及岩性柱状图

Fig.2 侏罗纪储层岩性特征

Fig.3 侏罗纪储层孔隙类型特征

Fig.4 侏罗纪储层孔渗分布

Fig.5 孔隙度谱形态结构

Fig.6 牛东地区牛X井3340~3370 m砂砾岩孔隙度谱

Fig.7 洛伦兹系数计算示意

Table 1 判断矩阵标度定义

Table 2 参数权重的配对比较矩阵

Fig.8 牛X井侏罗纪储层非均质性评价结果

Fig.9 牛X井岩心压汞毛管压力曲线

储层类型	岩性	$孔隙度范围平均值 / %$	$渗透率范围平均值 / 10 - 3 μ m 2$	洛伦兹系数	集中程度函数	综合概率函数	非均质性程度
I	泥质长石岩屑砂岩	$7.9 ~ 9.8 8.3$	$0.3 ~ 0.8 0.6$	≤0.1	≤0.001	≤0.07	弱
Ⅱ	砾质长石岩屑砂岩	$7.1 ~ 8.2 7.5$	$0.28 ~ 0.7 0.42$	0.1~0.15	0.001~0.002	0.07~0.2	一般
Ⅲ	含泥砾不等粒砂岩	$5.3 ~ 7.2 6.6$	$0.04 ~ 0.3 0.2$	>0.15	>0.002	>0.2	强

Table 3 综合概率值划分储层类型

[1]	吴海光, 康逊, 秦明阳, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷百口泉组砂砾岩非均质储层孔隙结构特征与成因[J]. 中南大学学报: 自然科学版, 2022, 53(9):3337-3353.
[1]	Wu H G, Kang X, Qin M Y, et al. Pore structure characteristics and genesis of heterogeneous conglomerate reservoir of Baikouquan Formation in Mahu Sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Central South University:Science and Technology, 2022, 53(9):3337-3353.
[2]	陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 等. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1):22-31.
[2]	Chen X J, Liu Z D, Liu Y X, et al. Research into the pore structure of tight reservoirs:A review[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1):22-31.
[3]	吴元燕, 陈碧珏. 油矿地质学[M]. 2版. 北京: 石油工业出版社,1996.
[3]	Wu Y Y, Chen B J. Petroleum geology[M]. 2th ed. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,1996.
[4]	裘怿楠. 油气储层评价技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社,1993.
[4]	Qiu Y N. Evaluation technology of oil and gas reservoir[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press,1993.
[5]	Yang S S, Huang X R, Yin C, et al. Intra-layer heterogeneity of sandstone with different origins in deep-water environment and its causes[J]. Sustainable Computing:Informatics and Systems, 2019, 21:10-18. doi: 10.1016/j.suscom.2018.11.003
[6]	曹江骏, 罗静兰, 马迪娜·马吾提汗, 等. 微观非均质性对砂砾岩储层致密化的影响机理:以准噶尔盆地东道海子凹陷DN8井区上二叠统梧桐沟组为例[J]. 地球科学, 2021, 46(10):3435-3452.
[6]	Cao J J, Luo J L, Madina M, et al. Influence mechanism of micro-heterogeneity on conglomerate reservoir densification:A case study of upper Permian Wutonggou formation in DN₈ area of dongdaohaizi sag,Junggar Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2021, 46(10):3435-3452.
[7]	严科, 杨少春, 任怀强. 储层宏观非均质性定量表征研究[J]. 石油学报, 2008, 29(6):870-874,879. doi: 10.7623/syxb200806015
[7]	Yan K, Yang S C, Ren H Q. Research on quantitative characterization of macroscopic heterogeneity of reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2008, 29(6):870-874,879. doi: 10.7623/syxb200806015
[8]	边会媛, 韩博华, 王飞, 等. 柴北缘牛东地区砂砾岩储层特征及分类评价[J]. 西安科技大学学报, 2020, 40(5):894-901.
[8]	Bian H Y, Han B H, Wang F, et al. Characteristics and classification of glutenite reservoirs in Niudong area,north margin of Qaidam Basin[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology, 2020, 40(5):894-901.
[9]	李海燕, 岳大力, 张秀娟. 苏里格气田低渗透储层微观孔隙结构特征及其分类评价方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(2):133-140.
[9]	Li H Y, Yue D L, Zhang X J. Characteristics of pore structure and reservoir evaluation of low permeability reservoir in Sulige gas field[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2):133-140.
[10]	袁红旗, 邓馨雨, 杜会尧, 等. 柳江盆地二叠系山西组露头致密砂岩储层非均质性表征方法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2023, 44(2):468-479.
[10]	Yuan H Q, Deng X Y, Du H Y, et al. Characterizing the heterogeneity of tight sandstone in outcropped Permian Shanxi Formation,Liujiang Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(2):468-479.
[11]	杨少春. 储层非均质性定量研究的新方法[J]. 石油大学学报:自然科学版, 2000, 24(1):53-56,5.
[11]	Yang S C. A new method for quantitatively studying reservoir heterogeneity[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum,China, 2000, 24(1):53-56,5.
[12]	田瀚, 杨敏. 碳酸盐岩缝洞型储层测井评价方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(3):545-552.
[12]	Tian H, Yang M. The logging evaluation methods for fractured-vuggy carbonate reservoirs[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 39(3):545-552.
[13]	崔裔曈, 王祝文, 徐方慧, 等. 基于斯通利波及电成像测井数据对火成岩裂缝地层的特征分析[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2022, 52(2):624-632.
[13]	Cui Y T, Wang Z W, Xu F H, et al. Analysis of fracture formation characteristics of igneous rock based on stoneley wave and electrical imaging logging[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2022, 52(2):624-632.
[14]	Aghli G, Moussavi-Harami R, Mohammadian R. Reservoir heterogeneity and fracture parameter determination using electrical image logs and petrophysical data:A case study,carbonate Asmari Formation,Zagros Basin,SW Iran[J]. Petroleum Science, 2020, 17(1):51-69. doi: 10.1007/s12182-019-00413-0
[15]	侯振学, 于雪娴, 李东旭, 等. 电成像测井处理新技术在储层评价方面的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2020, 35(2):573-578.
[15]	Hou Z X, Yu X X, Li D X, et al. Application of new processing technology of electrical imaging logging in reservoir evaluation[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020, 35(2):573-578.
[16]	李昌, 司马立强, 沈安江, 等. 电成像测井储层非均质性评价方法在川东北G地区FC段地层的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(2):725-732.
[16]	Li C, Sima L Q, Shen A J, et al. The application of the reservoir heterogeneity evaluate method with microresistivity image log in FC formation of G region in northeastern Sichuan[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(2):725-732.
[17]	蔺敬旗, 孟鑫, 李晴晴, 等. 砾岩储层电成像测井表征方法及应用——以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷砾岩油藏为例[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2022, 50(2):126-131.
[17]	Lin J Q, Meng X, Li Q Q, et al. Characterization method and application of electrical imaging logging in conglomerate reservoir:A case study in Mahu Sag of Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2022, 50(2):126-131.
[18]	徐凤银, 彭德华, 侯恩科. 柴达木盆地油气聚集规律及勘探前景[J]. 石油学报, 2003, 24(4):1-6. doi: 10.7623/syxb200304001
[18]	Xu F Y, Peng D H, Hou E K. Hydrocarbon accumulation and exploration potential in Qaidam Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2003, 24(4):1-6.
[19]	左程吉, 王祝文, 向旻, 等. 基于电成像测井孔隙度分析技术的火山岩孔隙径向非均质性研究[J]. 石油物探, 2016, 55(3):449-454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2016.03.016
[19]	Zuo C J, Wang Z W, Xiang M, et al. The radial pore heterogeneity of volcanic reservoir based on the porosity analysis of micro-electric imaging logging[J]. Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 2016, 55(3):449-454. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2016.03.016
[20]	王宇竹, 潘保芝, 郭宇航. 致密砂岩储层的相渗特征与岩电参数的关系研究[J]. 世界地质, 2017, 36(4):1277-1283.
[20]	Wang Y Z, Pan B Z, Guo Y H. Relationship between relative permeability and electrical parameters of tight sandstone reservoirs[J]. Global Geology, 2017, 36(4):1277-1283.
[21]	张帆, 高明, 陈国军, 等. 电成像孔隙度谱在砂砾岩有效储层识别的应用[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(2):488-495.
[21]	Zhang F, Gao M, Chen G J, et al. Application of electrical imaging logging porosity spectrum in identification of effective reservoir in sandy conglomeratic reservoirs[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(2):488-495.
[22]	岳崇旺, 杨小明, 钟晓勤, 等. 利用测井曲线的洛伦兹系数评价地层的非均质性[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2015, 45(5):1539-1546.
[22]	Yue C W, Yang X M, Zhong X Q, et al. Evaluation of formation heterogeneity using Lorentz coefficient of logging curves[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2015, 45(5):1539-1546.
[23]	王志仁, 吴辉碇, 吴德星. 集中程度函数及其初步应用[J]. 海洋学报, 2001, 23(2):40-45.
[23]	Wang Z R, Wu H D, Wu D X. Concentrative function and its primary application[J]. Acta Oceanologica Sinica, 2001, 23(2):40-45.
[24]	黄捍东, 刘徐敏, 蔡燕杰, 等. 综合利用测井—地震方法识别火成岩裂缝[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2015, 50(5):942-950,805-806.
[24]	Huang H D, Liu X M, Cai Y J, et al. Igneous rock fracture prediction with well logging and seismic data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(5):942-950,805-806.

[1]	冯进, 赵冰, 张占松, 张超谟. 珠江口盆地惠州凹陷储层测井产能分级与识别方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(1): 81-87.
[2]	郭怀志, 潘保芝, 刘文斌, 张明杨. 利用直线型四探针法刻度微电阻率成像测井电阻率[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(4): 715-718.
[3]	钟广法, 祁兴中, 马勇, 张永忠, 柳建华, 杜寻社. 电成像测井资料在裂缝成因分析中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2005, 29(2): 116-118.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed