REN Zhi-Ping1,2, LI Xiu1, QI Zhi-Peng1, ZHAO Wei1, ZHI Qing-Quan1, LIU Lei1
1. School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710054, China;
2. School of Electronic Engineering, Xi'an Shiyou University, Xi'an 710065, China
In view of the problem that the traditional calculation of surface nuclear magnetic resonance (SNMR) excitation field seldom considers various three-dimensional subsurface electric properties and different forms of launcher, the authors carried out surface NMR three-dimensional finite element modeling which premeditates the impact of a conductive medium. First, based on the three-dimensional finite element method, the authors realized the calculation of surface NMR excitation field under the condition of inhomogeneous medium. An approximate function was adopted to replace field source, so that it could be applied to different cases of transmitter loop. Then, the vertical component of excitation field was obtained through rotation matrix. Finally, the NMR response under different conditions was calculated. Several typical models were designed to analyze the effect of cap rock resistivity, formation resistivity, inhomogeneous medium and transmitter coil posture on SNMR signal. Numerical simulation shows that nuclear magnetic resonance is not sensitive to the change of the high cap rock resistivity. Low formation resistivity has great effect on SNMR response. The larger the inhomogeneous medium, the greater the SNMR response. For a certain size of the local inhomogeneous body, the difference between the SNMR response curves under the condition of low resistance is obvious. The coil posture should be considered in the field because it considerably impacts the NMR signal, and the coil orientation should be considered because the influence of the coil orientation on the magnetic signal is greater than electrical parameters.
[1] 许小强,程顺有. 地球物理找水方法概述[J]. 地下水,2007,29(3):28-29.
[2] 林君. 核磁共振找水技术的研究现状与发展趋势[J]. 地球物理学进展,2010,25(2):681-691.
[3] Braun M, Yaramanci U. Inversion of resistivity in magnetic resonance sounding[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics,2008,66(3):151-164.
[4] Braun M, Hertrich M, Yaramanci U. Study on complex inversion of magnetic resonance sounding signals[J]. Near Surface Geophysics,2005,3(3):155-163.
[5] Hertrich M, Braun M, Yaramanci U. Magnetic resonance soundings with separated transmitter andreceiver loops[J]. Near Surface Geophysics,2005,3(3):141-154.
[6] Hertrich M, Yaramanci U. Joint inversion of surface nuclear magnetic resonance and vertical electrical sounding[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics,2002,50(1):179-191.
[7] Vouillamoz J, Chatenoux B, Mathieu F, et al. Efficiency of joint use of MRS and VES to characterize coastal aquifer in Myanmar[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics,2007,61(2):142-154.
[8] 林君,蒋川东,段清明,等. 复杂条件下地下水磁共振探测与灾害水源探查研究进展[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版,2012(5):1560-1570.
[9] 孙淑琴,赵义平,林君,等. 用地面核磁共振方法评估含水层涌水量的实例[J]. 地球物理学进展,2008,23(4):1317-1321.
[10] 孙淑琴,林君,张世雄. 导电性对地面核磁共振信号的影响研究[J]. 物探化探计算技术,2005(2):127-130.
[11] 林君,蒋川东,林婷婷,等.地下工程灾害水源的磁共振探测研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2013(11):3619-3628.
[12] 翁爱华,王雪秋,刘国兴,等. 导电性影响的地面核磁共振反演[J]. 地球物理学报,2007,50(3):890-896.
[13] 翁爱华,李舟波,王雪秋. 层状导电介质中地面核磁共振响应特征理论研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2004,47(1):156-163.
[14] 戴苗,胡祥云,吴海波,等. 地面核磁共振找水反演[J]. 地球物理学报,2009,52(10):2676-2682.
[15] 万玲,林婷婷,林君,等. 基于自适应遗传算法的MRS-TEM联合反演方法研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2013,56(11):3728-3740.
[16] Herrmann R B. SH-wave generation by dislocation sources-a numerical study[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1979,69(1):1-15.
[17] 蒋川东,林君,段清明,等. 二维阵列线圈核磁共振地下水探测理论研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2011,54(11):2973-2983.