Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2016, Vol. 40 Issue (1): 174-178    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2016.1.31
  中国地球科学联合学术年会煤炭资源与矿山安全地球物理专题 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
瞬变电磁B场参数测试效果
赵育刚1, 薛国强2,3, 黄申硕1, 陆占国1, 崔江伟2,3, 侯东洋2,3
1. 北京桔灯地球物理勘探有限公司, 北京 102200;
2. 中国科学院矿产资源研究重点实验室, 北京 100029;
3. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所, 北京 100029
Test and analysis of TEM B field parameter
ZHAO Yu-Gang1, XUE Guo-Qiang2,3, HUANG Shen-Shuo1, LU Zhan-Guo1, CUI Jiang-Wei2,3, HOU Dong-Yang2,3
1. Beijing Orangelamp Geophysical Exploration Co., Ltd., Beijing 102200;
2. Key Laboratory of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100029;
3. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029
全文: PDF(7750 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

传统的瞬变电磁信息获取方式大多采用空芯线圈和磁芯线圈形式,用以测量磁场随时间变化率,但是晚期信号往往较弱,不利于分辨异常。笔者开展了直接测量瞬变电磁法磁场参数的模拟和实测效果分析研究。首先通过对B场和dB/dt参数的响应特性分析,认为B场参数在晚期探测方面具有一定的优越性;分别采用澳大利亚产SM24瞬变电磁系统(磁通门磁探头,直接测量B场)和GDP-32仪器(感应线圈,测量感应电压)进行了实测数据的对比,在同样瞬变电磁观测装置情况下,发现采用磁通门传感器所测量B场数据比采用感应线圈测量的二次感应电压数据效果较好,即:磁通门传感器的特征频率相对较低(往往小于1 kHz),衰减速度慢,磁场B数据与磁场变化率dB/dt场数据的幅值范围较大,受低阻覆盖层影响程度小,有利于晚期测量。研究结果表明开发和使用磁通门传感器是解决瞬变电磁精细探测的突破方向之一。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract

In normal TEM sounding,the parameter of secondary induced voltage V signal is collected by using magnetic induced coil;however,the late signal is usually too weak to identify deep buried target.In this paper,direct measuring of B field parameters is used to test its practical effect.Firstly,from the response of B field and dB/dt and numerical calculation of different models,we can see that the B field has superiority in late time detection.Then the SM24 TEM system which is used to measure B field and the GDP-32 system which is adopted to measure induced voltage are compared with each other.With the same observation parameters,B field data are more superior than induced voltage data.The characteristic frequency of fluxgate sensor is relatively low and it decays slow.In addition,the amplitude of B field data is larger than that of dB/dt data.This means is favorable for measurement in late time because the influence of low resistivity covered layer on it is relatively low.The results show that developing and using fluxgate sensor is an important direction to resolve fine TEM exploration.

收稿日期: 2015-11-07      出版日期: 2016-02-10
:  P631  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金项目(41474095)

作者简介: 赵育刚(1974-),男,主要从事应用地球物理装备技术推广工作。
引用本文:   
赵育刚, 薛国强, 黄申硕, 陆占国, 崔江伟, 侯东洋. 瞬变电磁B场参数测试效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(1): 174-178.
ZHAO Yu-Gang, XUE Guo-Qiang, HUANG Shen-Shuo, LU Zhan-Guo, CUI Jiang-Wei, HOU Dong-Yang. Test and analysis of TEM B field parameter. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2016, 40(1): 174-178.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2016.1.31      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2016/V40/I1/174

[1] 蒋邦远.实用近区磁源瞬变电磁法勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.

[2] 李貅,薛国强.瞬变电磁法拟地震偏移成像研究[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.

[3] 牛之琏.时间域电磁法原理[M].长沙:中南大学出版社,2007.

[4] Levy G M.Correction of measured transient electromagnetic responses for finite transmitter turn-off duration[M].1984.

[5] Mc Cracken K G,Oristaglio M L,Hohmann G W.A comparison of electromagnetic exploration systems[J].Geophysics,1986,51(3):810-818.

[6] Sarma D G,Maru V M,Varadarajan G.An improvedbpulse transient airborne electromagnetic system for locating goodv conductors[J].Geophysics,1976,41(2):287-299.

[7] Eaton P A,Hohmann G W.An evaluation of electromagnetic methods in the presence of geologic noise[J].Geophysics,1987,52(8):1106-1126.

[8] Smith R S,Annan A P.The use of B field measurements in an airborne time-domainsystem Part I:Acomparison of B field with dB=dt measurements[J].Exploration Geophysics,1998,29(3):24-29.

[9] Wolfgram P,Thomson S.The use of B field measurements in an airborne time-domain system-Part Ⅱ:Examples in conductive regimes[J].Exploration Geophysics,1998,29(5):225-229.

[10] Duckworth K,O'Neill D.Detection of a brine conductor under an oil field by means of a fixed transmitter electromagnetic survey using a squid magnetometer[J].Exploration Geophysics,1989,25(1):61-73.

[11] Richard Smith,Peter Annan.Using an induction coil sensor to indirectly measure the B field response in the bandwidth of the transient electromagnetic method[J].Geophysics,2000,65(5):1489-1494.

[12] James.Experience with SQUID magnetometers in airborne TEM surveying Exploration[J].Geophysics,2002,67(2):009-013.

[13] 陈晓东,赵毅,张杰,等.高温超导磁强计在瞬变电磁法中的应用研究[J].地球物理学报,2012,55(2):702-708.

[14] 王赤军,陈晓东,赵毅,等.77K SQUID磁强计在TEM测量上的应用研究[J].地球物理学报,1999,41(S1):161-166.

[15] 李貅.瞬变电磁测深的理论与应用[M].西安:陕西科学技术出版社,2002.

[1] 陈秀娟, 刘之的, 刘宇羲, 柴慧强, 王勇. 致密储层孔隙结构研究综述[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 22-31.
[2] 肖关华, 张伟, 陈恒春, 卓武, 王艳君, 任丽莹. 浅层地震技术在济南地下空间探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 96-103.
[3] 石磊, 管耀, 冯进, 高慧, 邱欣卫, 阙晓铭. 基于多级次流动单元的砂砾岩储层分类渗透率评价方法——以陆丰油田古近系文昌组W53油藏为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 78-86.
[4] 陈大磊, 王润生, 贺春艳, 王珣, 尹召凯, 于嘉宾. 综合地球物理探测在深部空间结构中的应用——以胶东金矿集区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 70-77.
[5] 周能, 邓可晴, 庄文英. 基于线性放电法的多道脉冲幅度分析器设计[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 221-228.
[6] 吴燕民, 彭正辉, 元勇虎, 朱今祥, 刘闯, 葛薇, 凌国平. 一种基于差分接收的电磁感应阵列探头的设计与实现[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 214-220.
[7] 王猛, 刘媛媛, 王大勇, 董根旺, 田亮, 黄金辉, 林曼曼. 无人机航磁测量在荒漠戈壁地区的应用效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 206-213.
[8] 张化鹏, 钱卫, 刘瑾, 武立林, 宋泽卓. 基于伪随机信号的磁电法渗漏模型试验[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 198-205.
[9] 张建智, 胡富杭, 刘海啸, 邢国章. 煤矿老窑采空区地—井TEM响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 191-197.
[10] 张宇哲, 孟麟, 王智. 基于Gmsh的起伏地形下井—地直流电法正演模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 182-190.
[11] 马德志, 王炜, 金明霞, 王海昆, 张明强. 海上地震勘探斜缆采集中鬼波产生机理及压制效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 175-181.
[12] 张洁. 基于拉伸率的3DVSP道集切除技术及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 169-174.
[13] 丁骁, 莫思特, 李碧雄, 黄华. 混凝土内部裂缝对电磁波传输特性参数的影响[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 160-168.
[14] 崔瑞康, 孙建孟, 刘行军, 文晓峰. 低阻页岩电阻率主控因素研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 150-159.
[15] 陈亮, 付立恒, 蔡冻, 李凡, 李振宇, 鲁恺. 基于模拟退火法的磁共振测深多源谐波噪声压制方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 141-149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com