Uneven electric body near the ground surface interferes the target field, which is called static effect that is regarded as one of the noises of deep exploration. In order to deeply understand the static effect, the authors simulated respectively the ground surface responses of axial and asides observation methods on the conditions of taking homogeneous earth as model background and Cagniard apparent resistivity as explanation parameter. Some conclusions have been reached:(1) The effects of static characteristics of the two observation methods are consistent. (2) The interference is maximum for measuring points above the anomaly body. On the contrary, the interference is minimum for the points which stay away from the anomaly body. (3) Low resistivity abnormal body causes the contours of the interference area to become concave. The resistivity is lower. High resistivity abnormal body causes the contours of the interference area to become convex. However, changes of contours into convexity are not obvious although the resistivity of anomaly body is enlarged. Both low resistivity abnormal body and high one cause the mid-low frequency contours to become nearly erect in the interference area; (4) The static effect of low resistivity causes the standard curve to be parallel downward in mid-low frequency, but in high frequency the extent of the standard curve paralleling downward depends on low resistivity value, the lower the resistivity is, the less parallel the standard curve downward is, because of stronger electromagnetic induction for lower abnormal body which is superimposed upon the static effect. However, the static effect of high resistivity causes the standard curve parallel upward in full frequency, which is consistent with previous conclusions. The results can provide a reference for the identification and improvement of static effect correction algorithm and hence has a certain theoretical and practical value.
胡瑞华, 林君, 孙彩堂, 刘长胜, 周逢道. 均匀大地CSAMT静态效应模拟及其特征研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(6): 1150-1155.
HU Rui-Hua, LIN Jun, SUN Cai-Tang, LIU Chang-Sheng, ZHOU Feng-Dao. Simulation of CSAMT static effect and research on its characteristics in homogeneous earth. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 39(6): 1150-1155.
[1] Nabighian M N. Electromagnetic method in applied geohpysics(1):Theory[C]//Society of Exploration Geophysicists. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1992.[2] 朴化荣.电磁测深原理[M].北京:地质出版社,1990.[3] Cagniard L. Basic theory of the magnetotelluric methods of geophysical prospecting[J].Geophysics,1953,18:605-635.[4] 汤井田,何继善.可控源音频大地电磁法及其应用[M].长沙:中南大学出版社,2005.[5] 陈明生.对频率电磁测深静态效应问题的再探讨[J].煤田地质与勘探, 2013,41(6):74-77.[6] Zhdanov M S,Golubev N G,Spiehak V V. The construction of effective methods for electromagnetic modeling[J]. Geophysics,1982,68:623-638.[7] 屈有恒,张贵宾,晋风明.倾斜线源的三维电场数值模拟研究[J].物探化探计算技术, 2007, 29(5):431-435.[8] 孙娅,何展翔,柳建新,等.长导线源频率域电磁测深场源静态位移的模拟研究[J].石油地球物理勘探, 2011, 46(1):149-154.[9] Sternberg B K,Wshburne J C.Correction for the static shift in Magnetotellutic using transient elecetromagnetic soundings[J]. Geophysics,1988,53(11):1459-1468.[10] De Groot-Hedlin C.Removal of static shift in two dimensions by regulariged inversion[J]. Geophysics,1991,56:2102-2106[11] 杨妮妮,王志宏.CSAMT测量的静态效应研究[J].河南科学,2009,27(4):433-436.[12] 陈辉,王春庆,雷达,等.CSAMT法静态效应模拟及其校正方法对比[J].物探化探计算技术,2007,29(S1):64-67.[13] 黄兆辉,底青云,候胜利. CSAMT的静态效应校正及应用[J].地球物理学进展,2006,21(4):1290-1295.[14] 谢海军,陈明生,闫述.利用小波分析压制静态效应[J].煤田地质与勘探,1998,26(4):61-65.[15] 闫述,陈明生.频率域电磁测深的静态偏移及校正方法[J].石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(2):238-247.[16] 罗延钟,何展翔,马瑞伍,等.可控源音频大地电磁法的静态效应校正[J].物探与化探,1991,15(3):196-202.[17] Johansen H K, Sorensen K I. Fast Hankel transforms[J]. Geophysical Prospecting,1979,27:876-901.[18] Chave A D. Numerial integration of related Hankel transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion[J].Geophysics,1983,48:1671-1686.[19] 赵广茂,李志华,朱旭东,等.长导线源CSAMT一维正演研究[J].铁道工程学报,2010,143(8):21-24.[20] 胡瑞华,林君,孙彩堂,等.电偶极子切分算法研究[J].物探化探计算技术,2014,36(4):389-393.[21] 沈金松.用交错网格有限差分计算三维频率域电磁响应[J].地球物理学报,2003,(2):281-288.