Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2012, Vol. 36 Issue (5): 861-864    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2012.5.30
  生态环境调查 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
应用EIS观测技术圈定垃圾填埋区范围
尉斌1, 闫永利2, 马晓冰2, 王显祥2, 王迪1
1. 北京国环清华环境工程设计研究院有限公司, 北京 100084;
2. 中国科学院地质与地球物理研究所, 北京 100029
THE APPLICATION OF THE EIS DETECTING TECHNOLOGY TO DELINEATING THE LANDFILL AREA
WEI Bin1, YAN Yong-li2, MA Xiao-bing2, WANG Xian-xiang2, WANG Di1
1. State-Tsinghua Environmental Engineering & Consulting Co. , Ltd. , Beijing 100084, China;
2. Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
全文: PDF(1045 KB)  
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 应用电法成像观测(EIS)技术对北京通州某垃圾填埋场开展了面积性探测,并采用Quasi-Newton算法对EIS观测资料进行了反演,获取了地下介质电阻率的分布特征。在此基础上,对垃圾填埋范围进行了解释推断。钻孔结果表明,EIS解释结果较为准确地圈定了垃圾填埋的范围。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
Abstract:Electrical imaging survey (EIS) was conducted in a refuse sanitary landfill in Tongzhou District of Beijing. By adopting quasi-Newton inversion algorithm, the authors implemented the inversion of EIS data and obtained the cross-sections of resistivity. Based on the results, the authors infer the filling limits of the refuse sanitary. It is shown that the inferred results are in good agreement with the borehole data.
收稿日期: 2011-07-10      出版日期: 2012-10-10
:  P631.3  
  X8  
基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目(40774070,40474048);中科院知识创新工程重大项目(KZCX1-YW-15-14)
作者简介: 尉斌(1981-),男,工程师,毕业于北京师范大学,获环境工程硕士学位,从事环境场地调查、评价以及场地修复工程工作。
引用本文:   
尉斌, 闫永利, 马晓冰, 王显祥, 王迪. 应用EIS观测技术圈定垃圾填埋区范围[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(5): 861-864.
WEI Bin, YAN Yong-li, MA Xiao-bing, WANG Xian-xiang, WANG Di. THE APPLICATION OF THE EIS DETECTING TECHNOLOGY TO DELINEATING THE LANDFILL AREA. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2012, 36(5): 861-864.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2012.5.30      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2012/V36/I5/861
[1] Texkan B. A joint application of radiomagnetotellurics and transient electromagnetics to the investigation of waste deposit in Cologne[J].Journal of Application Geophysics, 1996, 34(3).
[2] Benson A K. Mapping groundwater contamination using DC resistivity and VLF geophysical method-a case study[J].Geophysics, 1997, 62(1).
[3] Park S. Fluid migration in the vadose zone from 3D inversion of resistivity monitoring data[J].Geophysics, 1998, 63(1).
[4] Ogily R. Imaging of industrial waste deposits and burred quarry geometry by 3D resistivity tomography[J].European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 1999, (3).
[5] Buselli G. Groundwater contamination monitoring with multichannel electrical and electromagnetic methods[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2001, 48(1).
[6] 闫永利.大地电磁法在阿苏卫填埋场地下水污染检测的应用研究[J].地球物理学报,2007,50(6).
[7] Alaia A, Patella D,Mauriello P. Application of geophysical 3D probability tomography in a test-site of the archaeological park of Pompei[J].Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2008, (5):67-76.
[8] Daily W,Ramirez A. Electrical resistance tomography experiments at the oregon graduate institute[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics, 1995, 33:227-237.
[9] Friedel S,Thielen A,Springman S M. Investigation of a slope endangered by rainfall-induced landslides using 3D resistivity tomography and geotechnical testing[J].Journal of applied Geophysics, 2006, 60:100-114.
[10] Hauck C,Muhll D V. Using DC resistivity tomography to detect and characterize mountain permafrost[J].Geophysical Prospecting, 2003, 51:273-284.
[11] Lapenna L,Lorenzo P. 2D electrical imaging of some complex landslides in the Lucanian Apennine chain, Southern Italy[J].Geophysics, 2005, 70:B11-B18.
[12] Mauriello P,Monna D,Patella D. 3D geoelectrical tomography and archaeological applications[J].Geophysical Prospecting, 1998, 46:543-570.
[13] Loke M H. Rapid least-squares inversion of apparent resisitivity pseudosection by a quasi-Newton method[J].Geophysical Prospecting, 1996a, 44:131-152.
[14] Loke M H. A comparison of the Guass-Newton and Quasi-Newton methods in resisitivity imaging inversion[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2002, 49:149-162.
[1] 吴燕民, 彭正辉, 元勇虎, 朱今祥, 刘闯, 葛薇, 凌国平. 一种基于差分接收的电磁感应阵列探头的设计与实现[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(1): 214-220.
[2] 裴肖明, 冯国瑞, 戚庭野. 瞬变电磁法探测复杂状态下煤矿充水采空区物理模拟实验[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 1055-1063.
[3] 张斯薇, 吴荣新, 韩子傲, 吴海波. 双边滤波在探地雷达数据去噪处理中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(2): 496-501.
[4] 张伟, 胡蕾, 张钊搏. LEMI-417型地球深部电磁场观测系统的数据格式解析[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(4): 810-815.
[5] 张伟, 王永华, 廖国忠. 野外地质样品金元素测试分析箱的研制与应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(2): 356-361.
[6] 张鹏辉, 张小博, 袁永真, 方慧, 刘建勋, 姜春香. 辽河外围北部秀水盆地大地电磁测深研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(5): 986-996.
[7] 莫婉玲, 孙中华, 徐娅, 赵斌. 界面极化电压的外推法测量研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(3): 484-488.
[8] 熊俊楠, 孙铭, 彭超, 王泽根, 刘姗, 周坚. 基于探地雷达的城镇燃气PE管道探测方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(5): 1079-1084.
[9] 麻昌英, 柳建新, 孙娅, 刘海飞. 高频大地电磁测深法与双频激电法在水文地质调查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(5): 944-947.
[10] 刘成禹, 林毅鹏, 林超群, 刘汗青. 球状孤石在探地雷达探测成果中的表现特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(4): 860-866.
[11] 黄理善, 侯一俊, 杨红, 王建超, 赵毅, 张力. 斑岩型铜矿床带条件约束的CSAMT数据精细处理和反演解释[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(4): 817-822.
[12] 赵翠荣, 胡通海, 郭福强. 一种用于混凝土结构探测的探地雷达天线阵列的设计[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(3): 633-636,640.
[13] 蔡连初. 探地雷达圆形测线探测方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(3): 637-640.
[14] 邓国文, 王齐仁, 廖建平, 朱云峰. 隧道不良地质现象的探地雷达正演模拟与超前探测[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(3): 651-656.
[15] 张西君, 王永泰, 陈坡. AMT法勘查贵州铝土矿[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(2): 283-287.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com