THE APPLICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF EULER DECONVOLUTION IN GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC FIELD
WANG Ming1,2, LUO Yao1,2, LUO Feng1,2, TIAN Song1,2
1. China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Laboratory of Earth Observation Technology, China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China
Abstract：As an important method in potential field data processing and interpretation, Euler deconvolution has aroused widespread attention among researchers because it can provide automatic or semi-automatic estimates of source locations and depths under the condition of less priori information. This paper described the principles of Euler deconvolution, summarized its improvement as well as related problems that geophysical experts both in China and abroad have been working on in recent decades, analyzed the choice of structural index and the stability of Euler solution and the others. The future research emphasis and developing direction of Euler deconvolution are pointed out in this paper, which are of important significance for practical use of Euler deconvolution in potential fields.
王明, 骆遥, 罗锋, 田嵩. 欧拉反褶积在重磁位场中应用与发展[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(5): 834-841.
WANG Ming, LUO Yao, LUO Feng, TIAN Song. THE APPLICATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF EULER DECONVOLUTION IN GRAVITY AND MAGNETIC FIELD. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2012, 36(5): 834-841.
[1] Nabighian M N. The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section:Its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation[J].Geophysics, 1972,37(3):507-517.[2] Nabighian M N. Additional comments on the analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section[J].Geophysics,1974,39(1):85-92.[3] Nabighian M N.Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms:Fundamental relations[J].Geophysics,1984,49(6):780-786.[4] Roest W R,Verhoef J,Pilkington M.Magnetic interpretation using the 3-D analytic signal[J].Geophysics,1992,57(1):116-125.[5] Werner S. Interpretation of magnetic anomalies of sheet-like bodies[J]. Sveriges Geologiska Undersok.,1953,43(6).[6] Hartman R R,Teskey D J,Friedberg J L.A system for rapid digital aeromagnetic interpretation[J].Geophysics,1971,36(5):891-918.[7] Jain S. An Automatic Method of Direct Interpretation of Magnetic Profiles[J]. Geophysics,1976, 41(3):531-541.[8] Hansen R O, Simmonds M. Multiple-source Werner deconvolution[J].Geophysics,1993,58(12):1792-1800.[9] Hansen R O.3D multiple-source Werner deconvolution for magnetic data[J].Geophysics,2005, 70(5):45-51.[10] Moreau F, Gibert D, Holschneider M,et al. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform:Basic theory[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,1999,104 (b3):5003-5013.[11] Hornby P, Boschetti F, Horowitz F G. Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain[J]. Geophysical Journal International,1999,137(1):175-196.[12] Sailhac D, Galdeano A, Gibert D, et al. Identification of sources of potential fields with the continuous wavelet transform:Complex wavelets and application to aeromagnetic profile in French Guiana[J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2000,105(b8):5003-5013.[13] Martelet G, Sailhac P, Moreau F, et al. Characterization of geological boundaries using 1-D wavelet transform on gravity data[J].Theory and application to the Himalayas. Geophysics, 2001,66(4):1116-1129.[14] 陈玉东.利用位场连续复小波变换识辨磁场源(上)[J].物探化探计算技术,2003,25(2):113-118.[15] 陈玉东.利用位场连续复小波变换识辨磁场源(下)[J].物探化探计算技术,2003,25(3):220-225.[16] 陈玉东.复小波变换反演重力异常[J].物探与化探,2003,27(5):354-361.[17] Thompson D T. EULDPH-a new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data[J].Geophysics,1982,47(1):31-37.[18] Reid A B, Allsop J M, Granser H,et al. Magnetic interpretation in three dimensions using euler deconvolution[J].Geophysiscs,1990,55(1):80-91.[19] 姚长利,管志宁,吴其斌,等.欧拉反演方法分析及实用技术改进[J].物探与化探,2004,28(2):150-155.[20] 郭志宏.航磁及梯度数据正反演解释方法技术实用化改进及应用.北京:中国地质大学,2004.[21] Peters L J. The direct approach to magnetic interpretation and its practical application[J]. Geophysics,1949,14(3):290-320.[22] Hood P J. Gradient measurements in aeromagnetic surveying[J].Geophysics,1963,30(5):891-902.[23] Reid A B. Euler Deconvolution,Past,Present and Future:A Review[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts, 1995:861-863.[24] Mushayandebvu M F, Driel P V, Reid A B, et al. Magnetic imaging using extended Euler deconvolution[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,1999:400-403.[25] Mushayandebvu M F, Driel P V, Reid A B,et al. Magnetic source parameters of two-dimensional structures using extended Euler deconvolution[J].Geophysiscs,2001,66(3):814-823.[26] Mushayandebvu M F, Lesur V, Reid A B, et al. Grid Euler deconvolution with constraints for 2D structures[J]. Geophysics,2004,69(2):489-496.[27] Nabighian M N,Hansen R O. Unification of Euler and Werner deconvolution in three dimensions via the generalised Hilbert transform[J].Geophysics,2001,66(6):1805-1810.[28] Jeffrey D, Phillips. Two-step processing for 3D magnetic source locations and structural indices using extended Euler or analytic signal methods[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,2002:727-730.[29] Reid A B, FitzGerald D, Flanagan G. Hybrid Euler magnetic basement depth estimation:Bishop 3D tests[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,2005:671-673.[30] Jeffrey D, Phillips. Estimating structural dip from gravity and magnetic profile data[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,2010:1202-1206.[31] Davis1 K, Li Y, Nabighian M N. Automatic detection of UXO magnetic anomalies using extended Euler deconvolution[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,2005:1133-1136.[32] Davis1 K, Li Y, Nabighian M N. Automatic detection of UXO magnetic anomalies using extended Euler deconvolution[J]. Geophysiscs,2010,75(3):13-20.[33] Salem A, Ravat D. A combined analytic signal and Euler method(AN-EUL)for automatic interpretation of magnetic data[J].Geophysics,2003,68(6):1952-1961.[34] Salem A, Smith R, Generalized magnetic tilt-Euler deconvolution//SEG Expanded Abstracts, 2007:790-794.[35] Salem A, Williams S.Interpretation of magnetic data using tilt-angle derivatives[J]. Geophysics,2007,73(1):1-10.[36] Miller H G, Singh V. Potential field tilt:A new concept for location of potential field sources[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics,1994,32(2):213-217.[37] Hsu S, Sibuet J, Shyu C. High-resolution detection of geologic boundaries from potentialfield anomalies:An enhanced analytic signal technique[J].Geophysics,1996,61(2):373-386.[38] Barbosa V C F, Silva J B C, Medeiros W E. New criterion for selecting the structural index in Euler deconvolution[G]//.SEG Expanded Abstracts,1997:539-543.[39] Stavrev P. Euler deconvolution using differential similarity transformations of gravity or magnetic anomalies[J].Geophysics Prospect,1997,45(2):207-246.[40] Barbosa V C F, Silva J B C, Medeiros W E. Stability analysis and improvement of structural index estimation in Euler deconvolution[J].Geophysics,1999,64(1):48-60.[41] Barbosa V C F, Silva J B C, Medeiros W E. Making Euler deconvolution applicable to small ground magnetic surveys[J].Journal of Applied Geophysics,2000,43(1):55-68.[42] Silva J B C, Barbosa V C F, Medeiros W E.Scattering, symmetry, and bias analysis of source-position estimates in Euler deconvolution and its practical implications[J]. Geophysics,2001,66(4):1149-1156.[43] Keating P, Pilkington M. Euler deconvolution of the analytic signal and its application to magnetic interpretation[J].Geophysical Prospecting,2004,52(3):165-182.[44] Smith R S, Salem A.Imaging depth,structure,and susceptibility from magnetic data:The advanced source-parameter imaging method[J]. Geophysics,2005,70(4):31-38.[45] Gerovska D, Araúzo-Bravo M J. Automatic interpretation of magnetic data based on Euler deconvolution with unprescribed structural index[J].Computers & Geosciences 2003,29(8):949-960.[46] Florio G,Fedi M,Pasteka R.On the application of Euler deconvolution to the analytic signal[J].Geophysics,2006,71(6):87-93.[47] Fedi M, Florio G. SCALFUN:3D analysis of potential field scaling function to determine independently or simultaneously Structural Index and depth to source[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,2006:963-967.[48] Fedi M. DEXP:A fast method to determine the depth and the structural index of potential fields sources[J].Geophysics,2007,72(1):1-11.[49] Mikhailov V, Galdeano A, Diament M,et al. Application of artificial intelligence for Euler solutions clustering[J].Geophysics,2003,68(1):168-180.[50] Ugalde H, Morris B. Cluster analysis of Euler deconvolution solutions:New filtering techniques and actual link to geological structure[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,2008:794-798.[51] Ugalde H, Morris B. Cluster analysis of Euler deconvolution solutions:New filtering techniques and actual link to geological structure[J]. Geophysics,2010:61-70.[52] Cooper G R J. Obtaining dip and susceptibility information from Euler deconvolution using the Hough transform[J].Computers & Geosciences,2006,32(10):1592-1599.[53] Thurston J. Euler deconvolution in the presence of sheets with finite widths[J].Geophysics, 2010,75(3):71-78.[54] Fairhead J D, Bennett K J, Gordon D R H et al. Euler:beyond the"Black Box"[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,1994:422-424.[55] 范美宁.欧拉反褶积方法的研究与应用.长春:吉林大学,2006.[56] Stavrev P, Reid A B.Euler deconvolution of gravity anomalies from thick contact/fault structures with extended negative structural index[J].Geophysics,2010,75(6):51-58.[57] Neil C, Whaler K A, Reid A B. Extensions to Euler's method for three-dimensional potential field interpretation[G]//53rd EAEG meeting,Florence,Italy,Expanded Abstracts,1991:416-417.[58] 鲁宝亮,范美宁,张原庆.欧拉反褶积中构造指数的计算与优化选取[J].地球物理学进展,2009,24(3):1027-1031.[59] Silva J B C, Barbosa V C F. 3D Euler deconvolution:Theoretical basis for automatically selecting good solutions[J]. Geophysics,2003,68(6):1962-1963.[60] Gerovska D, Araúzo-Bravo M J, Whaler K. Three-dimensional interpretation of magnetic and gravity anomalies using the finite-difference similarity transform[J]. Geophysics,2010, 75(4):79-90.[61] Gerovska D,Araúzo-Bravo M J,Stavrev P,et al.MaGSoundDST-3D automatic inversion of magnetic and gravity data based on the differential similarity transform[J].Geophysics,2010,75(1):25-38.[62] Gerovska D,Stavrev P. Finite-difference Euler Deconvolution Algorithm Applied to the Interpretation of Magnetic Data from Northern Bulgaria[J].Pure and applied geophysics, 2005,162(3):591-608.[63] 范美宁,孙运生,田庆君.关于欧拉反褶积方法计算中的一点改进[J].物探化探计算技术,2005,27(2):171-174.[64] Marson I, Klingele E E. Advantages of using the vertical gradient of gravity for 3-D interpretation[J].Geophysics,1993,58(11):1588-1595.[65] Zhang C, Mushayandebvu M F, Reid A B, et al. Euler deconvolution of gravity tensor gradient data[J]. Geophysics,2000,65(2):512-520.[66] 范美宁,江裕标,张景仙.不同数据用于欧拉方程的模型计算[J].地球物理学进展,2008,23(4):1250-1253.[67] 郭志宏,管志宁,熊盛青.长方体ΔT场及其梯度场无解析奇点理论表达式[J].地球物理学报,2004, 46(6):1131-1138.[68] Hsu S K. Imaging magnetic sources using Euler's equation[J].Geophysical Prospecting,2002, 50(1):15-25.[69] Stavrev P, Gerovska D, Araúzo-Bravo M J. Automatic inversion of magnetic anomalies from two height levels using finite-difference similarity transforms[J].Geophysics,2006,71(6):75-86.[70] Stavrev P, Gerovska D, Araúzo-Bravo M J. Depth and shape estimates from simultaneous inversion of magnetic fields and their gradient components using differential similarity transforms[J]. Geophysical Prospecting,2009,57(4):707-717.[71] Dewangan P, Ramprasad T, Ramana M V, et al. Automatic interpretation of magnetic data using Euler deconvolution with nonlinear background[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics,2007,164(11):2359-2372.[72] 史辉,刘天佑,Ghaboush D W.利用欧拉反褶积法估计二度磁性体深度与位置[J].物探与化探,2005, 29(3):230-233.[73] Keating P B. Weighted Euler deconvolution of gravity data[J].Geophysics,1998,63(5):1595-1603.[74] Davis K, Li Y.Enhancement of depth estimation techniques with amplitude analysis[G]//SEG Expanded Abstracts,2009:908-912.[75] Hansen R O, Suciu L. Multiple-source Euler deconvolution[J].Geophysics,2002,67(2):525-535.
