|
|
Leakage model-based experimental study on magnetometric resistivity method combined with pseudo-random signal technology |
ZHANG Hua-Peng( ), QIAN Wei( ), LIU Jin, WU Li-Lin, SONG Ze-Zhuo |
School of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Hohai University,Nanjing 211100,China |
|
|
Abstract The magnetoelectric resistivity (MMR) method is a type of electromagnetic exploration method popular in China in recent years. It enjoys technical advantages in detecting long highly conductive geological bodies such as underground seepages. However, it is yet to be widely applied since it suffers poor anti-interference ability and is liable to be affected by external noises. In recent years, the pseudo-random signal technology has been widely used in the field of geophysical exploration. It allows noises to be reduced through the convolution operation of impulse and step responses, thus greatly improving the anti-interference ability. Based on the exploration principle of the magnetoelectric resistivity method and the principle of the pseudo-random identification system, this paper proposes the method of applying the pseudo-random signal technology to the magnetoelectric resistivity method to improve the anti-interference ability of the latter. Meanwhile, it analyzes the anti-interference effects through leakage model-based experiments, which have verified the feasibility of the proposed method. As indicated by the experimental results, the proposed method has remarkable noise reduction ability and can roughly eliminate the interference of external magnetic fields. Meanwhile, the relative errors at peaks above the leakage channel were less than 3%, indicating extremely strong anti-interference ability. This study lays a basis for the future development of related detection instruments.
|
Received: 12 May 2021
Published: 25 February 2022
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
QIAN Wei
E-mail: 593763490@qq.com;wei.geoserve@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
|
Calculation of line current magnetic field
|
|
Identification calculation steps of pseudo random system
|
|
Pseudorandom magnetoelectric meter
|
|
Arrangement of comparative test equipment for flume leakage model
|
|
Measurement area
|
|
Contour map of uniform magnetic field
|
|
Contour map of simulated magnetic field
|
|
Simulation fitting diagram
|
|
Contour map of measured magnetic field
|
|
Actual measurement fitting diagram
|
|
Variation curve of magnetic induction intensity
|
测点 | B/nT | 相对误差δ/% | 测量结果ηai | 计算结果 | 7 | 195 | 190 | 2.63% | 12 | 192 | 187 | 2.67 | 28 | 202 | 205 | -1.46 | 33 | 212 | 216 | -1.85 | 49 | 206 | 208 | -0.96 | 55 | 193 | 191 | 1.05 | 70 | 211 | 212 | 0.47 | 77 | 220 | 223 | 1.35 |
|
Magnetic induction data at peak value
|
[1] |
Nabighian M N, Oppliger G L, Edwards R N, et al. Cross-hole magnetometric resistivity (MMR)[J]. The Leading Edge, 1984,49(8):1313-1326.
|
[2] |
Fathianpour N, Heinson G, White A. The total field magnetometric resistivity (TFMMR) method: Part 1: Theory and 2.5D forward modelling[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 2005,36(2):181-188.
|
[3] |
Edwards R N. The cross-hole magnetometric resistivity (MMR) response of a disc conductor[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2010,32(5):955-969.
|
[4] |
Edwards R N, Lee H, Nabighian M N. On the theory of magnetometric resistivity (MMR) methods[J]. Geophysics, 2012,43(6):1176-1203.
|
[5] |
Butler S L, Zhang Z. Forward modeling of geophysical electromagnetic methods using Comsol[J]. Computers and Geosciences, 2016,87(2):1-10.
|
[6] |
励宝恒, 王式铭. 磁激发极化法[J]. 物探与化探, 1979,3(4):68-73.
|
[6] |
Li B H, Wang S M. Magnetic induced polarization method[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1979,3(4):68-73.
|
[7] |
傅良魁. 磁电勘探法原理[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1984.
|
[7] |
Fu L K. Principle of magnetoelectric exploration [M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1984.
|
[8] |
杨建文. 起伏地形点电源地下传导电流磁场表达式:磁电阻率法地形改正[J]. 桂林冶金地质学院学报, 1991,11(1):77-87.
|
[8] |
Yang J W. Expression of magnetic field of underground conduction current of ups and downs point power supply: terrain correction by magnetoresistance method[J]. Journal of Guilin Institute of Metallurgical Geology, 1991,11(1):77-87.
|
[9] |
邓靖武. 磁电法正演理论研究[D]. 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2005.
|
[9] |
Deng J W. Forward theory study of magnetoelectric resistivity and induced polarization method [D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2005.
|
[10] |
翁爱华, 李斯睿, 杨悦, 等. 磁电法基本原理、发展现状及前景展望[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2017,47(6):1838-1854.
|
[10] |
Weng A H, Li S R, Yang Y, et al. Basic principle, current status and prospect of magnetoelectric resistivity[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Geoscience Edition, 2017,47(6):1838-1854.
|
[11] |
Ziolkowski A, Wright D. Removal of the airwave in shallow-marine transient EM data[J]. Seg Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 2007,26(1):534.
|
[12] |
Ziolkowski A, Hobbs B A, Wright D. Multitransient electromagnetic demonstration survey in France[J]. Geophysics, 2007,72(4):F197-F209.
|
[13] |
Ziolkowski A, Parr R, Wright D, et al. Multitransient electromagnetic repeatability experiment over the North Sea Harding field[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2010,58(6):1159-1176.
|
[14] |
Ziolkowski A. Wiener estimation of the Green’s function[J]. Geophysics, 2013,78(5):W31-W44.
|
[15] |
柴治媛. 可控震源伪随机扫描方法与地震响应的数值模拟[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2007.
|
[15] |
Chai Z Y. Pseudo-random sweeping method and numerical simulation for seismic response based on a vibrator[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2007.
|
[16] |
张群英, 方广有. 伪随机序列编码脉冲信号在探地雷达中的应用研究[J]. 电子与信息学报, 2011,33(2):424-428.
|
[16] |
Zhang Q F, Fang G Y. The study of pseudo random sequence’s application to GPR[J]. Journal of Electronics and Information, 2011,33(2):424-428.
|
[17] |
何继善. 广域电磁法和伪随机信号电法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
|
[17] |
He J S. Wide area electromagnetic method and pseudo random signal electrical method [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2010.
|
[18] |
罗延钟, 陆占国, 孙国良, 等. 伪随机信号电法仪器的“第二方案”算法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2016,31(6):2604-2608.
|
[18] |
Luo Y Z, Lu Z G, Sun G L, et al. Algorithms of second solution for instruments of electrical and electromagnetic prospecting using pseudo random signal[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2016,31(6):2604-2608.
|
[19] |
罗延钟, 陆占国, 孙国良, 等. 相关辨识抗干扰性的再认识[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2020,35(2):760-766.
|
[19] |
Luo Y Z, Lu Z G, Sun G L, et al. Recognition of the anti-interference of correlation identification[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2020,35(2):760-766.
|
[1] |
ZHAO Bao-Feng, WANG Qi-Nian, GUO Xin, GUAN Da-Wei, CHEN Tong-Gang, FANG Wen. Gravity survey and audio magnetotellurics-based insights into the deep structures and geothermal resource potential of the Rucheng Basin[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(5): 1147-1156. |
[2] |
HE Sheng, WANG Wan-Ping, DONG Gao-Feng, NAN Xiu-Jia, WEI Feng-Feng, BAI Yong-Yong. Application of the opposing-coils transient electromagnetic method in urban geological surveys[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(5): 1379-1386. |
|
|
|
|