|
|
A discussion on the comprehensive evaluation method of agricultural land grade in Linxia region |
FENG Bei-Zhan, WU Yong-Qiang( ), LIU Wen-Hui, WANG Xiang, LI Chun-Liang |
Geological Survey Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China |
|
|
Abstract The method proposed in this paper is based on the use of land quality geochemical survey data and the collected comprehensive information on agricultural land environment to accurately classify the land grades in Linxia, Gansu. Taking the agricultural landform and yield per mu as macro-level indicators, the authors used the soil traits, soil nutrients, land cleanliness and life-health elements as micro-indicators to decompose, quantify and assign various indicators. The authors objectively and comprehensively used the new viewpoints of macro-index grading and micro-level grading, established cadastral archives of agricultural land quality survey, and provided an important basisfor land management decision-making.
|
Received: 30 September 2019
Published: 29 December 2020
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WU Yong-Qiang
E-mail: 461689577@qq.com
|
|
|
|
指标分类 | 环境要素 | 指标类型 | 指标权重 | 指标状态 | 指标等级 | 指标含义 | 指标变量 | 宏观指标 (权重50) | 农田地貌(权重20) | 坡度 | 4 | <5° | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X1 | | | 5°~15° | II级 | 中等 | X2 | | | >15° | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X3 | 含水率 | 6 | >15% | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X4 | | | 8%~15% | II级 | 中等 | X5 | | | <8% | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X6 | 耕作条件 | 10 | 大型机耕 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X7 | | | 小型机耕 | II级 | 中等 | X8 | | | (人)牛耕 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X9 | 亩产量 (权重30) | 产量 | 30 | >750 kg | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X10 | | | 500~750 kg | II级 | 中等 | X11 | | | <500 kg | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X12 | 微观指标 (权重50) | 土壤性状(权重6) | 土壤质地 | 4 | 壤土 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X13 | | | 壤黏土 | II级 | 中等 | X14 | | | 重(硬)黏土 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X15 | 耕层厚度 | 2 | >120 mm | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X16 | | | 80~120 mm | II级 | 中等 | X17 | | | <80 mm | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X18 | 指标分类 | 环境要素 | 指标类型 | 指标权重 | 指标状态 | 指标等级 | 指标含义 | 指标变量 | | 土壤养分 (权重10) | 全氮 | 2 | >2×10-3 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X19 | | | (1~2)×10-3 | II级 | 中等 | X20 | | | <1×10-3 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X21 | 全磷 | 2 | >1×10-3 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X22 | | | (0.6~1)×10-3 | II级 | 中等 | X23 | | | <0.6×10-3 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X24 | 全钾 | 2 | >25×10-3 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X25 | | | (15~25)×10-3 | II级 | 中等 | X26 | | | <15×10-3 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X27 | 有机质 | 4 | >40×10-3 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X28 | | | (20~40)×10-3 | II级 | 中等 | X29 | | | <20×10-3 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X30 | | 土壤微量元素 (权重5) | 全锗 | 1 | >1.5×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X31 | | | (1.3~1.5)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X32 | | | <1.3×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X33 | 全钼 | 1 | >0.85×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X34 | | | (0.55~0.85)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X35 | | | <0.55×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X36 | 全硼 | 3 | >65×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X37 | | | (45~65)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X38 | | | <45×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X39 | 微观指标 (权重50) | 土壤环境 (权重19) | 镉 | 5 | <0.3×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X40 | | | (0.3~0.6)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X41 | | | >1.5×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X42 | 汞 | 4 | <1.3×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X43 | | | (1.3~3.4)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X44 | | | >2.0×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X45 | 砷 | 3 | <25×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X46 | | | (25~40)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X47 | | | >40×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X48 | 铅 | 3 | <70×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X49 | | | (70~170)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X50 | | | >400×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X51 | 铬 | 1 | <150×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X52 | | | (150~250)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X53 | | | >800×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X54 | 铜 | 1 | <50×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X55 | | | (50~100)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X56 | | | >100×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X57 | 镍 | 1 | <60×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X58 | | | (60~190)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X59 | | | >190×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X60 | 锌 | 1 | <200×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X61 | | | (200~300)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X62 | | | >300×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X63 | | 生命健康元素 (权重10) | 硒 | 4 | >0.4×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X64 | | | (0.125~0.4)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X65 | | | <0.125×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X66 | 碘 | 3 | >5×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X67 | | | (1~5)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X68 | | | <1×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X69 | 氟 | 3 | >550×10-6 | Ⅰ级 | 好 | X70 | | | (400~550)×10-6 | II级 | 中等 | X71 | | | <400×10-6 | Ⅲ级 | 差 | X72 |
|
Integrated evaluation index system of agricultural land environmental quality in study area
|
等别 | 一等 | 二等 | 三等 | 四等 | 五等 | 含义 | 优等 | 良好 | 中等 | 较差 | 劣等 | P值 | >0.72 | 0.67~0.72 | 0.62~0.67 | 0.62~0.57 | ≤0.57 |
|
Agricultural land classification and grading standards in the Linxia region
|
|
Macro index grading
|
|
Micro index grading
|
等级 | 一等 | 二等 | 三等 | 四等 | 五等 | 所占面积/km2 | 1316 | 1824 | 2912 | 136 | 0 | 所占比例/% | 21.27 | 29.48 | 47.06 | 2.20 | 0 |
|
Summary of results of agricultural land classification and grading in Linxia
|
|
Classification of environmental quality grades of agricultural land in Linxia region
|
[1] |
肖桂义, 秦爱华. 多目标区域地球化学调查与评价文集[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011: 230-237.
|
[1] |
Xiao G Y, Qin A H. Multi-objective regional geochemistry investigation and evaluation[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2011: 230-237.
|
[2] |
甘肃省土壤普查办公室. 甘肃土壤[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1990.
|
[2] |
Gansu Soil Survey Office. Gansu soil[M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1990.
|
[3] |
吴克宁. 土地评价及在土地利用与管理中的应用[C]// 中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学评估教材,北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2008: 16-18.
|
[3] |
Wu K N. Application of land evaluation in land use and management[C]// Teaching materials for geochemical assessment of land quality of China Geological Survey. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2008: 16-18.
|
[4] |
侯青叶, 岑静, 杨忠芳. 评估指标筛选与权重阈值[C]// 中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学评估教材,北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2008: 74-75.
|
[4] |
Hou Q Y, Cen J, Yang Z F. Evaluation index selection and weight threshold[C]// Teaching materials for geochemical assessment of land quality of China Geological Survey.Beijing: China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2008: 74-75.
|
[5] |
余涛, 杨忠芳, 王果, 等. 求属度函数模型及其在土地质量地球化学评估中的应用[C]//中国地质调查局土地质量地球化学评估教材, 北京:中国地质大学(北京), 2008.
|
[5] |
Yu T, Yang Z F, Wang G, et al. The model of genus degree function and its application in geochemical assessment of land mass[C]//Teaching materials for geochemical assessment of land quality of China Geological Survey. Beijing:China University of Geosciences(Beijing), 2008.
|
[6] |
李绍山, 段增强. 安徽省农用地分等、定级与估价信息系统的设计与开发[C]// 2006年中国土地学会学术年会论文集, 2006.
|
[6] |
Li S S, Duan Z Q. Design and development of agricultural land grading, grading and valuation information system in Anhui Province[C]// Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Chinese Land Society in 2006, 2006.
|
[7] |
王建国, 单艳红, 杨林章. 我国农用地分等定级理论与方法探讨[J]. 农业系统科学与综合研究, 2002(2):84-88.
|
[7] |
Wang J G, Shan Y H, Yang L Z. Discussion on the theory and method of agricultural land grading in China[J]. Agricultural System Science and Comprehensive Research, 2002(2):84-88.
|
[8] |
李楠, 徐东瑞. 土壤养分含量的协同克里格法插值研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2011,23(5):1001-1006.
|
[8] |
Li N, Xu D R. Collaborative Kriging interpolation of soil nutrient content[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2011 , 23(5):1001-1006.
|
[9] |
周勇, 田有国, 任意. 定量化土地评价指标体系及评价方法探讨[J]. 生态环境, 2003,12(1):37-41.
|
[9] |
Zhou Y, Tian Y G, Ren Y. Quantitative land evaluation index system and evaluation method[J]. Ecological Environment, 2003,12(1):37-41.
|
[10] |
但承龙, 江水玲. 县域农用土地分等、定级与估价模式的构建[J]. 山东农业大学学报, 2001,3(1):15-17.
|
[10] |
Dan C L, Jiang S L. Construction of classification, grading and valuation model of agricultural land in county[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 2001,3(1):15-17.
|
[11] |
杨忠芳, 余涛, 李敏, 等. DZ/T0295—2016 土地质量地球化学评价规范[S]. 2016.
|
[11] |
Yang Z F, Yu T, Li M, et al. DZ/T0295—2016 Specification for geochemical evaluation of land quality[S]. 2016.
|
[12] |
邓留献. 农用地定级估价理论与实践[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2000.
|
[12] |
Deng L X. Theory and practice of agricultural land grading and valuation[M]. Beijing: China Dadi Press, 2000.
|
[13] |
徐晗, 雷磊. 农用地分等中3个等别的相关性问题探讨[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011,39(5):3028-3029.
|
[13] |
Xu H, Lei L. Discussion on the correlation of three grades of agricultural land[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science, 2011,39(5):3028-3029.
|
[14] |
王万茂, 但承龙. 农用土地分等、定级与估价的理论与方法探讨[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2001,41(2):22-26.
|
[14] |
Wang W M, Dan C L. Discussion on the theory and method of agricultural land classification, grading and valuation[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Zoning, 2001,41(2):22-26.
|
[15] |
陈安庆. 兰州市农用土地分等定级的基本理论与方法[J]. 甘肃科学:甘肃省科学院学报, 1990,2(4):32-43.
|
[15] |
Chen A Q. Basic theory and method of gradation of agricultural land in Lanzhou City[J]. Gansu Science:Journal of Gansu Academy of Sciences, 1990,2(4), 32-43.
|
[16] |
罗睿, 何腾兵, 李博, 等. 土地整治前后耕地质量的等级评价:以凤冈为例[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2016,44(3):86-91.
|
[16] |
Luo R, He T B, Li B, et al. Grade evaluation of cultivated land quality before and after land consolidation: A case study of fenggang[J]. Guizhou Agricultural Science, 2016,44(3):86-91.
|
[17] |
张凤荣, 安莉萍, 王军艳, 等. 耕地分等中的土壤质量指标体系与分等方法[J]. 资源科学, 2002,24(2):71-75.
|
[17] |
Zhang F R, An L P, Wang J Y, et al. Soil quality index system and grading method in cultivated land grading[J]. Resources Science, 2002,24(2):71-75.
|
[18] |
韩霁昌, 成生权, 罗林涛. 建立新增耕地质量评价体系[J]. 中国土地, 2002(3):30-32.
|
[18] |
Han J C, Cheng S Q, Luo L T. Establishing a quality evaluation system for newly cultivated land[J]. China Land, 2002(3):30-32.
|
[19] |
彭世琪. 我国耕地地力等级及中低产田类型划分的一种理论和方法[J]. 中国农技推广, 1997(1):34-35.
|
[19] |
Peng S Q. A theory and method for the classification of arable land fertility and the types of medium and low-yielding land in China[J]. China Agricultural Technology Extension, 1997 (1):34-35.
|
[20] |
田玉福. 土地整理的土地质量指标体系研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2012.
|
[20] |
Tian Y F. Research on land quality index system of land consolidation[D]. Zhengzhou:Henan Agricultural University, 2012.
|
[21] |
王培豪. 耕地地力评价方法研究与合理性检验[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2012.
|
[21] |
Wang P H. Research on farmland fertility evaluation method and rationality test[D]. Zhengzhou:Henan Agricultural University, 2012.
|
[22] |
黄勇, 杨忠芳. 中国土地质量评价的研究现状及展望[J]. 地质通报, 2008,27(2):207-211.
|
[22] |
Huang Y, Yang Z F. Research status and prospect of land quality assessment in China[J]. Chinese Geological Bulletin, 2008,27(2):207-211.
|
[23] |
宋延洲. 禹县土地质量评价方法[J]. 自然资源, 1981,2(4):12-22.
|
[23] |
Song Y Z. Land quality evaluation method in Yu County[J]. Natural Resources, 1981,2(4):12-22.
|
|
|
|