|
|
Forward simulation of approximate vertical reflection method and its application to underground engineering |
Lei XU1,2, Si-Yuan WANG1,2, Jian-Qing ZHANG1,2, Wen-Zhong LI1,2, Peng LI1,2 |
1. Changjiang Geophysical Exploration & Testing Co.,Ltd.(Wuhan),Wuhan 430010,China 2. Changjiang Survey,Planning,Design and Research Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430010,China |
|
|
Abstract The approximate vertical reflection method is a seismic exploration technique with a minimum offset,which does not need a sufficiently large offset and is suitable for tunnel,roadway and other underground projects with narrow space.It can be used to locate and track medium and large geological structures such as faults and corrosion zones.Firstly,combined with the actual engineering situation,the tunnel and fault model are modeled,and the model parameters which are in accordance with the actual engineering are given.The forward simulation research is carried out,and the theoretical detection results of the fault are obtained.Then,approximate vertical reflection method detection is carried out three times in practical engineering by using forward simulation of seismic array parameters,and the results of forward simulation are compared and analyzed.Finally,the validity of approximate vertical reflection method in fault detection is proved by the actual excavation of tunnel.
|
Received: 10 June 2019
Published: 24 June 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
The principle sketch of vertical reflection method
|
岩石 | 密度/ (g·cm-3) | 纵波波速/ (m·s-1) | 波阻抗/ (kg·cm-2·s) | 土壤 | 1.10~2.00 | 200~800 | 22~160 | 黏土 | 1.50~2.20 | 1800~2400 | 270~530 | 砂岩 | 2.40~2.70 | 2300~4000 | 550~1100 | 灰岩 | 2.60~2.90 | 3000~5500 | 780~1600 | 玄武岩 | 2.80~3.10 | 4500~7500 | 1260~2300 | 水 | 1.00 | 1400~1600 | 140~160 |
|
Wave impedance parameters of typical rock
|
|
The sketch of staggered grids
|
|
The sketch of perfectly matched layer
|
|
The sketch of 400 Hz ricker wavelet
|
|
Amplitude spectrum of 400 Hz ricker wavelet
|
|
Engineering geological map of 2# inclined shaft
|
|
Sketch of forward modeling
|
|
The result of the first forward simulation
|
|
The result of the second forward simulation
|
|
The results of the third forward simulation
|
|
Schematic layout of vertical reflection method
|
|
Field work photos
|
|
First detection result
|
|
Second detection result
|
|
Third detection result
|
|
Comprehensive analysis chart of the three survey results
|
|
Right side wall rock photos
|
[1] |
钱七虎. 地下工程建设安全面临的挑战与对策[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012,31(10):1945-1956.
|
[1] |
Qian Q H. Challenges faced by underground projects construction safety and countermeasures[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012,31(10):1945-1956.
|
[2] |
钱七虎, 戎晓力. 中国地下工程安全风险管理的现状、问题及相关建议[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2008,27(4):649-655.
|
[2] |
Qian Q H, Rong X L. State issues and relevant recommendations for security risk management of China's underground engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2008,27(4):649-655.
|
[3] |
胡平, 刘保金, 白立新, 等. 奥林匹克公园地区隐伏断裂综合探测[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010,53(6):1486-1494.
|
[3] |
Hu P, Liu B J, Bai L X, et al. Synthetic exploration of the buried faults in Olympic park area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010,53(6):1486-1494.
|
[4] |
顾勤平, 许汉刚, 赵启光. 厚覆盖层地区隐伏活断层探测的地震方法技术——以桥北镇—宿迁断层为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2015,39(2):408-415.
|
[4] |
Gu Q P, Xu H G, Zhao Q G. The seismic exploration method for buried active faults in thick sediment area:A case study of Qiaobei-Suqian fault[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015,39(2):408-415.
|
[5] |
酆少英, 龙长兴, 高锐, 等. 高分辨折射和浅层反射地震方法在活断层探测中的联合应用[J]. 地震学报, 2010,32(6):718-724,767.
|
[5] |
Feng S Y, Long C X, Gao R, et al. Joint application of high-resolution refraction and shallow reflection seismic exploration approach to active fault survey[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 2010,32(6):718-724,767.
|
[6] |
杨炳南, 周琦, 杜远生, 等. 音频大地电磁法对深部隐伏构造的识别与应用:以贵州省松桃县李家湾锰矿为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015,34(6):26-32.
|
[6] |
Yang B N, Zhou Q, Du Y S, et al. Identification and application of audio magnetotellurics to the deep buried structure:a case study of Lijiawan manganese deposit at Songtao county in Guizhou Province[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2015,34(6):26-32.
|
[7] |
李金都, 王学潮. 南水北调西线工程区活动断层CSAMT技术探测研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2004,23(17):2932-2936.
|
[7] |
Li J D, Wang X C. Application of CSAMT to prospecting active fault[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2004,23(17):2932-2936.
|
[8] |
李帝铨, 张永超, 薛融晖, 等. CSAMT在某重大城市活动断层探测中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2010,25(4):1387-1395.
|
[8] |
Li D Q, Zhang Y C, Xue R H, et al. Application of CSAMT to detection of active faults[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2010,25(4):1387-1395.
|
[9] |
罗登贵, 刘江平, 王京, 等. 活动断层高密度电法响应特征与应用研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014,29(4):1920-1925.
|
[9] |
Luo D G, Liu J P, Wang J, et al. Study on the response characteristics and application of high density resistivity method of active fault[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014,29(4):1920-1925.
|
[10] |
徐佩芬, 李世豪, 杜建国, 等. 微动探测:地层分层和隐伏断裂构造探测的新方法[J]. 岩石学报, 2013,29(5):1841-1845.
|
[10] |
Xu P F, Li S H, Du J G, et al. Microtremor survey method:A new geophysical method for dividing strata and detecting the buried fault structures[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2013,29(5):1841-1845.
|
[11] |
徐佩芬, 李传金, 凌甦群, 等. 利用微动勘察方法探测煤矿陷落柱[J]. 地球物理学报, 2009,52(7):1923-1930.
|
[11] |
Xu P F, Li C J, Ling S Q, et al. Mapping collapsed column in coal mines utilizing microtremor survey methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2009,52(7):1923-1930.
|
[12] |
李征西, 曾昭发, 李恩泽, 等. 地球物理方法探测活动断层效果和方法最佳组合分析[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2005(s1):109-114.
|
[12] |
Li Z X, Zeng Z F, Li E Z, et al. The function of geophysical method in active fault detection and discuss of combining methods[J]. Journal of Jilin University:Earth Science Edition, 2005(s1):109-114.
|
[13] |
徐磊, 张建清, 漆祖芳. 水工隧洞综合超前地质预报应用对比研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018,33(1):411-417.
|
[13] |
Xu L, Zhang J Q, Qi Z F. Comparison research on comprehensive advanced geological prediction of hydraulic tunnels[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018,33(1):411-417.
|
[14] |
钟世航. 陆地声纳法及其应用效果[J]. 物探与化探, 1997,19(3):172-179.
|
[14] |
Zhong S H. Land sonar method and effectiveness[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1997,19(3):172-179.
|
[15] |
李术才, 刘斌, 孙怀凤, 等. 隧道施工超前地质预报研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014,33(6):1090-1113.
|
[15] |
Li S C, Liu B, Sun H F, et al. State of art and trends of advanced geological prediction in tunnel construction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014,33(6):1090-1113.
|
[16] |
周竹生, 刘喜亮, 熊孝雨. 弹性介质中瑞雷面波有限差分法正演模拟[J]. 地球物理学报, 2007,50(2):567-573.
|
[16] |
Zhou Z S, Liu X L, Xiong X Y. Finite difference modelling of Rayleigh surface wave in elastic media[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2007,50(2):567-573.
|
[17] |
王润秋, 李兰兰, 李会俭. 塔里木地区勘探地震正演模拟研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2010,53(8):1875-1882.
|
[17] |
Wang R Q, Li L L, Li H J. Forward modeling research for seismic exploration of Tarim area[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2010,53(8):1875-1882.
|
[18] |
韩文功, 沈财余. 陆相断陷盆地复杂地质模型建立与正演模拟[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2006,41(4):396-401.
|
[18] |
Han W G, Shen C Y. Buildup of complex geologic models in continental fault depression basin and their forward simulation[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2006,41(4):396-401.
|
[19] |
李琳, 刘韬, 胡天跃. 三角谱元法及其在地震正演模拟中的应用[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014,57(4):1224-1234.
|
[19] |
Li L, Liu T, Hu T Y. Spectrum element method with triangular mesh and its application in seismic modeling[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2014,57(4):1224-1234.
|
[20] |
吴玉, 符力耘, 陈高祥. 基于分数阶拉普拉斯算子解耦的黏声介质地震正演模拟与逆时偏移[J]. 地球物理学报, 2017,60(4):1527-1537.
|
[20] |
Wu Y, Fu L Y, Chen G X. Forward modeling and reverse time migration of viscoacoustic media using decoupled fractional laplacians[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2017,60(4):1527-1537.
|
[1] |
YU Yong-Peng, YAN Zhao-Tao, MAO Xing-Jun, YANG Yan-Cheng, MA Yong-Xiang, HUANG Peng-Cheng, LU Ai-Guo, ZHANG Guang-Bing. The application of the comprehensive electric and seismic method to coal exploration in the huge Cenozoic coverage area[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(5): 1231-1238. |
[2] |
YONG Fan, LIU Zi-Long, JIANG Zheng-Zhong, LUO Shui-Yu, LIU Jian-Sheng. The key technology of shallow imaging in urban 3D seismic data processing[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(5): 1266-1274. |
|
|
|
|