|
|
Research on energy leakage recovery of adaptive K-SVD |
Zhen HE1, Si-Yuan CAO2,3, Hua-Jie HAO4, Xu-Yuan DUAN5, 5, Yun-Pei ZHANG1 |
1. Exploration and Development Research Institute of PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company,Karamay 834000,China 2. Institute of Geophysics,China University of Petroleum (Beijing) ,Beijing 102249,China 3. CNPC Geophysical Key Laboratory,China University of Petroleum (Beijing),Beijing 102249,China 4. Data Company Information Institute of PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company,Karamay 834000,China 5. Xingang Branch Company of PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company,Karamay 834000,China |
|
|
Abstract In view of the problem of residual signal (also known as energy leakage) in the noise profile of the existing conventional denoising method in the parameter selection,this paper proposes the energy leakage recovery method of adaptive K-SVD to achieve effective recycling of signals.Firstly,a high-quality sample is obtained by using traditional methods such as wavelet threshold and fx domain denoising to perform dictionary construction,and then the correlation coefficient matching criterion is introduced to sparsely decompose the residual profile so as to realize the secondary separation of random noise and residual effective signal.The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can better balance the denoising and amplitude preservation of seismic signals and has adaptability.
|
Received: 21 June 2019
Published: 22 April 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Algorithm flow chart
|
|
Wedge model test results a—wedge model;b—noise wedge model;c—dictionary constructed under noise;d—noise dictionary denoising profile;e—noise dictionary denoising profile;f—noiseless dictionary denoising profile;g—noise dictionary denoising residuals;h—noiseless dictionary denoising residuals;i—wedge model 15th signal;j—noise wedge model 15th;k—noise dictionary denoising after 15th;l—No15 after noiseless dictionary denoising
|
|
Tilt model section test results a—tilt model;b—charging tilt model;c—wavelet threshold denoising profile;d—wavelet threshold denoising residual;e—effective signal for normal sample separation;f—effective signal for good sample separation;g—ordinary sample energy recovery results;h—high quality sample energy recovery results
|
|
Test results of the 75th signal of tilt model a—tilt model;b—tilt model noise;c—wavelet threshold denoising result;d—normal sample energy recovery result;e—good sample energy recovery result
|
|
Result of the practical test of the method a—f-x domain denoising profile;b—f-x domain denoising residual;c—improved wavelet threshold denoising profile;d—improved wavelet threshold denoising residual;e—ASVD denoising proflie;f—ASVD denoising residual;g—f-x domain denoising energy recovery result(75th channel);h—improved wavelet threshold denoising energy recovery result(75th channel);i—ASVD denoising energy recovery result(75th channel)
|
|
Actual data processing a—2D actual data in a region;b—f-x domain denoising profile;c—f-x domain denoising residual;d—f-x domain denoising recovery profile;e—ASVD denoising proflie;f—ASVD denoising residual;g—ASVD domain denoising recovery profile
|
[1] |
Donoho D L . Denoising by soft-thresholding[J]. IEEE Trans on Information Theory, 1995,41(3):613-627.
|
[2] |
李红延, 周云龙, 田峰 , 等. 一种新的小波自适应阈值函数振动信号去噪算法[J]. 仪器仪表学报, 2015,36(10):2200-2206.
|
[2] |
Li H Y, Zhou Y L, Tian F , et al. A new wavelet adaptive threshold function vibration signal denoising algorithm[J]. Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2015,36(10):2200-2206.
|
[3] |
付燕 . 基于二次小波变换的地震信号去噪方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2005,40(2):154-158.
|
[3] |
Fu Y . Seismic signal denoising method based on quadratic wavelet transform[J]. Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting, 2005,40(2):154-158.
|
[4] |
Sergio L M F, Tad J U . Application of singular value decomposition to vertical seismic profiling[J]. Geophysic, 1998,53(6):778-785.
|
[5] |
刘志鹏, 赵伟, 陈小宏 , 等. 局部频率域SVD压制随机噪声方法[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2012,47(2):202-207.
|
[5] |
Liu Z P, Zhao W, Chen X H , et al. SVD suppression random noise method in local frequency domain[J]. Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting, 2012,47(2):202-207.
|
[6] |
康冶, 于承业, 贾卧 , 等. f-x域去噪方法研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2003,38(2):136-140.
|
[6] |
Kang Y, Yu C Y, Jia W , et al. Research on denoising method of f-x domain[J]. Petroleum Geophysical Prospecting, 2003,38(2):136-140.
|
[7] |
房欣欣 . F-X域去噪方法研究[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2018.
|
[7] |
Fang X X . Research on F-X domain denoising method[D].Xi'an: Chang’an University, 2018.
|
[8] |
李超, 岳文正, 汤昌晟 , 等. 高分辨率Radon变换及其在声反射成像测井中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014,29(4):1678-1688.
|
[8] |
Li C, Yue W Z, Tang C Y , et al. High-resolution Radon transform and its application in acoustic reflection imaging logging[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014,29(4):1678-1688.
|
[9] |
刘菲菲, 潘军, 李西双 , 等. 应用抛物线Radon变换去除海上小道距斜缆高分辨率地震数据中的虚反射[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017,32(2):872-877.
|
[9] |
Liu F F, Pan J, Li X S , et al. Application of parabolic Radon transform to eliminate false reflection in high resolition seismic data of offshore small diagonal cables[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2017,32(2):872-877.
|
[10] |
贾春梅, 姜国庆, 刘志成 , 等. 频域稀疏双曲Randon变换去噪方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2016,40(3):527-533.
|
[10] |
Jia C M, Jiang G Q, Liu Z C , et al. Denoising method of sparse hyperbolic Randon transform in frequency domain[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2016,40(3):527-533.
|
[11] |
刘思延 . 基于自适应阈值的三维块匹配降噪算法研究[D]. 太原:中北大学, 2016.
|
[11] |
Liu S Y . Research on 3D block matching noise reduction algorithm based on adaptive threshold[D]. Taiyuan:North University of China, 2016.
|
[12] |
肖佳, 张俊华, 梅礼晔 . 基于改进BM3D算法的椒盐噪声去噪[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2018,54(21):170-207.
|
[12] |
Xiao J, Zhang J H, Mei L Y . Denoising of salt and Pepper noise based on improved BM3D algorithm[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications, 2018,54(21):170-207.
|
[13] |
Protter M, Elad M . Image sequence denoising via sparse and redundant representations[J]. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2009,18(1):27-35.
|
[14] |
杨爱萍, 田玉针, 何宇清 , 等. 基于改进K-SVD和非局部正则化的图像去噪[J]. 计算机工程, 2015,41(5):249-253.
|
[14] |
Yang A P, Tian Y Z, He Y Q , et al. Image dnoising based on improved K-SVD and non-local regularization[J]. Computer Engineering, 2015,41(5):249-253.
|
[15] |
张军华, 藏胜涛, 周振晓 , 等. 地震资料信噪比定量计算及方法比较[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2009,44(4):481-489.
|
[15] |
Zhang J H, Zang S T, Zhou Z X , et al. Quantitative calculation and method comparison of signal-to-noise ratio of seismic data[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2009,44(4):481-489.
|
[16] |
郝建军, 刘勇刚, 廖刚 , 等. 一种改进小波阈值函数的信号去噪[J]. 重庆理工大学学报:自然科学, 2019,33(4):93-97.
|
[16] |
Hao J J, Liu Y G, Liao G , et al. Signal denosing based on improved wavelet threshold function[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology:Natural Science, 2019,33(4):93-97.
|
[17] |
徐彦凯, 曹思远, 何元 . 双曲Radon-ASVD方法压制叠前地震数据随机噪声研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2017,52(3):451-457.
|
[17] |
Xu Y K, Cao S Y, He Y . Study on random noise of pre-stack seismic data by hyperbolic radon-ASVD method[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2017,52(3):451-457.
|
[1] |
CHEN Xiu-Juan, LIU Zhi-Di, LIU Yu-Xi, CHAI Hui-Qiang, WANG Yong. Research into the pore structure of tight reservoirs:A review[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 22-31. |
[2] |
SHI Lei, GUAN Yao, FENG Jin, GAO Hui, QIU Xin-Wei, QUE Xiao-Ming. Multi-level division method of flow units for accurate permeability assessment of glutenite reservoirs:A case study of reservoir W53 of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Lufeng oilfield[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 78-86. |
|
|
|
|