|
|
Analysis and solution of negative values in airborne radioactivity data processing |
De-Wei DENG1,2, Bo YANG1, Yu-Qin YANG1, Xue WU1, Hua-Shan JIA1, Xiang ZHANG1, Yan LUO1, Cheng QI1 |
1. Airborne Survey and Remote Sensing Center of Nuclear Industry, Shijiazhuang 050002,China 2. Key Laboratory of Uranium Resources Geophysical Exploration Technology, Shijiazhuang 050002, China |
|
|
Abstract In this paper, the authors processed the navigation data obtained from Alxa Left Banner in Inner Mongolia to summarize the process and main reasons for the formation of the negative value. The results are as follows: ①The nature of radioactive decay has statistical fluctuation, and this property plays an important role in the processing of revised data, especially in areas with low radionuclide; ②A slight negative value of uranium counting rate will occur after background correction and cosmic ray correction, and will increase negatively after atmospheric radon correction; both ends are prone to form high value false anomalies and continuous negative anomalies. After the peel correction, the number of negative values increases greatly, while the height correction and content conversion no longer produce new negative values, but only change the negative values. The authors found that zeroing the negative values generated by the correction process can eliminate high value false anomalies produced by atmospheric radon correction, and that continuous zero value data appear, which is inconsistent with the objective laws. Therefore, normalization method is proposed to eliminate negative values. This method can eliminate the negative value quickly and reasonably, and can control the changed value within a smaller value. In addition, it makes up for the lack and the deficiency of the negative value processing method.
|
Received: 15 March 2018
Published: 10 April 2019
|
|
|
|
|
本底及宇宙射线修正 | K | U | Th | 最大值 | 最小值 | 负值占比/% | 最大值 | 最小值 | 负值占比/% | 最大值 | 最小值 | 负值占比% | 修正前计数率/cps | 82 | 30 | 0 | 48 | 12 | 0 | 52 | 14 | 0 | 修正后计数率/cps | 18 | -20 | 50 | 12 | -12 | 52 | 14 | -11 | 50 |
|
Contrast table of background and cosmic radiation correction
|
|
Curve of high value false anomaly after atmospheric radon correction a—curve of uranium window count after aircraft background and cosmic rays correction;b—contrast curve of the upper uranium window before and after filtering;c—curve of radon background count ;d—curve of uranium window count after atmospheric radon correction
|
|
Curve of low value negative anomaly after atmospheric radon correction a—curve of uranium window count after aircraft background and cosmic rays correction;b—contrast curve of the upper uranium window before and after filtering;c—curve of radon background count ;d—curve of uranium window count after atmospheric radon correction
|
|
Distribution graph of negative distribution after correction of atmospheric radon 1—survey area;2—negative measurement point;3—survey line number;4—lower field of uranium content ;5—low field of uranium content
|
| 最小值 | 最大值 | 平均值 | 总测点数/个 | 负值点数/个 | 负值占比/% | 实测计数率/cps | 15 | 220 | 54 | 721227 | 0 | 0 | 本底及宇宙射线修正后/cps | -2.9 | 195.6 | 30.4 | 721227 | 7 | 0.00 | 大气氡修正后/cps | -37 | 198.6 | 22.6 | 721227 | 1210 | 0.18 | 剥离修正/cps | -49.8 | 174.5 | 13.7 | 721227 | 12794 | 1.77 | 高度衰减修正/cps | -38.3 | 129.8 | 10.6 | 721227 | 12794 | 1.77 | 地面核数含量换算/10-6 | -4.4 | 14.9 | 1.2 | 721227 | 12794 | 1.77 |
|
Statistical table of uranium window nagetive after each step correction
|
|
Distribution graph of negative distribution after correction of peeling 1—survey area;2—negative measurement point
|
|
Contrast curve of atmospheric radon correction effect a—curve of uranium window count after aircraft background and cosmic rays correction;b—contrast curve of radon background count before and after turning negative to zero;c—contrast curve of uranium window count
|
|
Curve of uranium content after zeroing negative value
|
|
Contrast curve of uranium content
|
[1] |
张恩 . 航测资料在沽源盆地铀矿远景预测中的应用[J]. 现代矿业, 2012,521(9):48-51.
|
[1] |
Zhang E . Uranium prospect forecast application of airborne survey data in Guyuan basin[J]. Modern Mining, 2012,521(9):48-51.
|
[2] |
李怀渊, 刘宪斌 . 核技术在油气勘查中的应用研究[J]. 现代地质, 2000,14(2):223-229.
|
[2] |
Li H Y, Liu X B . Study and application of nuclear measuring technology to oil and gas field[J]. Geo Science, 2000,14(2):223-229.
|
[3] |
江民忠, 谢迎春, 石岩 . 萍乐坳陷西部地区航测遥感油气预测研究[J]. 地质科技情报, 2002,21(4):60-64.
|
[3] |
Jiang M Z, Xie Y C, Shi Y . Study on oil and gas forecast with airborne survey and remote sensing data in western Pingle depression area[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2002,21(4):60-64.
|
[4] |
张德华 . 航放测量发现乌勇布拉克硝酸钾盐矿床[G]. 地球物理与中国建设——庆祝中国地球物理协会成立50周年文集, 1997: 156-158.
|
[4] |
Zhang D H . The foundation of potassium nitrate deposits by airborne gamma ray spectrometry method[G]. Geophysical with China Construction the 50th Anniversary Celebration of the Founding of the Chinese Association of Geophysical Corpus, 1997: 156-158.
|
[5] |
李怀渊, 江民忠, 韩长青 , 等. 航空物探测量的重大进展和技术创新[J]. 航测与遥感, 2014,83(1):4-6.
|
[5] |
Li H Y, Jiang M ZH, Han C Q , et al. The major progress and technical innovation of airborne geophysical survey method[J]. Airborne Survey and Remote Sensing, 2014,83(1):4-6.
|
[6] |
韩长青, 李怀渊, 陈国胜 . 我国铀矿勘查物化探技术现状与今后发展方向[J]. 航测与遥感, 2012,79(1):1-2.
|
[6] |
Han C Q, Li H Y, Chen G S . The present situation and the development direction of China’s uranium exploration geophysical technology in the future[J]. Airborne Survey and Remote Sensing, 2012,79(1):1-2.
|
[7] |
李运祓, 赵元洪, 童纯涵 , 等. 放射性勘探方法[M]. 北京: 原子能出版社, 1978.
|
[7] |
Li Y F, Zhao Y H, Tong C H , et al. Radioactive prospecting method[M]. Beijing: Atomic Energy Press, 1978.
|
[8] |
刘裕华, 顾仁康, 候振荣 . 航空放射性测量[J]. 物探与化探, 2002,26(4):250-252.
|
[8] |
Liu Y H, Gu R K, Hou Z R . Airborne radioactive survey[J]. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration, 2002,26(4):250-252.
|
[9] |
李怀渊 . 航空放射性测量在环境检测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2004,8(6):515-517.
|
[9] |
Li H Y . The application of airborne radioactivity survey to environmental monitoring[J]. Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration, 2004,28(6):515-517.
|
[10] |
倪卫冲, 何必胜, 高国林 , 等. 三门核电站地区环境辐射本底航空测量调查[J]. 辐射防护, 2016,36(2):104-111.
|
[10] |
Ni W C.He B S, Gao G L , et al. Airborne gamma-ray spectrometric survey for investigating the environmental radiation background around Sanmen NPP[J]. Radiation Protection, 2016,36(2):104-111.
|
[11] |
倪卫冲, 顾仁康 . 核应急航空监测方法[J]. 铀矿地质, 2003,19(6):366-373.
|
[11] |
Ni W C, Gu R K . Airborne monitoring method of nuclear emergency response[J]. Uranium Geology, 2003,19(6). 366-373.
|
[12] |
江民忠, 张积运, 石岩 , 等 .可地浸砂岩型铀矿床航放弱铀异常研究及其找矿意义[J].铀矿地质, 2006, 22(1):38-43:
|
[12] |
Jiang M Z, Zhang J Y, Shi Y , et al. Study on aero radiometric weak uranium anomaly above insitu leachable sandstone-type uranium deposit and its prospecting significance[J]. Uranium Geology, 2006,22(1):38-43.
|
[13] |
郑圻森, 李兵海, 江国元 .航测资料二次开发在吐哈盆地寻找可地浸砂岩型铀矿中的应用效果[J].铀矿地质, 2004, 20(2):110-114:
|
[13] |
Zheng Q S, Li B H, Jiang G Y . Application effector airborne survey data reuse to prospecting for insitu leachable sandstone type uranium deposits in Turpan-Hami basin[J]. Uranium Geology, 2004,20(2):110-114.
|
[14] |
IAEA. Airborne gamma ray spectrometry[R].IAEA.Tecdoc-323, VIENNA, 1991.
|
[15] |
胡明考 . 航放测量技术[R]. 石家庄:核工业航测遥感中心, 2012.
|
[15] |
Hu M K . Technology of Airborne gamma ray spectrometry[R]. Shijiazhuang: Airborne survey and remote sensing center of nuclear industry, 2012.
|
[16] |
毛利战 . 关于伽玛能谱仪本底测定与方法的讨论[J]. 铀矿地质, 1993,9(6):362-366.
|
[16] |
Mao L Z . Discussion on the background determination and method of gamma-ray spectrometer[J]. Uranium Geology. 1993,9(6), 362-366.
|
[17] |
李兵海, 李晓禄, 杨玉勤 , 等. 基于小波变换的航放数据去噪研究[J]. 铀矿地质, 2017,33(4):221-227.
|
[17] |
Li B H, Li X L, Yang Y Q , et al. Wavelet based denoising study on airborne radioactive data[J]. Uranium Geology. 2017,33(4), 221-227.
|
[18] |
刘裕华, 韩长青, 蔡文良 , 等. EJ/T 1032-2005中华人民共和国核行业标准:航空伽玛能谱测量规范[S]. 北京:国防科技工业委员会,2005: 9-27
|
[18] |
Liu Y H, Han C Q , Cai W L , et al. EJ/T 1032-2005 Nuclear industry standard of the People’s Republic of China:Specification for airborne gamma-ray spectrometry [S].Beijing:Defense science,technology and industry committee, 2005: 9-27.
|
[1] |
Yi ZHAO, Xiao-Dong CHEN, Yue HUANG, Gang WANG, Yong-Bo LI, Fu-Gang ZHAO, Shu-Min WANG. The development of three-component inductive magnetic field sensor suitable for shallow water work[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 43(6): 1326-1332. |
[2] |
MAO Li-feng, CHEN bin, LV Dong-wei. THE 1D INVERSION METHOD OF AIRBORNE TEM FOR INACCURATE ALTIMETER DATA[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2011, 35(3): 402-405. |
|
|
|
|