|
|
Study on characteristics of three axis airborne magnetic gradient anomaly |
De-Wen ZHOU, Qing-Kui MENG, Yi YANG, Jiu-Ming JIANG, Wei GAO, Chen-Yang WANG |
China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Land and Resources, Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
Abstract Because of the advantages of multi-parameter and the suppression of the shallow anomaly, the measurement of airborne magnetic gradient has become a new research hotspot in the field of airborne geophysical exploration in recent years. Based on AGS-863 three axis airborne magnetic gradiometer, it described the aeromagnetic gradient theory and the application research status. In order to summarize the relationship between aeromagnetic anomaly and the underground geological bodies, it designed some typical geomagnetic models, took a large number of forward simulation work, and drew the following conclusions: compared with the total field anomaly, gradient anomaly had more advantageous in the delineation of the magnetic bodies; for single magnetic body, the vertical gradient peak corresponded precisely to the center position of the magnetic body, and the longer of strike length of the magnetic body, the closer of the zero point of the main section to the abnormal body boundary, and the main section longitudinal gradient's maximum and minimum values exactly corresponded to abnormal body's left and right boundary and the main section's perpendicular section transverse gradient's minimum and maximum values exactly corresponded to abnormal body's up and down boundary; for the combined magnetic bodies, the range of the magnetic body which was locked with the main section longitudinal gradient peak and the main section's perpendicular section transverse gradient was enlarged, and the vertical gradient peak was shifted to the direction of the nearby magnetic body. By comparing the measured gradient data with the theoretical gradient data, it found that the measured gradient data has obvious advantages, and it can play a prominent role in the identification of human interference and high frequency geological information. These work could provide reference for the field data acquisition workers to understand and identify anomaly and distinguish between true and false anomaly, and provide some help for the anomaly interpretation workers.
|
Received: 20 January 2017
Published: 04 June 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
朱英 . 中国石油航空磁测的进展和展望[J]. 石油物探, 1989,28(3):16-21.
|
[2] |
Cowan D R, Baigent M, Cowan S . Aeromagnetic gradiometers-a perspective[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1995,26(3):241-246.
|
[3] |
张昌达 . 航空磁力梯度张量测量—航空磁测技术的最新进展[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2006,3(5):354-361.
|
[4] |
乔日新, 王守坦 . 我国航空物探的成就与展望[J]. 北京地质, 1996,8(2):29-34.
|
[5] |
熊盛青 . 我国航空重磁勘探技术现状与发展趋势[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2009,24(1):113-117.
|
[6] |
熊盛青 . 发展中国航空物探技术有关问题的思考[J]. 中国地质, 2009,36(6):1366-1374.
|
[7] |
郭华, 吴成平 . 航磁梯度数据与地质异常反映之间的关系[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014,29(4):1650-1656.
|
[8] |
骆遥, 段树岭, 王金龙 , 等. AGS-863航磁全轴梯度勘查系统关键性指标测试[J]. 物探与化探, 2011,35(6):620-625.
|
[9] |
郭志宏, 管志宁, 熊盛青 . 长方体场及梯度场无解析奇异点理论表达式[J]. 地球物理学报, 2004,47(6):1131-1138.
|
[10] |
郭华, 王平, 谢汝宽 . 航磁全轴梯度数据地质解释优势研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2013,28(5):2692-2699.
|
[11] |
郭华, 贾伟洁, 王平 , 等. 航磁梯度数据在磁性地质体边界判断方面的研究[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2015,45(1):273-281.
|
[12] |
张青杉, 麻丰林, 许丽云 . 航空三维磁梯度测量方案研究[J]. 地质与勘探, 2010,46(6):1087-1091.
|
[13] |
李晓禄, 常树帅 . 航磁梯度测量及其在砂岩型铀矿勘查中的应用初探[J]. 铀矿地质, 2009,25(6):355-360.
|
[14] |
李海侠 . 航磁梯度异常的延拓与转换方法研究[D]. 浙江:浙江大学, 2009.
|
[15] |
Rasmussen R, Pedersen L B . End corrections in potential field modeling[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1979,27(4):749-760.
|
[16] |
Chao C K, Sharp J A . Werner deconvolution for automated magnetic interpretation and its refinement using Marquardt's inverse modeling[J]. Geophysics, 1983,48(6):754-774.
|
[17] |
姚长利, 黎益仕, 管志宁 . 重磁异常正反演可视化实时方法技术改进[J]. 现代地质, 1998,12(1):115-122.
|
[18] |
孟庆奎, 朱宏伟, 朱彦珍 . 起伏飞行对航磁异常的影响研究[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2016,13(4):465-469.
|
[1] |
WANG Bo, GUO Liang-Hui, CUI Ya-Tong, Wang Xiang. The approach to gravity forward calculation of 3D Tesseroid mesh model and its parallel algorithm[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(6): 1597-1605. |
[2] |
ZHI Qing-Quan, WU Jun-Jie, WANG Xing-Chun, SUN Huai-Feng, YANG Yi, ZHANG Jie, DENG Xiao-Hong, CHEN Xiao-Dong, DU Li-Ming. The application of ANSYS to TEM 3D forward modeling[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(4): 1037-1042. |
|
|
|
|