|
|
The reproducibility and comparability of the fine particle soil survey geochemical patterns |
Han-Liang LIU1,2,3, Bi-Min ZHANG1,2,3, Xue-Qiu WANG1,2,3, Zhen-Hai ZHANG1,2,3, Dong-Sheng LIU1,2,3 |
1. Key Laboratory of Geochemical Exploration, Ministry of Land and Resources, Langfang 065000, China 2. Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, CAGS, Langfang 065000, China 3. UNESCO International Center on Global-Scale Geochemistry, Langfang 065000, China |
|
|
Abstract The problem as to whether a stable and traceable geochemical model can be obtained by different sampling densities and different sampling time spans constitutes an important basis for testing the reliability of geochemical methods. In this paper, the authors conducted fine sampling densities and sampling time spans over the Huaniushan Pb-Zn deposit of Gansu Province. The conclusions are as follows: the media values and background values of elements obtained by different sampling densities and different sampling time spans are consistent, the geochemical patterns are very similar and reproducible, and so the stable and traceable geochemical patterns can be achieved. The larger the sampling spacing, the more scattered the values, suggesting that the distribution of elements is characterized by local heterogeneity. It is thus held that researchers can portray the details of changes of geochemical patterns and further track the mineralization bodies by increasing the sampling density.
|
Received: 11 May 2017
Published: 04 June 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 标准物质准确度控制 | 标准物质精密度控制 | 实验室重复样控制 | 野外重复样控制 | 公式 | ΔlgC=|lgCi-lgCs| | Dr,s= | Dr=︱C1-C2︱/ [(C1+C2)/2]*100% | Er=︱So-Sd︱/ [(So+Sd)/2]*100% | 含量范围 | 控制限 | 控制限 | 控制限 | 控制限 | 其他元素 | Au | 其他元素 | Au | 小于3倍检出限 | ≤0.15 | ≤17% | ≤50% | ≤100% | ≤50% | ≤100% | 大于3倍检出限 | ≤0.10 | ≤10% | ≤40% | ≤50% | ≤50% | ≤50% |
|
|
分析项目 | 分析方法 | 检出限 | 单位 | 标准物质合格率/% | 重复样合格率/% | Au | 无火焰原子吸收光谱法(AAN) | 0.2 | 10-9 | 100 | 100 | As | 氢化物-原子荧光光谱法(HG-AFS) | 0.2 | 10-6 | 100 | 100 | Bi | 等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS) | 0.05 | 10-6 | 100 | 100 | Cu | 等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS) | 1 | 10-6 | 100 | 100 | Hg | 冷蒸气-原子荧光光谱法(CV-AFS) | 2 | 10-9 | 100 | 100 | Ni | 等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS) | 2 | 10-6 | 100 | 100 | Pb | 等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS) | 2 | 10-6 | 100 | 100 | Sb | 等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS) | 0.05 | 10-6 | 100 | 100 | Zn | 等离子体质谱法(ICP-MS) | 2 | 10-6 | 100 | 100 |
|
|
元素 | 采样年度 | 样品数 | 最小值 | 25%分位数 | 平均值 | 中位数 | 75%分位数 | 最大值 | 剔出数 | 背景值 | Pb | 2013 | 125 | 68.1 | 398 | 2190 | 1024 | 2248 | 26100 | 18 | 1068 | | 2015 | 149 | 60.5 | 501 | 2816 | 1068 | 2409 | 34954 | 29 | 1057 | Zn | 2013 | 125 | 91.3 | 289 | 931 | 589 | 1215 | 9489 | 6 | 718 | | 2015 | 149 | 69.6 | 306 | 1213 | 644 | 1271 | 14112 | 15 | 713 | Au | 2013 | 125 | 3.092 | 7.22 | 15.6 | 10.5 | 18.3 | 110 | 9 | 12.1 | | 2015 | 149 | 0.735 | 6.19 | 15.9 | 10.6 | 17.4 | 125 | 10 | 11.6 | As | 2013 | 125 | 12.1 | 57.6 | 168 | 113 | 185 | 1231 | 11 | 121 | | 2015 | 149 | 11.7 | 52.6 | 226 | 113 | 264 | 3030 | 13 | 143 | Bi | 2013 | 125 | 0.27 | 0.91 | 1.50 | 1.34 | 1.76 | 6.00 | 1 | 1.47 | | 2015 | 149 | 0.37 | 0.86 | 1.90 | 1.32 | 2.10 | 31.73 | 8 | 1.52 | Cu | 2013 | 125 | 14.2 | 31.1 | 41.1 | 36.8 | 47.7 | 126 | 4 | 39.2 | | 2015 | 149 | 12.1 | 30.2 | 43.0 | 36.9 | 47.2 | 181 | 8 | 39.0 | Hg | 2013 | 125 | 11.1 | 34.2 | 75.1 | 58.4 | 86.4 | 460 | 8 | 60.5 | | 2015 | 149 | 10.3 | 36.3 | 73.2 | 58.9 | 79.6 | 416 | 13 | 56.9 | Ni | 2013 | 125 | 13.9 | 28.4 | 31.1 | 30.4 | 33.3 | 55.3 | 4 | 30.5 | | 2015 | 149 | 13.4 | 28.2 | 31.8 | 30.4 | 34.7 | 81.3 | 3 | 31.1 | Sb | 2013 | 125 | 1.53 | 6.50 | 30.1 | 14.8 | 37.6 | 257 | 15 | 17.7 | | 2015 | 149 | 1.40 | 7.09 | 41.5 | 15.5 | 36.1 | 1218 | 13 | 20.0 |
|
|
粒级 | SQ1 | SQ2 | SQ3 | 质量/g | 百分比/% | 质量/g | 百分比/% | 质量/g | 百分比/% | 4~20目 | 86.3 | 16.12 | 126.3 | 16.54 | 15.5 | 3.02 | 20~40目 | 67.8 | 12.66 | 131.8 | 17.26 | 62.5 | 12.18 | 40~60目 | 70.5 | 13.17 | 88.5 | 11.59 | 83.0 | 16.17 | 60~80目 | 50.7 | 9.47 | 96.0 | 12.58 | 126.7 | 24.68 | 80~100目 | 45.2 | 8.44 | 88.8 | 11.63 | 57.9 | 11.28 | 100~120目 | 35.3 | 6.59 | 45.7 | 5.99 | 69.3 | 13.50 | 120~200目 | 69.1 | 12.90 | 86.0 | 11.27 | 45.6 | 8.88 | <200目 | 110.6 | 20.65 | 100.3 | 13.14 | 52.8 | 10.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
王学求, 孙宏伟, 迟清华 , 等. 地球化学异常再现性与可对比性[J]. 中国地质, 2005,32(1):135-140.
|
[2] |
王学求 . 荒漠戈壁区超低密度地球化学调查与评价——以东天山为例[J]. 新疆地质, 2001,19(3):200-206.
|
[3] |
刘汉粮, 张必敏, 刘东盛 , 等. 土壤微细粒全量测量在甘肃花牛山矿区的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016,40(1):33-39.
|
[4] |
杨建国, 翟金元, 杨宏武 , 等. 甘肃北山地区花牛山铅锌矿区玄武岩锆石LA-ICP-MS U-Pb定年及其地质意义[J]. 地质通报, 2010,29(7):1017-1023.
|
[5] |
聂风军, 江思宏, 白大明 . 北山地区金属矿床成矿规律及找矿方向[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2002.
|
[6] |
朱江, 吕新彪, 曹晓峰 , 等. 甘肃花牛山铅锌金矿床地质特征及成矿物质来源[J]. 矿床地质, 2010,29(增刊):1033-1034.
|
[7] |
何智祖, 曹俊, 董钦伟 . 甘肃北山花牛山东金矿床地质特征及找矿思路[J]. 甘肃冶金, 2012,34(3):74-78.
|
[8] |
代文军 . 甘肃北山花牛山金银铅锌矿床成因探讨[J]. 华南地质与矿产, 2010(3):25-33.
|
[9] |
殷勇, 殷先明 . 甘肃北山重要金属矿床类型与找矿预测[J]. 甘肃地质, 2008,17(2):9-18.
|
[10] |
刘德长 . 区域控矿断裂带的航空高光谱遥感技术研究——以黑石山—花牛山深大断裂带为例[J]. 地质与勘探, 2015,51(2):366-375.
|
[11] |
张必敏, 迟清华, 张永勤 . 干旱荒漠覆盖区隐伏金矿上方覆盖层三维地球化学分布模式[J]. 地学前缘, 2012,19(3):130-137.
|
[12] |
赵善定, 王学求 . 荒漠戈壁区地表疏松层中元素的分布规律[J]. 物探与化探, 2006,30(6):517-520.
|
[13] |
赵善定 . 荒漠戈壁区地表覆盖层中元素的分布规律与存在形式[D]. 西安:长安大学, 2005: 12-15.
|
[14] |
杜佩轩 . 新疆北部干旱荒漠区勘查地球化学得方法研究与应用效果[G]//第四届勘查地球化学学术讨论会论文选编.武汉: 中国地质大学出版社, 1991.
|
[15] |
刘汉粮, 王学求, 张必敏 , 等. 岩屑测量和土壤微细粒测量在沙泉子铜镍矿的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2015,39(2):228-233.
|
[16] |
Wang X Q , The CGB Sampling Team. China geochemical baselines: Sampling methodology[J]. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 2015,148:25-39.
|
[17] |
张勤, 白金峰, 王烨 . 地壳全元素配套分析方案及分析质量监控系统[J]. 地学前缘, 2012,19(3):33-42.
|
[18] |
迟清华, 鄢明才 . 应用地球化学元素丰度数据手册[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2008, 88-112.
|
[19] |
中国科学院地球化学研究所. 高等地球化学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
|
[20] |
王学求, 张必敏, 叶荣 . 纳米地球化学与覆盖区矿产勘查[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2016,35(1):43-51.
|
[21] |
张必敏, 王学求, 徐善法 , 等. 盆地金属矿穿透性地球化学勘查模型与案例[J]. 中国地质, 2016,43(5):1697-1709.
|
[22] |
刁理品 . 沟系土壤地球化学测量在贵州普晴锑金矿勘查区应用与找矿效果[J]. 地质与勘探, 2010,46(1):120-127.
|
[23] |
席明杰, 马生明, 刘崇民 , 等. 内蒙古准苏吉花铜钼矿区土壤地球化学异常特征与评价[J]. 地质与勘探, 2013,49(2):337-345.
|
[1] |
LI Jian-Ting, LIU Xue-Min, WANG Xue-Qiu, HAN Zhi-Xuan, JANG Yao. Tracing and identification of concealed Luoboling copper-molybdenum deposit in Fujian Province using trace elements and isotopes in fine-grained surface soils[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 32-45. |
[2] |
LIU Han-Liang, ZHANG Bi-Min, LIU Dong-Sheng, WANG Xue-Qiu, ZHANG Zhen-Hai, HAN Zhi-Xuan. The application of soil geochemical measurement method to the Huaniushan Pb-Zn deposit, Gansu Province[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2016, 40(1): 33-39. |
|
|
|
|