|
|
The seismic exploration technology of the sandstone-type uranium deposit in Wucaiwan area of Junggar Basin |
Qu-Bo WU1,2, Cheng-Yin CAO1,2, Zi-Wei LI1,2 |
1. Beijing Research Institute of Uranium Geology,Beijing 100029,China 2. CNNC Key Laboratory of Uranium Exploration and Evaluation Technology,Beijing 100029,China |
|
|
Abstract The study of the ore-forming environments of sandstone-type uranium,such as strata,folds,fractures and sand bodies,is significant for predicting and evaluating the uranium resource in Wucaiwan area of Junggar Basin.The technology of the two-dimensional seismic exploration was used to detect the ore-forming environment of sandstone-type uranium deposits for the first time and to tackle the problem that the traditional methods have low accuracy in surveying the structures and interpreting the sands in this area.On the basis of the previous methods,the related technology was improved through experimental research,a seismic data acquisition method based on vibroseis for sandstone-type uranium deposits in Junggar Basin was set up,a set of processing flow for the seismic data characteristics in the area was established,and the method for identifying the sand body was founded based on the seismic inversion technique of linear quasi-acoustic reconstruction.On such a basis,the fold morphology of "Shaqiuhe anticline,Lucaogou syncline,Huoshaoshan anticline,Xidagou syncline and Zhangpenggou anticline" in this area was basically ascertained.It is found that there exist ore-controlling fractures in the two wings of the Huoshaoshan anticline,and there exist the developing characteristics of sand bodies in target beds;meanwhile,an ore-forming favorable area was predicted.In conclusion,the established and improved seismic exploration technology for sandstone-type uranium deposits in the Junggar Basin can solve the problem of detecting the metallogenic environment of uranium deposits in this area.
|
Received: 02 March 2018
Published: 19 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
王果, 王国荣, 鲁克改 , 等. 准噶尔盆地铀矿地质工作回顾及今后找矿方向[J]. 铀矿地质, 2016,32(6):341-350.
|
[2] |
秦明宽, 何中波, 刘章月 , 等. 准噶尔盆地砂岩型铀矿成矿环境与找矿方向研究[J]. 地质论评, 2017,63(5):1255-1269.
|
[3] |
金若时, 黄澎涛, 苗培森 , 等. 准噶尔盆地东缘侏罗系砂岩型铀矿成矿条件与找矿方向[J]. 地质通报, 2014,33(2/3):359-369.
|
[4] |
唐湘飞, 杨勇, 杜杰 , 等. 新疆准噶尔盆地东部铀资源调查评价[R]. 乌鲁木齐:核工业216大队, 2015.
|
[5] |
聂逢君, 周维勋, 管太阳 , 等. 扇三角洲砂体特征及其与可地浸砂岩型铀矿化的关系[J]. 铀矿地质, 2000,16(1):6-12.
|
[6] |
杨龙泉, 吴国东, 赵丹 , 等. 活性炭测氡在五彩湾地区砂岩型铀矿勘查中的应用[J]. 世界核地质科学, 2015,32(3):159-163.
|
[7] |
金若时, 程银行, 杨君 , 等. 准噶尔盆地侏罗纪含铀岩系的层序划分与对比[J]. 地质学报, 2016,90(12):3293-3309.
|
[8] |
谭思源 . 准噶尔盆地东缘中下侏罗统沉积特征及其对砂岩型铀矿成矿影响[D].北京:中国地质大学( 北京), 2016.
|
[9] |
何中波, 刘章月, 郭强 , 等. 准噶尔大型叠合盆地地浸砂岩型铀矿预测技术研究[R]. 北京:核工业北京地质研究院, 2015.
|
[10] |
万汉平, 程纪星, 乔宝强 , 等. 准噶尔盆地砂岩型铀矿地球物理探测技术开发与应用研究[R]. 北京:核工业北京地质研究院, 2016.
|
[11] |
李子伟, 陈敬国, 吴曲波 , 等. 地震勘探方法在伊犁盆地南缘砂岩型铀矿勘查中的应用研究[J]. 铀矿地质, 2016,32(4):235-241.
|
[12] |
吴曲波, 李子伟, 潘自强 , 等. 砂岩型铀矿地震勘探技术应用现状与发展[J]. 物探与化探, 2017,41(4):648-655.
|
[13] |
吴曲波, 李子伟 .砂岩型铀矿地震勘探中砂体识别的几个问题[C]//中国核科学技术进展报告(第四卷 )——中国核学会2015年学术年会论文集第1册(铀矿地质分卷、铀矿冶分卷), 2015:198-203.
|
[14] |
吴曲波, 李子伟, 潘自强 . 鄂尔多斯盆地北部砂岩型铀矿地震探测技术应用研究[J]. 铀矿地质, 2016,32(2):104-111.
|
[15] |
张金带, 徐高中, 林锦荣 , 等. 中国北方6种新的砂岩型铀矿对铀资源潜力的提示[J]. 中国地质, 2010,37(5):1435-1449.
|
[16] |
易超, 陈心路, 李西得 , 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北东部古层间氧化带砂岩型铀矿成矿特征[J]. 铀矿地质, 2015,31(s1):247-257.
|
[17] |
吴曲波, 潘自强, 李子伟 . 砂岩型铀矿地震勘探中可控震源激发参数试验[J]. 铀矿地质, 2016,32(6):371-375.
|
[18] |
吴曲波, 李子伟, 潘自强 , 等. 砂岩型铀矿地震勘探中若干问题研究[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2017,32(5):2097-2106.
|
[19] |
吴曲波, 刘武生, 李子伟 , 等. 地震勘探技术在定位古河道中的试验[J]. 铀矿地质, 2015,31(s1):193-197.
|
|
|
|