|
|
Agricultural geochemical partitioning in Zhangye-Yongchang region |
Yong-Qiang WU1, Chun-Liang LI1, Xing-Xing DUAN2, Nan LIANG2, Xiang WANG1, Jiang LI1 |
1. Geological Survey Institute of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730000, China 2. Xi'an Geological Survey Center of China Geological Survey, Xi'an 710054, China |
|
|
Abstract According to the distribution characteristics of heavy metal elements, nutrient elements (varied quantities of elements for agricultural benefits) and healthy elements in surface obtained from multi-purpose regional geochemical survey in Zhangye-Yongchang area, in combination with features of the landform, soil types and geological characteristics, and with the content grades of pollution elements affecting soil environmental quality (non-pollution, slight pollution, moderate pollution) as the major partitioning basis, the authors divided the whole region into high quality agricultural area, medium quality agricultural area and low quality agricultural area. Among them the high quality agricultural area was further divided into five subareas, which cover an area of 691.83 km 2, accounting for 19.66% of the whole surveying area; the medium quality agricultural area was further divided into three subareas, which cover an area of 5 799.49 km 2 with widest distribution, accounting for 67.38% of the whole surveying area; the low quality agricultural area was further divided into three subareas, which cover an area of 1 116.10 km 2, accounting for 12.96% of the whole surveying area.
|
Received: 19 January 2018
Published: 19 December 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
等级 | 一等 | 二等 | 三等 | 四等 | 五等 | 土壤环境 | Pi≤1 | 1<Pi≤2 | 3<Pi≤3 | 3<Pi≤5 | Pi>5 | | 清洁 | 轻微污染 | 轻度污染 | 中度污染 | 重度污染 |
|
|
|
|
元素 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 | 丰富 | 较丰富 | 适度 | 较缺乏 | 缺乏 | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 有机质 | 101 | 4.68 | 62 | 2.87 | 101 | 4.68 | 580 | 25.85 | 1316 | 60.93 | N | 265 | 12.27 | 146 | 6.76 | 533 | 24.68 | 529 | 24.49 | 687 | 31.81 | P | 265 | 12.27 | 569 | 26.34 | 932 | 43.15 | 332 | 15.37 | 62 | 2.97 | K | 6 | 0.28 | 1295 | 59.95 | 828 | 38.33 | 27 | 1.25 | 0 | 0 | Ca | 1479 | 69.09 | 557 | 26 | 105 | 4.9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Mg | 2124 | 99.21 | 15 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.09 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | S | 926 | 43.28 | 366 | 17.09 | 409 | 19.09 | 260 | 12.14 | 180 | 8.4 |
|
|
|
|
等级 | 一等 | 二等 | 三等 | 四等 | 五等 | 含义 | 丰富 | 较丰富 | 中等 | 较缺乏 | 缺乏 | f养综 | ≥ 4.5 | 4.5~3.5 | 3.5~2.5 | 2.5~1.5 | <1.5 |
|
|
|
|
元素 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 | 丰富 | 较丰富 | 适度 | 较缺乏 | 缺乏 | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | Fe | 1720 | 80.35 | 318 | 14.85 | 83 | 3.87 | 12 | 0.56 | 8 | 0.37 | Mn | 5 | 2.57 | 740 | 34.27 | 1120 | 52.38 | 274 | 12.98 | 2 | 0.09 | Zn | 2 | 0.09 | 15 | 0.07 | 1327 | 61.95 | 597 | 27.87 | 200 | 9.34 | Cu | 59 | 2.8 | 1616 | 75.44 | 372 | 17.37 | 94 | 4.39 | 0 | 0 | B | 11 | 0.51 | 164 | 7.66 | 1346 | 62.84 | 594 | 27.73 | 26 | 1.21 | Mo | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.19 | 302 | 14.1 | 2502 | 70.12 | 333 | 15.55 |
|
|
|
|
元素 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 | 丰富 | 较丰富 | 适度 | 较缺乏 | 缺乏 | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | Si | 2141 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Co | 2 | 0.09 | 600 | 25.26 | 1226 | 59.15 | 285 | 13.73 | 28 | 1.45 | Na | 222 | 10.36 | 1479 | 69.05 | 433 | 20.21 | 8 | 0.37 | 0 | 0 | Ni | 549 | 25.68 | 1223 | 57.1 | 308 | 14.38 | 51 | 2.38 | 10 | 0.47 |
|
|
|
|
元素 | 缺乏 | 边缘 | 适量 | 高 | 过剩 | 硒 | ≤0.125 | 0.125~0.175 | 0.175~0.40 | 0.40~3.0 | >3.0 | 碘 | ≤1 | 1~1.50 | 1.50~5 | 5~100 | >100 | 氟 | ≤400 | 400~500 | 500~550 | 550~700 | >700 |
|
|
元素 | 一级 | 二级 | 三级 | 四级 | 五级 | 过剩 | 高 | 适量 | 边缘 | 缺乏 | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | 样品数 | 比例/% | Se | 0 | 0 | 458 | 21.4 | 1513 | 70.7 | 130 | 6.1 | 40 | 1.9 | I | 1 | 0.05 | 9 | 0.42 | 520 | 24.28 | 1272 | 59.38 | 339 | 15.83 | F | 78 | 3.69 | 1176 | 54.9 | 698 | 32.59 | 163 | 7.61 | 26 | 1.21 |
|
|
|
|
农业地球化 学分区类型 | 土壤环境质量 | 养分元素 | 健康元素 | 大量和中量营养元素 | 微量营养元素 | 作物有益元素 | 优质农业区 | 无污染 | 较丰富 | 适度 | 丰富 | 适度 | 中等农业区 | 初始/轻度污染 | 适度 | 适度 | 适度 | 较缺乏以上 | 低等农业区 | 轻度/中度污染 | 缺乏 | 缺乏 | 缺乏 | 较缺乏 |
|
|
|
|
分区编号 | 面积/km2 | 地层 | 土壤类型 | 地貌类型 | 地球化学特征 | Ⅰ号优质农业区 | 61.38 | Qp、K | 灰棕漠土 | 冲洪积平原 | 无污染,N、P、Zn、Cu、Mg、Mn丰富,F、S、Se、K较丰富,有机质、Mo、I适当 | Ⅱ号优质农业区 | 74.94 | Qp、Z | 灰钙土、栗钙土 | 低山丘陵、冲洪积平原 | 无污染,Mg、K、Mn、I、F、S丰富,N较丰富、有机质、P适当 | Ⅲ号优质农业区 | 431.86 | Qh、Qp、C、S | 灌漠土、栗钙土、黑土 | 冲洪积平原、低山丘陵 | 无污染,Mg、Mo、N 、B、Mn、较丰富,K、P、S、Se、I、F、Zn较丰富,有机质较丰富偏适当 | Ⅳ号优质农业区 | 903.11 | Qh、Qp、C、 S、∈ | 灰钙土、栗钙土、 灌漠土 | 冲洪积平原、冲积平 原、准平原台地 | 无污染,Mg、Mn、P、N 丰富,K、B、Se、I、F、Zn较丰富,有机质较丰富偏适当 | Ⅴ号优质农业区 | 220.54 | Qp、C、∈ | 栗钙土、灌漠土 | 冲洪积平原、中山 | 无污染,Mg、Mn、K、P、Mo、Se、F丰富,有机质、N适当 | Ⅰ号中等农业区 | 3744.08 | Qp、Qh、N、 K、S、O | 灰钙土、灰漠土、 灰棕漠土、灌漠土 | 冲积平原、冲洪积平原 | 无污染,Ca、Se、I、F适当,N、P适当偏缺乏,有机质较缺乏 | Ⅱ号中等农业区 | 483.04 | Qp、Qh、S | 灰钙土、栗钙土 | 冲洪积平原、低山丘陵 | 无污染,P丰富,Se、I、F、K、N适当,有机质较缺乏 | Ⅲ号中等农业区 | 1572.37 | Qp、Qh、S | 灰钙土、灰棕漠土、 灌漠土 | 冲洪积平原、低山 丘陵、中山 | 无污染,K、Se、F较丰富,P、N较缺乏,有机质缺乏 | Ⅰ号低等农业区 | 59.58 | Qp、pt1、pt2 | 灌漠土、沼泽土 | 洪积平原 | 轻度污染,K 适当,N、P、I、有机质缺乏 | Ⅱ号低等农业区 | 799.56 | Qh、Qp、J 、Z、 K、Ar3 | 灰钙土、灰棕 漠土、灌漠土 | 冲洪积平原、中山 | 轻度/中度污染, N、P、K、I、有机质缺乏 | Ⅲ号低等农业区 | 256.96 | Qp、Qh | 灌漠土 | 洪积平原 | 轻度/中度污染,K 适当,N、P、I、有机质缺乏 |
|
|
[1] |
何伟相, 马逸麟, 梅丽辉 . 潘阳湖区农业环境质量地球化学分区[J]. 岩矿测试, 2008,27(4):269-273.
|
[2] |
卢婷, 王会峰, 易宗义 , 等. 西安地区农业地球化学分区[G]//多目标区域地球化学调查与评价文集.北京: 地质出版社, 2011, 67-74.
|
[3] |
刘文辉 . 甘肃省张掖—永昌地区土地质量评估[J]. 物探与化探, 2013,37(1):132-136.
|
[4] |
全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤普查技术[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1992: 1-28.
|
[5] |
甘肃省土壤普查办公室. 甘肃土壤[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1990.
|
[1] |
TAO Chun-Jun, SHI Chun-Hong, ZHANG Xiao-Rong, GUAN Hou-Chun, JIA Shi-Jun. Research on soil sampling density and environmental quality of Huaibei plain covered area: A case study of 1∶50 000 Gaoluji Sheet[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(1): 200-206. |
[2] |
XIE Wei, YANG Yao-Dong, HOU Jia-Yu, JIAN Gui-Qin, LI Guo-Cheng, ZHAO Xin-Hua. The evaluation of soil environmental quality of main walnut producing areas based on various methods of heavy metal contamination assessment in Tianjin[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(1): 207-214. |
|
|
|
|