|
|
Analyzing PML absorbing impact factors with wave equation simulation |
LIU Rui-He1, YIN Xing-Yao1, PU Yi-Tao2 |
1. School of Geoscience, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China;
2. Bureau of Geophysical Prospecting INC., China National Petroleum Corporation, Korla 841001, China |
|
|
Abstract In seismic numerical simulation, the perfectly matched layer (PML) boundary can attenuate the seismic wave effectively, and the snapshots and record have no boundary reflection interferes.The authors further analyzed the attenuation mechanism of split perfectly matched layer (SPML).By wave equation simulation, the authors analyzed the problem as to how the parameters affect absorption and attenuation characteristics of SPML boundary, such as source dominant frequency, spatial grid spacing and medium speed.As a result, the authors obtained the results of PML attenuation based on different conditions.Through analyzing and comparing the results, the conclusions have been reached that source dominant frequency has no direct influence on PML attenuation, spatial grid spacing is in inverse proportion to the PML attenuation, and high-speed medium slows down PML attenuation effect.By Marmousi2 test, the authors confirmed the validity of the conclusions.The selection method of SPML parameter in complex model or different scales of numerical simulation was given, which lays a foundation for quantitative selection of SPML boundary parameters in numerical simulation.
|
Received: 11 September 2015
Published: 10 August 2016
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
CHEN Xiu-Juan, LIU Zhi-Di, LIU Yu-Xi, CHAI Hui-Qiang, WANG Yong. Research into the pore structure of tight reservoirs:A review[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 22-31. |
[2] |
SHI Lei, GUAN Yao, FENG Jin, GAO Hui, QIU Xin-Wei, QUE Xiao-Ming. Multi-level division method of flow units for accurate permeability assessment of glutenite reservoirs:A case study of reservoir W53 of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Lufeng oilfield[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 78-86. |
|
|
|
|