|
|
The wave field separation method in comparison with other methods in prestack reverse-time migration denoising |
ZHANG Shu-Jie1,2, XUE Ting-Xiao1,3,4 |
1. College of Earth Sciences, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;
2. Geological Party of Northeastern Jiangxi Province, Jiangxi Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, Shangrao 334000, China;
3. Guangxi Scientific Experiment Center of Mining, Metallurgy and Environment, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China;
4. Key Laboratory of Geological Engineering Center of Guangxi, Guilin 541004, China |
|
|
Abstract Two-way wave equation based on reverse time migration (RTM) has such advantages as simple principle,no angle restrictions,suitability for the model of arbitrary speed changes,and correct imaging for all kinds of waves.Nevertheless,the adoption of the cross-correlation imaging condition can produce low-frequency noise problems.Based on analyzing the mechanism of the low frequency noise,the authors put forward an effective wave field separation denoising method,in which the source and the receiver wave field are separated into different directions of one way wave component,and only cross-correlation imaging is conducted on the effective path of the component,so as to achieve the purpose of removing noise.The results of the model test and comparative study of the denoising effects of Poynting vector filtering,Laplasse filtering and wave field separation show that the wave field separation method is relatively effective in these three methods.
|
Received: 09 May 2014
Published: 10 April 2015
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
CHEN Xiu-Juan, LIU Zhi-Di, LIU Yu-Xi, CHAI Hui-Qiang, WANG Yong. Research into the pore structure of tight reservoirs:A review[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 22-31. |
[2] |
SHI Lei, GUAN Yao, FENG Jin, GAO Hui, QIU Xin-Wei, QUE Xiao-Ming. Multi-level division method of flow units for accurate permeability assessment of glutenite reservoirs:A case study of reservoir W53 of Paleogene Wenchang Formation in Lufeng oilfield[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 78-86. |
|
|
|
|