Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2021, Vol. 45 Issue (4): 906-912    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2021.1391
  地质调查·资源勘查 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
乌尔逊凹陷泥页岩演化特征及潜力区预测
杨松林1, 李岩2, 刘亚轩3, 杨雪3, 蒋文博4
1.烟台黄金职业学院,山东 烟台 264000
2.东北石油大学 地球科学学院,黑龙江 大庆 163318
3.中国石油玉门油田分公司老君庙采油厂,甘肃 酒泉 735019
4.青海油田勘探开发研究院,甘肃 敦煌 736200
Evolution characteristics and potential area prediction of shale in Wuerxun Sag
YANG Song-Lin1, LI Yan2, LIU Ya-Xuan3, YANG Xue3, JIANG Wen-Bo4
1. Yantai Gold College,Yantai 264000,China
2. School of Earth Sciences, Northeast Petroleum University, Daqing 163318,China
3. Laojunmiao Oil Production Plant of Yumen Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Jiuquan 735019,China
4. Exploration and Development Research Institute of Qinghai Oilfield, Dunhuang 736200,China
全文: PDF(1996 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

乌尔逊凹陷为海拉尔盆地南部重要的含油区,具有较大勘探潜力。笔者通过油源对比确定乌尔逊凹陷主力烃源岩层,分析不同区域源岩发育特征及有机质丰度、类型等地球化学指标,评价乌尔逊凹陷主力烃源岩生油成熟期和成藏阶段,通过流体包裹体均一化温度的测量,来判断油气充注史,预测优先勘探潜力部位。研究发现,乌尔逊凹陷不同区域油源不完全相同,乌尔逊北部油藏源于南屯组泥页岩母质,乌尔逊南部区域除了南屯组泥页岩,还有铜钵庙组暗色泥岩生成的油流混入。乌尔逊凹陷具有两期成藏:第一期为伊敏组后期—青元岗组早期,原油由烃岩层排出、运移注入圈闭成藏;第二期为青元岗组后期构造活动使早期油藏原油重新调整分配注入新的圈闭成藏。综合分析认为乌北洼陷西侧、乌南洼陷东侧构造带为两个重要的勘探潜力带。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
杨松林
李岩
刘亚轩
杨雪
蒋文博
关键词 海拉尔乌尔逊地区泥页岩潜力区包裹体    
Abstract

Wuerxun Sag is an important oil-bearing area in the south of Hailaer basin, which has great exploration potential. This paper determines the main source rocks in Wuerxun Sag by oil source correlation, analyzes the development characteristics of source rocks in different regions and geochemical indicators such as organic matter abundance and type, evaluates the oil generation maturity and accumulation stage of main source rocks in Wuerxun Sag, and judges the oil and gas filling history and predicts the preferred exploration potential position by measuring the homogenization temperature of fluid inclusions. It is found that the oil source in different areas of Wuerxun Sag is not identical. The oil reservoir in the north of Wuerxun Sag is derived from the parent material of mud shale rock of Nantun formation. In the south of Wuerxun Sag, besides the mud shale of Nantun formation, there is oil flow from dark mudstone of Tongbomiao formation. Wuerxun Sag has two stages of hydrocarbon accumulation: The first stage is from the later Yimin formation to the early Qingyuangang formation; The second stage is the late structural activity of Qingyuangang formation, which makes the early oil reservoir redistribute and inject new traps. It is considered that the west side of Wubei sag and the east side of Wunan sag are two important exploration potential zones.

Key wordsHailar    Wuerxun area    shale    potential area    inclusion
收稿日期: 2020-07-24      修回日期: 2021-04-16      出版日期: 2021-08-20
ZTFLH:  P632  
基金资助:国家科技重大专项(2016ZX05009005)
作者简介: 杨松林(1987-),男,硕士,山东济南人,烟台黄金职业学院讲师,主要从事矿产地质与勘查研究工作。
引用本文:   
杨松林, 李岩, 刘亚轩, 杨雪, 蒋文博. 乌尔逊凹陷泥页岩演化特征及潜力区预测[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 906-912.
YANG Song-Lin, LI Yan, LIU Ya-Xuan, YANG Xue, JIANG Wen-Bo. Evolution characteristics and potential area prediction of shale in Wuerxun Sag. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(4): 906-912.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2021.1391      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2021/V45/I4/906
Fig.1  海拉尔盆地构造单元划分
Fig.2  烃源岩成熟度分析
层位 岩性 有机碳 氯仿沥青“A” 热解生烃潜量 评价结果
范围/% 平均值/% 范围/% 平均值/% 范围/10-3 平均值/10-3
K1n2 泥页岩 0.27~5.9 2.2 0.0010~0.23 0.057 0.12~21.1 7.10 中—好
K1n1 泥页岩 0.13~4.3 2.0 0.001~0.51 0.12 0.05~37.0 5.38 中—好
K1t 泥岩 0.09~3.4 1.0 0.003~0.12 0.06 0.09~11.0〗 3.8 中等
Table 1  乌尔逊凹陷烃源岩有机质地球化学参数
Fig.3  有机质类型分析
Fig.4  乌尔逊凹陷岩原油及烃源岩质量色谱
Fig.5  原油和烃源岩碳同位素特征
Fig.6  乌尔逊深部洼陷烃源岩演化剖面
Fig.7  乌尔逊凹陷地层埋藏史、热史及充注史
Fig.8  均一化温度分布
Fig.9  乌尔逊凹陷主力烃源岩分布及潜力区预测
[1] 齐士龙. 海拉尔油田薄差储层细分多层压裂技术[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2015,34(5):81-86.
[1] Qi S L. Subdivided multilayer fracturing technology for the thin and poor reservoirs of hailer oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2015,34(5):81-86.
[2] 吴文祥, 张海祥, 李占东, 等. 层序地层地球化学方法在烃源岩评价中的应用——以海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2015,36(4):705-710.
[2] Wu W X, Zhang H Y, Li Z D, et al. Sequence stratigraphic geochemistry and its application in evaluation of source rocks: taking Beier sag of Hailar Basin as an example[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2015,36(4):705-710.
[3] 申文静. 海拉尔盆地中部断陷带与外围凹陷烃源条件类比分析[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2016,30(4):39-46.
[3] Shi W J. Analogical analysis of hydrocarbon source conditions between central fault depression and peripheral depression in Hailaer Basin[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2016,30(4):39-46.
[4] 李娇娜, 徐然, 张健, 等. 内蒙古海拉尔盆地侏罗系烃源岩地球化学特征[J]. 地质与资源, 2017,26(2):147-156.
[4] Li J N, Xu R, Zhang J, et al. Geochemistry of the jurassic source rocks in hailar basin,inner Mongolia[J]. Geology and Resources, 2017,26(2):147-156.
[5] 徐立恒, 宋宝权, 韩嵩, 等. 变尺度构造模型在地质统计学反演储层预测中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 2019,40(2):190-196.
[5] Xu L H, Song B Q, Han S, et al. Application of variable-scale structure modelon geostatistics inversion reservoir prediction[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019,40(2):190-196.
[6] Tissot B P, Pelet R, Ungerer P. Thermal history of sedimentary basins, maturation indices,and kinetics of oil and gas generation[J]. AAPG Bull., 1987,71(12):445-466.
[7] 邬立言, 顾信章. 热解技术在我国生油岩研究中的应用[J]. 石油学报, 1986,7(2):13-19.
[7] Wu L Y, Gu X Z. The application of pyrolysis technique in source rock research[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 1986 , 7(2):13-19.
[8] 卢双舫, 张敏. 油气地球化学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2007: 174-199.
[8] Lu S F, Zhang M. Petroleum geochemistry[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2007: 174-199.
[9] 刘超英, 闫相宾, 徐旭辉, 等. 应用流体包裹体研究惠民凹陷南斜坡油气充注史[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2008,29(4):507-510.
[9] Liu C Y, Yan X B, Xu X H, et al. Application of fluid inclusion to the study of hydrocarbon charge history of the south slope in the Huimin Sag[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2008,29(4):507-510.
[10] 崔军平. 海拉尔盆地热演化史与油气成藏史研究[D]. 西安:西北大学, 2014, 15-56.
[10] Cui J P. Geothermal evolution and hydrocarbon accumulation history of Hailaer Basin[D]. Xi'an:Northwest University, 2014: 15-56.
[11] 刘新颖. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊凹陷油气生成、运移及成藏[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学, 2016: 10-30.
[11] Liu X Y. Hydrocarbon generation in Wuerxun Sag, Hailaer Basin:Migration and accumulation[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2016: 10-30.
[12] 王成, 张安达. 海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷储层特征及其孔隙演化[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2019,38(5):151-159.
[12] Wang C, Zhang A D. Reservoir characteristics and pore evolution of Wuerxun-Beier Sag in Hailar Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019,38(5):151-159.
[1] 刘畅, 张参辉, 张鑫, 纵瑞. 河南灵宝董家埝银矿床流体包裹体特征及矿床成因[J]. 物探与化探, 2023, 47(2): 343-352.
[2] 孟凡洋, 包书景, 陈科, 王鹏, 李柳德. 基于广域电磁法的页岩气有利区预测——以渝东北巫山地区为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(1): 68-74.
[3] 刘祜, 魏文博, 程纪星, 漆富成. 音频大地电磁测深在江西修武盆地页岩气目标层研究中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(5): 904-908.
[4] 朴寿成, 张博文, 师磊, 于泽新. 辽宁小塔子沟金矿床矿脉地球化学特征及找矿标志[J]. 物探与化探, 2007, 31(2): 120-123,128.
[5] 董胜. 安徽省贵池地区区域地球化学特征及找矿意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2006, 30(3): 215-219,223.
[6] 燕建设. 马超营断裂带流体系统地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2005, 29(6): 487-492,496.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com