综合物探方法在嘉祥县青山省级地质公园溶洞勘察中的应用效果

doi:10.11720/wtyht.2020.0111

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF(2053 KB) HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

嘉祥县青山省级地质公园地质遗迹非常丰富,总面积2.43 km²,是以典型三山子组地层剖面、丰富构造形迹、泉水景观和洞穴类地质遗迹为主的小型地质公园,为进一步促进旅游业的发展,开拓岩溶洞穴景观面积,采用综合物探方法寻找隐藏岩溶洞穴,利用微重力勘察方法圈定异常3处,均为连续性重力低特征,同时利用高密度电阻率法对圈定异常进行了验证,最终新发现具备一定规模的岩溶洞穴3个,取得了良好的勘察效果。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	孟庆旺

关键词 ：青山省级地质公园, 综合物探方法, 岩溶洞穴

Abstract：

Qingshan Provincial Geopark in Jiaxiang County, with a total area of 2.43 km², is rich in geological relics. It is a small geopark mainly composed of typical Sanshanzi Formation stratigraphic profile, rich structural traces, spring landscape and cave type geological relics. In order to further promote the development of tourism and expand the landscape area of karst caves, the authors used comprehensive geophysical methods to look for hidden karst caves, and utilized microgravity survey methods to delineate three anomalies, all of which are of continuous low gravity characteristics. At the same time, the high-density resistivity method was used to verify the delineated anomalies. Finally, three karst caves with a certain scale were found, and good exploration results were achieved.

Key words： Qingshan Provincial Geopark comprehensive geophysical methods karst caves

收稿日期: 2020-03-10 出版日期: 2020-12-29

P631

基金资助:局控地质勘察和科技创新项目“山东省嘉祥县青山省级地质公园溶洞勘察”(鲁地字20184)(JKKC201825)

作者简介: 孟庆旺(1988-),男,潍坊诸城人,工程师,主要从事物化探找矿工作。Email:mqwsjz@163.com

引用本文:

孟庆旺. 综合物探方法在嘉祥县青山省级地质公园溶洞勘察中的应用效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(6): 1464-1469.
MENG Qing-Wang. The application effect of comprehensive geophysical method in karst cave investigation of Qingshan Provincial Geopark in Jiaxiang County. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(6): 1464-1469.

链接本文:

https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2020.0111 或 https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2020/V44/I6/1464

Fig.1 青山地质公园地质简图
1—巨野组;2—平原组;3—三山子组a段;4—三山子组b段;5—三山子组c段;6—炒米店组;7—崮山组;8—张夏组;9—断裂;10—园区边界

Fig.2 青山地质公园岩溶勘察工作布置

Fig.3 青山地质公园布格重力异常

Fig.4 青山地质公园剩余布格重力异常

Fig.5 L105测线视电阻率拟断面

Fig.6 青山地质公园溶洞范围平面

[1]	唐苏芹, 曾理. 山东省东平县大洪顶山地区岩溶洞穴景观资源评价[J]. 山东国土资源, 2014,30(3):79-82.
[1]	Tang S Q, Zeng L. Karst cave candscape resource assessment in Hongdingshan area in dongping county of shandong province[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2014,30(3):79-82.
[2]	赵健. 山东的喀斯特洞穴[J]. 中国岩溶, 1991,10(4):335-345.
[2]	Zhao J. Karst caves in Shandong Province[J]. Karst in China, 1991,10(4):335-345.
[3]	周治民. 综合物探方法在栖霞中桥地区溶洞塌陷地质灾害调查中的应用[J]. 山东国土资源, 2019,35(8):47-52.
[3]	Zhou Z M. Application of comprehensive geophysical prospecting method in geological Hazard in vestigation of Karst cave collapse in Qixiazhongqiao area[J]. Shandong Land and Resources, 2019,35(8):47-52.
[4]	赵健. 鲁中南地区喀斯特洞穴旅游资源的初步评价[J]. 中国岩溶, 1981,7(2):139-146.
[4]	Zhao J. Preliminary evaluation of karst cave tourism resources in central and southern Shandong Province. Karst[J], Karst in China, 1981,7(2):139-146.
[5]	卢耀如. 中国岩溶—景观—类型—规律[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1986: 22-23.
[5]	Lu Y R. Karst landscape type law in China[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1986: 22-23.
[6]	中国科学院地质研究所岩溶研究组. 中国岩溶研究[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979: 261-267.
[6]	Karst Research Group, Institute of Geology, Chinese. Academy of Sciences. Karst research in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1979: 261-267.
[7]	孟凡松, 张刚, 陈梦君, 等. 高密度电阻率法二维勘探数据的三维反演及其在岩溶探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2019,43(3):672-678.
[7]	Meng F S, Zhang G, Cheng M J, et al. 3-D inversion of high density resistivity method based on 2-D high-density electrical prospecting data and its engineering application[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019,43(3):672-678.
[8]	邬健强, 赵茹玥, 甘伏平, 等. 综合电法在岩溶山区地下水勘探中的应用——以湖南怀化长塘村为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2020,44(1):93-98.
[8]	Wu J Q, Zhao R Y, Gan F P, et al. The application of electrical prospecting method to groundwater exploration in karst mountainous areas:A case study of Changtang Village, Huaihua area, Hunan Province[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020,44(1):93-98.
[9]	朱晓刚, 袁炳强, 冯旭亮, 等. 基于MT和重力资料的渭河盆地西部地区基底属性[J]. 物探与化探, 2020,44(2):254-261.
[9]	Zhu X G, Yuan B Y Q, Feng X L, et al. Basement attribute of western Weihe Basin based on MT and gravity data[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020,44(2):254-261.
[10]	许艺煌, 黄真萍, 程志伟, 等. 高密度电阻率法在弃渣堆积体分布调查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2020,44(2):435-440.
[10]	Xu Y H, Huang Z P, Cheng Z W, et al. The application of high density electrical resistivity method to the investigation of the distribution of slag accumulation in hydropower station[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020,44(2):435-440.
[11]	屈利军, 李波, 周佩. 综合物探方法在湘中贫水山区找水中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2017,41(5):835-839.
[11]	Qu L J, LI B, Zhou P. The application of multiple geophysical methods to water exploration in the arid areas of central Hunan Province[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2017,41(5):835-839.
[12]	林希仲. 井—地直流电法在岩溶地基探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016,40(3):619-623.
[12]	Lin X Z. The application of borehole-to-surface electrical prospecting to karst foundation survey[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2016,40(3):619-623.

[1]	李玉录, 邢利娟, 拜占红, 刘志华, 王震. 综合物探方法在青海省跃进山铁矿勘查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(5): 889-895.
[2]	黄宁, 陈国光, 张景, 鲁胜梅, 张宝松. 综合物探方法在多金属矿找矿靶区预测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(5): 929-934.
[3]	屈挺, 刘建利, 李磊, 尹虎, 申丽. 重、磁、电综合物探方法在雪峰山西侧油气远景区地质调查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(3): 452-460.
[4]	胡让全, 黄健民. 综合物探方法在广州市金沙洲岩溶地面塌陷、地面沉降地质灾害调查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, (3): 610-615.
[5]	李忠平. 应用综合物探方法探测新疆萨尔苏克外围及深部金铜矿床[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, (3): 417-422.
[6]	刘国辉, 刘志远, 李达, 张雪娟. 综合物探方法在太原市蒙山采空区探测中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(6): 1020-1023.
[7]	杨守渠, 翟雷, 铁健康. 洛阳市龙门高温地热井的综合物探勘查[J]. 物探与化探, 2012, 36(4): 562-566.
[8]	唐杰, 卢建伟, 刘勇. 双频激电法在豫西南某金铜矿勘查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(5): 642-646.
[9]	谢志峰, 张翔. 炭质地层覆盖区综合物探方法寻找隐伏矿床[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(4): 448-453.
[10]	赵成斌, 刘保金, 姬继法, 李长法, 袁宏克. 综合物探方法在地质灾害调查中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2001, 25(6): 464-468.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed