天津滨海新区深部地热流体水文地球化学特征

doi:10.11720/wtyht.2022.1182

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章
Metrics

全文: PDF(3517 KB) HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

通过近几年滨海新区深部热储的勘探开发,对古近系东营组和蓟县系雾迷山组的认识也逐步加深。从水化学特征、热储温度、水文地球化学作用方面对东营组和雾迷山组地热流体展开分析,为进一步开发利用深部热储地热资源提供了依据。宁河凸起雾迷山组补给较为充分,东营组赋存环境较封闭,东营组地热流体属于“平衡水”;地热温标计算出的雾迷山组热储平均温度约126 ℃,东营组热储平均温度100 ℃,两者均源自大气降水,东营组地热流体与岩石交换时间更长些,循环能力更弱,深部地热流体径流方向自NE向SW向,径流过程主要发生了溶滤作用、阳离子交换、沉淀作用及混合作用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	石晓今
	李嫄嫄
	黄贤龙

关键词 ：深部热储, 水化学特征, 热储温度, 水文地球化学

Abstract：

The understanding of the Paleogene Dongying formation and the Jixianian Wumishan formation have been gradually deepened with the exploration and development of deep thermal reservoirs in the Binhai New Area.This paper analyzes the hydrochemical characteristics, reservoir temperature, and hydrogeochemical effects of the geothermal fluid of the Dongying and Wumishan formations, thus providing bases for the further development and utilization of deep geothermal resources. The Wumishan formation in the Ninghe salient is adequately recharged. In contrast,the Dongying formation occursin a relatively closed environment, and the geothermal fluid in it is at a state of chemical equilibrium. The average temperature of the geothermal reservoirs in the Wumishan and Dongying formation scalculated using geothermometers is about 126 ℃ and 100 ℃, respectively. The geothermal fluid in both formations originates from atmospheric precipitation. Compared to the Wumishan formation, the geothermal fluidin the Dongying formation exchanges heat with rocks for a longer time and has a weaker cycling capacity. The runoff direction of the geothermal fluid in the formations is from northeast to southwest, with leaching, cation exchange, precipitation,and mixing mainly occurring during the fluid runoff.

Key words： deep geothermal reservoir hydrochemical characteristics reservoir temperature hydrogeochemical effect

收稿日期: 2021-03-30 修回日期: 2021-07-08 出版日期: 2022-04-20

ZTFLH:

P632

基金资助:天津市国土资源和房屋管理局项目“滨海新区深部地热资源调查评”(国土房任[2015]5号)

作者简介: 石晓今(1986-),女,2012年毕业于中国地质大学(北京),研究生学历,天津地热勘查开发设计院工程师,研究方向为地热勘查、开发利用及地热流体水文地球化学特征、地球化学模拟。

引用本文:

石晓今, 李嫄嫄, 黄贤龙. 天津滨海新区深部地热流体水文地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2022, 46(2): 316-322.
SHI Xiao-Jin, LI Yuan-Yuan, HUANG Xian-Long. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of deep geothermal fluids in the Binhai New Area, Tianjin City. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(2): 316-322.

链接本文:

https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2022.1182 或 https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2022/V46/I2/316

Fig.1 研究区内地热井分布及地质构造

Fig.2 地热流体Piper图

井号	热储层	K⁺	Na⁺	Ca²⁺	Mg²⁺	Cl^-	S $O 4 2 -$	HC $O 3 -$	SiO₂	F^-	矿化度	水化学类型
TG-34	Ed	7.4	1064	6.1	0.6	1169.8	8.2	781.1	49	5.21	2407.3	Cl·HCO₃-Na
TG-33	Ed	4.9	593.3	9.7	0.8	402.4	235.9	555.3	42.5	7.08	3122.2	Cl·HCO₃-Na
塘20-2	Ed	9.4	1190	8.4	0.9	1258.5	40.1	872.6	58.4	3.5	1692.1	Cl·HCO₃-Na
ST-01	Ed	8.0	801.1	10.5	0.9	831.3	116.1	579.7	58.5	3.6	2406.1	Cl·HCO₃-Na
ST-01B	Ed	7.9	779.7	9.7	0.8	852.6	105.1	619.4	61	4	2436.2	Cl·HCO₃-Na
BST-01	Jxw	79.9	201.4	36.4	6.8	85.1	200.8	414.9	94.5	8.23	1119.8	HCO₃-Na
DG-53	Jxw	41.2	536.1	22.7	4.1	460.8	280.1	494.3	72	9.6	1915.5	Cl·HCO₃-Na
DG-46	Jxw	72.5	642.8	38.1	7.9	581.4	343.9	454.6	83.8	10.4	2225	HCO₃·Cl-Na
DG-45B	Jxw	51.2	554.5	30.1	6.1	478.6	302.6	494.3	74.5	10.8	1991.9	Cl-Na

Table 1 研究区地热流体主要组分含量

Table 2 地热流体水样溶解及溢出气体组分占比

Table 3 BST-01地热流体水样微量气体组分数据

Fig.3 BST-01地热流体He-Ar-N₂气体三角图

Fig.4 Na-K-Mg含量三角图

Fig.5 SiO₂与温度关系

Table 4 地热流体热储温度估算

Table 5 研究区水样同位素组分

Fig.6 研究区流体δD-δ¹⁸O曲线

Fig.7 研究区地热流体主要离子关系

[1]	李文龙, 黄贤龙, 张连第, 等. 天津市滨海新区地热地质条件及热储特征分析[J]. 中国水运, 2014, 14(11):280-282
[1]	Li W L, Huang X L, Zhang L D, et al. Analysis of geothermal geological conditions and thermal storage characteristics in Tianjin Binhai New Area[J]. China Water Transport, 2014, 14(11):280-282
[2]	阮传侠, 于彦, 高宝珠, 等. 天津滨海新区地热流体水化学特征分析[J]. 地下水, 2010, 2(1):51-53.
[2]	Ruan C X, Yu Y, Gao B Z, et al. Hydrochemical characteristics analysis of geothermal fluids in Tianjin Binhai New Area[J]. Groundwater. 2010, 2(1):51-53.
[3]	赵平, 谢鄂军, 多吉, 等. 西藏地热气体的地球化学特征及其地质意义[J]. 岩石学报, 2002, 18(4):539-550.
[3]	Zhao P, Xie E J, Duo J, et al. Geochemical characteristics of geothermal gases and geological significance in Tibet[J]. Acta Petrologica Sinica, 2002, 18(4):539-550.
[4]	刘昭, 蔺文静, 张萌, 等. 西藏尼木—那曲地热流体成因及幔源流体贡献[J]. 地学前缘, 2014, 21(6):366-367.
[4]	Liu Z, Lin W J, Zhang M, et al. Genesis of Nimu-Nagqu geothermal fluids in Tibet and contribution of mantle-derived fluids[J]. Geoscience Frontier, 2014, 21(6): 366-367.
[5]	叶海龙, 樊柄宏, 白细民, 等. 地热水混合比例估算探讨[J]. 江西地质, 2017, 18(4):317-322.
[5]	Ye H L, Fan B H, Bai X M, et al. Discussion on the estimation of the mixing ratio of geothermal water[J]. Geology of Jiangxi, 2017, 18(4):317-322.
[6]	王莹, 周训, 于渡, 等. 应用地热温标估算地下热储温度[J]. 现代地质, 2007, 21(4):606-612.
[6]	Wang Y, Zhou X, Yu D, et al. Estimation of storage temperature of underground thermal using geothermal temperature scale[J]. Geoscience, 2007, 21(4):606-612.
[7]	宋小庆, 段启彬, 孟凡涛, 等. 贵州息烽温泉地质成因分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2014, 33(5):216-220.
[7]	Song X Q, Duan Q B, Meng F T, et al. Geological genesis analysis of Xifeng hot spring in Guizhou[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2014, 33(5):216-220.
[8]	袁建飞, 邓国仕, 徐芬, 等. 川西南喜德热田地下水水文地球化学特征[J]. 现代地质, 2017, 31(1):200-208.
[8]	Yuan J F, Deng G S, Xu F, et al. Hydrogeochemical characteristics of groundwater in Xide hot field in southwestern Sichuan[J]. Geoscience, 2017, 31(1): 200-208.
[9]	马振民, 何江涛, 张锡明. 菏泽凸起地下热水的水文地球化学特征及成因分析[J]. 山东地质, 2000, 16(2):24-30.
[9]	Ma Z M, He J T, Zhang X M. Hydrogeochemical characteristics and genesis analysis of underground hot water in Heze uplift[J]. Shandong Geology, 2000, 16(2):24-30.
[10]	张保建. 鲁西北地区地下热水的水文地球化学特征及形成条件分析[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2011.
[10]	Zhang B J. Analysis of hydrogeochemical characteristics and formation conditions of underground hot water in northwestern Shandong[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2011.
[11]	林黎, 高宝珠, 阮传侠, 等. 全国地热资源研究评价与区划——天津市地热资源现状研究评价与区划[R]. 天津:天津地热勘查开发设计院, 2014.
[11]	Lin L, Gao B Z, Ruan C X, et al. National geothermal resources research evaluation and division- Research, evaluation and division of geothermal resources in Tianjin[R]. Tianjin:Tianjin Geothermal Exploration and Development-Designing Institute, 2014.
[12]	汪啸. 广东沿海典型深大断裂带地热水系统形成条件及水文地球化学特征[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2018.
[12]	Wang X. Formation conditions and hydrogeochemical characteristics of the geothermal water system in the typical deep and large fault zone along the coast of Guangdong[D]. Wuhan: China University of Geosciences, 2018.
[13]	孙红丽. 关中盆地地热资源赋存特征及成因模式研究[D]. 北京: 中国地质大学, 2015.
[13]	Sun H L. Study on the occurrence characteristics and genetic model of geothermal resources in the Guanzhong Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Geosciences, 2015.
[14]	程万庆, 唐永香. 滨海新区深部地热资源调查评价报告[R]. 天津:天津地热勘查开发设计院, 2017.
[14]	Cheng W Q, Tang Yong X. Investigation and evaluation report of deep geothermal resources in Binhai New Area[R]. Tianjin:Tianjin Geothermal Exploration and Development-Designing Institute, 2017.

[1]	申月芳, 马晗宇, 杨耀栋, 曹阳. 武清凹陷浅层含氟地下水演化特点及成因分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(2): 528-535.
[2]	牛俊强, 范威, 郭昆. 武汉城市圈岩溶热储水化学特征及水—岩作用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2019, 43(4): 741-748.
[3]	李林果, 李百祥. 从青海共和-贵德盆地与山地地温场特征探讨热源机制和地热系统[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(1): 29-34.
[4]	韩晔, 郑玉萍, 张涛, 李立伟, 马超. 山东省高密市高氟区地球化学及水文地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2013, 37(6): 1107-1113.
[5]	王卫星, 孙玉东, 杨永江, 王光辉, 赵娜. 天津市东丽湖地热对井的地质与水文地球化学特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(1): 44-48.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed