|
|
Prediction of interbed multiples based on the Green's function |
XU Qiang1( ), XU Shuang2, WANG Wei1, WANG Hai-Kun1 |
1. Geophysical R&D institute,COSL,Tianjin 300451,China 2. BGP Geological Research Center,CNPC,Zhuozhou 072750,China |
|
|
Abstract The surface-related multiple elimination (SRME) method is usually used to predict the multiples of marine seismic data.However,it cannot be used to predict the interbed multiples formed between strong reflection interfaces in seismic data.This study,based on the Huygens principle and the received known seismic wave fields,inferred the interbed multiples propagating between the strong reflection interfaces using Green's function.First,the Green's function propagating between the strong reflection interfaces at each receiver was calculated;then the obtained Green's function was convoluted with the received wave field(the original seismic data received by all receivers of the current shot gather);finally,the sum of the results was taken as the model of the interbed multiples of the current receiver.Subsequently,subtracting the multiple model from the original data through adaptive subtraction achieved the prediction and attenuation of interbed multiples.The tests based on simulation data and actual data indicate that the method proposed in this study can effectively attenuate interbed multiples.
|
Received: 25 December 2021
Published: 03 January 2023
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interlayer multiples propagation diagram
|
|
Forward velocity model
|
|
Forward shot before and after interlayer multiple suppression a—forward shot record;b—after suppressing interlayer multiples;c—predicted multiple model
|
|
Forward stackbefore and after interlayer multiple suppression a—forward stack record;b—after suppressing interlayer multiples;c—difference of subtraction between fig. a and fig. b
|
|
Comparison of multiple prediction models using different layer velocities
|
|
Shot before and after interlayer multiple suppression a—original shot record;b—after interlayer multiple suppression;c—interlayer multiple prediction mode
|
|
Comparison of stack before and after multiple suppression of marine seismic data a—original stack section;b—stack after the attenuation of interlayer multiples
|
|
Autocorrelation of stack section before and after multiple suppression a—autocorrelation of original stack section;b—stack profile autocorrelation after interlayer multiples suppression
|
|
Velocity spectrum of stack section before and after multiple suppression a—raw data velocity spectrum;b—velocity spectrum after interlayer multiples suppression
|
[1] |
Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J. Focal transformation,an imaging concept for signal restoration and noise removal[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(6):A55-A59.
|
[2] |
Berkhout A J. Seismic processing in the inverse data space[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(4):A29-A33.
|
[3] |
Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion;Part 1,Theoretical considerations[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(5):1586-1595.
|
[4] |
徐强, 王征, 史增园, 等. 浅水多次波衰减[J]. 石油地球物理探, 2015, 50(2):238-242.
|
[4] |
Xu Q, Wang Z, Shi Z Y, et al. Shallow water multiple attenuation[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2015, 50(2):238-242.
|
[5] |
Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion,part I:theoretical considerations[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(5): 1586-1595.
|
[6] |
Hung B, Yang K L, Zhou J, et al. Surface multiple attenuation in seabeach-shallow water,case study on data from the Bohai Sea[C]// SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1949:4453.
|
[7] |
Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J. Removal of internal multiples with the common-focus-point (CFP) approach:Part 1—Explanation of the theory[J]. Geophysics, 2005, 70(3):V45-V60.
|
[8] |
金明霞, 易淑昌, 王征. 多次波正演与SRME技术影响因素分析及应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, 38(3):566-570.
|
[8] |
Jin M X, Yi S C, Wang Z. The analysis and application of multiple wave forward modeling and the influencing factors of SRME technology[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(3):566-570.
|
[9] |
徐强. 基于格林函数的多次波预测方法[J]. 中国造船, 2019, 60(4):155-160.
|
[9] |
Xu Q. Multiple prediction method based on Green Function[J]. Shipbuilding of China, 2019, 60(4):155-160.
|
[10] |
Berkhout A J, Verschuur D J. Estimation of multiple scattering by iterative inversion,Part I:Theoretical considerations[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(5):1586-1595.
|
[11] |
Song J W, Verschuur E, Chen X H. Comparing three feedback internal multiple elimination methods[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2013, 95:66-75.
|
[12] |
Borselen R V. Data-driven interbed multiple removal:Strategies and examples[C]// SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 1999:2106.
|
[13] |
Ikelle L T, Erez I, Yang X. Scattering diagrams in seismic imaging:More insights into the construction of virtual events and internal multiples[J]. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2009, 67(2):150-170.
|
[14] |
Ypma F, Verschuur D J. Estimating primaries by sparse inversion,a generalized approach[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 61(s1):94-108.
|
[1] |
HE Zi-Lin, LI Zhen-Chun, LI Zhi-Na, XU Yi-Peng. A review of multiple suppression methods based on feedback iteration model[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(2): 275-284. |
[2] |
LIU Jun, WU Shu-Yu, GAO Jin-Yao, CHEN Jian-Wen. An effectiveness analysis of multiple depression technique in the Shallow water of the central uplift in South Yellow Sea[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2016, 40(3): 568-577. |
|
|
|
|