|
|
Statistics and application of petrophysical properties in the Jiama mining area, Tibet |
QU Ting1, HE Ri-Zheng2, YU Peng-Liang1, WANG Su-Feng2, CHEN Xiao-Long1, LIU Jian-Li1 |
1. Shaanxi Geological and Mineral Exploration Party Co., Ltd., Xi'an 710043, China 2. Center for Deep Earth Exploration, Chinese Academy of Geosciences, Beijing 100037, China |
|
|
Abstract The Jiama mining area in Tibet is one of the most important large deposits in the eastern Gangdise porphyry copper belt. There are many kinds of rocks, and the physical properties of different strata and intrusive rocks are complex and diverse. In the past, due to the lack of enough attention to the physical properties of rocks, the types of rock determination were not comprehensive enough, and there was a lack of systematic and complete understanding of the physical properties of rocks in the Jiama mining area. On the basis of an analysis of rock physical property data in the past and through the physical property measurement and statistical analysis of core samples from six typical boreholes in the Jiama mining area, the characteristics of rock density, magnetism, resistivity and polarizability in the mining area were summarized, and the rock geological geophysical model of the mining area was established, which provides a reliable basis for the subsequent geophysical work in the mining area. Secondly, the rock electrical parameters were used to correct the static effect measuring points on the magnetotelluric sounding profile in the mining area so as to provide the basis for the magnetotelluric sounding profile interpretation and guide the magnetotelluric data processing and interpretation in the mining area. Through the comparison and verification of drilling data, good exploration results were achieved.
|
Received: 15 January 2020
Published: 27 July 2021
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
WANG Su-Feng
|
|
|
|
|
Geological map of Jiama mining area
|
岩石名称 | 标本数 | κ/(10-6×4π·SI) | Jr/(10-3 A·m-1) | ρ/(Ω·m) | 变化范围 | 平均值 | 变化范围 | 平均值 | 变化范围 | 平均值 | 离散度 | 板岩 | 30 | 110~369 | 248 | 71~343 | 194 | 44~224 | 102 | 29.7 | 角岩 | 30 | 518~909 | 680 | 74~298 | 183 | 157~429 | 288 | 64.3 | 大理岩 | 30 | 22~163 | 91 | 63~232 | 155 | 496~2310 | 1135 | 56.5 | 矽卡岩 | 30 | 507~969 | 680 | 114~535 | 269 | 194~2245 | 650 | 80.8 | 铜矿体 | 30 | 66~361 | 104 | 137~321 | 168 | 163~877 | 411 | 32.6 | 斑岩 | 30 | 244~849 | 597 | 63~1361 | 350 | 271~762 | 393 | 51.3 | 灰岩 | 30 | 44~220 | 124 | 34~154 | 86 | 131~282 | 192 | 33.7 |
|
Statistics of magnetic and electrical parameters of previous rock samples of Jiama mining area
|
岩性 | 测定数量 | 电阻率/(Ω·m) | 极化率/% | 密度/(g·cm-3) | 磁化率/(10-5SI) | 常见范围 | 众值 | 常见范围 | 众值/ 平均值 | 常见范围 | 众值 | 常见范围 | 众值 | 炭质板岩 | 27 | 150~400 | 225 | 10~80 | 30 | 2.40~2.65 | 2.55 | 5~29 | 15 | 角岩 | 216 | 0~9000 | 2700 | 5~35 | 10.8/25.2 | 2.55~2.85 | 2.72 | 4~170 | 48 | 硅化角岩 | 28 | 0~5600 | 2450 | 4~22 | 8.5/19.5 | 2.49~2.67 | 2.59 | 6~35 | 13 | 矽卡岩 | 25 | 0~2400 | 1400 | 7~48 | 19.5/42 | 2.50~3.2 | 2.78 | 5~109 | 35 | 灰岩 | 27 | 1000~7000 | 5000 | 0~16.5 | 4 | 2.68~2.78 | 2.75 | 1~4 | 2 | 二长花岗斑岩 | 12 | 2000~4600 | 3542 | 7.8~10.2 | 9.3 | 2.58~2.62 | 2.60 | 200~600 | 300 | 石英闪长玢岩 | 36 | 2200~8000 | 3900 | 8~30 | 9/13 | 2.69~2.81 | 2.74 | 14~392 | 37 | 花岗闪长斑岩 | 48 | 5000~25000 | 8750 | 6~20 | 9 | 2.60~2.68 | 2.62 | 22~600 | 69 |
|
Statistical results of physical parameters of core samples of Jiama mining area
|
|
Statistical histogram of rock resistivity of Jiama mining area
|
|
Statistical histogram of rock polarizability of Jiama mining area
|
|
Statistical histogram of rock susceptibility of Jiama mining area
|
|
Statistical histogram of rock density of Jiama mining area
|
|
ZK028 column profile and vertical profile of physical parameters
|
|
Rock geological geophysical model of Jiama mining area
|
|
Magnetotelluric sounding resistivity section and interpretation inference diagram
|
|
Comparison of resistivity cross section measured by borehole side MT 2D inversion and borehole core
|
[1] |
杨建辉, 王亮, 张家德, 等. 应该重视岩(矿)石物性标本采测的代表性[J]. 贵州地质, 2013, 30(1):78-80.
|
[1] |
Yang J H, Wang L, Zhang J D, et al. We should pay attention to the representativeness of rock (ore) physical property specimens[J]. Guizhou Geology, 2013, 30(1):78-80.
|
[2] |
唐菊兴, 邓世林, 郑文宝, 等. 西藏墨竹工卡县甲玛铜多金属矿床勘查模型[J]. 矿床地质, 2011, 30(2):179-196.
|
[2] |
Tang J X, Deng S L, Zheng W B, et al. Exploration model of Jiama copper polymetallic deposit in Mozhugongka County, Tibet[J]. Deposit Geology, 2011, 30(2):179-196.
|
[3] |
胡永才. 西藏甲玛铜多金属矿床的成矿分析与找矿模型探讨[J]. 硅谷, 2014, 7(23):175-177.
|
[3] |
Hu Y C. Metallogenic analysis and exploration model of Jiama copper polymetallic deposit in Tibet[J]. Silicon Valley, 2014, 7(23):175-177.
|
[4] |
李伟林. 冈底斯成矿带矽卡岩型矿床重磁异常特征研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2014.
|
[4] |
Li W L. Characteristics of gravity and magnetic anomalies of skarn deposits in Gangdise metallogenic belt[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2014.
|
[5] |
汪洋. 西藏斑岩型铜矿重磁异常特征及找矿规律研究[D]. 成都:成都理工大学, 2012.
|
[5] |
Wang Y. Characteristics of gravity and magnetic anomalies and prospecting regularity of porphyry copper deposits in Tibet[D]. Chengdu: Chengdu University of Technology, 2012.
|
[6] |
牛杰, 王家仁, 李星, 等. 岩矿石电性参数测量研究与总结[J]. 云南冶金, 2018, 47(6):6-10.
|
[6] |
Niu J, Wang J R, Li X, et al. Research and summary on measurement of electrical parameters of rocks and ores[J]. Yunnan Metallurgy, 2018, 47(6):6-10.
|
[7] |
周新鹏, 邹长春, 乔祎, 等. 岩矿石电性参数测定实验研究[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2015, 12(2):205-213.
|
[7] |
Zhou X P, Zou C C, Qiao Y, et al. Experimental study on Determination of electrical parameters of rocks and ores[J]. Acta Geophysica Sinica, 2015, 12(2):205-213.
|
[8] |
邵平安. 河南省区域岩石密度背景参考值统计特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2014, 38(1):71-74,80.
|
[8] |
Shao P A. Statistical characteristics of regional rock density background reference value in Henan Province[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014, 38(1):71-74,80.
|
[9] |
柳建新, 童孝忠, 郭荣文, 等. 大地电磁测深法勘探——资料处理、反演与解释[M]. 北京: 北京科学出版社, 2012.
|
[9] |
Liu J X, Tong X Z, Guo R W, et al. Magnetotelluric sounding exploration data processing, inversion and interpretation [M]. Beijing: Beijing Science Press, 2012.
|
[10] |
甘之翔, 张艺. 物性工作在矿区地球物理勘探中点、线、面上的应用[J]. 世界有色金属, 2017(23):197-198.
|
[10] |
Gan Z X, Zhang Y. Application of physical property work in point, line and plane of geophysical exploration in mining area[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2017(23):197-198.
|
[11] |
严加永, 刘光海, 王君恒, 等. 内蒙古羊蹄子山—磨石山钛矿床的物性特征及有效找矿方法探讨[J]. 矿床地质, 2008(4):494-501.
|
[11] |
Yan J Y, Liu G H, Wang J H, et al. Physical properties and effective prospecting methods of Yangtizishan-Moshishan titanium deposit in Inner Mongolia[J]. Deposit Geology, 2008(4):494-501.
|
[12] |
张镕哲. 多物性参数的联合反演研究及应用[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2020.
|
[12] |
Zhang R Z. Research and application of joint inversion of multiple physical parameters[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2020.
|
[13] |
张建民. 金川铜镍矿区地球物理特征及深部成矿预测[D]. 长春:吉林大学, 2019.
|
[13] |
Zhang J M. Geophysical characteristics and deep metallogenic prediction of Jinchuan copper nickel deposit[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2019.
|
[1] |
ZHANG Yang-Yang, DU Wei, WANG Zhi-Shui, MIAO Xu-Huang, ZHANG Xiang. Application of particle swarm algorithm based on Lévy flight in magnetotelluric inversion[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(4): 986-993. |
[2] |
JIANG Shou-Jin, CHEN Yong-Ling, LI Huai-Yuan, HU Jun-Feng. Resistivity of moraine deposits in the Tangbu section, Dongcuoqu, southeastern Tibet[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2023, 47(1): 73-80. |
|
|
|
|