|
|
Two-dimensional anomaly characteristics of the magnetotelluric method for a symmetrical anisotropic body |
Miao-Xin YANG1,2, Han-Dong TAN2, Sheng-Jun LIANG1, Xin WANG1 |
1. China Aero Geophysical Survey & Remote Sensing Center for Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China; 2. School of Geophysics and Information Technology, China University of Geosciences (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China |
|
|
Abstract Lots of observational data have indicated that anisotropic physical properties are common in rocks in the depth. This requires the construction of anisotropic models to obtain a true reflection of the underground medium. The basis of the present study is a review of previous research results and an investigation of the electrical properties of a layered medium representing actual geological conditions. For a symmetrical anisotropic body, an anisotropy coefficient is proposed, together with an equation for the variation of the Earth's electromagnetic field regarded as two-dimensional. Finally, a finite element simulation of a symmetrical anisotropic body is described. The finite element calculation results are compared with finite difference results to verify the accuracy of the FE program. Three sets of model conditions are considered: (1) fixed anisotropy coefficient and different dip angles, showing the effect of dip angle on an anisotropic body; (2) fixed dip angle and different anisotropy coefficients, showing the effect of the anisotropy coefficient on an anisotropic body; (3) different dip angles and different anisotropy coefficients. Forward pseudo section maps clearly demonstrate the relationship between dip angle, anisotropy coefficient and their anisotropic effect.
|
Received: 04 July 2018
Published: 15 August 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resistivity model of the layered rock a—rock in the actual situation;b—equivalent model
|
类型 | λ范围 | 冲积层 | 1.02~1.10 | 干燥页岩,固结页岩 | 1.10~1.60 | 煤—无烟煤(沥青质的) | 2.00~2.55(1.70~2.60) | 辉长岩 | 1.10~2.00 | 花岗岩 | 1.05~1.50 | 石墨板岩 | 2.00~2.80 | 硬石膏和页岩互层 | 4.00~7.50 | 页岩、砂岩互层 | 1.05~1.15 | 石灰岩 | 1.00~1.14 | 含磁铁矿角页岩 | 1.20 | 磁铁矿 | 1.65 | 页岩层 | 1.02~1.05 | 砂岩层 | 1.10~1.60 | 绿泥石片岩—黑云母 | 1.12 | 板岩 | 1.10~2.25 | 火山岩 | 1.10~1.20 |
|
Anisotropy coefficient range of some rocks and strata
|
|
Survey region and element analysis a—survey region;b—parent element and subunit
|
|
Thick plate model
|
|
The influence of different frequencies of the center point on the calculation results
|
|
The influence of different dip angles on the calculation results
|
|
The influence of different anisotropy coefficients on the calculation results
|
|
Section comparison figures of different dip angles and anisotropy coefficients of thick plate model
|
|
M type abnormal body model
|
|
Section comparison figures of different dip angles and anisotropy coefficients of M type abnormal body
|
[1] |
李金铭 . 地电场与电法勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2005.
|
[1] |
Li J M. Electric and electrical prospecting[M]. Beijing: Geology Publishing House, 2005.
|
[2] |
内吉 J G, 萨拉夫 P D . 大地介质电磁各向异性问题[M]. 邹永辉, 陈德志, 译. 北京: 地质出版社, 1992.
|
[2] |
Negi J G, Saraf P D (translated by Zou Y H, Chen D Z). Anisotropy in geoelectromagnetism[M]. Beijing: Geology Publishing House, 1992.
|
[3] |
O’Brueb D P, Morrison H F . Electromagnetic fields in an N-layered anisotropic half-space[J]. Geophysics, 1967,32(4):668-677.
|
[4] |
Pek J, Santos F A M . Magnetotelluric impedances and parametric sensitivities for 1-D anisotropic layered media[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2002,28:939-950.
|
[5] |
霍光谱, 胡祥云, 方慧 , 等. 层状各向异性介质大地电磁联合反演研究[J]. 物理学报, 2012, 61(12): 129101(1-10).
|
[5] |
Huo G P, Hu X Y, Fang H , et al. Magnetotelluric joint inversion for anisotropic conductivities in layered media[J]. Acta Physica Sinica, 2012, 61(12):129101(1-10).
|
[6] |
Reddy I K, Rankin D . Magnetotelluric response of latterlly inhomogeneous and anisotropic media[J]. Geophysics, 1975,40(6):1035-1045.
|
[7] |
徐世浙, 赵生凯 . 二维各向异性地电剖面的大地电磁场的有限元解法[J]. 地震学报, 1985,7(1):80-90.
|
[7] |
Xu S Z, Zhao S K . Solution of magnetotelluric field equations for a two-dimensional, anisotropic geoelectric section by the finite element method[J]. Acta Seismologica Sinica, 1985,7(1):80-90.
|
[8] |
Pek J, Verner T . Finite-difference modeling of magnetotelluric fields in two-dimensional anisotropic media[J]. Geophysics Journal International, 1997,128(1):505-521.
|
[9] |
Li Y . A finite-element algorithm for electromagnetic induction in two-dimensional anisotropic conductivity structures[J]. Geophysics Journal International, 2002,148:389-401.
|
[10] |
Li Y, Key K . 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling, part 1: an adaptive finite-element algorithm[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2): WA51-WA62.
|
[11] |
Li Y, Pek J . Adaptive finite element modelling of two-dimensional magnetotelluric fields in general anisotropic media[J]. Geophysics Journal International, 2008,175:942-954.
|
[12] |
林长佑, 武玉霞, 杨长福 , 等. 水平层状对称各向异性介质的大地电磁资料反演[J]. 地球物理学报, 1996,39(S1):342-348.
|
[12] |
Lin C Y, Wu Y X, Yang C F , et al. Magnetotelluric inversion for symmetrically anisotropic layered medium[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 1996,39(S1):342-348.
|
[13] |
霍光谱, 胡祥云, 刘敏 . 各向异性介质中大地电磁正演研究综述[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2011,26(6):1976-1982.
|
[13] |
Huo G P, Hu X Y, Liu M . Review of the forward modeling of magnetotelluric in the anisotropy medium research[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2011,26(6):1976-1982.
|
[14] |
胡祥云, 霍光谱, 高锐 , 等. 大地电磁各向异性二维模拟及实例分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2013,56(12):4268-4277.
|
[14] |
Hu X Y, Huo G P, Gao R , et al. The magnetotelluric anisotropic two-dimensional simulation and case analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2013,56(12):4268-4277.
|
[15] |
徐世浙 . 地球物理中的有限单元法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1994.
|
[15] |
Xu S Z. The finite element method in geophysics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1994.
|
[1] |
CHEN Da-Lei, WANG Run-Sheng, HE Chun-Yan, WANG Xun, YIN Zhao-Kai, YU Jia-Bin. Application of integrated geophysical exploration in deep spatial structures: A case study of Jiaodong gold ore concentration area[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2022, 46(1): 70-77. |
[2] |
CHEN Jun, YAN Liang-Jun, ZHOU Lei. Denoising of magnetotelluric data based on Hilbert-Huang transform[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2021, 45(6): 1462-1468. |
|
|
|
|