|
|
Analysis of static correction of near-surface seismic image |
De-Bing ZHU1,2, Cheng-Jun LIU1,2, You-Bin ZHANG1,2( ), Guang-Jian ZHOU1,2, Jun-Yong PEI3 |
1.School of Geosciences and Info-Physics,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China 2.Key Laboratory of Metallogenic Prediction of Nonferrous Metals,Ministry of Education,Central South University,Changsha 410083,China 3.School of Geophysics,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu 610059,China |
|
|
Abstract Quaternary coverage causes the existence of local low velocity zone in the transverse and longitudinal direction in the near-surface area due to natural or human disturbances.It increases the travel time of effective first arrival wave in seismic imaging method and causes seismic imaging profile to lose the background of relative depth extraction about underground layer and anomalies,leading to mislead the judgement in the interpretation process.Ray tracing can simulate the characteristics of the time field in seismic imaging profile when there exists low zone in the near-surface area.To confirm the feasibility and applicability of using direct travel time to make static correction,the authors changed the offset and the depth of the object layer.The results show that the greater the offset,the more serious the distortion of object reflection layer lineups after static correction;the depth of object layer almost has no effect on the statics when the offset is constant;when the offset and the depth of object layer are constant,the greater velocity difference between low velocity zone and underground media,the greater the amount of excessive static correction.The authors used the cross-correlation method to conduct static correction.The anomaly of the profile after static correction is consistent with the drilling result.The two ways confirm the feasibility and applicability of using travel time difference to conduct static correction of seismic image profiles.
|
Received: 15 November 2016
Published: 20 February 2018
|
|
|
|
|
[1] |
张维,何正勤,胡刚,等.用面波联合勘探技术探测浅部速度结构[J].地球物理学进展,2013,28(4): 2199-2206.
|
[2] |
温一波. 工程地球物理探测技术进展与局限探讨[J].云南大学学报:自然科学版,2007,29(s1):647-654.
|
[3] |
朱德兵. 工程地球物理方法技术研究现状综述[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(1):163-170.
|
[4] |
李庆春,邵广周,刘金兰,等.瑞雷面波勘探的过去、现在和未来[J].地球科学与环境学报,2006,28(3):74-77.
|
[5] |
赵德亨,田钢,王帮兵.浅层地震折射波法综述[J].世界地质,2005,24(2):188-193.
|
[6] |
刘江平,王莹莹,刘震,等.近地表反射和折射法的进展及应用[J].地球物理学报,2015,58(9):3286-3305.
|
[7] |
刘云祯. 工程物探新技术[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.
|
[8] |
单娜林,程志平,刘云祯.工程地震勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.
|
[9] |
姚姚. 地震波场与地震勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,2006.
|
[10] |
张华,徐红利.地震映像法在地质灾害调查中的应用[J].工程勘察,2010,38(5):89-93.
|
[11] |
单娜琳,程志平.地震映像方法及其应用[J].桂林工学院学报,2003,23(1):36-40.
|
[12] |
张赓,庹先国,葛宝,等.地震映像法在古河道探测中的应用[J].成都理工大学学报:自然科学版,2011,38(1):38-41.
|
[13] |
王治华,仇恒永,杨振涛,等.地震映像法及其应用[J].物探与化探,2008,32(6):696-704.
|
[14] |
杨良权,李波,魏定勇,等.地震映像法在垃圾坑勘察中的应用[J].地球物理学进展,2012,27(4):1788-1794.
|
[15] |
刘波,王占雷,刘超,等.高密度地震映像在古建筑检测中的应用[J].勘察科学技术,2011(5):55-57.
|
[16] |
齐君,高俊国.水域地震映像法及其在海洋地质调查中的应用[J].海洋地质前沿,2011,27(3):52-57.
|
[17] |
张宇辉,张献民.地震映像技术在地下工程透水事故中的应用[J].南京航空航天大学学报,2012,44(2):266-272.
|
[18] |
蔡雄飞,廖计华,蔡海磊,等.第四系冲、洪积物的识别标志和研究意义[J]:海洋地质动态,2007,23(1):10-12,16.
|
[19] |
裴正林,牟永光.地震波传播数值模拟[J].地球物理学进展,2004,19(4):933-941.
|
[20] |
李世杰,师素珍.基于射线追踪方法的煤层地震响应特征[J].物探与化探,2016,40(1):209-213.
|
[21] |
朱介寿. 地震学中的计算方法[M].北京:地震出版社,1988:603-630.
|
[22] |
王向前,王昀.射线追踪数值模拟方法研究及效果分析[J].断块油气田,2008,15(4):44-47.
|
[23] |
王辉,崔若飞.利用多项式拟合单炮初至作地表静校正[J].中国矿业大学学报,2001,30(1):87-90.
|
[24] |
李录明,李正文.地震勘探原理、方法和解释[M].北京:地质出版社,2005.
|
|
|
|