Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2020, Vol. 44 Issue (3): 685-690    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2020.0053
     中国地质学会勘探地球物理专委会2019年会优秀论文 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
薄板状导体地-井瞬变电磁场数值模拟及晚期响应特征
刘祖鉴1, 刘诗华1, 马一行2,3, 张博洋4
1. 中国自然资源航空物探遥感中心,北京 100083
2. 中国地质调查局 发展研究中心,北京 100037
3. 自然资源部矿产勘查技术指导中心, 北京 100083
4. 中国科学院 力学研究所,北京 100190
Numerical simulation and late response characteristics of surface-borehole transient electromagnetic field of thin plate
Zu-Jian LIU1, Shi-Hua LIU1, Yi-Xing MA2,3, Bo-Yang ZHANG4
1. China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Natural and Resources, Beijing 100083, China
2. Development and Research Center of China Geological Survey, Beijing 100037, China
3. Technical Guidance Center for Mineral Resources of Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China
4. Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
全文: PDF(2856 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

瞬变电磁在导电板状体中的感应涡流进入晚期后涡流分布状况已经趋于稳定,并按指数规律衰减。在等效数学模型中,利用等效涡流法计算晚期瞬变电磁响应更为简便,该方法能计算1~4块任意组合体和有导电围岩或覆盖层的响应情况,具有一定的适用性。本文推导了晚期瞬变电磁等效涡流场感应电压的计算方法,通过对4种典型地电模型进行数值模拟和晚期异常特征分析,得出以下结论:①在断电延时较短时,导电体异常响应幅值较大,当钻孔从异常体中心位置穿过时,异常形态为单峰正异常响应;随着时间推移,电磁响应逐步衰减。②当钻孔位于矿体边界位置时,水平矿体产生三峰对称状异常,异常峰值为负异常;倾角为45°时,矿体异常形态出现非对称正负异常,矿体顶侧出现负异常,底侧出现正异常。③相同产状条件下,简单组合板状体异常幅值较单板状体的异常幅值增大,其异常形态符合单板状体的异常响应特征。此项研究成果对利用正演拟合完善地-井瞬变电磁法的后期解释工作以及工区布置参数的确定,如回线大小、剖面长度、发射电流大小等,具有一定的意义。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘祖鉴
刘诗华
马一行
张博洋
关键词 地--井瞬变电磁等效涡流场导电薄板磁偶源响应特征    
Abstract

After the induced eddy current in the conductive thin plate is transient, the eddy current distribution has become stable and decays exponentially. In the equivalent mathematical model, it is easier to calculate the late transient electromagnetic response by the equivalent eddy current method. This method can calculate the response of any combination of 1~4 blocks and conductive surrounding rock or cover layer, and has certain applicability. In this paper, the calculation method of late transient electromagnetic equivalent eddy current field induced voltage is deduced. By numerical simulation and typical characteristic analysis of four typical geoelectric models, some results have been obtained: ① When the power-off delay is short, the amplitude of the abnormal response of the conductor is large. When the borehole passes through the center of the abnormal body, the abnormal shape is a single-peak positive abnormal response; with the elapse of time, the electromagnetic response gradually decays. ② When the borehole is located at the boundary of the orebody, the horizontal orebody produces a three-peak symmetrical anomaly, and the anomalous peak value is a negative anomaly; when the inclination is 45°, the anomaly morphology of the orebody exhibits asymmetric positive and negative anomalies, and a negative anomaly appears on the top side of the orebody, with positive anomaly on the underside. ③ Under the same condition, the abnormal amplitude of the simple plate-shaped body is larger than that of the single plate-shaped body, and its abnormal shape conforms to the abnormal response characteristics of the single plate-shaped body. The research results have certain significance for the ground-well transient electromagnetic method to use forward fitting to improve the later interpretation work and to determine the layout parameters of the work area, such as loop size, section length, point distance, and emission current.

Key wordssurface-borehole transient electromagnetic    equivalent eddy current field    plate    magnetic source    response characteristics
收稿日期: 2020-01-19      出版日期: 2020-06-24
:  P631  
基金资助:中国地质调查局项目(DD20191011)
作者简介: 刘祖鉴(1993-),硕士研究生,助理工程师,主要从事综合地球物理方法研究及应用工作。Email: dasliuzj@163.com
引用本文:   
刘祖鉴, 刘诗华, 马一行, 张博洋. 薄板状导体地-井瞬变电磁场数值模拟及晚期响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(3): 685-690.
Zu-Jian LIU, Shi-Hua LIU, Yi-Xing MA, Bo-Yang ZHANG. Numerical simulation and late response characteristics of surface-borehole transient electromagnetic field of thin plate. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(3): 685-690.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2020.0053      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2020/V44/I3/685
Fig.1  涡流在板状体和球状体中运动的示意
地电
模型
倾角
/(°)
板状体
埋深/m
σ
/(S·m-1)
响应
曲线
水平单板 0 400 1 图2
倾斜单板 45 400 1 图3
水平多板(4块) 0 360,380,420,460 1 图4
倾斜多板(4块) 45 360,380,420,460 1 图5
I=10 A ; σ均匀大地= 0.01 S/m ;
钻孔偏移距:A孔0 m,B孔80 m,C孔150 m,D孔800 m
Table 1  薄板体瞬变电磁数值模拟参数一览
Fig.2  不同钻孔接收水平单板体模型示意及异常响应曲线
Fig.3  不同钻孔接收倾斜单板体模型示意及异常响应曲线
Fig.4  不同钻孔接收水平多板体纵向组合模型示意及异常曲线
Fig.5  不同钻孔接收倾斜多板体纵向组合模型示意及异常曲线
[1] Dyck A V, West G F. The role of simple computer models in interpretation of wide-band, drill-hole electromagnetic surveys in mineral exploration[J]. Geophysics, 1984,49:957-980.
doi: 10.1190/1.1441741
[2] Eadie T, Staltari G. Introduction to downhole electromagnetic methods[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1987,18(3):247-351.
[3] Macnae J, Staltari G. Classification of sign changes in Borehole TEM decays[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1987,18:331-339.
doi: 10.1071/EG987331
[4] Annan A P. The equivalent source method for electromagnetic scattering analysis and its geophysical application[D]. St John's:Memorial University of Newfoundland, 1974.
[5] Gallagher P R, Ward S H, Hohmann G W. A model study of a thin plate in free space for EM37 transient electromagnetic system[J]. Geophysics, 1985,50(6):1002-1005.
doi: 10.1190/1.1441966
[6] Eaton P A, Hohmann G W. The influence of a conductive host on two-dimensional borehole transient electromagnetic responses[J]. Geophysics, 1984,49:861-869.
doi: 10.1190/1.1441732
[7] West R C, Ward S H. The borehole transient EM of the three-dimensional fractured zone in a conductive half space[J]. Geophysics, 1988,53(11):1469-1487.
doi: 10.1190/1.1442427
[8] Buselli G, Lee S K. Modelling of drill-hole TEM responses form multiple targets covered by a conductive overburden[J]. Exploration Geophysics, 1996,27:141-153.
doi: 10.1071/EG996141
[9] 蒋邦远. 实用近区磁源瞬变电磁法勘探[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 1998.
[9] Jiang B Y. Applied near zone magnetic source transient electromagnetic exploration [M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 1998.
[10] 牛之琏. 时间域电磁法原理[M]. 长沙: 中南大学出版社, 2007.
[10] Niu Z L. The Theory of time domain electromagnetic methods [M]. Changsha: Central South University of Technology Press, 2007.
[11] 李貅. 瞬变电磁测深的理论与应用[M]. 西安: 陕西科学技术出版社, 2002.
[11] Li X. The theory and application of transient electromagnetic sounding [M]. Xi’an: Shanxi Science Technology Press, 2002.
[12] 张杰, 邓晓红, 谭捍东, 等. 地-井瞬变电磁资料矢量交会解释方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2015,39(3):572-579.
doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2015.3.23
[12] Zhang J, Deng X H, Tan H D, et al. A study of vector intersection for borehole transient electromagnetic method[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2015,39(3):572-579.
doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2015.3.23
[13] 刘继东, 方文藻. 用线性数字滤波法计算大回线源在地下形成的瞬变电磁场[J]. 物化探计算技术, 1996,18(3):231-237.
[13] Liu J D, Fang W Z. The calculation of the TEM field underground generated by a large loop on the ground by means of the linear digital filter method[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 1996,18(3):231-237.
[14] 孟庆鑫, 潘和平. 地-井瞬变电磁异常特征数值模拟分析[J]. 地球物理学报, 2012,55(3):1046-1053.
doi: 10.6038/j.issn.0001-5733.2012.03.035
[14] Meng Q X, Pan H P. Numerical simulation analysis of surface-hole TEM responses[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2012,55(3):1046-1053.
[15] 丁世荣, 方文藻. 球形地质体在阶跃磁偶极源激励下的瞬变电磁响应[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报:自然科学版, 1997,20(3):218-223.
[15] Ding S R, Fang W Z. The transient electromagnetic response of a spherical geologic body excited by a step magnetic dipole[J]. Journal of Liao-ning Normal University: Natural Science, 1997,20(3):218-223.
[16] 陈锡杰, 任怀宗. 钻井中等轴状导体的瞬变电磁响应[J]. 地质与勘探, 1988,24(11):39-43.
[16] Chen X J, Ren H Z. Response of a buried equiaxial conductive body in drill hole transient electromagnetic measurements[J]. Geology and Prospecting, 1988,24(11):39-43.
[17] 张杰, 王兴春, 邓晓红, 等. 地-井瞬变电磁井旁板状导体异常响应特征分析[J]. 物探化探计算技术, 2014,36(06):641-648.
[17] Zhang J, Wang X C, Deng X H, et al. Borehole transient electromagnetic response characteristics of the borehole-side plate-like conductor[J]. Computing Techniques for Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2014,36(6):641-648.
[1] 易洪春. 地—井瞬变电磁响应特征研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(5): 970-976.
[2] 林振洲, 刘东明, 潘和平, 李洋, 高文利, 邱礼泉, 张小未. 木里地区天然气水合物测井响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(6): 1012-1018.
[3] 覃瑞东, 林振洲, 潘和平, 秦臻, 邓呈祥, 纪扬, 徐伟. 木里地区水合物及岩性测井识别方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(6): 1088-1098.
[4] 许新刚, 徐正玉. 地—井瞬变电磁响应三维时域有限差分模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(3): 496-504.
[5] 王攀, 梁明星. 煤系烃源岩测井响应特征及有机碳评价方法[J]. 物探与化探, 2016, 40(1): 197-202.
[6] 强建科, 周俊杰, 满开峰. 时间域航空电磁法2.5维有限元模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(5): 1059-1062.
[7] 陈礼, 杨小江, 文晓涛, 石战战, 隆芳芳. 基于波动方程数值模拟的冲积扇地震响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2013, 37(2): 314-317.
[8] 武毅, 封绍武, 王亚清. 应用大地电磁法TE、TM模式勘查构造裂隙水[J]. 物探与化探, 2011, 35(3): 329-332.
[9] 蒋邦远. TEM中心回线中—远带响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(2): 176-179.
[10] 杨云见, 何展翔, 王绪本, 罗卫锋. 直流电测深法与中心回线瞬变电磁法联合反演[J]. 物探与化探, 2008, 32(4): 442-444.
[11] 杨海燕, 岳建华. 磁偶源2.5维瞬变电磁场全空间FDTD数值模拟[J]. 物探与化探, 2008, 32(3): 326-330.
[12] 王祝文, 李舟波, 刘菁华. 天然气水合物评价的测井响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 2003, 27(1): 13-17.
[13] 吕绍林, 何继善. 瓦斯突出煤层的无线电波响应特征[J]. 物探与化探, 1998, 22(3): 222-226.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com