Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2024, Vol. 48 Issue (1): 48-57    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2024.1339
  地质调查·资源勘查 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
羌塘盆地白云湖凹陷航空重磁异常特征及其油气勘探意义
刘中戎1(), 胡悦2(), 范志伟1, 贺鸿冰1, 周道卿2, 郭志宏2, 曹宝宝2, 魏岩岩2
1.中国石油化工股份有限公司勘探分公司,四川 成都 610041
2.中国自然资源航空物探遥感中心,北京 100083
Airborne gravity-magnetic anomalies in the Baiyunhu sag,Qiangtang Basin:Characteristics and implications for oil and gas exploration
LIU Zhong-Rong1(), HU Yue2(), FAN Zhi-Wei1, HE Hong-Bing1, ZHOU Dao-Qing2, GUO Zhi-Hong2, CAO Bao-Bao2, WEI Yan-Yan2
1. SINOPEC Exploration Company,Chengdu 610041,China
2. China Aero Geophysical Survey and Remote Sensing Center for Land and Resources,Beijing 100083,China
全文: PDF(10307 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

航空重磁数据是揭示盆地深部构造的有效手段,本文通过最新测量的航空重磁数据结合野外实测物性资料,阐述了白云湖凹陷航空重、磁异常特征及其地质成因,利用航空重磁资料识别出白云湖凹陷断裂与岩浆岩的分布情况,采用人工切线法、功率谱分析法和Parker-Oldenburg迭代反演算法,计算了白云湖凹陷基底埋藏深度与中生界底面构造形态,并通过重点剖面重磁综合解释,对构造分层结果进行了验证。研究结果表明白云湖凹陷中生界、古生界沉积层的起伏变化是引起重力异常的主要因素,区域航磁异常则主要反映了前寒武纪基底展布特征。白云湖凹陷基底埋深较深,中生界分布连续且厚度较大,区域断裂—岩浆活动不发育,整体受构造运动影响较少,具有较好的油气勘探前景。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
刘中戎
胡悦
范志伟
贺鸿冰
周道卿
郭志宏
曹宝宝
魏岩岩
关键词 白云湖凹陷航空重磁异常构造分层油气勘探意义羌塘盆地    
Abstract

Airborne gravity-magnetic data are effective in revealing the deep structures of a basin.Based on the latest airborne gravity-magnetic data,combined with field-measured physical property data,this study expounded the characteristics and geological origin of airborne gravity-magnetic anomalies present in the Baiyunhu sag.Using the airborne gravity-magnetic data,this study identified the distribution of faults and magmatic rocks in the Baiyunhu sag.Furthermore,it calculated the burial depth of the magnetic basement and the structural morphologies of the Mesozoic basement in the sag using the artificial tangent method, power spectrum analysis method,and Parker-Oldenburg iterative inversion algorithm.Additionally,this study verified the structural stratification results through the integrated interpretations of gravity and magnetism in target sections.The findings suggest that the undulations of the Mesozoic and Paleozoic sediments in the Baiyunhu sag are the primary cause of gravity anomalies,while the regional airborne magnetic anomaly primarily reflects the distribution features of the Precambrian basement.The deeply buried basement of the Baiyunhu sag,featuring continuously distributed,thick Mesozoic strata and the lack of regional faulting and magmatic activity,is scarcely affected by tectonic movements and possesses great potential for oil and gas exploration.

Key wordsBaiyunhu sag    airborne gravity-magnetic anomaly    structural stratification    significance of oil and gas exploration    Qiangtang Basin
收稿日期: 2023-09-27      修回日期: 2023-12-01      出版日期: 2024-02-20
ZTFLH:  P631.4  
基金资助:中国石油化工股份有限公司科技部项目“羌塘盆地油气资源潜力分析与勘探关键技术”(P22199);中国地质调查局项目“羌塘及塔里木等盆地航空物探调查”(DD20160065)
通讯作者: 胡悦(1986-),女,高级工程师,2012年毕业于中国地质大学(北京),从事油气航空物探调查与解释工作。Email:27wjlnhy@sohu.com
作者简介: 刘中戎(1972-),男,高级工程师,1995年毕业于中国地质大学(武汉),从事油气勘探与地质综合评价工作。Email:ktnflzr@163.com
引用本文:   
刘中戎, 胡悦, 范志伟, 贺鸿冰, 周道卿, 郭志宏, 曹宝宝, 魏岩岩. 羌塘盆地白云湖凹陷航空重磁异常特征及其油气勘探意义[J]. 物探与化探, 2024, 48(1): 48-57.
LIU Zhong-Rong, HU Yue, FAN Zhi-Wei, HE Hong-Bing, ZHOU Dao-Qing, GUO Zhi-Hong, CAO Bao-Bao, WEI Yan-Yan. Airborne gravity-magnetic anomalies in the Baiyunhu sag,Qiangtang Basin:Characteristics and implications for oil and gas exploration. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2024, 48(1): 48-57.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2024.1339      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2024/V48/I1/48
Fig.1  研究区位置
Fig.2  研究区区域地质
地层
岩性
密度/(g·cm-3) 磁化率/(10-5SI)
极大值 极小值 平均值 极大值 极小值 平均值


新近系 含砾砂岩 2.61 2.38 2.52 35 12 25
古近系 砂岩 2.53 2.20 2.43 87 3 39
油页岩 2.10 1.70 1.88 11 4 8


白垩系 砾岩 2.67 2.44 2.56 16 3 8
砂岩 2.66 2.33 2.53 27 16 22
灰岩 2.70 2.67 2.65 20 7 13
侏罗系 砂岩 2.75 2.19 2.59 97 1 50
膏盐 1.98 1.73 1.82 8 2 5
灰岩 2.99 2.53 2.66 35 1 20
三叠系 砂岩 2.82 2.40 2.55 47 4 18
灰岩 2.69 2.63 2.66 11 4 8
玄武岩 2.96 2.73 2.85 951 178 567


二叠系 灰岩 2.85 2.38 2.67 36 4 12
砂岩 2.66 2.62 2.65 43 18 30
玄武岩 2.94 2.83 2.89 1129 350 708
石炭系 灰岩 2.69 2.63 2.67 17 8 12
泥质粉砂岩 2.75 2.71 2.73 47 31 38
泥盆系 灰岩 2.69 2.56 2.65 14 6 10
白云岩 2.83 2.68 2.78 15 6 11


前寒
武系
大理岩 2.84 2.71 2.75 84 5 27
片麻岩 2.79 2.61 2.70 225 25 95
斜长角闪片麻岩 2.90 2.72 2.76 6349 760 2479
斜长角闪岩 2.97 2.75 2.91 3327 63 910
角闪变粒岩 2.76 2.71 2.72 4121 1397 2349
Table 1  研究区密度层划分、磁化率统计
Fig.3  白云湖凹陷航磁ΔT化极
Fig.4  白云湖凹陷航磁ΔT垂向一阶导数
Fig.5  白云湖凹陷航空布格重力场平面
Fig.6  白云湖凹陷航空布格重力垂向一阶导数
Fig.7  白云湖凹陷推断岩浆岩构造
Fig.8  白云湖凹陷磁性基岩埋藏深度
Fig.9  白云湖凹陷中生界底面埋藏深度
Fig.10  重磁剖面异常解释
[1] 王剑, 付修根, 沈利军, 等. 论羌塘盆地油气勘探前景[J]. 地质论评, 2020, 66(5):1091-1110.
[1] Wang J, Fu X G, Shen L J, et al. Prospect of the potential of oil and gas resources in Qiangtang Basin,Xizang(Tibet)[J]. Geological Review, 2020, 66(5):1091-1110.
[2] 王成善, 伊海生. 羌塘盆地地质演化与油气远景评价[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2001.
[2] Wang C S, Yi H S. Geological evolution and gas potential evolution[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2001.
[3] 李志, 赵炳坤, 杨亚斌, 等. 青藏高原及邻区重力系列图及说明书(1∶3000000)[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2013.
[3] Li Z, Zhao B K, Yang Y B, et al. The gravity map of the Qinghai-Tibet plateau and adjacent areas(1∶3000000)[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2013.
[4] 熊盛青, 丁燕云, 李占奎. 西藏羌塘盆地的重磁场特征及地质意义[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2013, 48(6):999-1007.
[4] Xiong S Q, Ding Y Y, Li Z K. The characteristics of gravity and magnetic fields and their geological significance in Qiangtang Basin,Tibet[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 48(6):999-1007.
[5] 熊盛青, 周道卿, 曹宝宝, 等. 羌塘盆地中央隆起带的重磁场证据及其构造意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2020, 69(9):3491-3502.
[5] Xiong S Q, Zhou D Q, Cao B B, et al. Characteristics of the central uplift zone in Qiangtang basin and its tectonic implications:Evidences from airborne gravity and magnetic data[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 2020, 69(9):3491-3502.
[6] 陈文彬, 付修根, 谭富文, 等. 羌塘盆地二叠系白云岩油苗地球化学特征及意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2017, 35(3):611-618.
[6] Chen W B, Fu X G, Tan F W, et al. Geochemical characteristics and significance of Permain dolomite oil seep-ages in Qiangtang Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2017, 35(3):611-618.
[7] 付修根, 王剑, 宋春彦, 等. 羌塘盆地第一口油气科学钻探井油气地质成果及勘探意义[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2020, 40(1):15-24.
[7] Fu X G, Wang J, Song C Y, et al. Petroleumgeological achievements and exploration significance of the first oil and gas scientific drilling well in the Qiangtang Basin[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2020, 40(1):15-24.
[8] 周道卿, 曹宝宝, 赵睿, 等. 羌塘盆地高精度航空重磁调查对盆地基底性质与构造格局的启示[J]. 地质学报, 2021, 95(11):3178-3191.
[8] Zhou D Q, Cao B B, Zhao R, et al. High-precision airborne gravity and magnetic survey analysis of the Qiangtang basin implications for basin basement properties and tectonic framework[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2021, 95(11):3178-3191.
[9] 潘桂棠, 王立全, 尹福光, 等. 青藏高原形成演化研究回顾、进展与展望[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2022, 42(2):151-172.
[9] Pan G T, Wang L Q, Yin F G, et al. Researches on geological-tectonic evolution of Tibetan plateau:A review,recent advances,and directions in the future[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2022, 42(2):151-172.
[10] 解超明, 李才, 李庆林, 等. 藏北羌塘中部首次发现泥火山[J]. 地质通报, 2009, 28(9):1319-1324.
[10] Xie C M, Li C, Li Q L, et al. First discovery of mud volcanoes in central Qiangtang,northern Tibet,China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2009, 28(9):1319-1324.
[11] 付修根, 王剑, 谭富文, 等. 藏北羌塘盆地油气地质勘探新进展[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2015, 35(1):16-24.
[11] Fu X G, Wang J, Tan F W, et al. Recent progress in oil and gas geological exploration in the Qiangtang Basin,northern Xizang[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2015, 35(1):16-24.
[12] 吴珍汉, 赵珍, 吴忠海, 等. 西藏双湖古近纪唢呐湖组碎屑锆石U-Pb年龄与古海拔高度[J]. 地质学报, 2018, 92(7):1352-1368.
[12] Wu Z H, Zhao Z, Wu Z H, et al. U-Pb ages of detrital zircons from the Suonahu formation and Paleo-elevation determination in late Paleogene in the Suonahu area,northern Tibet[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2018, 92(7):1352-1368.
[13] 刘中戎, 张佳伟. 西藏羌塘盆地中生代晚期构造事件与油气的关系[J]. 沉积与特提斯地质, 2017, 37(2):23-29.
[13] Liu Z R, Zhang J W. Late mesozoic tectonic events and hydrocarbon accumulation in the Qiangtang Basin,northern Xizang[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2017, 37(2):23-29.
[14] 张明华, 乔计花, 黄金明, 等. 重磁电数据处理解释软件RGIS[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2011.
[14] Zhang M H, Qiao J H, Huang J M, et al. Gravity magnetic and electric data processing and interpretation software RGIS[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2011.
[15] 郭祖军, 李永铁, 南征兵, 等. 羌塘盆地变形构造与油气聚集保存关系[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2008, 35(5):563-568.
[15] Guo Z J, Li Y T, Nan Z B, et al. Relationship between deformation structure and petroleum accumulation and preservation,Qiangtang Basin,Tibet[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2008, 35(5):563-568.
doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(09)60089-6
[16] 李才, 解超明, 王明, 等. 羌塘地质[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2016.
[16] Li C, Xie C M, Wang M, et al. Qiangtang geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2016.
[17] 潘桂棠, 陆松年, 肖庆辉, 等. 中国大地构造阶段划分和演化[J]. 地学前缘, 2016, 23(6):1-23.
[17] Pan G T, Lu S N, Xiao Q H, et al. Division of tectonic stages and tectonic evolution in China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2016, 23(6):1-23.
[18] 王剑, 付修根. 论羌塘盆地沉积演化[J]. 中国地质, 2018, 45(2):237-259.
[18] Wang J, Fu X G. Sedimentary evolution of the Qiangtang basin[J]. Geology in China, 2018, 45(2):237-259.
[19] 赵珍, 陆露, 吴珍汉. 羌塘盆地中央隆起带的抬升演化:构造—热年代学约束[J]. 地学前缘, 2019, 26(2):249-260.
doi: 10.13745/j.esf.sf.2018.9.7
[19] Zhao Z, Lu L, Wu Z H. Uplifting evolution of the central uplift belt,Qiangtang:Constraints from tectono-thermochronology[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2019, 26(2):249-260.
[20] 南征兵, 张艳玲, 李永铁, 等. 羌塘中生代盆地演化特征[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(3):534-539.
[20] Nan Z B, Zhang Y L, Li Y T, et al. Evolution characteristics of the Qiangtang Basin in the Mesozoic Era[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(3):534-539.
[1] 王飞, 裴金梅, 刘凤智, 刘志欢, 李国顺. 羌塘盆地尼玛地区盒子波分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2018, 42(2): 352-357.
[2] 杨志斌, 周亚龙, 孙忠军, 张富贵, 张舜尧, 李广之. 羌塘盆地泥火山发育区天然气水合物地球化学勘查[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(3): 452-458.
[3] 刘建勋, 张保卫, 王小江, 徐明才. 羌塘盆地浅层地震探测方法技术[J]. 物探与化探, 2015, 39(4): 678-685.
[4] 李晓昌. 连续电磁剖面法在青藏高原北羌塘盆地龙尾湖区块构造详查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2010, 34(3): 303-307.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com