现阶段地表油气化探技术难题与发展对策

全文: PDF(355 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要

虽然地表油气化探方法技术已取得显著的应用效果, 但是由于成功率计算标准不同及方法技术本身的缺陷, 导致人们对方法的认同度较低。当前, 地表油气化探技术的发展, 一方面要以可靠的实验依据、严谨的数理推导及理论模型应对来自方法技术本身的挑战, 另一方面也要利用其快速、廉价和直接的优势, 加强与地质、遥感、非震物探等方法综合应用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	白彬艳

关键词 ：套损监测, 电磁探伤与多臂井径, 油套管损伤, 结垢腐蚀

Abstract：

The surface oil and gas geochemical exploration technique has made remarkable application results. Nevertheless, Due to the different standards for success rate calculation and the inherent defects of the technique, people do not have much confidence in this technique. Therefore, the development of surface oil and gas geochemical exploration technique should be on the one hand based on reliable experimental data, rigorous mathematical deduction and theoretical modeling and on the other hand combined with geological, remote sensing and non-seismic geophysical methods so as to give full play to its advantages such as rapidness, low cost and directness.

Key words： casing damage monitoring electromagnetic inspection and multi-arm caliper oil casing damage corrosion fouling

收稿日期: 2005-06-29 出版日期: 2005-12-24

P632

作者简介: 姚俊梅(1963-), 女, 河南孟县人, 高级工程师, 主要从事油气地球化学勘探及科技情报研究工作。

引用本文:

姚俊梅. 现阶段地表油气化探技术难题与发展对策[J]. 物探与化探, 2005, 29(6): 477-480,486.
YAO Jun-mei. SOME DIFFICULT PROBLEMS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF SURFACE OIL AND GAS GEOCHEMICAL EXPLORATION TECHNIQUE AND THE COUNTERMEASURES. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2005, 29(6): 477-480,486.

链接本文:

https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/ 或 https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2005/V29/I6/477

［1］育斌, 张金来, 吴学明, 等.油气地球化学勘查［J］.武汉:中国地质大学出版社, 1995.
［2］ Schumacher D. Surface geochemical exploration for oil and gas:new life for an old technology［J］.The Leaging Edge, 2000, (3):258-261.
［3］周才兴, 李跃.油气化探方法在油气勘探中的地位及重要作用［J］.复式油气田, 1995, 6(3):50-54.
［4］ Sundberg K R.Surface geochemistry applications in oil and gas exploration［J］.Oil & Gas Journal, 1994, 92(23):47-56.
［5］刘崇禧, 赵克斌, 程军.油气化探经验与教训［J］.石油勘探与开发, 2001, 28(3):99-102.
［6］ Davidson M J.On the acceptance and rejection of surface geochemical exploration［J］.Oil & Gas Journal, 1994, 92(23):70-76.
［7］汤玉平, 刘运黎.烃类垂向微运移的地球化学效应及其机理讨论［J］.石油实验地质, 2002, 24(5):431-436.
［8］程同锦, 王者顺, 吴学明, 等.烃类运移的近地表显示与地球化学勘探［M］.北京:石油工业出版社, 1999.
［9］ Tedesco S A.Surface Geochemistry in Petroleum Exploration［M］.New York: Chapman & Hall, 1995, 159-200.
［10］ Saunders, Donald F, Burson K R, et al.Model for hydrocarbon microseepage and related near-surface alterations［J］.AAPG Bulletin, 1999, 83(1):170-185.
［11］刘崇禧, 赵克斌, 程军.油气化探技术本土化过程与意义［J］.物探与化探, 2002, 26(2):106-109, 117.
［12］赵克斌, 程军.我国油气化探近几年的成果与问题［J］.石油实验地质, 1997, 19(2):153-157.
［13］ Potter, Harrington P A, Silliman A H, et al.Significance of geochemical anomalies in hydrocarbon exploration:one company's experience.in Schumacher D, Abrams M A. Hydrocarbon migration and its near-surface expression:AAPG Memoir 66.1996, 431-439.
［14］ Schumacher D, Leonard A LeSchack.Surface exploration case histories:applications of geochemistry, magnetics, and remote sensing［J］.AAPG studies in geology, 2003, 48:xii-xvii.
［15］夏响华, 杨瑞琰, 鲍征宇.烃类组分垂向微运移的模拟研究［J］.石油与天然气地质, 2003, 24(3):260-263.
［16］ Brown A. Evaluation of possible 3 gas microseepage mechanisms［J］.AAPG Bulletin, 2000, 84(11):1775-1789.
［17］贾国相.地表油气化探的影响因素及消除方法［J］.物探与化探, 2004, 28(3):218-221.
［18］张刘平.油气化探研究中干扰排除与异常识别的新方法及其应用［J］.中国海上油气(地质), 2003, 17(4):269-275.
［19］刘崇禧, 程军.不同勘查阶段油气化探异常的地质意义［J］.石油勘探与开发, 1999, 26(2):42-45.
［20］刘崇禧, 汪怀.油气化探阶段的划分及其在勘探中的意义［J］.石油勘探与开发, 1989, 16(4):27-34.