两种回转波FWI方法对比研究和应用

    Comparative study and application of two FWI methods for turning waves

    • 摘要: 全波形反演(full waveform inversion, FWI)是目前精度最高的速度反演建模技术。该技术通过迭代算法不断更新速度模型,使正演数据和实际数据的误差不断减小,从而逼近真实的速度模型。该技术面临的主要问题是跳周现象,即正演数据和实际数据相差半个周期以上时,随着速度模型的更新,正演数据和实际数据会发生错误的匹配,导致速度模型向错误的方向收敛。传统的最小二乘FWI的目标函数只考虑正演数据和实际数据的能量差,因此,只能依靠数据中周期较大的低频信息和尽量准确的初始速度模型来尽量避免跳周现象,对原始数据中低频信号的质量要求较高且初始速度模型建模工作量较大。为了解决该问题,本文提出时延全波形反演,其目标函数为正演数据和实际数据的能量差对二者时差的积分,即目标函数中既考虑二者的能量差,又考虑二者的时差,因此可以更好地避免跳周现象,在原始数据低频信号能量较弱以及初始速度模型误差较大的情况下依然能够使速度模型向正确的方向收敛,降低了对原始数据中低频信号的依赖,同时减少了初始速度模型建模的工作量。本文分别利用理论速度模型和实际地震数据进行试验,对比两种方法的结果,证明了在初始速度模型误差较大的情况下,本文提出的时延FWI依然可以反演得到更准确的速度模型。本文使用的最小二乘FWI和时延FWI均为回转波FWI,即只使用地震数据中的回转波进行匹配,不使用反射波。

       

      Abstract: Currently, full-waveform inversion (FWI) represents the velocity inversion and modeling technology with the highest accuracy. By continuously updating the velocity model through an iterative algorithm, FWI gradually minimizes the errors between forward modeling data and real data, thereby approaching the true velocity model. The primary challenge faced by FWI is cycle skipping, which occurs when the phase difference between forward modeling data and real data exceeds half a cycle. In this case, with the updating of the velocity model, the forward modeling data and real data will be incorrectly matched, causing the velocity model to converge in a wrong direction. In conventional least-squares FWI, the objective function considers merely the energy difference between forward modeling data and real data. In this case, cycle skipping can only be avoided as far as possible by using the low-frequency signals with high cycles in the data and a sufficiently accurate initial velocity model. This poses stringent demands for the quality of low-frequency signals in raw data and entails a substantial workload for the initial velocity modeling. To address this issue, this study proposes a time-lag FWI (TLFWI) method. In this method, the objective function is defined as the integral of the energy difference between forward modeling data and real data with respect to their time difference. In this manner, the objective function accounts for both the energy difference and time difference between forward modeling data and real data, enabling cycle skipping to be effectively avoided. In the case of weak low-frequency signals in raw data and large errors in the initial velocity model, TLFWI can still enable the velocity model to converge in the correct direction. Therefore, TLFWI reduces the dependence on low-frequency signals in raw data and decreases the workload for constructing the initial velocity model. The results of experiments on a theoretical velocity model and practical seismic data reveal that, compared to least-squares FWI, TLFWI can derive a more accurate velocity model under the condition of high errors in the initial velocity model. Notably, both least squares FWI and TLFWI used in this study are turning wave FWI. In other words, only turning waves in seismic data are used for matching in both methods, with reflected waves excluded.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回