基于不同规范的重力仪性能试验的误差指标对比

    Comparison of error indicators for performance tests of gravimeters based on different specifications

    • 摘要: 重力仪器的性能试验是重力调查工作的一个重要内容,贯穿外业调查的始终。工作中,普遍采用“均方误差”“精度”和“中误差”对仪器性能试验结果进行定量化表述。通过对比地质调查、石油、测量这3类规范中的动态试验、一致性试验理论算式,发现“均方误差”“精度”和“中误差”存在明显的混用现象,其中,在3类规范中一致性试验的算式一致,计算结果却采用上述3种表述。本文通过对3类规范的动态、一致性试验的算式研究,分析了“均方误差”和“中误差”的区别,阐明了“中误差”相对于“均方误差”的规范性,确定了“中误差”的使用范围,为避免混淆,建议规范中采用“准确度”作为定性表述,“中误差”作为定量表述。

       

      Abstract: As an important part of gravity investigation, the performance tests of gravimeters are required throughout field surveys. In these tests, mean squared error (MSE), accuracy, and root mean squared error (RMSE) are commonly employedto quantitatively describe the test results. The comparison of the theoretical equations for dynamic and consistency tests in specifications on geological surveys, petroleum, and measurement reveals a pronounced confusion in the usage of MSE, accuracy, and RMSE. This issue is observed in the consistent equations forconsistency testsin these specifications. Through investigations into the equations used in the dynamic and consistency tests inthe threespecifications, this study analyzed the differences between mean MSE and RMSE, elucidated the normativity of RMSE relative to MSE, and determined the applicablerange of RMSE. To avoid confusion, it is recommended that accuracy be used for qualitative expression and RMSE for quantitative expression in these specifications.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回