|
|
The petrophysical characteristics of Upper Paleozoic source rocks from the central and southern part of the Da Hinggan Mountains |
Yong-Zhen YUAN1,2, Peng-Hui ZHANG1,2, Xiao-Bo ZHANG1,2 |
1. Institute of Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, CAGS, Langfang 065000, China 2. Electromagnetic Detection Technology Key Laboratory of Ministry of Natural Resources, Langfang 065000, China |
|
|
Abstract Based on a study of regional stratigraphic development characteristics, the authors hold that the Upper Paleozoic in the central and southern part of the Da Hinggan Mountains has a good prospect for oil and gas exploration. In this study, stratigraphic physical specimens were systematically collected from Jarud basin, Tuquan basin and Ulanhot area, and density, magnetization and resistivity were analyzed. Combined with the previous character research data and the results of this work, the petrophysical parameters of the strata in Jarud basin, Tuquan basin and Ulanhot area were systematically sorted out, and the petrophysical interface of the strata in Linxi formation of the Upper Paleozoic was emphatically analyzed, thus providing basic data for the non-seismic geophysical survey in this area. A comparative study of two aspects of paleogeographic environment and physical characteristics shows that the hydrocarbon source rock strata of Linxi Formation in three areas are different. It is considered that the conditions for the formation of hydrocarbon source rock in Tuquan basin area are relatively favorable and, in addition, the degree of slatinization of mudstone is low, suggesting that this area is the most favorable area in the search for hydrocarbon source rock of Linxi Formation.
|
Received: 19 February 2019
Published: 15 August 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
The range of the research area and the petrophysical characteristics of point collection
|
地层(代号) | 岩性 | 密度/(103 kg·m-3) | 电阻率/(Ω·m) | 梅勒图组(K1m) | 安山岩 | 2.63 | 2239 | 白音高老组(J3b) | 凝灰岩 | 2.56 | 332 | 玛尼吐组(J3mn) | 凝灰岩 | 2.59 | 789 | 满克头鄂博组(J3mk) | 凝灰岩、流纹岩 | 2.56 | 358 | 傅家洼子组(J2f) | 凝灰岩 | 2.64 | 260 | 万宝组(J2w) | 凝灰岩 | 2.53 | 326 | 红旗组(J1h) | 板岩 | 2.28※ | 20~80※ | 林西组(P3l) | 粉砂岩、砂岩 | 2.69 | 1475 | 大石寨组(P2ds) | 安山岩 | 2.56 | 4611 | 砂岩、粉砂岩 | 2.79 | 寿山沟组(P1ss) | 砂岩 | 2.66 | 782 | 侵入岩 | 花岗斑岩 | 2.56 | 563 | 花岗岩 | 2.58 | 1067 | 辉长岩 | 2.63 | 2851 |
|
Petrophysical statistics of Zhalute basin
|
地层(代号) | 岩性 | 密度/(103 kg·m-3) | 电阻率/(Ω·m) | 梅勒图组(K1m) | 玄武岩 | 2.64 | 2519 | 白音高老组(J3b) | 凝灰岩 | 2.47 | 308 | 玛尼吐组(J3mn) | 安山岩 | 2.51 | 198 | 满克头鄂博 组(J3mk) | 凝灰岩 | 2.49 | 439 | 砂岩 | 2.63 | 445 | 上侏罗统蒙阴组(J3m) | 英安岩 | 2.52 | 441 | 傅家洼子组(J2f) | 凝灰岩 | 2.53 | 374 | 呼日格组(J2h) | 凝灰岩 | 2.56 | 256 | 江仓组(J2j) | 凝灰岩 | 2.52 | 373 | 粉砂岩、英安岩 | 2.55 | 万宝组(J2w) | 粉砂岩 | 2.56 | 1250 | 红旗组(J1h) | 泥岩 | 2.60 | 560 | 林西组(P3l) | 板岩 | 2.66 | 632 | 哲斯组(P2zs) | 粉砂岩、砾岩 | 2.68 | 2071 | 大石寨组(P2ds) | 砂岩 | 2.69 | 21 | 侵入岩 | 花岗斑岩 | 2.48 | 624 | 花岗岩 | 2.56 | 875 |
|
Petrophysical statistics of Tuquan basin
|
地层(代号) | 岩性 | 密度/(103 kg·m-3) | 电阻率/(Ω·m) | 新生界(Q+R) | 黏土、泥砂岩 | 2.05 | | 大磨拐河(K1d) | 砂岩 | 2.54 | 407 | 甘河组(K1g) | 安山岩 | 2.61 | 575 | 凝灰岩 | 2.47 | 251 | 龙江组(K1l) | 凝灰岩 | 2.48 | 467 | 粉砂岩 | 2.45 | 128 | 白音高老组(J3b) | 凝灰岩 | 2.54 | 1258 | 砂岩 | 2.50 | 363 | 玛尼吐组(J3mn) | 凝灰岩 | 2.60 | 1348 | 凝灰角砾岩 | 2.55 | 371 | 安山岩 | 2.66 | 4677 | 满克头鄂博组(J3mk) | 凝灰岩 | 2.59 | 1202 | 砂岩 | 2.63 | 173 | 林西组(P3l) | 板岩 | 2.72 | 1348 | 泥岩 | 2.69 | | 砂岩 | 2.64 | 776 | 大石寨组(P2ds) | 凝灰岩 | 2.89 | 3235 | 火山岩 | 2.69 | 1513 | 哲斯组(P2zs) | 灰岩 | 2.69 | 7079 | 泥岩 | 2.69 | | 寿山沟组(P1ss) | 板岩 | 2.7 | 524 | 宝力高庙组(CPbl) | 大理岩 | 2.75 | 4466 | 凝灰岩 | 2.68 | 891 |
|
Petrophysical statistics of Wulanhaote-solon
|
盆地 | 密度/(103 kg·m-3) | 电阻率/(Ω·m) | 扎鲁特盆地 | 2.69 | 1475 | 突泉盆地 | 2.66 | 632 | 乌兰浩特地区 | 2.70 | 1348 |
|
The density and specific resistance of Linxi slate
|
[1] |
乔德武, 任收麦, 邱海峻 , 等. 中国油气资源勘探现状与战略选区[J]. 地质通报, 2011,30(2/3):187-196.
|
[1] |
Qiao D W, Ren S M, Qiu H J , et al. The present situation of oil & gas resources exploration and strategic selection of potential area in China. Geological Bulletin of China, 2010,28(2/3):187-196.
|
[2] |
张抗 . 中国大北方上古生界油气勘探新领域(代序)[J]. 地质通报, 2011,30(6):803-810.
|
[2] |
Zhang K . New domain of Upper Paleozoic hydrocarbon exploration in “Large North” of China. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011,30(6):803-810.
|
[3] |
张兴洲, 周建波, 迟效国 , 等. 东北地区晚古生代构造-沉积特征与油气资源[J]. 吉林大学学报:地球科学版, 2008,38(5):719-725.
|
[3] |
Zhang X Z, Zhou J B, Chi X G , et al. Late Paleozoic Tectonic-Sedimentation and Petroleum Resources in Northeastern China. Jour nal of Jilin University :Earth Science Edition, 2008,38(5):719-725.
|
[4] |
周建波, 张兴洲, 马志红 , 等. 中国东北地区的构造格局与盆地演化[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2009,30(5):530-538.
|
[4] |
Zhou J B, Zhang X Z, Ma Z H , et al. Tectonic frame work and basin evolutionin Northeast China[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2009,30(5):530-538.
|
[5] |
任收麦, 乔德武, 张兴洲 , 等. 松辽盆地及外围上古生界油气资源战略选区研究进展[J]. 地质通报, 2011,30(2/3):197-204.
|
[5] |
Ren S M, Qiao D W, Zhang X Z , et al. The present situation of oil & gas resources exploration and strategic selection of potential area in the Upper Paleozoic of Songliao Basin and surrounding area,NE China[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2011,30(2/3):197-204.
|
[6] |
陈树旺, 丁秋红, 郑月娟 , 等. 松辽盆地外围新区、新层系——油气基础地质调查进展与认识[J]. 地质通报, 2013,32(8):1147-1158.
|
[6] |
Chen S W, Ding Q H, Zheng Y J , et al. New areas and series of strata on the periphery of Songliao Basin: the progress and recognition based on foundational geological survey for oil and gas resources[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013,32(8):1147-1158.
|
[7] |
张健, 卞雄飞, 陈树旺 , 等. 大兴安岭中南部上二叠统林西组页岩气资源前景[J]. 地质通报, 2013,32(8):1297-1306.
|
[7] |
Zhang J, Bian X F, Chen S W , et al. Shale gas resources prospect of late Permian Linxi Formation in the middle-southern part of the Da Hinggan Mountains[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013,2(8):1297-1306.
|
[8] |
郑月娟, 黄欣, 孙跃武 , 等. 松辽盆地及外围石炭系—二叠系划分与对比[J]. 地质与资源, 2018,27(1):1-15.
|
[8] |
Zheng Y J, Huang X, Sun Y W , et al. The Carboniferous-permian stratigraphic division and correlation in the songliao basin and its peripheral areas[J]. Geology and Resourdes, 2018,27(1) : 1-15.
|
[9] |
汪新文 . 中国东北地区中—新生代盆地构造演化与油气关系[M]. 北京: 地质出版社, 2007.
|
[9] |
Wang X W. Tectonic evolution and hydrocarbon relationship of meso-cenozoic basins in Northeast China[M]. Beijing: Geological Press, 2007.
|
[10] |
方慧, 钟清, 李晓昌 , 等. 内蒙古扎鲁特盆地深部林西组发育特征——来自大地电磁探测的依据[J]. 地质通报, 2013,32(8):1289-1296.
|
[10] |
Fang H, Zhong Q, Li X C , et al. The development of Linxi Formation in the depth of Zhalute basin:Evidence from magnetotelluric sounding[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2013,32(8):1289-1267.
|
[11] |
张健, 李晓海, 郑月娟 , 等. 内蒙古扎鲁特地区上二叠统林西组古盐度分析[J]. 地质与资源, 2013,22(6):471-477.
|
[11] |
Zhang J, Li X H, Zheng Y J , et al. Analysis on the paleosalinity of upper permian linxi formation in Jarud area,inner mongolia[J]. Geology and Resourdes, 2013,22(6):471-477.
|
[12] |
苏飞, 李臻, 张健 , 等. 内蒙古突泉盆地突D2 井上二叠统林西组烃源岩新发现[J]. 地质与资源, 2017,26(3):268-274.
|
[12] |
Su F, Li Z, Zhang J , et al. Discovery of the soure rock from upper permaln linxi formation in tuquan basin,inner mongolia[J]. Geology and Resourdes, 2017,26(3):268-274.
|
[1] |
Yan PENG, Xiao-Bo ZHANG, Jian ZHANG, Peng-Hui ZHANG, Yong-Zhen YUAN, Chun-Xiang JIANG. The application of magnetotelluric sounding method to oil-gas geological survey and evaluation of the western slope area of Binbei[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(3): 656-664. |
[2] |
Xin-Wen ZHANG, Xuan-Bo GAO, Yun-Fei YANG, Chun-An XIE, Jing-Juan TAN. Geochemistry and oil-source rock correlations in the Shuanghe oilfield, Biyang sag, Nanxiang basin[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2019, 43(5): 966-975. |
|
|
|
|