Please wait a minute...
E-mail Alert Rss
 
物探与化探  2020, Vol. 44 Issue (5): 1098-1102    DOI: 10.11720/wtyht.2020.0207
  广域电磁勘探技术应用专栏 本期目录 | 过刊浏览 | 高级检索 |
基于广域电磁法的准南山前带砾石层勘探攻关试验
张光大(), 古志文, 邹忠平
四川中成煤田物探工程院有限公司,四川 成都 610072
The key test of gravel exploration in the piedmont area of Zhunan Mountain based on the wide field electromagnetic method
ZHANG Guang-Da(), GU Zhi-Wen, ZOU Zhong-Ping
Sichuan Zhongcheng Coal Field Geophysical Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd.,Chengdu 610072,China
全文: PDF(1499 KB)   HTML
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 

新疆地区石油资源勘探开发前景广阔,准噶尔盆地南缘山前地带就是其中的重点区域。但是该地区勘探难度大,特别是准噶尔盆地南缘山前地带,砾石层大量分布,埋深厚,部分地段埋深甚至达到1 km以上,对地震勘探及其他勘探方法,带来了极大挑战。本文通过分析广域电磁法在准噶尔盆地南缘山前带砾石层的勘探应用效果,说明了电磁法在石油勘探中,也大有可为。

服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
张光大
古志文
邹忠平
关键词 准噶尔盆地南缘山前地带砾石层勘探广域电磁法    
Abstract

However, the prospect of oil resources exploration and development in Xinjiang is far beyond these achievements, and there are still large-scale reserves lying underground. The piedmont area at the south edge of Junggar Basin is one of the key areas. However, the exploration in this area is very difficult; especially in the piedmont area on the southern margin of Junggar Basin, the gravel layer is widely distributed and deeply buried, and the buried depth of some sections is even more than 1km, which brings great challenges to seismic exploration and other exploration methods. This paper analyzes the application effect of the wide field electromagnetic method in the piedmont area on the south margin of Junggar Basin, expounds the application effect of the electromagnetic method in the exploration of shallow gravel layer and deep concealed structure, and indicates that the electromagnetic method has great potential in oil exploration.

Key wordspiedmont area on the southern margin of Junggar Basin    gravel exploration    wide field electromagnetic method
收稿日期: 2020-04-26      出版日期: 2020-10-26
:  P631  
作者简介: 张光大(1964-),男,四川达州人,高级工程师,主要从事地震、电磁法勘探、测井、水土保持工作。Email: 1643888326@qq.com
引用本文:   
张光大, 古志文, 邹忠平. 基于广域电磁法的准南山前带砾石层勘探攻关试验[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1098-1102.
ZHANG Guang-Da, GU Zhi-Wen, ZOU Zhong-Ping. The key test of gravel exploration in the piedmont area of Zhunan Mountain based on the wide field electromagnetic method. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2020, 44(5): 1098-1102.
链接本文:  
https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/10.11720/wtyht.2020.0207      或      https://www.wutanyuhuatan.com/CN/Y2020/V44/I5/1098
Fig.1  工区所在区域构造位置
地层分层 电阻率范围
/(Ω·m)
正态分布统计电阻率
平均值/(Ω·m)
电阻率特征
Q+N2d 2~220 49.2 表层高阻
N1t-K 1~16 1.9 低阻
J3q 5~40 20.6 相对高阻
Table 1  岩石电阻率值统计
Fig.2  广域电磁法资料处理流程
Fig.3  1线反演电阻率断面砾岩层标定解释成果
Fig.4  1线广域电磁法反演电阻率断面与地质解释推断
Fig.5  1线广域电磁法反演电阻率一次导数高分辨率成图
Fig.6  1线广域电磁法反演电阻率二次导数高分辨率成图
[1] 何继善. 广域电磁法和伪随机电法[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2010.
[1] He J S. The test result of the controlled source audio-frequecy magnetotelluric method in the prospecting for deep ore deposits[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2010.
[2] 何继善. 广域电磁测深法研究[J]. 中南大学学报:自然科学版, 2010,41(3):1065-1072.
[2] He J S. Wide filed electromagnetic and pseudo random signal method[J]. Journal of Central South University:Natural Science Edition, 2010,41(3):1065-1072.
[3] 吴旭. 探析广域电磁法在隐伏矿产资源勘查中的应用[J]. 世界有色金属, 2018(12):147-149.
[3] Wu X. Application of wide area electromagnetic method in concealed exploration of mineral resources[J]. World Nonferrous Metals, 2018(12):147-149.
[4] 张乔勋, 李帝铨, 田茂军. 广域电磁法在赣南某盆地油气勘探中的应用[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2017,52(5):1085-1092.
[4] Zhang Q X, Li D Q, Tian M J. Application of wide field electromagnetic method to the hydrocarbon exploration in a basin of south Jiangxi[J]. OGP, 2017,52(5):1085-1092.
[5] 曹彦荣, 宋涛, 韩红庆, 等. 用广域电磁法勘查深层地热资源[J]. 物探与化探, 2017,41(4):678-683.
[5] Cao Y R, Song T, Hang H Q. Exploration of deep geothermal energy resources with wide field electromagnetic method[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2017,41(4):678-683.
[6] 符超, 袁博, 李学兰, 等. 广域电磁法在保靖页岩气勘探中的应用[J]. 工程地球物理学报, 2016,13(4):416-422.
[6] Fu C, Yuan B, Li X L. The exploration of wide field electromagnetic method on shale gas[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering Geophysics, 2016,13(4):416-422.
[7] 符超. 广域电磁法在湘西北海相页岩气勘探中的应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018,33(4):1486-1490.
[7] Fu C. Marine shale gas exploration with wide field electromagnetic method in north-western Hunan[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018,33(4):1486-1490.
[8] 刘春明, 佟铁钢, 何继善. 多种电磁法在某金矿的野外勘探应用[J]. 中国有色金属学报, 2013,23(9):2422-2429.
[8] Liu C M, Tong T G, He J S. Exploration of various electromagnetic method in some gold mine[J]. Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 2013,23(9):2422-2429.
[9] 张国鸿, 李仁和. 可控源音频大地电磁法深部找矿实验效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2010,34(1):66-70.
[9] Zhang G H, Li R H. The test result of the controlled source audio-frequecy magnetotelluric method in the prospecting for deep ore deposits[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2010,34(1):66-70.
[10] 新疆维吾尔自治区地质局区域地质测量大队三分队. 1:20万区域地质调查报告(乌苏幅)[R]. 1977.
[10] No.3 Team of Regional Geological Survey Team of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Geological Bureau. 1:200000 Regional geological survey report(Wusu)[R]. 1977.
[11] 新疆地质第一水文地质工程地质大队. 1:20万综合水文地质报告(乌苏幅)[R]. 1978.
[11] Xinjiang Geology No.1 Hydrogeological Engineering Geological Brigade. 1:200000 Comprehensive hydrogeological report(Wusu)[R]. 1978.
[12] 新疆维吾尔自治区地质矿产局第一区域地质调查大队. 1:20万区域地质调查报告(沙井子幅)[R]. 1977.
[12] No.1 Regional Geological Survey Team. Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. 1:200000 Regional geological survey report(Shajingzi)[R]. 1977.
[13] 汤井田, 何继善. 可控源音频大地电磁法及应用[M]. 长沙: 中南大学出版社, 2005: 250-285.
[13] Tang J T, He J S. Controlled source audio magnetotelluric method and its application[M]. Changsha: Central South University Press, 2005: 250-285.
[14] 朱裕振, 许聪悦. 广域电磁法深部找矿实验效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2011,35(6):743-746.
[14] Zhu Y Z, Xu C Y. The experimental application of wider field electromagnetic method to the prospectiang for deep ore deposits[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2011,35(6):743-746.
[15] 周必文, 凌帆. E-Ex广域电磁法探测火山岩油气藏的实验研究[J]. 油气地球物理, 2012,10(3):56-59.
[15] Zhou B W, Ling F. E-Ex wide field electromagnetic method experiment research in exploring volcanic rock reservoirs[J]. Oil and Gas Geophysics, 2012,10(3):56-59.
[1] 李帝铨, 肖教育, 张继峰, 胡艳芳, 刘最亮, 张新. WFEM与CSAMT在新元煤矿富水区探测效果对比[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(5): 1359-1366.
[2] 朱云起, 李帝铨, 王金海. 基于MySQL的广域电磁法数据处理与解释软件[J]. 物探与化探, 2021, 45(4): 1030-1036.
[3] 危志峰, 陈后扬, 吴西全. 广域电磁法在宜春某地地热勘查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1009-1018.
[4] 詹少全, 李爱勇, 王导丽, 郝红蕾, 王磊. 极寒环境中广域电磁法勘探技术研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1019-1024.
[5] 田红军, 尹文斌, 刘光迪, 蒋永芳, 游文兵. 广域电磁法在低阻覆盖区的应用与评价——以河南中牟为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1025-1030.
[6] 曾何胜, 徐元璋, 刘磊, 唐宝山, 张祎然, 李义, 陈宇峰. 广域电磁法在复杂电磁干扰环境的应用研究——以某市周边地热勘查为例[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1031-1038.
[7] 王洪军, 熊玉新. 广域电磁法在胶西北金矿集中区深部探测中的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1039-1047.
[8] 梁维天, 孙新胜, 王东波, 冯家新, 孙文, 陈广镇. 广域电磁法在河洼多金属矿勘查中的应用[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1048-1052.
[9] 王洪军, 田红军, 贺春艳, 刘光迪. 多种物探方法在胶西北金矿集中区深部勘探的效果分析[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1053-1058.
[10] 王永兵, 尹文斌, 张磊. 航空广域电磁法初步探索[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1059-1065.
[11] 武建平, 张超, 陈剑平, 杨玺, 裴运军, 周庆东. 广域电磁法三维有限单元法模拟研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1066-1072.
[12] 蒋永芳, 李芳书, 曹渊, 夏灵云, 张婷. 广域电磁法在金属矿勘探中的应用研究和探讨[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1073-1077.
[13] 梁维天, 李勇, 王东波, 李浩, 袁圣, 冯家新, 孙文. 辽东南金属矿勘查中广域电磁法应用效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1078-1084.
[14] 刘耀文, 蒋永芳, 冯绍平, 游文兵, 张苏坤, 常嘉毅, 李利, 张怡静. 广域电磁法在上宫金矿集区的应用研究[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1085-1092.
[15] 田红军, 张光大, 刘光迪, 游文兵, 张应文. 黔北台隆区地热勘探中广域电磁法的应用效果[J]. 物探与化探, 2020, 44(5): 1093-1097.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
京ICP备05055290号-3
版权所有 © 2021《物探与化探》编辑部
通讯地址:北京市学院路29号航遥中心 邮编:100083
电话:010-62060192;62060193 E-mail:whtbjb@sina.com